Anons we’ve had plenty of posts on the upcoming Supreme Court Case 22-380. People have been posting on why it’s important, will it fly or not fly. Well Juan O’Savin brings up one of the best discussions really coming to a head or the point starting at 12min in and reaches the mountain top point at 14ish, finishing gloriously at 18min!! But hearing the 2-3 min leading up is so important for context! See the linked Rumble video below. Anyway I’ve read the entire case, and listened carefully to Juan, and of course every one of his videos spanning near 2 years.
But in this video Juan seriously gets to the point of why this case is being taken up and why it’s soooooo important to the Supreme Court!! Pay attention please.
To summarize, the Lame-Duck Congress or even new Congress is per plan, the heads of the parties (Juan does not name but I Am) Shumer, McConnel and McCarthy, are going all in on “de-fanging” the Supreme Court for Roe vs Wade and other lesser decisions or Future decisions by: removing their “lifetime appointments”, “packing the court”, and other sneaky legislation to neuter their 3rd Branch powers. All of The Legislative Pieces To De-Fang them are already set to be voted on by committees and main houses! It’s already to go and the Supreme Court now has wind of all this!
So, what do they do?! Toss the case? Let the legislative moves happen then fight it later, going up against TWO Known Compromised Branches? Or do they take the defensive to save their Constitutional duty, and take Theeee Only Chance they have before ANY Of The Pieces of Cabal legislation can be heard, and obliterate all of the treason, killing two Birds with ONE STONE! David vs Goliath!! THIS Is BIBLICAL!!
Am I making Sense from Juan? Of course he is also extremely clear once he gets into this piece. And holy crap is it that ONE Chance to get it right! Just One Chance for Freedom!
So if they: toss the case, it’ll be seen as failure to defend Constitution. Legislations will take place and they’ll be pretty much neutered, packed, term limited, Years Of Legal Battles after while Biden destroys America fully.
If they take it and uphold case; they will need to use the US Marshals or military to remove treasonous parties, to install correct politicians once military sorts it out, or Put In Rightful President and have new elections. If This Happens, here is where I see the Democrats and RINOs joining to RHEEEEE, Death of America! The DemoLibs and media would flip completely out and rage as they go down in the greatest RRRHHHEEEEE Storm ever!
The Econ will collapse, but all the info/data on elections will FLOOD out! The Plan! This will also reverse ALL LEGISLATIVE Pieces and VOTING all the way back before the 2020 Election! VOIDING ALL Federal Stuff the last 6 years in One Blow!! And the Supreme Court saves itself, the Constitution, and Republic in one TOTALLY LEGAL CASE and move. CHECKMATE! And Trump did nothing on its face to make it happen! 4 Trumpet Players from Utah did, and brought down Jericho’s walls! It’s could be truly that Biblical moment!
Will there be legal fights, heck yes and all sorts of turmoil, but it’ll be quickly squashed because The Military Will by law be dictating what goes on until shit gets straightened out period.
Will this happen?! That is thee trillion dollar question only the Supreme Court can answer. God give us all strength and the glory to see what ever unfolds through. Because no matter what, Where We Go One We Go All, together.
https://americanmediaperiscope.com/the-supreme-court-petition-set-to-rock-america/
Juan also said Trump would be arrested at MarALago before Thanksgiving.
He also has alluded & insinuated that he is JFK Jr. Openly allows people to address him as such, in addition to allowing people refer to him as part of the Q team.
Dude's ego is truly insurmountable. Parading himself as some super secret James Bond character wrapped in mystique to sell it better to whatever the conspiracy/alt news following currently is. He's been shystering people with the same grift for a long while now, the topic of discussion just changes over time.
I know there is a lot of back and forth by people saying "He claims he is JFK Jr" and "He is not JFK Jr", but I have never once seen anything he said that amounts to alluding or insinuating he is JFK Jr.
Can you point me to a video where he actually does it? I have watched most of his videos since 2020.
As Autists we need to judge people by the fruit of their labor and not their personalities. Judging Juan by the fruit of his labour is a very rewarding task. Why? Because on the offset it feels like the fruits are almost non existant.
