The real illusion is that the pharmaceutical industry is even about health to begin with.
The truth is that food is medicine, and the prerogative of big pharma is to not only not heal you, but to actively poison you in order to produce a paying customer for their snake oils.
What will become abundantly clear is that the best medicine a person could ever hope for is to keep a clean diet of unprocessed real whole foods, and get plenty of sunshine and exercise. Herbal remedies can be taken for a number ailments that a whole foods diet cannot naturally surpass.
There is also the Parasite Pill theory that suggests that many of our modern diseases are not bacterial, fungal, or viral in nature, but rather parasitic. This of course explains why Big Pharma had a major freakout when Ivermectin was gaining in popularity in 2020, as one of its major known properties was being an anti-parasitic. The propagandists even made fun of those seeking out Ivermectin by pointing out the very fact that it is an anti-parasitic, almost as if they want people to laugh at the possibility that humans can be infected with parasites at all. Rather odd behavior coming from the medical establishment.
Turpentine (100% gum spirits) and either castor oil or sugar will kill anything and every parasite infesting us. Check your poop if you’re not prone to fainting lol
That was a great read until it tried to associate the queen of heaven with Satan. The Blessed Mother is the bane of Satan, he hates her more then anyone because she was beyond his reach and gave birth to his destruction via the incarnation. She is prophesied in Genesis and Revelation to crush his head with her heel. Mary is depicted standing on the moon because she replaced the pagan deities associated with the moon, artists were trying to convey she is above false idols. We have many documented accounts from Exorcists about how invoking the Blessed Mother causes pain and anguish to demons. If the article would make that correction it would make way more sense.
She was crowned queen of heaven after her assumption. We have depictions of her wearing crown found in the catacombs as early as the 100s AD. The earliest Christians understood this.
In the PDF it said Satan is a tranny, and it was satan CLAIMING to be the queen of heaven. I don't think he's talking about Mary.
"Conclusion: The Dragon, that old serpent, which is the Devil and Satan, is a transsexual Hive Mind who calls himself the Queen of Heaven and uses parasite demons to infect the children of God, by which he tempts them, influences them, kills them, and even takes complete and total control over them through demonic parasitic possession"
Quite a lot of gods are both sex. Or they are "supra-sex", which mudmen like us might perceive as "both sexes". Adam Kadmon is both male and female. Indeed "Hermaphrodite" comes from "Hermes + Aphrodite". The Egyptians, the Greeks, the Romans... all had gods that were both male and female. If one goes back and looks at the famous Aleister Crowley-esque depiction of Baphomet one will notice that "he" is half female, even in the depiction.
I do think it is very possible that there is a strain of human that has the belief system that glorifies the idea of overcoming their own biology and becoming as a god, and that this means rising above their sex to become more, both, whatever. They're fucking nuts, so, anything is possible. But ask yourself.... why do these folks care so much about the cause of the tranny? Perhaps it's just to beat us down. But I think it's more. I think they want to come out of the shadows and let their freak flags fly. And have us adore or at least accept that they are superior to us mud men. Again, they're fucking nuts.
Now whether Satan is sending worms to take over our brains, I will reserve agreeing with that. :) However, bad people do seem to be happy with the idea that we are not healthy.
..... If you look above to what these comments are attached to, Furecrotch posted a PDF called "The parasite pill". That's where this rubbish comes from.
Ho-lee-fuck. I'm deeply disturbed but for some reason this makes a ton of sense.
Interesting how I've used Fenben, Ivermectin, and now Chlorine Dioxide. I don't think I've made a healthy environment for parasites the last couple years 😂.
Unfortunately its a bit more complicated that simply quitting sugar.
We have to recognize that the highly processed foods that have been made available in the west are only one step away from being sugar themselves. Foods like white flour, white rice, vegetable oil, etc. are all poison to the body. The processed carbohydrates lack their antidote shell of fiber and core nutrients. Lacking the protective fiber, these carbs get processed instantaneously in the body to glucose. They would have eventually been turned into glucose with the fiber, but the point is that the eventual glucose dose in the body would be 10x less with the fiber removed due to the hyper concentration of the refined carbohydrates.
The key is, as you pointed out, home grow as much as possible. Or rather, eat as many whole unprocessed and unrefined foods as you can. The body was designed to break down complex whole foods, not to get a hit of super refined simple carbs that overload the body with glucose.
To link back to the topic of parasites, bacteria, and fungi, these three invasive organisms thrive on the excess glucose supply in the body, and also on a low acid stomach. The western diet generally decreases the body's acidity, leading to ailments like GERD and acid reflux which are then treated with proton pump inhibitors which further decrease stomach acidity, and introduce problems like malabsorption of key nutrients. This in turn causes most people to overeat and overconsume the foods that led to their condition in the first place.
When you begin to delve deep into the subject of nutrition and the food pyramid you begin to realize that the entire western diet was purposefully designed to keep us sick. They fed us lies like "fat is bad," and "simple carbs are good" when in reality the exact opposite is true when you are trying to rid the body of diseases. Parasites, bacteria, and fungi cannot thrive in a highly acidic environment where the only fuel source available in the blood stream is ketones produced by the breaking down of fat. This is why fasting has been so successful in treating sickness and disease, and why when we get sick our appetites generally decrease. Our body knows how to fight these invaders very well.
I could go on and on about this subject all day. For those interested in learning more about the nutritional side of this topic, I encourage you to read Dr. Jason Fung's book The Obesity Code.
Also want to add that these microbes pleiomorph, meaning they change their function and form in response to the environment. They do this in order to biodegrade toxins and reset the environment back to a healthy state. Toxins that get into your body cause these microbes to pleiomorph, and when they attempt to clean the environment ( your internal terrain) you become the collateral damage of their cleanup work.
Toxicity is the root cause of most of your health problems, in addition to heightened emotional experiences, or trauma.
There was a bowl game yesterday, the "Cheezit _____Bowl" (I've already forgotten what the actual bowl game was :) ) During the commercials, they ran, of course, commercials for Cheezits, but several other equally healthy food products. It's scary how unhealthy almost all U.S. food is. I tried to buy some salad dressing in a large grocery store, and there wasn't a single one used without soy oil. Almost every bread contains dozens of ingredients. And it's hard to buy produce that isn't GMO.
Every animal in the USA has a de-worming protocol.
Except humans.
If one goes to other countries, one will see that the medical regime in those countries typically prescribes annual (or even more frequent) anti-worm drugs like Albendazol, etc.
Goliad Pharmaceuticals bought a company that developed cures for hepititis B, C, and D. They proceeded to make a fortune by charging $80,000 per cycle for it in the US while citizens of poorer countries like India hardly paid anything. It's one example that supports Q's statement that the American citizen subsidizes the world.
But your point in general is still accurate. We should expect a better batting average from this industry, especially in cancer research.
When one of my closest friends was dying of cancer at age 39, he dedicated the final months of his life to promoting fundraising for cancer research. I encouraged others to donate on his behalf. But when it was my turn to donate, to my surprise, I could not follow through. I felt terrible, but I had to ask myself "What results have we seen from all these donations to cancer research? Why do they fundraise and ask for donations while they charge each patient's insurance $1 million?" I see the large luxury homes of the cancer researchers and their executives, but I don't see progress in the technology. I don't see the prices of this 50 year old chemo technology becoming more affordable, and oh yeah, why are we still relying on 50 year old chemo technology?
Meanwhile, high school kids are inventing cancer fighting techniques that these top-dollar research centers somehow failed to think of for decades.
