Had a friend who ran social media for a country music singer for awhile. She was on the record label payroll. Occasionally he would text her something that he wanted her to tweet, but most of it was her. He had his own private account with an alias.

This is probably pretty standard practice. ie Pierre Delecto.

I had two temp bans RE: A Steven King comment. These were months apart, but almost instant. Someone is keeping a close watch on his account comments.

Tangentially, did anyone see the MSNBC interview Kerry gave on the oil and gas industry saying "there is no free pass here"? Heres the article from GWP:

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2023/04/theres-no-free-pass-here-john-kerry-puts-oil-and-gas-industry-on-notice-video/

Go to the article and look at the pics of him. Does that look like John Kerry to anyone? To me the hair is much too fine and the face much less craggy and lined. The pic on the homepage struck me immediately so I did an image search. Kerrys face is extremely craggy and lined and his hair is wiry. The photo has a smooth skinned individual and his hair is very fine.

Something to keep an eye on. Sorry to hijack your thread about twitter but your theory brought this to mind.

There's another theory floating on Twitter. There's a Block the Blue "movement" on the left to block anyone who has a blue check mark because they "bent the knee" and paid for the verification. So - Elon gave it to those three and then said "checkmate". Or so the theory goes.

https://mashable.com/article/block-the-blue-twitter-campaign-dril?taid=6444fa9f29be17000166aaa9&utm_campaign=trueAnthem%3A+Trending+Content&utm_medium=trueAnthem&utm_source=twitter

Shatner is based. I'm assuming he isn't part of the weirdo club.

You know, I was thinking this either last night or this morning, or something along these lines. Saw someone post that Hillary supposedly lost her blue checkmark (But I just checked, she still has it).

But with that thought in mind, I wondered if removing the blue checkmark from certain people was a signal that these people were taken out, or no longer exist or control their accounts for one reason or another.

And just to add, President Trump got his blue check mark back!

What if all their (celebs etc) info was exposed, I wonder what would turn up?

Could it be they don’t want blue check because they’d be verifying their identity and could be held liable and legally responsible (criminally?) for what they did bad in the past with account? If they never prove it is them through payment method, they could always claim it was someone else or someone else’s phone. Plausible deniability, right?

Interesting post.

Ironic. When I was briefly on Twitter, I had my own #blocktheblue campaign.

I blocked anyone with a blue wave, blue heart, or any other Democrat emoji.

Did the same with any trans/lgbtqrstuvwyxz emojis, Uke flags, or sunflowers (another Uke symbol) and any mainstream media or entertainment sites.

Took about a week, and Twitter became a pretty nice place to hang out.

I still decided it wasn't worth my time and left, but if you're going to hang out there, I highly recommend it. Nice thing, is when you click on one of these morons to block, Twitter will helpfully suggest a bunch of other similar morons for you to conveniently block as well.

Or he gave it to a bunch of celebs so he could give Trump his checkmark without them thinking he's biased (and working with Trump and the WHs)

So, Elon is paying for an author, an actor, and a sports figure to maintain their blue check. That covers a LOT of entertainment areas. And Elon offered no reason why those three. It does make you wonder their significance.

Okay...that makes perfect sense. It's like many famous authors who crank out like 5 books a year along with a "co author" listed below. The celebs are basically lending their name/cred while someone else posts woke garbage on their behalf. I've often wondered how someone who is a famous celeb has the time to tweet out stuff like crazy...and sure enough!

I bet Elon looked into it and saw a lot of the blue checks were ghost written accounts that had little to do with the person mentioned. So he changed it to make sure it really was the person named. LeBron, King, Shatner are probably legit so he let them keep their blue checks, but others he is forcing them to verify.

There is a theory that MATE is connected to JP Morgan 👉 https://markets.ft.com/data/investment-trust/tearsheet/summary?s=MATE:LSE

DON’T FORGET!

Q SPECIFICALLY ASKED US….

WHO GETS FIRST ACCESS TO ACCOUNTS LIKE

@GOD @SATAN ETC

Obviously accounts like this would be taken up immediately

Obviously they would take these accounts and reserve them from the public

Q specially mentioned @SATAN accounts and asks us WHO is really running it?

So we know an account like that wasn’t just picked up on a first come first serve basis, SO WHO CONTROLS IT AND WHY DO THEY MOCK GOD? WHY DO THEY NORMALIZE/HUMOUR SATAN?

MORE IMPORTANTLY

WHY DO THESE ACCOUNTS COME OUT IN POLITICAL LOCKSTEP W THE RADICAL LEFTIST AND SATANIST AGENDAS?

Wouldn’t be surprised to see someone like OBAMA at the head of @Satan just to mock us because they can.

Someone pull these posts up if they can I think it would be a big start.

Q told us to specifically dig into accounts w names that are reserved from first come first serve like GOD and SATAN…

It's all part of eliminating the infestation of bots on twitter.

What if A.I. is running the sccounts?

You have been "checked" ......mate!

Kobe Bryant, Norm Macdonald, Anthony Bourdain, Chadwick Boseman, and Michael Jackson were among the celebrities who each got a posthumous blue check added to their Twitter accounts as the site began to purge legacy verifications on Thursday, pivoting to only displaying the checks on the profiles who pay for the subscription service.