He made plenty of predictions - some of them laughable (like Trump getting arrested, Trump being reinstated before Apr 1 2021, Biden Harris destroying each other before Thanksgiving 2021, etc etc) - and one might easily be tempted to write him off as crank.
But. Thinking a bit more deeply can show us the role he is really playing (either wittingly or unwittingly). I believe that he is the prime disinformation channel for the WHs. Whenever they want the Cabal to think they will do certain action and want to make them panic, they deploy Juan.
I believe the SCOTUS case may or may not go as planned, but this case is definitely a very power chess move, and will get the Cabal to panic. Will this be the move that will actually get them to collapse the markets? Fake nuke war? Precipice? One can hope.
But one thing is for sure. The whole story about congress trying to get rid of this scotus and scotus using this case as a defence - I think thats just cover. There is no way even the stupid Cabal will try and use lame duck congress to dilute the Scotus.
Just the idea of believing that the... [::sound of trumpets and angels chanting::] SUPREME COURT will suddenly rise up on its hind legs and do the right thing to save itself and the Nation...tough to swallow
Like NESARA, killing the income tax/IRS, and justice for the traitors who manufactured a plandemic and an insurrection to cover up their coup, carefully producing all three for TV... it'd be great, but in all truth kind of hard to buy at the moment
And you have done………what? Put together……… what compared to him? I’ll probably have to wait a long time for an answer on this from you won’t I? You shouldn’t Doom-Troll so hard if you haven’t come even a fleck close to putting in as much work as Juan. You need to keep in mind, The End Won’t Be For Everyone. And things you didn’t think were true, just might, just might turn out to have some fact inside the disinformation around the information you thought was correct.
I am anon. I am autist. I have baked. I have memed. I have researched. I have shitposted.
Since the inception of the Q drops I have been involved the same as any digital soldier.
The problem with Juanita is he is a sophist. Like any PAYtriot personality he is a philosopher for hire. Paid infotainment for your pleasure. So you'll have to excuse my immediate dismissal if this case turns out to be a nothing burger like 99% of the predictions and topics he rambles on about.
Well he isn’t the only one. Research some more. It’s coming to light and is mentioned covertly a lot. Lots of pieces to be put together to glue up the parts. It’s the only thing to take The US Cabal out in 1 swoop, or Stone. David vs. Goliath. Biblical.
Yeah, I am not a fan of Juan O'Savin. I am interested in this case in spite of his limited involvement. In reality, he has nothing to do with the case, so it seems safe to just ignore him... which I am getting pretty good at doing.
There is an update on the petition.
http://ralandbrunson.com/History/History.html
Today, the supreme court has set a conference date for the 9 justices to vote on the petition. If 4 justices vote yes, then the petition will proceed to a hearing and be argued before the SC.
I don't know the date of the conference that was set. Friday would be the earliest, but they have other conference dates next week as well. It is possible that the petition has been sealed, and if so will not show up in the normal SC calendars, etc.
The date is January 6th.
It took 6 days for the Trumpeters to bring down the Walls of Jericho. And David killed Goliath with 1 Stone. The 4 men bringing this case all play the Trumpet. Biblical!
No coinkidinks.
Numbers in The Bible = God's coding
Thanks. That is later than I thought it would be - I figured they would expedite it so it occurred in December of this year.
Also, the SC clerk was pushing them to deliver the petition ASAP... so the delay until January is a bit surprising.
I looked at their calendar for conferences... Dec 2, Dec 9 were the next two available, followed by Jan 6th being the first date after the holiday break, I guess.
I have not been able to find the case in a calendar for Jan 6th... where are you seeing that? Just curious.
Here is the link: https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/docket/docketfiles/html/public/22-380.html
That is too late accomplish what Juan was suggesting.
Dunno, but that might have been a joke.
J6
And that Trump would be reinstated in April...err...June...err August.... err maybe December of 2021.
He's overdue to hit a broken clock prediction here soon though...
With the news this weekend could just be he had his timeline wrong.
juan o savin is a fraud. any post about him should not be stickied.
