Or maybe she's pleading guilty so she can "help" the prosecution by poising their evidence. Then the Kraken will be unleashed, the feds will have their hands to full to pursue president Trump.
Powell admitted guilt to six misdemeanor counts of conspiracy to commit intentional interference with the performance of election duties. She was sentenced to six years probation and agreed to pay a $6,000 fine and $2,700 in restitution to the state of Georgia, turn over documents and testify truthfully in her co-defendants’ trials."
What documents? That's really what it's all about, I'm sure. If she testifies truthfully then it would be in Trump's favor. So it has to be all about the documents. Maybe she has stuff that they want to push into the trials. This would be a way to do it.
Probably all her emails, texts, communications for one.
She was subpoenaed by the grand jury but she didn't show up.
This is where she is mentioned in the GA indictment
Act33.
On or about the 6th day of December 2020, SIDNEY KATHERINE POWELL entered into a written engagement agreement with SullivanStrickler LLC....The unlawful breach of election equipment in Coffee County, Georgia, was subsequently performed under this agreement
There's a bunch of other stuff involving Coffee County including
making false statements and representations in a sworn deposition in 2022 to the Jan 6 Committee.
....then she is also mentioned here
Act90.
or about the 18th day of December 2020, DONALD JOHN TRUMP met with
RUDOLPH WILLIAM LOUIS GIULIANI, SIDNEY KATHERINE POWELL , unindicted co-conspirator Individual 20, whose identity is known to the Grand Jury, and others a tthe White House. The individuals present at the meeting discussed certain strategies and theories intended to influence the outcome of the November 3 , 2020 , presidential election, including seizing voting equipment
she plead guilty out of fear of the low % chance she is convicted and goes to prison. It is a calculated move. The govt are run by nazis so she took the easier route.
So in other words, she's NOT a woman of conviction willing to see the fight to the end.
How many other fickle soldiers are left? Who else wants to take the easy route and bow out?
I thought she was impressive, but now I see she's just another clueless, convictionless lawyer. You wanna know how things got to this point? Look no further than the character or rather lack thereof Sidney Powell.
Is this part of the "they want you disillusioned, blah blah blah"? Because honestly, it's not disillusioning me, it's pissing me off. Between her and Flynn, WTAF is going on?
Gray hat. She probably meant well and was given marching orders, decided not to follow and is probably suffering the consequences. Or she was never a part of the plan.
Either way, this move seems foolish overall. But it's done now.
As another anon said. Look at it this way. She can fight the case, and spend $500K for a 50/50 chance for a guilty verdict or take the $2,700.00 fine. It's a legal dirty trick for the prosecution to get a "guilty" plea. That will allow the headlines "Trump attorney pleads guilty." Lawfare at it's finest! All legal shit.
While I completely agree, and while everything you say is 100% true, I'm not sure I see that in this situation.
Sidney is simply making a business decision. Gamble $500k-$1m of a 50/50 guilty verdict or spend $2,700.00 on a sure thing. Not a hard decision.
BUT:
When she has to make the plea in court (I forget the name of this process) if I were her, I'd sure explain the blackmail that the prosecution is playing. I'd say that I do NOT enter this plea voluntarily, but rather that I was coerced and blackmailed by legal thuggery. But then again, that's the type of person I am.
People on the left have a strong tendency to favor collectivist ideals. They lack the ability to think for themselves, unlike individualists. It is in their nature to follow the herd, and stick together- it is no coincidence that people on the left are referred to as sheep by people on the right.
While this is true, Sidney is not a member of the politicians. She is an independent lawyer, not a staff or Trump lawyer. I'm confident she still supports and stands with Trump and MAGA. In this situation, (IMHO) she's making a business decision.
Thank you for the update.
People are making a big deal that she's testifying "against" Trump, when really she's just required to answer questions honestly. And if there were honestly no shenanigans, why are people suddenly labelling her a traitor?
I'm sure she didn't know the bigger picture Trump was playing. Trump needed the "pause" but he needed to at least show he was "trying" to contest the election. Sidney did the right thing, and she played her part perfectly. IMHO, her part is now complete. Same for Rudy, Linn, and others.