This high school girl invented a technique to fight tumors after reading research papers: https://tinyurl.com/bchzudnx
This 15 year old kid discovered a technique for detecting cancers of the pancreas, ovaries, and lungs. https://tinyurl.com/y2camtxj
Who knew that major breakthroughs in the world's most lethal disease were actually driven by children's curiosity rather than the intellectual horsepower of the millionaire Science Wizards we're supposed to never question?
I asked a coworker who just beat stage 3 colon cancer if I was morally wrong to not donate. He said "Hail naw!" and he agreed with me. He saw the grift while he was undergoing chemo. The only question anyone needs to ask is "Do I really think these people would kill their own golden goose if they actually discovered a cure?" Based on my observations, "Hail naw!"
So why does an 11-20 CENT per dose oral polio vaccine exist then? Wouldn't it be much better to let people get gimped by polio and sell them more expensive drugs to deal with that?
Are you kidding? The entire ‘science’ behind vaccines are dubious and faulty. Read about Edward Jenner.
And as for corruption, what era is the term ‘snake oil’ from? Was bloodletting medical corruption or a viable health treatment? Did fiber prevent masturbation in the Kellog medical treatment protocols?
I don't wonder why because I know why: Big Pharma is comprised of a bunch of evil bastards. There's been cures for cancer numerous times, but Big Pharma finds a way to keep the cure away from the public.
They work really, really hard to find that sweet spot where they can remediate symptoms enough to justify their existence while making damn sure they don't accidentally actually cure somebody. To wit: HIV meds. Doctors who discover cures are often found dead and their research gone.
They devote equal amounts of attention to suppressing cures as they devote to testing every conceivable synthetic toxin to see if it might have some incidental effect on one of the myriad diseases they "discover" every year, many of which are literally caused by some of their own products.
I'll rattle off a few beneficial compounds that are effective against a plethora of ailments including viruses and cancer and suppressed or enshrouded in either silence or lies (many effective drugs are approved but only for veterinary use)...
I've had chronic sinusitis for the past 10 years, was always congested, I would have wierd staph-infection like outbreaks come out of my nose, and had surgery for drainage issues.
There's a spot on my leg that the doc said looks like skin cancer, about the size of a dime (if you know what that is lol).
Low energy, and brain fog that changes during the day.
4 hours after starting 3 drops every hour my sinuses started draining and my sense of smell came back. I did not expect it to start working that fast! A couple days later i noticed the spot on my leg has shrunk and turned a pale grey (it was bright pink before, I've been wiping some of the mixture on the spot also). I get a bunch of energy and most of the brain-fog dissapears. Best I've felt in a longgg time.
It has only been about 2 weeks since starting it, but it's looking very promising so far... My eyesight has got pretty bad the last few years, there is protocols to use for the eyes that I am going to try.
CDS is a concentrated aqueous solution of 0,3% (3000ppm) of chlorine dioxide gas, with no sodium chlorite (NaClO2) content in the solution and has a neutral pH.
10ml is diluted with 1 liter of water obtaining 0,003% (30ppm) in 10 shots of 100ml every hour as a daily dose. (= 3mg ClO2 per dose)
What is MMS?
MMS is the mixture of sodium chlorite (NaClO2) activated with citric acid that contains sodium chlorite and is of acidic pH. MMS It is the name Jim Humble gave to the mixture of sodium chlorite (NaClO2) activated with citric acid at the time. It works excellent for many illnesses, but there is a stomach reaction and it can cause diarrhea as a side effect and its taste is unpleasant for many. It is the basis for manufacturing CDS
Don't use citric acid, use hydrochloric acid. Much easier on the stomach. And I personally felt it was better for the esophagus and less disgusting too.
If they turn some of the raw data over to the anons at 8kun and 4chan, most of our big diseases would probably be cured within a week. Oh, also if they stop poisoning our food and water and slowly genociding us with bioweaponized viruses and experimental jabs.
Protocol A – this is a general monthly protocol – if Herxheimer Reactions are severe, reduce dosage or
discontinue until the reactions have stopped
Protocol B – this is a monthly protocol based on Fenbendazole, Ivermectin, and doxycycline only, taken
for a longer period to deal with difficult/persistent infections (ie. cancer); repeat as needed before
moving back to Protocol A or moving on to Protocol C
Protocol C – this is a monthly protocol designed for maintenance, no sooner than after 6 months when
parasites are no longer detected in the stool
Anti-Viral Protocol – this is a 2-month protocol to clear out viral infections (ie. Epstein Barr Virus)
Lyme Protocol – this is a 2-month protocol to clear out Lyme symptoms
Sample Approach: Protocol A for the first month. Half dosing may help to determine tolerance. Upon
completion of Protocol A roll right into Protocol B for 2 months. This will cover the first 3 months. Then
repeat Protocol A for the next 3 months. Finally, start Protocol C at month #7 if parasites are no longer
detected in stool.
A lot of the information is scattered throughout the websites linked above, and also on Truth Social I follow @floridasharkman and @ssg_q
I saw an old picture recently, and in the background of what the subject was was a big billboard saying something about donating to cancer research or finding a cure. Way back in the 50's. They've been making money off the backs of dying cancer patients for over 70 years.
I remember in the very early 2000's (maybe about 2001 or 2002) when Susan G Komen runs were so big... "race for the cure!!!" I read about their structure, their CEO, how much people are paid, how much money they raise a year... and that's when I realized, there's money in them NOT finding a cure. There's jobs that will be lost. The CEO was making a crap ton of money (I don't remember how much) and she did not want to lose that! That's when I stopped supporting a "cure". They don't want to work themselves out of a job, just raise money to be paid. I would tell everyone that would listen.. "there's money in not finding a cure!!! Go look it up!" but they didn't care. They were happy paying their money, running a 5k, and wearing the shirt. Virtue signaling.
you can tell someone they are getting sick enough times and they will believe it to the point that they exhibit symptoms. Some people only take once. I saw it a while back in some how to be a macho man or whatever book. power of suggestion is strong and can be dangerous. Jesus is the only cure I have ever found that works. Have Faith that you are well and you will be. Do not be tempted by the lies of the devil.
No, I have not wondered why nothing is cured for a very long time. Back in the late 70's early 80's, I figured drug companies earned more money treating symptoms. From a business perspective, curing illness means less $$$$.
I don’t wonder. I know it’s because cures aren’t profitable to Big Pharma. Their entire purpose is to keep you just sick enough to not die, but rely on them for their products to stay “healthy.” Their products then make you sick with something else requiring another drug
And it’s all such recent history (Rockefeller medical takeover). What a diabolically evil and ingenious plan. It boggles my mind to grasp that certain peoples’ minds were so bent and twisted to actually dream this up and successfully implement it upon the entire planet. And it’s but one facet of a complete blueprint of total control and subjugation of the entire human race. Just absolutely insane. It truly seems demonic in the sense that the level of intelligence and planning involved to knowingly successfully implement a total global takeover is “beyond” ordinary human thought.
Medical PRACTICE----you can't practice if you cure everything. Better to give a drug to treat the symptoms and make them tolerable. Repeat business for the doctors and BIG PHARMA!