I watched this interview of the brother of the plaintiff (who also has an identical case that is still working in the courts). He clarified several points for me.
https://rumble.com/v1xqob2-a-breach-of-national-security.-loy-brunson-supreme-court-case.html
The SCOTUS had the Dobbs case. The fact that they let the long-standing Roe v. Wade be overturned is a clue that there are still some justices who want to uphold constitutional law. OTOH, one or two of those votes might have had to do with pro-life beliefs more than upholding the Constitution, so not an ideal litmus test, but still an indication that they might do the right thing.
Loy Brunson said that the ONLY argument the defense has raised is the idea that the members of Congress have immunity. THAT IS THE ISSUE.
There was ample evidence to assert that the 2020 presidential election may have been rigged for the loser to win. THIS WAS NOT CONTESTED BY THE DEFENSE.
Once this evidence was presented to members of Congress, 377 voted to NOT INVESTIGATE this claim. But, they took an oath of office to support and defend the Constitution, and refusing to investigate a claim of treason against the United States is a violation of their oath of office.
The 14th Amendment says that any person who takes such an oath, and then acts in direct violation of it, shall be removed from office and be unfit to ever hold public office again.
Congress passed a statute several years ago giving them immunity for acts while they are doing their congressional duties. However, that cannot logically mean that it would include a violation of their oath of office. The immunity cannot stand because Congress cannot pass a law that violates the Constitution.
Again, the defense's ONLY defense is immunity.
If there is no immunity, then SCOTUS can make any decision they want.
Loy Brunson said that this is his brother's case, and that when they filed the paperwork with SCOTUS, they had to make a change after the filing. They asked about this, and they were told that THE SUPREME COURT WANTS THIS PAPERWORK FILED AS SOON AS POSSIBLE -- because it is a case of NATIONAL SECURITY.
This is the SCOTUS saying this, not some internet lawyer.
I now expect that SCOTUS actually WILL take this case. They need 4 justices to agree to take it. Later, they will decide it, and that will require 5 votes.
If SCOTUS takes this case and does NOT get the 5 votes, then it means that Congress AND the SCOTUS have created a situation so that there is NO RECOURSE for election fraud. In that case, either the military steps in, or the People must do something -- even if that is somehow getting justices removed via a new Congress, but how would you do that when elections are rigged? Catch 22.
If SCOTUS takes this case, they do NOT have to only send it back to the lower (corrupt and/or cowardly) courts. Rather, they can issue THEIR OWN ORDER to do whatever it is that must be done (because of national security).
This would be an interesting dig for someone (I don't have the time to do it at the moment) --
There are 377 members named as defendants in the lawsuit.
Of those, 2 are president and vice president. SCOTUS could remove Biden/Harris, and INSTALL Trump/Pence, as the rightful winners of the 2020 election. Doing so AFTER January 20, 2023 would be ideal, as then there would be no question that Trump could run for re-election in 2024.
Also, if this happens, it means that ALL of Biden's executive orders and ALL statutes passed by Congress and signed by him are null and void, as he was never the president.
Of the remaining 375 defendants, how many of those are NOT going to be in office starting in January, due to either not having run for re-election or having lost?
The House needs a quorum to do business. If these people are removed from office, would there be a quorum? There might be, if enough NEW members were elected for the upcoming session.
Same applies to the Senate.
Could this be why Trump was trumpeting the fact that 90% of the candidates he endorsed won?
We will soon find out if we have a SCOTUS with enough people who will uphold their own oaths of office.
Wow thank you for the additions Anon! Nice!
Didn’t they mention that Pence was one of the 375 defendants? That would eliminate him from VP
Yes he would be removed. Trump would then have to nominate a VP.
Also, I think I had the number wrong. 385 members of Congress, plus Biden, Harris, and Pence, making a total of 388 (not 377).
Plus John and/or Jane Does.....
Great Insight into this SC Case...this in a NUTSHELL, means the SC is on the SPIT and God HELP them if they VIOLATE THEIR OATH OF OFFICE...because if they do, the Supreme Court will NOT be the COURT as the U.S. Constitution lays out...
