Twitter’s bot check sample size was only 100 users, Musk reveals
What this means, of course, is that Twitter, along with the rest of Big Tech, is little more than a social engineering tool to manipulate and brainwash the masses into believing the scripted reality that psychopaths are using to maintain control.
Exactly. This wont kill twitter because ad revenue will dry up. This will kill twitter because people will find out coporate America isnt paying for ads. They are paying for our brainwashing.....The advertisers are not being tricked. This is what they want.
As soon as they made the movie I knew the entire narrative around the founding and history of Facebook was total bullshit.
Great film BTW, but it's complete historical fiction. And of course the farm always hand picks their marks (pun intended) out of the ivy league wasp breeding grounds. Just like Gates and Microsoft 30 years prior.
i think youtube started off as an independent company and then went to shit after being bought by google. they should be bankrupt after all the ztupid shit khazar ceo susan wajjikki does.
Just to clarify.. when you say : "Twotters bot check sample size was only 100." you are talking about their published number of less than 5% bots...when in reality, according to Musk, the actual bot percentage was at least 8-tines their published number and perhaps as high as eighteen times...
Just to clarify.... I didn't say anything about the bot sample size,
but I read Elon's comment where he was concerned about twitter's sample size, which they used when Elon made his claims,
twitter's response was to select 100 accounts (out of the supposed millions) which were then analysed, this is not a statistically valid size so results are worthless.
Ah "Bot-check sample" that is what i was getting at.. I agree 100 users is an insignificant sample and that doesn't even touch the non-objectivity of the twaddle people doing the so called statistical analysis..
This is very relatable. Even in some games, the botting population is well over 50%. In older games like Ragnarok Online, botting was close or above 70% of the total users in the game. Those bots were gaining experience, farming items and currency 24/7 while fighting monsters and navigating terrain without supervision.
Making cheap bots to follow, retweet and make random comments based on the topic is a walk in the park. These bots are also most likely owned by 3rd parties so that Twitter can claim it wasn't them.
Also, wasn't it admitted in a book (Platform Revolution) that Alibaba was initially just the owners burning capital to buy out the first few merchants to make people think it was a profitable platform? It's all the same trick. Nothing ever changes.
Now give the bots the ability to inject talking points and you get a massive platform designed to slowly slide people's opinions into one that isn't their own.
Is it still "white" hat when peoples opinions are being manipulated "for their own good".
Best thing a true white hat could do is shut the entire propaganda system down, people will be scared because they will have to start thinking on their own, but eventually they will think.
Yes, it is pretty well understood at the beginning, Bots are necessary because if not, you would have the empty universe problem. I would assume ALL platforms, especially those of social media, have bots to illustrate a good user population.
Twitter just didn't get rid of theirs when the platform hit the tipping point. Now they are fucked.
How many times have we said it ? Everything about the left is fake. They're so in the minority they have to cheat in everything - elections, amplify agenda thru media, indoctrinate kids, brainwash masses, rewrite districts and rules, bypass Constitution, punish opposition, etc.
Take away all of their chest puffing and they are 1% of the planet with 15 % of mindless drones following them to give their lives meaning.
The disappointing thing is even with Trump, Q, white hats, and Elon... nobody who is capable has made a full blown effort to counter the cabal on entertainment programming. All of this post modernism and critical theory started infesting all content about 15 years ago and it is the number one item subconsciously programming the youth and feable minded of the west. It reconfirms all their biases in the worst ways possible and nobody has made any effort to counter it.
And even if you start tomorrow with a billion dollars of god tier original content, it's already far too late. Two generations have been culturally poisoned by the content they were/are raised on. And this country will continually be dealing with the ramifications of that on a social level for decades to come.
The sad thing is, there really has been no excuse for patriots of exorbitant means to not enter into this space the past decade and compete. Entertainment and culture is at an all time low quality wise, you'd be up against zero competition. Silicon Valley was able to quickly toplle Hollywood with more nonsense streaming and low effort media. The right could have done the same but few with the means put their money where their mouth is. Trump can't do it all, but with his media background I wish he would have attacked from both angles starting in 2015.