My explanation? I know multiple factions exist, and evil abhors sharing power.
There is also the element of chaos and disorder. two good options to keep things swhirlilng around so people cannot see what is really happening. A llittle power can go to weak minds very quickly.
Dems do not back Dems. They put on a good show, but Democrats are just as fickle as Republicans.
There's only one moral side to take in war and that is the side of freedom. Genuine, standing up for people's right to decide their lives for themselves, freedom.
IMHO, the following comment from TGP encapsulates what just happened:
The corrupt DA wasn't prepared to go to trial in the next couple days so she made Powell an offer she couldn't refuse. Willis plead 6 racketeering accounts down to nothing but a slap on the wrist, with a small fine. Who wouldn't take that deal?
You only plead 6 racketeering counts to nothing when you have NOTHING.
And Willis didn't want her charges to implode this early in the process.
Powell will never be called by Willis to testify.
Every lawyer knows that the court room is a stage that can be easily scripted. Avoiding it is always the best approach. This is why better than 90% of cases never go to court. It is going into the lion's den. It's brings a new level of uncertainty into the fold. The court venue, the judge, the jury, the media.... all of these can easily sabotage a defendant no matter how innocent they are.
I watched the lawyers argue in court for dismissal against Powell. It couldn't be any clearer by the evidence that she was innocent of these charges. This case had no standing. Yet, the judge wouldn't budge. When this occurs, it indicates a kangaroo proceeding. Look no further than the J6 defendants. Powell got a sweet deal here and she recognized the kangaroo court she was entering and took the deal. This was all political...... and the RINOs in Georgia were doing nothing to put an end to this charade.
I actually do the paid sub. It is my only news sub as all my other paid subs are to youtubers via patreon. Epoch Times (I think) actually writes very professional stories but if you think otherwise I‘d honestly like to hear.
True, I hate pay walls and I wouldn’t either.
But that wasn‘t my question, so if you ever read them I‘m curious about what you think. Judging by the upvotes I think most here like their article (and don‘t like posting of pay walled articles.)
This is why Flynn’s statements that we must save America ourselves is complete buffoonery prior to a larger entity fixing our country at a basic level first. She’s a famous lawyer and got destroyed. We have absolutely no chance during the infiltration. Love you Flynn but sorry, not sorry.
If anyone recalls the various interviews given with Sidney Powell going back to early 2021, you'll remember that she began to walk back her claims 2 and a half years ago post-inauguration.
I seem to remember her saying President Trump quit or gave up. It was right after her, Flynn, and Byrne managed to get an audience with POTUS in mid December 2020.
You are at least partially correct. In an early 2021 interview with Dinesh Dsouza (she did a few interviews) she stated that Trump did not do everything he could have and did not utilize all of the legal paths that he could have followed and even went on to say that he was derelict of his duties to defend this nation from enemies foreign and domestic. She also said, either in the same interview or another, that the "release the Kraken" phrase she used on TV was something she had to come up with quickly as she had no idea that she would ever be put on TV, and also that she did not have any authority to conduct or be involved with military tribunals as some were suggesting at the time over 2 and a half years ago. That's what I remember watching. This was during a time where I was watching every press conference and interview that I could. By now I don't listen to anyone at all!
I'm sure she didn't know the bigger picture Trump was playing. Trump needed the "pause" but he needed to at least show he was "trying" to contest the election. Sidney did the right thing, and she played her part perfectly. IMHO, her part is now complete. Same for Rudy, Linn, and others.
Theyre going to use cases like these to reinforce their case that Trump was the leader of the criminal conspiracy that she just falsely admitted guilt to being involved in.
Living in The United States and breathing is a criminal conspiracy. {climate change or just voting legally, like in person with a pencil, on a paper ballot. Just saying
I’ll admit that I am no where smart enough to keep track of everything that seems to be fast tracking.. the only thing I have faith in is God… and whatever His plan is…I respect Powell, I respect GMF, I hugely admire everyone in here that brings different perspectives and angles… it brings hope and enthusiasm
That picture is from when Powell, Ellis, Giuliani, etc comprised Trump's "Elite Strike Force Team" and would regularly meet and hold conferences together. Circa November 2020.