WOWZA!!!!
Again, Thank you for the insight..."AGAINST ALL ENEMIES, BOTH FOREIGN AND DOMESTIC"...comes to mind...
Retired US MIlitary - 30 years!!!!!
Well said! And thank you so much for your service!!
Thank you so much, I am glad we have people like you with your knowledge.
That is incredible news!
There's a difference between hopium and being flat out delusional. This is the type of stuff that just sets up for a huge letdown. We saw this when Trump was supposed to be making a huge announcement that was going to go down in history as one of the most important days ever.
People kept going on and on, just like this, about what a momentous occasion it was going to be. And post after post of glorious, unbridled hopium was pinned, one after the other.
And people would try to bring a little reality into.it, and be called doomers and shills for it. And then what happened? The day came, and all it was was Trump declaring he would.run in 2024. And reality came crashing down on the heads of people who had been continually hyped up, and it turned ugly. People had a hard time being let down so epically, and were then told it was their own fault for getting their hopes up so much.
And now we're doing the exact same thing. Post after post pinned up, taking the hopium to the stratosphere. Getting people to the point where this is either a do or die scenario.
And those of us who are trying to interject a little bit of reality back into the conversation are being called shills and doomers.
Do you all really not see this? It's like being trapped in Groundhogs Day. Like every one has already forgotten we just went through this exact same set up.
I'm not saying don't have hope. I'm saying be realistic and stop making every single thing into THE epic show down between good and evil, where if it fails, the entire collapse of society is imminent. And then, a week after whatever deadline has passed, and nothing happens, there's a big blow up, and then as if by magic, group amnesia takes over and pretty much everyone forgets that society was supposed to collapse.
🤦♀️🤷♀️
Seriously, does no one else see this? I can't be the only one.
You’re not the only one. It’s the reason I gave up on all of it. There’s too many holes in too many stories, which means it’s an infinite loop of the game, “telephone,” where everyone feeds each other bullshit. If I keep talking like a normal person I might get banned though 🤦♂️
Thank you!
The problem with this is lack of force.
The enforcement arm (Military) will need to be behind the scenes FORCING the judges to take up the case and rule on it.
That's the only way this gets done.
The judges would fear their lives and do the wrong thing.
The information war can only take us so far.
Forcing the situation to get a certain result will have to come sooner or later.
They just made new laws to further protect Supreme Court Justices. Now though this case would “undo” this legislation. I’m pretty sure they’ll be protect until all is sorted out after.
https://www.usnews.com/news/politics/articles/2022-06-16/biden-signs-bill-to-protect-supreme-court-justices-into-law
There's already a significant amount of "force" on the Supreme Court justices: the Dems have proposed legislation that would both pack the court and remove their lifetime appointments. They have plenty of reason to take - and rule positively on - this case.
Good points anon!
There is a danger in anyone becoming identified as a "Qanon influencer". We saw the damage that Ron Watkins did when he talked to HBO, representing you. He spoke on behalf of you. He became identified as a leader of you and every other anon.
Because named individuals who claim to represent the anon community become identified as "qanon influencers" and then can be directly attacked.
This shit happens: https://www.thedailybeast.com/how-qanon-influencer-juan-o-savin-became-this-midterms-most-worrying-figure
I never voted for Ron Watkins to become a spokesperson for anons. I never voted for Juan O'Savin to become a spokesperson for anons.
He's fucking nutty. He makes unverifiable statements of fact that you simply must accept on a "trust me bro" status, because they cannot be proven.
Anons are not attackable. We have a shield of anonymity around us that Q identified as being vital. Our best characteristics are that:
One of the enemy's main strategies is to taint things by association. If they can show some individual representing a movement is a bad person or crazy, that movement gets degraded by association.
Every time there is a crime, the media zooms in hoping it was a white person who did it, because that means they can leverage that against all whites.
Likewise, if a named anon in the Q movement turned out to be a pedophile, have a criminal history, or goes insane ... the entire movement would be defined by them.