Wow, 90%? That's an outrageously massive number. Even 50% sounds outrageously high. Heck, if it were only 10%, that would be double what Twit execs say it is.
The funny thing is, I don't personally know anybody that uses Twitter, and I know hundreds of folks in the tech/internet/ecom space having worked within it for some 20 years. That could be telling...
I'd say anywhere near 20% is grounds for complete deal termination. If it's anywhere near 50%, that's game over for Twitter as we know it. If it's really 90% or close, that's a dagger in the heart of mainstream social media across multiple platforms.
I came back to Twitter after Elon announced his plans to buy it. I was unbanned on my original account and everything. But...slowly it became obvious that even the mass majority of MAGA accounts were bots. Haven't been back for over a month and there isn't a single thing that I feel like I'm missing because of it.
Is that right? Even the MAGA accounts huh? How interesting!
I was more of an opportunistic meme-bomber back in the 2018-2019 meme warfare time frame. That's all I used my account for. I didn't try to "get a following" so I have no real feel for it. I ruffled a few feathers from time to time and had quite a few back and forth arguments. It would be hard for me to believe that 9 out of 10 of those arguments were with bots. But hey, maybe....maybe. They were certainly incapable of understanding even a modicum of the common sense points the meme was making.....sigh....haha.
It is ironic that good AI may be incapable of simulating authentic stupidity. (Bad processing genetics. Being stupid is antithetical to learning, and AI is all about learning.)
Rush Limbaugh was talking about twitter being 80% bots in 2016, i looked into it back then and the numbers were on par and found that r e ddit had the same amount of bots
I believe Twitter's official position on this is that they only count bots that gross advertising dollars and "ignore" the bots that do not.
The fallout from the upcoming lawsuit will make the masses aware that 90% of twitter are indeed bots, income earning or not. Hopefully, people will start to look at other platforms like Reddit.
Oh god no, anything but Reddit. That place is a worse cesspool than Twitter could ever be. At least on Twitter if you follow the right people you can get a good feed. Reddit is just shit on top of shit everywhere you go. Any place that isn't is promptly banned or compromised.
In-Q-Tel sold 5,636 shares of Google, worth over $2.2 million, on November 15, 2005. The shares were a result of Google's acquisition of Keyhole, Inc, the CIA-funded satellite mapping software now known as Google Earth.
In August 2006, In-Q-Tel had reviewed more than 5,800 business plans and invested approximately $150 million in more than 90 companies. In 2016, it was funded with at least $120 million per year primarily from the CIA, as well as the NSA, FBI, and US Defense Department.
I only used Twitter a few times in the past. I have only started using truth social for a couple of days. Or I should say that I have only started posted on TS for the past 2 days. I got a TS account as soon as it was available to support our President.
I got very little feedback from Twitter. In fact almost none.
Truth Social has been insane.
To be honest I am not really into social media and Truth Social has been over the top with replies. I most likely will not post very much over there because I am too old. lol
My point is this. We have been hearing about people getting a much larger engagement on TS over Twitter even with fewer followers on TS.
From my little experience on both I would say that is the truth.
It could be possible that Twitter is almost all Bots.
I'm sorry you guys disagree with Musk. Frankly I think he's unremarkable overall and his electric car is a poorly engineered piece of crap that will be mostly gone from the roads in 10 years. With that said, he is still an ally, an enemy of our enemy. The fact that he exposed twitter for what it is is a victory for everyone and I can't wait for whatever move he makes next against the NWO faggots.
If you think his electric car is poorly engineered you have no idea what you're talking about. The amount of engineering that goes into a Tesla is many layers more than a lot of other engineering marvels.
And yes, even if you try to claim you're an engineer, it means nothing even if you were being honest which you probably aren't because you can't see past your own personal biases.
Well of course because most of the highly popular social media apps and websites are DARPA projects and/or started by people who were involved with or offspring of such projects.
It's true, my business twitter account that I worked for years basically did nothing for me at all. I would even contact people directly to give away my product for free to them, a product that people pay good money for today and in 5 years nobody ever got back to me.