Norm's death wasn't suspicious, it was a long illness. Don't know about Chadwick Boseman's untimely demise. Kobe died in a helicopter accident, Anthony Bourdain was very likely taken out, and the same could be said for MJ.

u/#q2559

Wow mods! Thanks for the sticky!

Allow me to offer a slight variation of the theory.

1. It is not the celebs who run these accounts. Typically, they're the face of the celebrity's name and brand and a PR professional is employed to manage those social media accounts to promote their work and manage their image.

2. Twitter's previous verification process was opaque. No one really knew how you'd get it, but if you were a public figure, you wanted one and went through the effort to get one. This was sold as protecting your name and your brand from imposters and trolls who'd try to make similar-looking accounts to yours and destroy your reputation.

3. Not all Twitter checks were bad guys.

4. Twitter was clearly being run by assets of the intelligence community including many former high ranking officials from various US intel agencies who has access to everything, including DMs. We learned this from the Twitter files disclosures.

Let's start with these as a base premise.

Now, allow me to add some new information. 2-3 months ago, Laura Logan's Twitter account got exposed. Turns out the guy she trusted to run her social media persona was Mossad. He had worked her as an asset, fed her stuff both real and true in order to gain her trust, and then gained control over her social media account and was using it to manipulate her audience. What kind of audience? Us. The kind of people who know what Q is, who went down the rabbit hole, who are wide awake to the evils of the world, who understand spiritual warfare, and who are patriots and nationalists loyal to their own country. Naturally, since Mossad has its tentacles in everything including controlling politicians and public figures to get them to act in Israel's interest, these people are dangerous, and so must be massaged to maintain loyalty to Israel, often using religion. Anyway, they got Laura Logan's account and comped it.

Twitter didn't start out being a spy tool. It became one slowly as intel assets infiltrated the highest ranks of the company. Eventually, the Twitter check mark became a way to identify people who were "on the team." It wasn't exact, since they had to let some non-players in just for the sake of appearing to be fair, but for the most part, Twitter became a way for the WEF/Davos cultists to talk to each other and to push their collective message to the world. Ever notice how the Left always seem to be on-message, unified, even to the point of using the same language for everything? The thought leaders coordinated, and the Twitter check mark was a way of verifying you were "on the team." Like any "secret society," they worked out in the open, but used secret signals to identify one another. If you were ever in a frat or sorority, you'll recognize some of this. Twitter's "team players" used similar cues online. Which exactly? No idea. I'm not initiated, but I'm certain they existed.

Naturally, if you have this seal of authority that makes you look special, identifies you as "trustworthy", and which helps you identify friendlies and communicate, the last thing you want is a bunch of randos who paid $8 all getting check marks and making your job of identifying each other and coordinating harder. The spies running various celebrities and politicians around like sock puppets now had to be a lot more careful. Further, as far as their core mission of shaping public opinion goes, now they had to compete with all the popullst bloggers, "conspiracy theorists," independent journalists, and free thinkers who got to post opposing opinion with the same appearance of authority (the check mark). Elon just threw a ton of noise into a conversation and it has totally screwed up their mission and risked compromising their agents.

Comms AF

so deepstate can cgi actors, use realistic latex mask and have body doubles for all these people but cant fake a verification?

Apologies if I've missed something obvious, but this sentence stood out for me:

"Further, Why is Elon paying for Shatner, King and Lebron James to keep that check mark?"

Is there any sauce or explanation on this? I hadn't heard this and curious to hear how we know this.

This is a very interesting concept

Remember 3 years ago when David Rodriguez said there was a sting operation going on in Hollywood taking down the pedophilia child trafficking networks?

https://rumble.com/v21upf6-david-nino-rodriguez-first-video-exposing-hollywood-elite-pedophiles-and-hu.html

How come Hollywood stopped making movies with big name actors the last few years?

We have talked about Tom Hanks, rabbit hole evidence indicates he was arrested and yet the black hats try to make it appear he is still free.

Deepstate was trying to make it appear that the anons collecting evidence against Hollywood were spreading disinformation, labeling us conspiracy theorists.

Perhaps it was the white hats forcing some Hollywood pedophiles to put out videos from time to time, pushing disinformation to minimize the panic boiling over in Hollywood.

Remember the video Davis Spay did, "If anything happens to Tom Hanks"

Last few seconds here:

https://twitter.com/PillarHouseArt/status/1241424459267035137

I think OP is right, fake Twitter accounts having the blue check removed, these people may have been arrested for crimes against humanity. The twitter echo chamber of progressive Hollywood faces pushing the democrat socialist narrative is over.

Q post 19 says the CIA props up Hollywood assets to push Operation Mockingbird narrative.

u/#q2584

u/#q19

It could also be that celebs are just entitled dumb shits.

Apparently he gave dead people blue checks Anthony Bourdain is mention in this article

https://www.engadget.com/twitter-adds-blue-checks-to-accounts-of-dead-celebrities-223749275.html

Remember those long waits to be verified when someone joined Truth Social. Maybe the TS verification process is the same template being used at Twitter. So, there may be more to the “Truth Social” name itself. Truth Social being a bigger part to the global awakening process than we are aware of.