In history there actually have been thousands of cures developed by various people and tribes. Most were of course herbal, but some are actually very complicated in their preparation and dosing. Big Pharma has been pouring through these traditional herbal cures since the very beginning of developed Western medicine. The big "advancement" was made in modern history when Big Pharma was not allowed to patent naturally occuring substances. The new laws made it such that they could only patent synthetic "man-made" drugs. This focused research on finding what active ingredients in traditional herbal medicines and medicinal compounds and "synthesizing" them into a patentable drug. A very classic and well documented case is Chloroquine. Chloroquine is the synthetic version of Quinine. Quinine was used for longer than recorder history in Central and South America to prevent and cure malaria. A spanish monk/missionary to the region brought this traditional cure to the entire world. Quinine is derived from the Cinchona Officianalis tree leaves and bark. This was the first anti-malarial ever discovered. This became common around the world and is the source of gin and tonic water (tonic water is made with quinine) when the British empire extended throughout Africa and India and was used as a preventative. Since no company could patent quinine, a pharma company synthesized the active ingredient that they found was killing the malarial parasites. This was patented as Quinine in the 1940's. There soon became obvious that the Chloroquine had terrible side effects and an overdose would kill the patient. The pharma company re-engineered to mitigate some of the side effects and created Hydroxychloroquine. This pattern has been repeated for numerous common drugs. Unfortunately, greed has no bounds and the Pharma companies have had to invent diseases to "find" cures for when they started running out of maladies to treat. In a natural progression, when inventing disease was not profitable enough, it became necessary for the creation of disease, in order to drum up new customers. I believe this is where dietary recommendations were warped, vaccines were "doctored" (forgive the pun), and all sorts of drugs were created to treat common illnesses which may have alleviated some symptoms, but caused many other problems, some of which take years to undo the damage caused. While the majority of medical professionals have been benign in their intent, they have been carefully brainwashed by their training. The medical school system, internship/residency programs have been carefully designed with a carrot and stick method to force conformity and instill aversion to alternative treatments that might actually be cures. The laws were even created to further the penalties for doctors and nurses to find their own treatments and cures. The persecution of doctors for finding cures is also well established. A great example is Dr. Burzynski and his trials and tribulations over curing cancer patients that were considered untreatable. He still has a practice in Houston Texas and is still curing "uncurable" cases. Research the lengths this man had to endure to even keep his freedom, let alone his practice.
Kevin Trudeau asked the same question years ago? Why no advancement after all the BILLIONS in research for cancer, muscular dystrophy, etc. With all the money spent in the "diet/health" industry, obesity is at its highest level. Told to wear sunscreen, yet numbers for skin cancer continues to climb.
Have you ever taken an organic chemistry class? If you had, you'll have had a laboratory component where you're asking to synthesize various things and learn other basic laboratory techniques like fractional distillation, recrystallization, various separations, etc. Having gone through such classes, what you read in the textbook isn't exactly how it works. It's not exactly A + B --> C + D. The reactions don't run to 100%. You'll get less, and you get various minor products which end up being impurities that you want to remove. Imperfections in your techinque can cost you part of your yield as well.
The point here is that to get maximum value out of a reaction, you need a fair amount of experience, ultra pure reagents, ultra clean equipment, and optimized technique. And if your synthesis pathway is 15-20 steps from A to X, it becomes a fairly precise business to do it correctly and avoid contamination through each reaction in the synthesis. There's a barrier to entry into the market caused by simply having to meet what we all would consider basic standards of cleanliness and purity of the products.
And then, there's the batch testing to prove what that you have what you think you have so you don't end up with meningitis-causing bacterial contamination in your product that ends up killing 200 kids (well, young adults) before people figure out where it came from.
To answer your question:
Your mom & pop apothecary probably can do it on a small scale, especially if the pharmacist is old school trained or has experience compounding
Doing it on a large scale is going to require a fairly steep barrier to entry (ie it's very expensive, 7-8 figures) in terms of building a facility and obtaining the equipment to do it, getting someone competent to optimize it all and keep it running at a high standard. And after all of that, then you have to deal with the FDA
Even if you did set up such an operation, you still need medicinal grade chemical products to start with that you'll have to purchase from laboratory suppliers or similar.
You really can't get out of the "system" without compromising on scale, quality, or cost.
The drugs being mentioned here are off patent, so non-big pharma companies can manufacture them. Those companies would be in the business of selling a product, not creating the conditions to sustain demand for new products.
I think the idea is the big pharma corruption silences a lot of truth.
So they will develop something like iver which they can use to keep foreign populations free of parasitic disease, because the cabal NEEDS booming migrant populations at the ready
but keep the other applications absolutely under the table. Similar to getting amazon to block NAC and a few other supplements at pandemic height.
There are a lot of people out there who believe Big Pharma is trying to kill them, or the Elites are, or Bill Gates is. These are people who tend to believe very grandiose claims without much investigation for evidence or nuance. And I'm not making a statement that their premise is wrong, only that it lacks nuance.
NAC is a victim of this. It's a powerful anti-oxidant. So is glutathione. So is Vitamin C (ascorbic acid). So are a dozen other things you would recognize quickly if I listed them. It does what it does. It reduces oxidized species (ie molecules or ions in an oxidized state) of various kinds in the body, and in so doing detoxifies them or resets other biological processes that detoxify them.
Because of that mechanism of action, it has been attributed as a cure for countless diseases which have a component of oxidative stress in their pathophysiology. Usually it's infectious disease or cancer, but it can be a ton of things due to the inherent function of the liver, which is to detoxify, and the fact that so many things go through a fair basic set of metabolic processes to metabolize and eliminate drugs/poisons/toxins/whatever from the body.
Of course, it's more complicated than this, and that's why I talked about nuance. Yes, NAC might help with cancer, but the root cause of the cancer is a series of genetic mutations that causes some cells to reproduce and grow when they're not supposed to. The NAC will help with some of the symptoms of that extra growth, but it won't treat the root cause. You still need to kill the cancer cells. In an infection, it's similar. NAC can help with some of the symptoms when your immune system turns your body into a molecular battlefield, but ultimately NAC doesn't kill the pathogen. Something else does.
There's one other big one if I speak broadly. Chronic metabolic disease from an unhealthy lifestyle: obesity, diabetes, alcoholism, smoking, unhealthy diet, etc are all linked in that they stress the body's metabolic process to take in food, store extra as fat, shuffle the various components around the body, and eliminate toxins in whatever we're putting down our throats. NAC helps, especially if your condition is extreme and the liver's various mechanisms are overwhelmed, but it's not a cure. The cure is to fix the diet and lifestyle.
So, NAC (and anti-oxidants in general) get oversold. If you're reasonably healthy, you don't need NAC. Drinking enough orange juice and ensuring you get your RDA of essential aminos (to make glutathione) is really all you need. If you're unhealthy, NAC is only part of the equation.
Not really, because it takes a coordinated worldwide assault to permanently put something down before it mutates and develops resistance.
Take malaria. We can treat malaria, but the problem is it becomes resistant to those treatments and even if we had a brand new drug and treated the entire planet with it right now it would come right back as mosquitos re-infected people. So we need to wipe out the mosquitoes that carry the bacteria too. Everywhere. And in a way they can't develop resistance to, which pretty much eliminates chemicals.
Can you imagine having to kill off an insect planet wide? Do you think the Taliban is going to cooperate?
pharmaca ( Latin) Noun pharmaca Inflection of pharmacum ( nominative plural) Inflection of pharmacum ( accusative plural) Inflection of pharmacum ( vocative plural) This is the meaning of pharmacum: pharmacum ( Latin) Origin & history Post-Augustan. From Ancient Greek φάρμακον ("a drug, charm, enchantment"), from φαρμακίς ("witch"). Pronunciation
Arguably the best post in a long time. This issue is right in front of God, us and everyone. Made me think of why I despise having to go to a doctor for anything or take medications for anything. I still have to [aspirin and such for an occasional headache] and some seltzer for an upset stomach, but that's about it.