If Juan really cared about bringing about the great awakening, he'd share verifiable information as an anon, not caring whether he was building a following.
Anons are not interested in celebrity, we want verifiable sourced information.
The guy who visited Maralago with Ye seems to fit the "guilty by association" ploy. I just can't figure out how Trump didn't know about the guy ahead of time, other than assuming the SS would properly vet his visitors.
Trump meets with everyone. No underlying meaning should be taken from anyone Trump meets.
He met with Romney after Romney screwed him over, and proceeded to endorse him. Trump endorsed McCain as well, even after he had the very publicized beef with him.
Trump, at one time, endorsed Nancy Pelosi for speaker and said he'd provide votes for her if she didn't have enough from the democrat side.
The MSM isn't going to print any less worse things about Trump than they already were, regardless if he met that guy or not.
My brother is not totally unsure that even Trump is part of the whole Cabal plan to take over the world. I wish "The Great Awakening"/Q-plan would hurry up so we don't have to keep wondering who really is for us and who is against us.
"the military is the only way" implies even the Scotus isn't going to be a saving grace here to me.
I no longer take Juan seriously
He's not a Charlie Ward. But yes. Ditto that.
Something something in your sleep on Christmas, we've done it.
It’s a Festivus miracle!
Why was this reposted?
The old posts Stickied were picked for a POINTED Reason thank you. It’s about America’s Near Death Experience! It’s about new and old Anons remembering and understanding where we are. Stay Calm and Carry On Anon. #WWG1WGA
I was just asking there was no criticism in my post.
Do they have that kind of survival instinct, not to mention care about the future after they are gone, or will they just look at it as a tanker-sized can of worms they will be dealing with in the future? Historically they don't go for the cans of worms. It is a very pertinent question, are government employees supposed to support the constitution. And if they aren't required to, there isn't any point to the Supremes spending their time interpreting it. Not getting my hopes up for this, but maybe a propaganda campaign pointing out that this is about them would sink into their thinking.
Yes they currently do. That why the sudden shift to the surprise they took up the case! Listen to Juan he actually carefully goes over the fine details. It’s a “Gotcha” or Checkmate he can state openly because it will either be heard and decided upon, or the Supreme Court will toss The Entire Constitution and USA into the garbage under total Cabal destruction. If, if the military doesn’t come out swinging after, if they toss the case. But logically it’s their only Defensive Case they have to save their own positions/skins, the Constitution, and whole country for that matter.
We can hope.
They haven't taken up the case, though. It simply cleared the hurtles to get it petitioned.
There's a huge difference. Over 7,000 cases are petitioned to the SC each year, and they only hear about 100 of them.
There is nothing to suggest that this case will ever be heard.
Maybe we should put up a little refresher course on how the SC works, because the vast majority of people seem to not understand.
This whole thing seems to be blown out of proportion simply because people think the SC.is actually going to hear the case.
Case 22-380. What is 380 divided by 22?
Do you think that the SC has agreed to hear this case because it was given a number?
TLDR: The second petition was denied in February and they've submitted a third petition just recently.
.
The third time's the charm?? This first link has some good background info to describe the history of the effort including links to legal documents. It came out before the second ruling (denial of petition to hear the case) was released.
https://prepareforchange.net/2023/02/18/scotus-to-reconsider-hearing-case-alleging-biden-harris-lawmakers-ignored-2020-fraud-broke-oaths/
.
So now the Brunson petition is going for an unprecedented (as claimed though I haven't verified this) THIRD petition for the SC to hear the actual case. This update is recent, last week, I believe. According to the article, after a suspicious postal delay the Brunsons were just waiting for the Office of the Clerk to sign for the registered mail package to get it on the docket to be considered for hearing. It's a general article, with a link to this third petition, but the salient point here seems to be that the recently released J6 information (presumably the video footage Tucker Carlson of Fox News released of just the preliminary footage he chose) is adding more weight to the Brunson petition for a hearing. BTW, the second petition, which was denied, included an argument for a hearing due to the fact that the coup is a threat to national security (and, hence, incumbent upon the SC to hear the case).
https://welovetrump.com/2023/03/14/part-three-brunson-brothers-update/
The old posts Stickied were picked for a POINTED Reason thank you. It’s about America’s Near Death Experience! It’s about new and old Anons remembering and understanding where we are. Stay Calm and Carry On Anon. #WWG1WGA
I'm not putting any hope in the corrupt SC. We know that are 4 Libs on the court and Roberts is comped. That leaves us 4 maybes. We can hope but don't bet the farm!