So many bots, but then you got people like me who run the account from an auto tweet deck thing and set up tweets for the month and then contacts people based on what they tweet. I'm convinced it's bots and then the real accounts are all just tweet decks tweeting back and forth to each other, that's like 80% of twitter, the other 20% is people arguing about politics and getting banned.
Oh an my other dead account for my game design, 10+ years ago I paid for followers I paid maybe $50 bucks for about 10k followers or something like that, I still have over 6k followers, I know for a fact that account probably only has a legitimate maybe 100 followers.
So, if 90% of Twitter is CIA bots, and "Twitter REFUSES To Censor Posts From Group Who Put BOUNTIES On The Heads Of Supreme Court Justices." That means that it is the CIA that is threatening to assassinate SC Justices.
He has a plan, I'm sure.
He is probably planning to link his cars to his satellites and the twitter platform will be modified and used for in-car communications. He's practising the old Rothschild tricks of destroying something of value so he can buy it for pennies on the Dollar.
Twitter’s bot check sample size was only 100 users, Musk reveals What this means, of course, is that Twitter, along with the rest of Big Tech, is little more than a social engineering tool to manipulate and brainwash the masses into believing the scripted reality that psychopaths are using to maintain control.
Winner winner fake meat chicken dinner
Finger licking ficken
“I’m too drunk to taste this chicken!”
The product is YOU.
Exactly. This wont kill twitter because ad revenue will dry up. This will kill twitter because people will find out coporate America isnt paying for ads. They are paying for our brainwashing.....The advertisers are not being tricked. This is what they want.
As soon as they made the movie I knew the entire narrative around the founding and history of Facebook was total bullshit.
Great film BTW, but it's complete historical fiction. And of course the farm always hand picks their marks (pun intended) out of the ivy league wasp breeding grounds. Just like Gates and Microsoft 30 years prior.
i think youtube started off as an independent company and then went to shit after being bought by google. they should be bankrupt after all the ztupid shit khazar ceo susan wajjikki does.
YouTube can at least turn you on to more music.
Putting this here on ur coat tails so it's easy to find for all.
Homeland Security on Bots
https://files.catbox.moe/oqnc1b.png
https://files.catbox.moe/7k74al.png
I'll leave this here https://greatawakening.win/p/15IqsmfGjK/should-elon-buy-tiktok-next-can-/
Just to clarify.. when you say : "Twotters bot check sample size was only 100." you are talking about their published number of less than 5% bots...when in reality, according to Musk, the actual bot percentage was at least 8-tines their published number and perhaps as high as eighteen times...
Just to clarify.... I didn't say anything about the bot sample size,
but I read Elon's comment where he was concerned about twitter's sample size, which they used when Elon made his claims,
twitter's response was to select 100 accounts (out of the supposed millions) which were then analysed, this is not a statistically valid size so results are worthless.
Ah "Bot-check sample" that is what i was getting at.. I agree 100 users is an insignificant sample and that doesn't even touch the non-objectivity of the twaddle people doing the so called statistical analysis..
This is very relatable. Even in some games, the botting population is well over 50%. In older games like Ragnarok Online, botting was close or above 70% of the total users in the game. Those bots were gaining experience, farming items and currency 24/7 while fighting monsters and navigating terrain without supervision.
Making cheap bots to follow, retweet and make random comments based on the topic is a walk in the park. These bots are also most likely owned by 3rd parties so that Twitter can claim it wasn't them.
Also, wasn't it admitted in a book (Platform Revolution) that Alibaba was initially just the owners burning capital to buy out the first few merchants to make people think it was a profitable platform? It's all the same trick. Nothing ever changes.
Now give the bots the ability to inject talking points and you get a massive platform designed to slowly slide people's opinions into one that isn't their own.
congrats. you are here.
Is it still "white" hat when peoples opinions are being manipulated "for their own good".
Best thing a true white hat could do is shut the entire propaganda system down, people will be scared because they will have to start thinking on their own, but eventually they will think.
OVERTON WINDOW BOT 3.65
You fren, may be more useful then you know. Most of us are not aware of this sort of info. Ty
Yes, it is pretty well understood at the beginning, Bots are necessary because if not, you would have the empty universe problem. I would assume ALL platforms, especially those of social media, have bots to illustrate a good user population.