Allopathy isn't a lie. It's simply the use of the scientific method to drive theories on treating disease. It's subject to the limits of what the scientific method can prove. Let me give an example.
The brain is a massive black box for us. Even with all the neurology research we've done, all of the fancy fMRI and PET scans and other crap we throw at the problem, we still don't understand a lot of how the brain works. We can't see inside the black box.
But we ARE careful observers of what goes in and what comes out of the black box. If you give a person cocaine, this is how the person responds. These are the changes we see in the scans. These are the nerve pathways that light up on fMRI. And if you repeat doses, the patient responds this way. If you give a person an SSRI we see their mood stabilizes, evens out, and the patient who previously had debilitating depression can now function.
The SSRI example was deliberate. For years we thought it was the serotonin that explained why they work. If we block the receptors that recover serotonin from the nerve synapse and let the serotonin signal stay on longer, it improves depression, therefore serotonin causes depression, right? That's logical. It's also wrong. See this paper if you're interested in the details. It turns out that as we carefully observe, there's substantial evidence that serotonin isn't what's causing what we see. The drug still works. We have decades of clinical evidence to show that. But we don't know why.
That doesn't mean that the allopathic approach to treating depression is a lie. It simply means we don't know as much as we think we do and we have to continue to ask intuitive questions, generate smart hypotheses, and conduct clever experiments to learn more.
Nope, allopathy is literally a deliberate, calculated deception. You can thank the Rockefeller's and their cohorts for the deception. Allopathy is literally wrong about everything. Not one cause of dis-ease is correct. Because dis-ease is not caused by germs, toxins, genetics, bad diet, poor exercise, cell mutations, etc. It's all nonsense lacking even a modicum of proof. It's even difficult for the allopathic researchers to even arrive at rough correlative studies.
Dis-ease is born in the mind due to unexpected events and situations in life that we cannot easily resolve - scares, frights, anger, losses, separations, self-devaluations, upsets, unsettling experiences, etc.. Every single one of them. Cancers, heart-disease, auto-immune disease, neurodegenerative disease, psychological disease, viral disease, etc. etc., borne in the mind and ultimately resolved in the mind. Matter follows mind. An unbreakable universal law.
Now, that being said, allopathy has concocted every imaginable pill and serum to bring about symptom suppression, pain relief, bacterial healing cessation, hormonal adjustments and brain chemistry alteration. On the surface, masking symptoms and altering chemical pathways can have the appearance of "healing", but this is never truly the case. The body/psyche does all the "healing".
I know why the serotonin gives the appearance of working - masking of increased estrogen levels. Check it out if you're a researcher Depression is caused by an unresolved double-conflict situation of which there are many. As is mania, also caused by a double-conflict situation where the order of conflicts strikes in opposite brain hemispheres depending on the gender, handedness and hormone levels of the individual. The second conflict determines whether the individual will be manic or depressive. And the "manic-depressive" is a person who temporarily resolves their second conflict only to slip back into it over and over again - a "hanging-healing" state.
The pharma drugs don't "fix" the situation - only the "appearance" of it. Depression or mania are both a purposeful biological program the psyche creates to assist the person with conflict resolution. Throwing pharma chemicals at what isn't really a "problem" from the perspective of nature only serves to exacerbate the core issues and potentially cause worse problems for the individual down the road. The fact that some people may "get better" while taking hormones/chemicals/pharma is merely coincidental. When this is the case, the person has simply resolved their active conflict.
And I wouldn't characterize the allopathic approach to treating depression as a "lie". It's undoubtedly a clever solution by those that have been taught to believe that "dis-ease" is something to be "gotten rid of" by any and all means necessary.
Herein lies the fatal flaw of allopathy, as the modality is profoundly incorrect right from the starting block. Based on that premise I would call allopathy's depression treatment brilliant, not a lie. But due to the fatally flawed fundamental premise of allopathy, all "treatments" for "dis-ease" demonstrate a complete lack of comprehension as to what "dis-ease" really is. Naturally, everything that follows this mistaken line of thinking must therefore also be in error.
What if "dis-ease" wasn't something to be "gotten rid of", but instead, was the evidence of a return to homeostasis following an unexpected life situation. If the patient were properly educated on the core causal factors of their depression, their understanding brings relief and a clear path to properly and permanently coming to terms with their active conflicts, and therefore, eliminating their depression.
All natural. As nature never makes a mistake. Our bodies are perfect machines. Our natural state is one of perfect health. Our cells don't "mutate". We don't have an "immune system" (TPTB just hijacked the lymphatic system in 1972) and therefore, our bodies do not "attack themselves". Nor do our bodies degenerate before the age of 120. These are all fallacies based on a mountain of lies that unfortunately, the overwhelming majority of our healthcare professionals have all been taught to believe. It's quite a mess and is going to take decades to unwind. But Covid has been a blessing in disguise, as many millions are now beginning to see dis-ease in a new light and starting to question the establishment.
The real illusion is that the pharmaceutical industry is even about health to begin with.
The truth is that food is medicine, and the prerogative of big pharma is to not only not heal you, but to actively poison you in order to produce a paying customer for their snake oils.
What will become abundantly clear is that the best medicine a person could ever hope for is to keep a clean diet of unprocessed real whole foods, and get plenty of sunshine and exercise. Herbal remedies can be taken for a number ailments that a whole foods diet cannot naturally surpass.
There is also the Parasite Pill theory that suggests that many of our modern diseases are not bacterial, fungal, or viral in nature, but rather parasitic. This of course explains why Big Pharma had a major freakout when Ivermectin was gaining in popularity in 2020, as one of its major known properties was being an anti-parasitic. The propagandists even made fun of those seeking out Ivermectin by pointing out the very fact that it is an anti-parasitic, almost as if they want people to laugh at the possibility that humans can be infected with parasites at all. Rather odd behavior coming from the medical establishment.
The parasite pill(pdf)
Fair warning . . . best not to be eating anything while reading that PDF. Quite disturbing and unsettling information.
I ate water melon while reading until the last part --- Tori Spelling and Poop!!! WOWZA...
Everything else I copied down and saved...lot of good articles about how to get rid of parasites using fenbendazole...
How would one rid itself of parasites?
Ivermectin and fenbendazole.
Turpentine (100% gum spirits) and either castor oil or sugar will kill anything and every parasite infesting us. Check your poop if you’re not prone to fainting lol
That was a great read until it tried to associate the queen of heaven with Satan. The Blessed Mother is the bane of Satan, he hates her more then anyone because she was beyond his reach and gave birth to his destruction via the incarnation. She is prophesied in Genesis and Revelation to crush his head with her heel. Mary is depicted standing on the moon because she replaced the pagan deities associated with the moon, artists were trying to convey she is above false idols. We have many documented accounts from Exorcists about how invoking the Blessed Mother causes pain and anguish to demons. If the article would make that correction it would make way more sense.
Mary is a queen now? Hmm she said herself she was a simple handmaid of the Lord.
She was crowned queen of heaven after her assumption. We have depictions of her wearing crown found in the catacombs as early as the 100s AD. The earliest Christians understood this.
In the PDF it said Satan is a tranny, and it was satan CLAIMING to be the queen of heaven. I don't think he's talking about Mary.
"Conclusion: The Dragon, that old serpent, which is the Devil and Satan, is a transsexual Hive Mind who calls himself the Queen of Heaven and uses parasite demons to infect the children of God, by which he tempts them, influences them, kills them, and even takes complete and total control over them through demonic parasitic possession"
Where do you get all this rubbish?