SO when she testifies, what happens when she references Documents not presented as evidence by the prosecution? Documents she has first hand knowledge of and Documents she can produce? Prosecution Objects, she replies its in the letter from X to Y dated January X, XXXX. Defense (Not hers) UH, we dont have that document your honor. What if all the people they dragged into this cut deals and they think they have Trump by the balls, they exonerate Trump, they Exonerate themselves. Sun Tzu at its best.
Now, she has agreed to tell the truth in questions that will be asked going forward. And she pled guilty to “interfering” in something she felt was wrong! Think about it! She can totally derail the prosecution now by being truthful to her yes and no answers based on her actions and how she felt or interpreted the law! She’s an attorney! They want her to TELL THE Truth! How do you present evidence under oath to the courts?! She can actually damage the prosecution by putting her on the stand. And you all know they won’t use her until they get to Trump himself or the people charged directly under him.
I could be wrong and she’s a black hat, but we all know how things can turn out when you try to Kill A Mockingbird.
She's guilty of not wanting to spend the rest of her life in jail. Fascist lawfare at it's finest.
Or guilty of wanting to introduce evidence legally....
Then she shouldn't have pled guilty...
She's a lawyer, I'm sure she knows what she is doing
Thats a mistake
Sincerely,
A lawyer
No kidding wtf , let’s finish off the disgrace with more so called proof that we did something wrong
Muh KrAcKeN!
Lets hope. This is getting way past ridiculous.
I suspect precisely that!
Or maybe she's pleading guilty so she can "help" the prosecution by poising their evidence. Then the Kraken will be unleashed, the feds will have their hands to full to pursue president Trump.
...two hands too full to pursue 😅
Possibly. Phil Waldron was the Kraken.
From numerous felonies to one misdemeanor. This is so rotten.
Fulton County prosecutors drop all 7 felony charges against Sidney Powell - in exchange for a misdemeanor plea.
Its a bait and trap. Now headlines can scream "She plead guilty!". They always do this and people fall for it every time.
She got a deal because she is going to testify
From your keys to God's ears.
What documents? That's really what it's all about, I'm sure. If she testifies truthfully then it would be in Trump's favor. So it has to be all about the documents. Maybe she has stuff that they want to push into the trials. This would be a way to do it.
Probably all her emails, texts, communications for one.
She was subpoenaed by the grand jury but she didn't show up.
This is where she is mentioned in the GA indictment
Act33. On or about the 6th day of December 2020, SIDNEY KATHERINE POWELL entered into a written engagement agreement with SullivanStrickler LLC....The unlawful breach of election equipment in Coffee County, Georgia, was subsequently performed under this agreement
There's a bunch of other stuff involving Coffee County including
making false statements and representations in a sworn deposition in 2022 to the Jan 6 Committee.
....then she is also mentioned here
Act90. or about the 18th day of December 2020, DONALD JOHN TRUMP met with RUDOLPH WILLIAM LOUIS GIULIANI, SIDNEY KATHERINE POWELL , unindicted co-conspirator Individual 20, whose identity is known to the Grand Jury, and others a tthe White House. The individuals present at the meeting discussed certain strategies and theories intended to influence the outcome of the November 3 , 2020 , presidential election, including seizing voting equipment
But she did plead guilty. She's a lawyer, are you accusing her of legal incompetence?
she plead guilty out of fear of the low % chance she is convicted and goes to prison. It is a calculated move. The govt are run by nazis so she took the easier route.
So in other words, she's NOT a woman of conviction willing to see the fight to the end.
How many other fickle soldiers are left? Who else wants to take the easy route and bow out?
I thought she was impressive, but now I see she's just another clueless, convictionless lawyer. You wanna know how things got to this point? Look no further than the character or rather lack thereof Sidney Powell.
Is this part of the "they want you disillusioned, blah blah blah"? Because honestly, it's not disillusioning me, it's pissing me off. Between her and Flynn, WTAF is going on?