We only need 4 to vote for it go to a full hearing. Does not require a majority in this case, due to it being a straight forward Constitutional Congressional procedural violation case.
That is what I said. I am sure of 2 of them, the other 2 are IFFY!
US falling is the falling of the Mystery Whore. Hang on tight, Kiddies, it’s going to be a rough ride!
Brent - interesting POV and put in a non fanatical, non cultish, non-read my tarot cards, non-ban you if you question Brian Cates manner.
I like it!
Hahaha nice!
u/#lightning
I'm siding with all three branches of government have to fail before the military steps.
Hopefully...THIS is where the MAN say's "We will be Happy" soon!
Hmm.. I don't know how you're posting this but all your text is falling off the page. Your LH margin is off and I can't read your postings. You have posted alot but none of it is easily readable. Can you fix this?
You do use sound logic here but as each day goes on my hope wanes that anything will change for the better. Have you noticed that Trump no longer says, "The best is yet to come" as he once did.
Yes. Pray for humanity. Trying to keep hope up
If Juan was as emportant to the movement as he would have us all think, he would have a phone that works. This video is unwatchable because of all the cutting out.
I get this when I click on the Rumble link:
Edited, put in the similar video he did with another host.
Turn off your video stream Juan. Might fix your audio quality. We don’t need to see that you’re vacationing while the rest of us are in hell anyway.
Please God please please please please
This was already rejected by the Supreme Court. Why is this 3 month old post stickied…?
Old and out of date thesis. Another prediction gone wrong..
The old posts Stickied were picked for a POINTED Reason thank you. It’s about America’s Near Death Experience! It’s about new and old Anons remembering and understanding where we are. Stay Calm and Carry On Anon. #WWG1WGA
Thank you.
I can see the Supremes telling congress to open the 10 investigation but not ordering the arrest mentioned. Will they hold that order to investigate until the new congress begins? That would make sense if Juan's defensive argument valid. This would threaten the lame duck congress into not acting.
Possibly. It’s fracking exciting never the less!
Oh yes, this the best possible twist in all this. What makes it even more exciting is no one saw this coming and the 10th circuit didn't take it serious. Then there is the TRUMPet players aspect. A masterpiece in the making.
I have a sincere question regarding the Brunson case. Didn't SCOTUS already reject this on 2 occasions? And perhaps a more important question regarding the validity of the Brunson case is reported by TGP:
Conservative Treehouse opines that by eliminating the motions from the records of the House, they could certify the fraud with no detractors on record and give SCOTUS a reason to claim that cases before it lacked standing.
In order to prevent those two motions, the Speaker of the House, the Minority Leaders, and the President of the Congress (VP Pence) could not be PRESENT IN THE CHAMBERS.
This allowed Speaker Pelosi to suspend the Congress UNILATERALLY UNDER EMERGENCY RULES. This protest was necessary. The crisis was created because there is no other way to suspend the business of certification UNILATERALLY. The crisis invoked emergency procedures and Pelosi was able to prevent the delay of certification herself.
When Congress returned later that night, Pelosi was in charge:
The Speaker initiated the NEW sessions under special emergency rules. These rules abandon and make it clear that the ONLY purpose of the new session was to EXPEDITE the certification and dismiss all prior regular session procedural rules. This is why those two motions to table votes to consider a debate and pause to the certifications of state vote electors never happened later that evening when the house business was reconvened!…
…it was at THIS NEW SESSION that VP Pence, President of Congress, would also have no ability to even consider pausing the electoral certification, because there were no motions of disagreements on the matter. So, in a technical legal claim, he is correct that he had no constitutional authority to address any issues of fraud or doubts about electoral irregularities.