I know...have you ever looked at past presidents and their "wives" and European royalty?
Quite a lot of gods are both sex. Or they are "supra-sex", which mudmen like us might perceive as "both sexes". Adam Kadmon is both male and female. Indeed "Hermaphrodite" comes from "Hermes + Aphrodite". The Egyptians, the Greeks, the Romans... all had gods that were both male and female. If one goes back and looks at the famous Aleister Crowley-esque depiction of Baphomet one will notice that "he" is half female, even in the depiction.
I do think it is very possible that there is a strain of human that has the belief system that glorifies the idea of overcoming their own biology and becoming as a god, and that this means rising above their sex to become more, both, whatever. They're fucking nuts, so, anything is possible. But ask yourself.... why do these folks care so much about the cause of the tranny? Perhaps it's just to beat us down. But I think it's more. I think they want to come out of the shadows and let their freak flags fly. And have us adore or at least accept that they are superior to us mud men. Again, they're fucking nuts.
Now whether Satan is sending worms to take over our brains, I will reserve agreeing with that. :) However, bad people do seem to be happy with the idea that we are not healthy.
They are actually trying to defeat God. His image is imprinted on our being so… Once our dna is changed it’s no longer true. They hate God
YES.
..... If you look above to what these comments are attached to, Furecrotch posted a PDF called "The parasite pill". That's where this rubbish comes from.
Ah I see, thanks for the clarification.
I think it's talking about the goddess Ishtar.
In Babylonian myth, "Queen of Heaven" is one of her nicknames.
She's also known to switch between male and female forms, though she prefers the latter.
Ho-lee-fuck. I'm deeply disturbed but for some reason this makes a ton of sense.
Interesting how I've used Fenben, Ivermectin, and now Chlorine Dioxide. I don't think I've made a healthy environment for parasites the last couple years 😂.
Unfortunately its a bit more complicated that simply quitting sugar.
We have to recognize that the highly processed foods that have been made available in the west are only one step away from being sugar themselves. Foods like white flour, white rice, vegetable oil, etc. are all poison to the body. The processed carbohydrates lack their antidote shell of fiber and core nutrients. Lacking the protective fiber, these carbs get processed instantaneously in the body to glucose. They would have eventually been turned into glucose with the fiber, but the point is that the eventual glucose dose in the body would be 10x less with the fiber removed due to the hyper concentration of the refined carbohydrates.
The key is, as you pointed out, home grow as much as possible. Or rather, eat as many whole unprocessed and unrefined foods as you can. The body was designed to break down complex whole foods, not to get a hit of super refined simple carbs that overload the body with glucose.
To link back to the topic of parasites, bacteria, and fungi, these three invasive organisms thrive on the excess glucose supply in the body, and also on a low acid stomach. The western diet generally decreases the body's acidity, leading to ailments like GERD and acid reflux which are then treated with proton pump inhibitors which further decrease stomach acidity, and introduce problems like malabsorption of key nutrients. This in turn causes most people to overeat and overconsume the foods that led to their condition in the first place.
When you begin to delve deep into the subject of nutrition and the food pyramid you begin to realize that the entire western diet was purposefully designed to keep us sick. They fed us lies like "fat is bad," and "simple carbs are good" when in reality the exact opposite is true when you are trying to rid the body of diseases. Parasites, bacteria, and fungi cannot thrive in a highly acidic environment where the only fuel source available in the blood stream is ketones produced by the breaking down of fat. This is why fasting has been so successful in treating sickness and disease, and why when we get sick our appetites generally decrease. Our body knows how to fight these invaders very well.
I could go on and on about this subject all day. For those interested in learning more about the nutritional side of this topic, I encourage you to read Dr. Jason Fung's book The Obesity Code.
Also want to add that these microbes pleiomorph, meaning they change their function and form in response to the environment. They do this in order to biodegrade toxins and reset the environment back to a healthy state. Toxins that get into your body cause these microbes to pleiomorph, and when they attempt to clean the environment ( your internal terrain) you become the collateral damage of their cleanup work.
Toxicity is the root cause of most of your health problems, in addition to heightened emotional experiences, or trauma.
I have been looking for Fung's name for a while and I just found it in your post. Thanks fren
But this very website keeps telling me that an ALKALINE body is good.
We eat goyslop
Parasite pill is more true than people know. I have personal experience with a lot of the subject matter…
There was a bowl game yesterday, the "Cheezit _____Bowl" (I've already forgotten what the actual bowl game was :) ) During the commercials, they ran, of course, commercials for Cheezits, but several other equally healthy food products. It's scary how unhealthy almost all U.S. food is. I tried to buy some salad dressing in a large grocery store, and there wasn't a single one used without soy oil. Almost every bread contains dozens of ingredients. And it's hard to buy produce that isn't GMO.
Every animal in the USA has a de-worming protocol.
Except humans.
If one goes to other countries, one will see that the medical regime in those countries typically prescribes annual (or even more frequent) anti-worm drugs like Albendazol, etc.
It's not a coincidence.
Came here to say THIS!
Parasites cause disease!
They weren't even calling it an anti-parasitic, they were just calling it horse paste. Now go back to eating your goyslop you slave animal.
Industry Motto: A patient cured is a customer lost
You can thank the Rockefeller family for that.
Goliad Pharmaceuticals bought a company that developed cures for hepititis B, C, and D. They proceeded to make a fortune by charging $80,000 per cycle for it in the US while citizens of poorer countries like India hardly paid anything. It's one example that supports Q's statement that the American citizen subsidizes the world.
But your point in general is still accurate. We should expect a better batting average from this industry, especially in cancer research.
When one of my closest friends was dying of cancer at age 39, he dedicated the final months of his life to promoting fundraising for cancer research. I encouraged others to donate on his behalf. But when it was my turn to donate, to my surprise, I could not follow through. I felt terrible, but I had to ask myself "What results have we seen from all these donations to cancer research? Why do they fundraise and ask for donations while they charge each patient's insurance $1 million?" I see the large luxury homes of the cancer researchers and their executives, but I don't see progress in the technology. I don't see the prices of this 50 year old chemo technology becoming more affordable, and oh yeah, why are we still relying on 50 year old chemo technology?
Meanwhile, high school kids are inventing cancer fighting techniques that these top-dollar research centers somehow failed to think of for decades.
This high school girl invented a technique to fight tumors after reading research papers: https://tinyurl.com/bchzudnx
This 13 year old kid in India discovered a treatment for pancreatic cancer: https://tinyurl.com/3kpp8fbu
This 15 year old kid discovered a technique for detecting cancers of the pancreas, ovaries, and lungs. https://tinyurl.com/y2camtxj
Who knew that major breakthroughs in the world's most lethal disease were actually driven by children's curiosity rather than the intellectual horsepower of the millionaire Science Wizards we're supposed to never question?
I asked a coworker who just beat stage 3 colon cancer if I was morally wrong to not donate. He said "Hail naw!" and he agreed with me. He saw the grift while he was undergoing chemo. The only question anyone needs to ask is "Do I really think these people would kill their own golden goose if they actually discovered a cure?" Based on my observations, "Hail naw!"
Much more money in treatment. Cure someone and you lose a revenue stream.
So why does an 11-20 CENT per dose oral polio vaccine exist then? Wouldn't it be much better to let people get gimped by polio and sell them more expensive drugs to deal with that?
https://www.unicef.org/supply/media/15226/file/OPV-vaccine-prices-13122022.pdf
Polio vaccine came before medical corruption.