Twitter just didn't get rid of theirs when the platform hit the tipping point. Now they are fucked.
The bots were supposedly from google/darpa according to the Q drops.
Along the lines of alibaba, Amazon is not profitable yet continue to decimate small businesses.
Literally ran off of investor money with no endgame. It's like playing an online game against somebody using cheats
How many times have we said it ? Everything about the left is fake. They're so in the minority they have to cheat in everything - elections, amplify agenda thru media, indoctrinate kids, brainwash masses, rewrite districts and rules, bypass Constitution, punish opposition, etc.
Take away all of their chest puffing and they are 1% of the planet with 15 % of mindless drones following them to give their lives meaning.
The disappointing thing is even with Trump, Q, white hats, and Elon... nobody who is capable has made a full blown effort to counter the cabal on entertainment programming. All of this post modernism and critical theory started infesting all content about 15 years ago and it is the number one item subconsciously programming the youth and feable minded of the west. It reconfirms all their biases in the worst ways possible and nobody has made any effort to counter it.
And even if you start tomorrow with a billion dollars of god tier original content, it's already far too late. Two generations have been culturally poisoned by the content they were/are raised on. And this country will continually be dealing with the ramifications of that on a social level for decades to come.
The sad thing is, there really has been no excuse for patriots of exorbitant means to not enter into this space the past decade and compete. Entertainment and culture is at an all time low quality wise, you'd be up against zero competition. Silicon Valley was able to quickly toplle Hollywood with more nonsense streaming and low effort media. The right could have done the same but few with the means put their money where their mouth is. Trump can't do it all, but with his media background I wish he would have attacked from both angles starting in 2015.
Wow, 90%? That's an outrageously massive number. Even 50% sounds outrageously high. Heck, if it were only 10%, that would be double what Twit execs say it is.
The funny thing is, I don't personally know anybody that uses Twitter, and I know hundreds of folks in the tech/internet/ecom space having worked within it for some 20 years. That could be telling...
I'd say anywhere near 20% is grounds for complete deal termination. If it's anywhere near 50%, that's game over for Twitter as we know it. If it's really 90% or close, that's a dagger in the heart of mainstream social media across multiple platforms.
It's definitely over 50%
Hahaha, if so, they're utterly finished. What a complete joke!
I came back to Twitter after Elon announced his plans to buy it. I was unbanned on my original account and everything. But...slowly it became obvious that even the mass majority of MAGA accounts were bots. Haven't been back for over a month and there isn't a single thing that I feel like I'm missing because of it.
Is that right? Even the MAGA accounts huh? How interesting!
I was more of an opportunistic meme-bomber back in the 2018-2019 meme warfare time frame. That's all I used my account for. I didn't try to "get a following" so I have no real feel for it. I ruffled a few feathers from time to time and had quite a few back and forth arguments. It would be hard for me to believe that 9 out of 10 of those arguments were with bots. But hey, maybe....maybe. They were certainly incapable of understanding even a modicum of the common sense points the meme was making.....sigh....haha.
It is ironic that good AI may be incapable of simulating authentic stupidity. (Bad processing genetics. Being stupid is antithetical to learning, and AI is all about learning.)
One can hope.
Secretary!!!
Send a letter to Mr Musk!
Singed
Anon
a growing majority are hearing what Elon is saying and understanding what he is saying, whatever his motives, he is waking people up.
True
The enemy of our enemy is our friend.
Rush Limbaugh was talking about twitter being 80% bots in 2016, i looked into it back then and the numbers were on par and found that r e ddit had the same amount of bots
I believe Twitter's official position on this is that they only count bots that gross advertising dollars and "ignore" the bots that do not.
The fallout from the upcoming lawsuit will make the masses aware that 90% of twitter are indeed bots, income earning or not. Hopefully, people will start to look at other platforms like Reddit.
Oh god no, anything but Reddit. That place is a worse cesspool than Twitter could ever be. At least on Twitter if you follow the right people you can get a good feed. Reddit is just shit on top of shit everywhere you go. Any place that isn't is promptly banned or compromised.
I think u/Stekky75 meant hopefully people will look at Reddit with the same set of eyes and expose the bots there.