Maybe Trump promised pardons? Maybe it was all part of the movie to keep even US distracted? Maybe it is all part of it... idk.
Exactly. This makes no sense. It's annoying. What is left to be done to finish the job at this point?
agree, age ia showing great weakness. Unless the plan calls for her to do this in order for them to convict Trump, ushering in the military.
But I am thinking she is either a weak opportunist or a black hat.
Gray hat. She probably meant well and was given marching orders, decided not to follow and is probably suffering the consequences. Or she was never a part of the plan.
Either way, this move seems foolish overall. But it's done now.
Historically, there are few women of conviction willing to see the fight to the end. That is why women shouldn't lead.
Yep. She took the deal vs jail.
As another anon said. Look at it this way. She can fight the case, and spend $500K for a 50/50 chance for a guilty verdict or take the $2,700.00 fine. It's a legal dirty trick for the prosecution to get a "guilty" plea. That will allow the headlines "Trump attorney pleads guilty." Lawfare at it's finest! All legal shit.
Not only that, but something we have NOT learned, is to stick together.
Dems back dems back dems back dems. Stay in lock step and NEVER back down. Except for the sacrificial lambs, of course.
What do we do? One whiff of a contrary opinion and they are dropped in the cold. Not in the plan? Dropped. Fend for your self.
Not always done this way, but often enough, it sucks.
While I completely agree, and while everything you say is 100% true, I'm not sure I see that in this situation.
Sidney is simply making a business decision. Gamble $500k-$1m of a 50/50 guilty verdict or spend $2,700.00 on a sure thing. Not a hard decision.
BUT: When she has to make the plea in court (I forget the name of this process) if I were her, I'd sure explain the blackmail that the prosecution is playing. I'd say that I do NOT enter this plea voluntarily, but rather that I was coerced and blackmailed by legal thuggery. But then again, that's the type of person I am.
I agree with you and that is great clarification. Thank you.
That would most certainly violate the terms of her deal.
People on the left have a strong tendency to favor collectivist ideals. They lack the ability to think for themselves, unlike individualists. It is in their nature to follow the herd, and stick together- it is no coincidence that people on the left are referred to as sheep by people on the right.
What about rfk Jr? The squad? Dems saying Biden is too old?
While this is true, Sidney is not a member of the politicians. She is an independent lawyer, not a staff or Trump lawyer. I'm confident she still supports and stands with Trump and MAGA. In this situation, (IMHO) she's making a business decision. Thank you for the update.
I'm with you on this.
People are making a big deal that she's testifying "against" Trump, when really she's just required to answer questions honestly. And if there were honestly no shenanigans, why are people suddenly labelling her a traitor?
I'm sure she didn't know the bigger picture Trump was playing. Trump needed the "pause" but he needed to at least show he was "trying" to contest the election. Sidney did the right thing, and she played her part perfectly. IMHO, her part is now complete. Same for Rudy, Linn, and others.
I'm not sure I understand how this is relevant to this topic.
I updated my comment to clarify which part I was responding to
My explanation? I know multiple factions exist, and evil abhors sharing power.
There is also the element of chaos and disorder. two good options to keep things swhirlilng around so people cannot see what is really happening. A llittle power can go to weak minds very quickly.
Dems do not back Dems. They put on a good show, but Democrats are just as fickle as Republicans.
There's only one moral side to take in war and that is the side of freedom. Genuine, standing up for people's right to decide their lives for themselves, freedom.
Why is it 50/50 if she's innocent?
Well, actually no, it's 50/50 the jury would deliver a fair and honest verdict; not 50/50 that she's guilty of anything other and being a patriot.
In a kangaroo court, perhaps this is the only way out.
Agreed, and there-in is why she took the path she did. This is a kangaroo court and she knows it! More like cut bait and run!
There are two women in this post picture. I am not sure if Powell is a white or black hat, I suspect white.
However, I feel quite certain that the DeSantis boot licker (Jenna Ellis) in the background is pure RINO, deep state, uni-party trash.