Are you kidding? The entire ‘science’ behind vaccines are dubious and faulty. Read about Edward Jenner. And as for corruption, what era is the term ‘snake oil’ from? Was bloodletting medical corruption or a viable health treatment? Did fiber prevent masturbation in the Kellog medical treatment protocols?
Maybe this is why:
https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/vpd/polio/hcp/vaccine-derived-poliovirus-faq.html
I don't wonder why because I know why: Big Pharma is comprised of a bunch of evil bastards. There's been cures for cancer numerous times, but Big Pharma finds a way to keep the cure away from the public.
This is about how my simple brain is able to break it down as well
There's no money in cures. Sick people are a goldmine.
They work really, really hard to find that sweet spot where they can remediate symptoms enough to justify their existence while making damn sure they don't accidentally actually cure somebody. To wit: HIV meds. Doctors who discover cures are often found dead and their research gone.
They devote equal amounts of attention to suppressing cures as they devote to testing every conceivable synthetic toxin to see if it might have some incidental effect on one of the myriad diseases they "discover" every year, many of which are literally caused by some of their own products.
I'll rattle off a few beneficial compounds that are effective against a plethora of ailments including viruses and cancer and suppressed or enshrouded in either silence or lies (many effective drugs are approved but only for veterinary use)...
Chlorine dioxide
Olive oil
Garlic (fresh, raw)
Oil of oregano
Fenbendozol
Ivermectin
sweet wormwood
Isn't chlorine dioxide what is referred to by some as MMS?
Yes! Best I've felt in 10 years when I started taking it a few weeks ago. https://www.bitchute.com/video/uyX9I6MuAg8z/
Were you taking it for anything in particular?
I started taking it for a few reasons.
I've had chronic sinusitis for the past 10 years, was always congested, I would have wierd staph-infection like outbreaks come out of my nose, and had surgery for drainage issues.
There's a spot on my leg that the doc said looks like skin cancer, about the size of a dime (if you know what that is lol).
Low energy, and brain fog that changes during the day.
4 hours after starting 3 drops every hour my sinuses started draining and my sense of smell came back. I did not expect it to start working that fast! A couple days later i noticed the spot on my leg has shrunk and turned a pale grey (it was bright pink before, I've been wiping some of the mixture on the spot also). I get a bunch of energy and most of the brain-fog dissapears. Best I've felt in a longgg time.
It has only been about 2 weeks since starting it, but it's looking very promising so far... My eyesight has got pretty bad the last few years, there is protocols to use for the eyes that I am going to try.
That's amazing. I'm glad that you're on your way to a healthier you.
What is CDS?
CDS is a concentrated aqueous solution of 0,3% (3000ppm) of chlorine dioxide gas, with no sodium chlorite (NaClO2) content in the solution and has a neutral pH.
10ml is diluted with 1 liter of water obtaining 0,003% (30ppm) in 10 shots of 100ml every hour as a daily dose. (= 3mg ClO2 per dose)
What is MMS?
MMS is the mixture of sodium chlorite (NaClO2) activated with citric acid that contains sodium chlorite and is of acidic pH. MMS It is the name Jim Humble gave to the mixture of sodium chlorite (NaClO2) activated with citric acid at the time. It works excellent for many illnesses, but there is a stomach reaction and it can cause diarrhea as a side effect and its taste is unpleasant for many. It is the basis for manufacturing CDS
https://andreaskalcker.com/en/cds-clo2.html
Don't use citric acid, use hydrochloric acid. Much easier on the stomach. And I personally felt it was better for the esophagus and less disgusting too.
If they turn some of the raw data over to the anons at 8kun and 4chan, most of our big diseases would probably be cured within a week. Oh, also if they stop poisoning our food and water and slowly genociding us with bioweaponized viruses and experimental jabs.
Oh, they have the cures but they do not want you to have access to them.
I decided to try the fenbendazol treatment described here (https://www.contrabandcures.com/Parasite_Protocol/30-Day_Schedule/index.php) see also (https://floridasharkman.org/)
I took the dosage recommended by the body weight calculator for three days.
I am blown away at how much better I feel now. I have tons more energy, my skin is silky smooth and there were 0 side effects or discomfort.
I cycle fen-Ben and ivermectin
What are Protocol A, B, C, whatever in those links? There's no description.
https://floridasharkman.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/ParasiteProtocol_10-15-22v12.pdf
Protocol A – this is a general monthly protocol – if Herxheimer Reactions are severe, reduce dosage or discontinue until the reactions have stopped
Protocol B – this is a monthly protocol based on Fenbendazole, Ivermectin, and doxycycline only, taken for a longer period to deal with difficult/persistent infections (ie. cancer); repeat as needed before moving back to Protocol A or moving on to Protocol C
Protocol C – this is a monthly protocol designed for maintenance, no sooner than after 6 months when parasites are no longer detected in the stool
Anti-Viral Protocol – this is a 2-month protocol to clear out viral infections (ie. Epstein Barr Virus)
Lyme Protocol – this is a 2-month protocol to clear out Lyme symptoms
Sample Approach: Protocol A for the first month. Half dosing may help to determine tolerance. Upon completion of Protocol A roll right into Protocol B for 2 months. This will cover the first 3 months. Then repeat Protocol A for the next 3 months. Finally, start Protocol C at month #7 if parasites are no longer detected in stool.
A lot of the information is scattered throughout the websites linked above, and also on Truth Social I follow @floridasharkman and @ssg_q
I downloaded the PDF, thanks.
I saw an old picture recently, and in the background of what the subject was was a big billboard saying something about donating to cancer research or finding a cure. Way back in the 50's. They've been making money off the backs of dying cancer patients for over 70 years.
I remember in the very early 2000's (maybe about 2001 or 2002) when Susan G Komen runs were so big... "race for the cure!!!" I read about their structure, their CEO, how much people are paid, how much money they raise a year... and that's when I realized, there's money in them NOT finding a cure. There's jobs that will be lost. The CEO was making a crap ton of money (I don't remember how much) and she did not want to lose that! That's when I stopped supporting a "cure". They don't want to work themselves out of a job, just raise money to be paid. I would tell everyone that would listen.. "there's money in not finding a cure!!! Go look it up!" but they didn't care. They were happy paying their money, running a 5k, and wearing the shirt. Virtue signaling.
Programming.
you can tell someone they are getting sick enough times and they will believe it to the point that they exhibit symptoms. Some people only take once. I saw it a while back in some how to be a macho man or whatever book. power of suggestion is strong and can be dangerous. Jesus is the only cure I have ever found that works. Have Faith that you are well and you will be. Do not be tempted by the lies of the devil.
100 percent this. Fear is believing in The negative
Fear is the dis-ease of mind
Doctors and researchers have been curing diseases, unfortunately they end up in prison or the cemetery.
No, I have not wondered why nothing is cured for a very long time. Back in the late 70's early 80's, I figured drug companies earned more money treating symptoms. From a business perspective, curing illness means less $$$$.
I don’t wonder. I know it’s because cures aren’t profitable to Big Pharma. Their entire purpose is to keep you just sick enough to not die, but rely on them for their products to stay “healthy.” Their products then make you sick with something else requiring another drug
And it’s all such recent history (Rockefeller medical takeover). What a diabolically evil and ingenious plan. It boggles my mind to grasp that certain peoples’ minds were so bent and twisted to actually dream this up and successfully implement it upon the entire planet. And it’s but one facet of a complete blueprint of total control and subjugation of the entire human race. Just absolutely insane. It truly seems demonic in the sense that the level of intelligence and planning involved to knowingly successfully implement a total global takeover is “beyond” ordinary human thought.