Funny thing is Reddit's bot problem is so bad, some of them even self-identify.
Ah yea, I get it now. Seems kind of obvious now that's what he meant now that you explained it. Thanks fren.
Wait a minute. So twitters "5%" bot actually meant 5% are actual people.
🤣🤣🤣🤣
yes, that's what Elon is saying.
Twitter will be torn apart by lawsuits. There will be nothing left of them.
Social Media funded by In Q Tel (IQT.org) is used as a control mechanism for Psy-Ops...
From their wiki:
Makes me wonder about bots on Reddit now
Reddit is just about the same. They're both CIA tools. 60%+ bots each.
And telegram too
I only used Twitter a few times in the past. I have only started using truth social for a couple of days. Or I should say that I have only started posted on TS for the past 2 days. I got a TS account as soon as it was available to support our President. I got very little feedback from Twitter. In fact almost none.
Truth Social has been insane. To be honest I am not really into social media and Truth Social has been over the top with replies. I most likely will not post very much over there because I am too old. lol
My point is this. We have been hearing about people getting a much larger engagement on TS over Twitter even with fewer followers on TS.
From my little experience on both I would say that is the truth. It could be possible that Twitter is almost all Bots.
I know a few people that read Twitter posts but do now know any people that post to Twitter.
Deep dream…. = twatter = c_a
LifeLog... =Facebook =C_A
Where are all theElon is the devil whiners?
Waaaaaaaah!
I'm sorry you guys disagree with Musk. Frankly I think he's unremarkable overall and his electric car is a poorly engineered piece of crap that will be mostly gone from the roads in 10 years. With that said, he is still an ally, an enemy of our enemy. The fact that he exposed twitter for what it is is a victory for everyone and I can't wait for whatever move he makes next against the NWO faggots.
You just don't like him because he's african-american.
Why are you being so racist?
If you think his electric car is poorly engineered you have no idea what you're talking about. The amount of engineering that goes into a Tesla is many layers more than a lot of other engineering marvels.
And yes, even if you try to claim you're an engineer, it means nothing even if you were being honest which you probably aren't because you can't see past your own personal biases.
This would easily explain a good chunk of the bots if not the overall majority.
Nuclear if true.
Dude's got to be on the wh team
Well of course because most of the highly popular social media apps and websites are DARPA projects and/or started by people who were involved with or offspring of such projects.
It's true, my business twitter account that I worked for years basically did nothing for me at all. I would even contact people directly to give away my product for free to them, a product that people pay good money for today and in 5 years nobody ever got back to me.
So many bots, but then you got people like me who run the account from an auto tweet deck thing and set up tweets for the month and then contacts people based on what they tweet. I'm convinced it's bots and then the real accounts are all just tweet decks tweeting back and forth to each other, that's like 80% of twitter, the other 20% is people arguing about politics and getting banned.
Oh an my other dead account for my game design, 10+ years ago I paid for followers I paid maybe $50 bucks for about 10k followers or something like that, I still have over 6k followers, I know for a fact that account probably only has a legitimate maybe 100 followers.
Remember that tweet from Elon talking about the creator of Bitcoin:
Satoshi Nakamoto:
Samsung, Toshibia, Nakamichi, Motorola
Musk’s tweet re founder of Bitcoin is viral
I just don’t know what is real anymore and what is a psy op.
So, if 90% of Twitter is CIA bots, and "Twitter REFUSES To Censor Posts From Group Who Put BOUNTIES On The Heads Of Supreme Court Justices." That means that it is the CIA that is threatening to assassinate SC Justices.
all manner of connections can be made.
Where did Musk make the CIA claim?
Ah yes AI bots if bet
And who controls the cia, Elon?
wow talk about a misleading headline
Black rock is majority owner in Tesla. Beware of trusting Mr Transhumanist space faker.
He has a plan, I'm sure. He is probably planning to link his cars to his satellites and the twitter platform will be modified and used for in-car communications. He's practising the old Rothschild tricks of destroying something of value so he can buy it for pennies on the Dollar.
You thought exactly what your handlers told you to think.
Unironically the NSA and BP might be the only ones with decent people left
Why?
OK shill