But how did Pence know this ahead of time so that he could clarify it in his statement that he released while President Trump was still talking?
This was a coup….it was a very organized and carefully planned coup. VP Pence without a doubt as well as most members of the house were quite aware of how the certification was going to be MANAGED. It would require new rules to prevent the debate clause from occurring! New rules that ONLY AN EMERGENCY CRISIS COULD CREATE! So, they created an emergency.
IT pretty much explains why people were ushered up to the capital and then invited into the capital building. In stating this, SCOTUS might have only the option to consider this legalistically. An emergency was indeed invoked, but fraudulently. Doesn't the fraud have to be exposed first in order to to declare the emergency rules null and void?
Another question is -- Did the minority leader, Kevin McCarthy know? Evidently, he left the chamber too.
I’ve commented ad nauseam on this Brunson case. It’s bad on so many levels. I am happy to explain if you want, or you can read my post history. This case wasn’t your particular question.
Congress can make its own rules. SCOTUS cannot interfere in 99.999999% of congressional rule disputes. If Congress tries to pass enhanced eligibility requirements beyond the constitution, for example, scotus can take that case. But most other disputes related to how that body conducts business are off limits as separation of powers. Similarly, Congress can’t tell SCOTUS who can practice law in federal courts - that is SCOTUS’ domain how to run their branch.
The fact that either legislative body did not abide by their own rules is not usually a basis to have the courts weigh in. In some circumstances, yes, but that typically involves a third party with some interest that brings the suit.
So while I love the treehouse and Sundance, there was no legal basis for them to “need” an “emergency” on this front. There was a political basis. But not legal. They could simply ignore their rule and move on to what they did. Except they’d have to explain why they did that to their constituents. It would have probably gone poorly.
How come nobody is asking all the dillholes who had pledged to vote against the problem state electors but then changed their minds after Jan 6 why 2 hours of guided tours somehow changed the fact that there was fraud in those states elections? Even if it was muh inciting erections, how does that alter the fraud element such that it is overlooked? That is what all those fools need to be ambushed with on camera.
You should post this in its own separate new thread so Anons can discuss it.
Thanks for sharing. Fascinating. Let's hope and 🙏 that this leads to something.
No video...they took it down!
Edited, found the similar version he did with another host.
Q post 14 asks a lot of questions in regard to a rigged election.
Great post. That Brunson case could save us and the Supreme Ct, and clean up Congress!
If the SC doesn’t hear the Brunson Case, it will be the death of the SC too, the last vestige of an attempt at justice. Life time appointments will cease and the Left will either replace current justices with liberals or stack the court so liberal justices are the majority.
He was also one of the only people saying “ Biden will be inaugurated”
I love that they are trumpet players. Could they be the Trumpets mentioned in the Bible???
Walls of Jericho, David and Goliath, 1 Stone! Even Kim Clement said it was so! Yes!
Fingers crossed !
No fingers crossed, just hold a cross and pray. I have faith that this throws that Stone to set things in motion for Checkmate.
I'm with you I sure hope this pans out.. 🙏
You have a great explanation of what is going on.. Thank you for that!!
I hope so too Anon. I’m Praying that even if it doesn’t totally go through, it sets things off enough for the Military to step up.
I agree! I'm comfy and full of Faith!
POTUS is God's Trumpet! There is NO doubt in my mind.
Pray and Give Thanks that we were chosen to witness God's Plan. 🙏🙌
I hope. You’ve followed me closely Anon. And I know you’ll please let me know if I skip off path on something. This is fantastic but very precarious too. I’m always feeling like I’m about to be laughed out of the room haha but luckily nothing like that yet. I’m trying to really go as God leads me.
Yes and because of your position as a mod I feel you are being extremely judicious when weighing this issue. I think your recent finds are extraordinary. The Bible is full of clues that unlock God's mysteries. Keep following where God leads fren!
I think there is more to Juan o Savin then just a guy talking shit. He makes the rounds on some of the guys I trust.
Bingo. If you follow all of my links, and put the puzzle pieces together, he is the real Deal.