It seems they cook up another strain of illness every year to put in the flu shots/rona shots and then those jabbed spread it far and wide
Medical PRACTICE----you can't practice if you cure everything. Better to give a drug to treat the symptoms and make them tolerable. Repeat business for the doctors and BIG PHARMA!
That's simply because the correct food is the cure.
And seemingly nobody wants that, especially not the sick ones. :(
Yeah, they just keep eating that bullshit goyslop.
They cured a limp dick… by accident.
In history there actually have been thousands of cures developed by various people and tribes. Most were of course herbal, but some are actually very complicated in their preparation and dosing. Big Pharma has been pouring through these traditional herbal cures since the very beginning of developed Western medicine. The big "advancement" was made in modern history when Big Pharma was not allowed to patent naturally occuring substances. The new laws made it such that they could only patent synthetic "man-made" drugs. This focused research on finding what active ingredients in traditional herbal medicines and medicinal compounds and "synthesizing" them into a patentable drug. A very classic and well documented case is Chloroquine. Chloroquine is the synthetic version of Quinine. Quinine was used for longer than recorder history in Central and South America to prevent and cure malaria. A spanish monk/missionary to the region brought this traditional cure to the entire world. Quinine is derived from the Cinchona Officianalis tree leaves and bark. This was the first anti-malarial ever discovered. This became common around the world and is the source of gin and tonic water (tonic water is made with quinine) when the British empire extended throughout Africa and India and was used as a preventative. Since no company could patent quinine, a pharma company synthesized the active ingredient that they found was killing the malarial parasites. This was patented as Quinine in the 1940's. There soon became obvious that the Chloroquine had terrible side effects and an overdose would kill the patient. The pharma company re-engineered to mitigate some of the side effects and created Hydroxychloroquine. This pattern has been repeated for numerous common drugs. Unfortunately, greed has no bounds and the Pharma companies have had to invent diseases to "find" cures for when they started running out of maladies to treat. In a natural progression, when inventing disease was not profitable enough, it became necessary for the creation of disease, in order to drum up new customers. I believe this is where dietary recommendations were warped, vaccines were "doctored" (forgive the pun), and all sorts of drugs were created to treat common illnesses which may have alleviated some symptoms, but caused many other problems, some of which take years to undo the damage caused. While the majority of medical professionals have been benign in their intent, they have been carefully brainwashed by their training. The medical school system, internship/residency programs have been carefully designed with a carrot and stick method to force conformity and instill aversion to alternative treatments that might actually be cures. The laws were even created to further the penalties for doctors and nurses to find their own treatments and cures. The persecution of doctors for finding cures is also well established. A great example is Dr. Burzynski and his trials and tribulations over curing cancer patients that were considered untreatable. He still has a practice in Houston Texas and is still curing "uncurable" cases. Research the lengths this man had to endure to even keep his freedom, let alone his practice.
Customers wanted not cures.
Kevin Trudeau asked the same question years ago? Why no advancement after all the BILLIONS in research for cancer, muscular dystrophy, etc. With all the money spent in the "diet/health" industry, obesity is at its highest level. Told to wear sunscreen, yet numbers for skin cancer continues to climb.
u/#cashmoney
Something that I need help with here.
We have an overwhelming consensus here that;
Big Pharma should not be trusted.
They have nefarious intentions towards us.
BigPharma wants to keep us dependent on the medications they make, so they can get rich off us.
And one way we can combat this is to;
Take medications like Ivermectin, hydroxychloroquine, and fenbendozol, which treat a vast plethora of diseases.
Ok, now here is where my comprehension of this plan stutters.
Are you all whipping up batches of these medications in your kitchens?
Or is your friendly neighborhood Ye Olde Mom and Pop Apothecary producing this for you?
Because try as I might, I can't find a source that produces these medications other than.....Big Pharma.
And I know they can't be trusted and just want my money.
So......do you see my dilemma here?
Have you ever taken an organic chemistry class? If you had, you'll have had a laboratory component where you're asking to synthesize various things and learn other basic laboratory techniques like fractional distillation, recrystallization, various separations, etc. Having gone through such classes, what you read in the textbook isn't exactly how it works. It's not exactly A + B --> C + D. The reactions don't run to 100%. You'll get less, and you get various minor products which end up being impurities that you want to remove. Imperfections in your techinque can cost you part of your yield as well.
The point here is that to get maximum value out of a reaction, you need a fair amount of experience, ultra pure reagents, ultra clean equipment, and optimized technique. And if your synthesis pathway is 15-20 steps from A to X, it becomes a fairly precise business to do it correctly and avoid contamination through each reaction in the synthesis. There's a barrier to entry into the market caused by simply having to meet what we all would consider basic standards of cleanliness and purity of the products.
And then, there's the batch testing to prove what that you have what you think you have so you don't end up with meningitis-causing bacterial contamination in your product that ends up killing 200 kids (well, young adults) before people figure out where it came from.
To answer your question:
You really can't get out of the "system" without compromising on scale, quality, or cost.
Well shoot. There goes my new business plan of creating my own boutique "Small Pharma" chain of Ye Olde Cognitive Dissonance Apothecaries. 😮💨
The drugs being mentioned here are off patent, so non-big pharma companies can manufacture them. Those companies would be in the business of selling a product, not creating the conditions to sustain demand for new products.
Wait wait wait.
Are you serious? You think "Big Pharma" means people who make name brand medications and, what, "small pharma" makes generic?
Pardon me for one moment, please.
🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂😂🤣😂🤣😂😂🤣🤣
Whew. Ok. Back now.
Yeah, that's not what "Big Pharma" is.
I think the idea is the big pharma corruption silences a lot of truth.
So they will develop something like iver which they can use to keep foreign populations free of parasitic disease, because the cabal NEEDS booming migrant populations at the ready
but keep the other applications absolutely under the table. Similar to getting amazon to block NAC and a few other supplements at pandemic height.
Then why make it virtually a miracle drug, that treats everything from a cold to cancer?
Because that's what I've seen it represented here as literally hundreds, if not thousands of times in the past 2 years.
There are a lot of people out there who believe Big Pharma is trying to kill them, or the Elites are, or Bill Gates is. These are people who tend to believe very grandiose claims without much investigation for evidence or nuance. And I'm not making a statement that their premise is wrong, only that it lacks nuance.
NAC is a victim of this. It's a powerful anti-oxidant. So is glutathione. So is Vitamin C (ascorbic acid). So are a dozen other things you would recognize quickly if I listed them. It does what it does. It reduces oxidized species (ie molecules or ions in an oxidized state) of various kinds in the body, and in so doing detoxifies them or resets other biological processes that detoxify them.
Because of that mechanism of action, it has been attributed as a cure for countless diseases which have a component of oxidative stress in their pathophysiology. Usually it's infectious disease or cancer, but it can be a ton of things due to the inherent function of the liver, which is to detoxify, and the fact that so many things go through a fair basic set of metabolic processes to metabolize and eliminate drugs/poisons/toxins/whatever from the body.
Of course, it's more complicated than this, and that's why I talked about nuance. Yes, NAC might help with cancer, but the root cause of the cancer is a series of genetic mutations that causes some cells to reproduce and grow when they're not supposed to. The NAC will help with some of the symptoms of that extra growth, but it won't treat the root cause. You still need to kill the cancer cells. In an infection, it's similar. NAC can help with some of the symptoms when your immune system turns your body into a molecular battlefield, but ultimately NAC doesn't kill the pathogen. Something else does.
There's one other big one if I speak broadly. Chronic metabolic disease from an unhealthy lifestyle: obesity, diabetes, alcoholism, smoking, unhealthy diet, etc are all linked in that they stress the body's metabolic process to take in food, store extra as fat, shuffle the various components around the body, and eliminate toxins in whatever we're putting down our throats. NAC helps, especially if your condition is extreme and the liver's various mechanisms are overwhelmed, but it's not a cure. The cure is to fix the diet and lifestyle.
So, NAC (and anti-oxidants in general) get oversold. If you're reasonably healthy, you don't need NAC. Drinking enough orange juice and ensuring you get your RDA of essential aminos (to make glutathione) is really all you need. If you're unhealthy, NAC is only part of the equation.
I really enjoy your comments. They're obviously very well thought out and I'm assuming you have extensive knowledge of some of the hard sciences.
Are you a chemist?
Nope. Doesnt surprise me because i know how corporate systems work especially in health as a market. Better to treat a problem than cure it.
In a free market system this wouldnt be an issue, as once a cure is found it will be the choice of consumers.
Yeah, medicine is a farce.
Not really, because it takes a coordinated worldwide assault to permanently put something down before it mutates and develops resistance.
Take malaria. We can treat malaria, but the problem is it becomes resistant to those treatments and even if we had a brand new drug and treated the entire planet with it right now it would come right back as mosquitos re-infected people. So we need to wipe out the mosquitoes that carry the bacteria too. Everywhere. And in a way they can't develop resistance to, which pretty much eliminates chemicals.
Can you imagine having to kill off an insect planet wide? Do you think the Taliban is going to cooperate?
$
pharmaca ( Latin) Noun pharmaca Inflection of pharmacum ( nominative plural) Inflection of pharmacum ( accusative plural) Inflection of pharmacum ( vocative plural) This is the meaning of pharmacum: pharmacum ( Latin) Origin & history Post-Augustan. From Ancient Greek φάρμακον ("a drug, charm, enchantment"), from φαρμακίς ("witch"). Pronunciation
Arguably the best post in a long time. This issue is right in front of God, us and everyone. Made me think of why I despise having to go to a doctor for anything or take medications for anything. I still have to [aspirin and such for an occasional headache] and some seltzer for an upset stomach, but that's about it.
As long as I’ve been alive.
Some forms of cancer get cured now. Typically they use dose adjusted Chemotherapy and monoclonal antibodies as the treatment.
It's because allopathy is a lie, top to bottom. How could they find any cures when they don't even know causes first?
Allopathy isn't a lie. It's simply the use of the scientific method to drive theories on treating disease. It's subject to the limits of what the scientific method can prove. Let me give an example.
The brain is a massive black box for us. Even with all the neurology research we've done, all of the fancy fMRI and PET scans and other crap we throw at the problem, we still don't understand a lot of how the brain works. We can't see inside the black box.
But we ARE careful observers of what goes in and what comes out of the black box. If you give a person cocaine, this is how the person responds. These are the changes we see in the scans. These are the nerve pathways that light up on fMRI. And if you repeat doses, the patient responds this way. If you give a person an SSRI we see their mood stabilizes, evens out, and the patient who previously had debilitating depression can now function.
The SSRI example was deliberate. For years we thought it was the serotonin that explained why they work. If we block the receptors that recover serotonin from the nerve synapse and let the serotonin signal stay on longer, it improves depression, therefore serotonin causes depression, right? That's logical. It's also wrong. See this paper if you're interested in the details. It turns out that as we carefully observe, there's substantial evidence that serotonin isn't what's causing what we see. The drug still works. We have decades of clinical evidence to show that. But we don't know why.
That doesn't mean that the allopathic approach to treating depression is a lie. It simply means we don't know as much as we think we do and we have to continue to ask intuitive questions, generate smart hypotheses, and conduct clever experiments to learn more.
Nope, allopathy is literally a deliberate, calculated deception. You can thank the Rockefeller's and their cohorts for the deception. Allopathy is literally wrong about everything. Not one cause of dis-ease is correct. Because dis-ease is not caused by germs, toxins, genetics, bad diet, poor exercise, cell mutations, etc. It's all nonsense lacking even a modicum of proof. It's even difficult for the allopathic researchers to even arrive at rough correlative studies.
Dis-ease is born in the mind due to unexpected events and situations in life that we cannot easily resolve - scares, frights, anger, losses, separations, self-devaluations, upsets, unsettling experiences, etc.. Every single one of them. Cancers, heart-disease, auto-immune disease, neurodegenerative disease, psychological disease, viral disease, etc. etc., borne in the mind and ultimately resolved in the mind. Matter follows mind. An unbreakable universal law.
Now, that being said, allopathy has concocted every imaginable pill and serum to bring about symptom suppression, pain relief, bacterial healing cessation, hormonal adjustments and brain chemistry alteration. On the surface, masking symptoms and altering chemical pathways can have the appearance of "healing", but this is never truly the case. The body/psyche does all the "healing".
I know why the serotonin gives the appearance of working - masking of increased estrogen levels. Check it out if you're a researcher Depression is caused by an unresolved double-conflict situation of which there are many. As is mania, also caused by a double-conflict situation where the order of conflicts strikes in opposite brain hemispheres depending on the gender, handedness and hormone levels of the individual. The second conflict determines whether the individual will be manic or depressive. And the "manic-depressive" is a person who temporarily resolves their second conflict only to slip back into it over and over again - a "hanging-healing" state.
The pharma drugs don't "fix" the situation - only the "appearance" of it. Depression or mania are both a purposeful biological program the psyche creates to assist the person with conflict resolution. Throwing pharma chemicals at what isn't really a "problem" from the perspective of nature only serves to exacerbate the core issues and potentially cause worse problems for the individual down the road. The fact that some people may "get better" while taking hormones/chemicals/pharma is merely coincidental. When this is the case, the person has simply resolved their active conflict.
And I wouldn't characterize the allopathic approach to treating depression as a "lie". It's undoubtedly a clever solution by those that have been taught to believe that "dis-ease" is something to be "gotten rid of" by any and all means necessary.
Herein lies the fatal flaw of allopathy, as the modality is profoundly incorrect right from the starting block. Based on that premise I would call allopathy's depression treatment brilliant, not a lie. But due to the fatally flawed fundamental premise of allopathy, all "treatments" for "dis-ease" demonstrate a complete lack of comprehension as to what "dis-ease" really is. Naturally, everything that follows this mistaken line of thinking must therefore also be in error.
What if "dis-ease" wasn't something to be "gotten rid of", but instead, was the evidence of a return to homeostasis following an unexpected life situation. If the patient were properly educated on the core causal factors of their depression, their understanding brings relief and a clear path to properly and permanently coming to terms with their active conflicts, and therefore, eliminating their depression.
All natural. As nature never makes a mistake. Our bodies are perfect machines. Our natural state is one of perfect health. Our cells don't "mutate". We don't have an "immune system" (TPTB just hijacked the lymphatic system in 1972) and therefore, our bodies do not "attack themselves". Nor do our bodies degenerate before the age of 120. These are all fallacies based on a mountain of lies that unfortunately, the overwhelming majority of our healthcare professionals have all been taught to believe. It's quite a mess and is going to take decades to unwind. But Covid has been a blessing in disguise, as many millions are now beginning to see dis-ease in a new light and starting to question the establishment.