I can only look at her if I am forced to.
u/#FactChecked
Is she a black hat, setting the stage to make Trump look guilty of something?
Also, I am totally demoralized.
Stop reading headlines. Start reading content.
Lin Wood warned she's a black hat. Maybe he was right
Be careful with what Lin Wood says, fren. Seems like recently, some of it is turning out to be the opposite
Disagree. Lin is accurate as heck. I love his thinking and ideas
Agree Speakfree
IMHO, the following comment from TGP encapsulates what just happened:
Every lawyer knows that the court room is a stage that can be easily scripted. Avoiding it is always the best approach. This is why better than 90% of cases never go to court. It is going into the lion's den. It's brings a new level of uncertainty into the fold. The court venue, the judge, the jury, the media.... all of these can easily sabotage a defendant no matter how innocent they are.
I watched the lawyers argue in court for dismissal against Powell. It couldn't be any clearer by the evidence that she was innocent of these charges. This case had no standing. Yet, the judge wouldn't budge. When this occurs, it indicates a kangaroo proceeding. Look no further than the J6 defendants. Powell got a sweet deal here and she recognized the kangaroo court she was entering and took the deal. This was all political...... and the RINOs in Georgia were doing nothing to put an end to this charade.
Reasonable explanation and makes sense. Thank you for sharing!
Isn't there going to be Trial in a couple of days
She and Ken Cheesebro were going to trial together. I think he's still having his trial......yeah jury selection is tomorrow and the trial is Monday
I'm not giving Epoch Times my email in order to read this story.
I actually do the paid sub. It is my only news sub as all my other paid subs are to youtubers via patreon. Epoch Times (I think) actually writes very professional stories but if you think otherwise I‘d honestly like to hear.
I would never post anything that others would have to either pay or give their private info to see. Period.
True, I hate pay walls and I wouldn’t either. But that wasn‘t my question, so if you ever read them I‘m curious about what you think. Judging by the upvotes I think most here like their article (and don‘t like posting of pay walled articles.)
I ignored your question rather than tell you why I don't buy a particular news source is none of your business. Nor is why do any of mine.
Grump.
LOL Get lost child.
I wish you lots of LOVE.
https://www.theepochtimes.com./us/sidney-powell-pleads-guilty-in-fulton-county-election-case-5513297
(Adding a "." to the end of their domain, bypasses the paywall/signup)
Read details here:
https://share.newsbreak.com/570wynf5
Fine, don’t support the only newspaper that’s on our side! You’re a warrior.
Questioning an election is now a crime, officially a 3rd world nation
THIS
This is why Flynn’s statements that we must save America ourselves is complete buffoonery prior to a larger entity fixing our country at a basic level first. She’s a famous lawyer and got destroyed. We have absolutely no chance during the infiltration. Love you Flynn but sorry, not sorry.
whats this "larger entity" that you think is coming?
Flynn wants the common folk to put our heads in the communist rigged lawfare chopping block.
If anyone recalls the various interviews given with Sidney Powell going back to early 2021, you'll remember that she began to walk back her claims 2 and a half years ago post-inauguration.
I seem to remember her saying President Trump quit or gave up. It was right after her, Flynn, and Byrne managed to get an audience with POTUS in mid December 2020.
Am I remembering that right?
You are at least partially correct. In an early 2021 interview with Dinesh Dsouza (she did a few interviews) she stated that Trump did not do everything he could have and did not utilize all of the legal paths that he could have followed and even went on to say that he was derelict of his duties to defend this nation from enemies foreign and domestic. She also said, either in the same interview or another, that the "release the Kraken" phrase she used on TV was something she had to come up with quickly as she had no idea that she would ever be put on TV, and also that she did not have any authority to conduct or be involved with military tribunals as some were suggesting at the time over 2 and a half years ago. That's what I remember watching. This was during a time where I was watching every press conference and interview that I could. By now I don't listen to anyone at all!
I'm sure she didn't know the bigger picture Trump was playing. Trump needed the "pause" but he needed to at least show he was "trying" to contest the election. Sidney did the right thing, and she played her part perfectly. IMHO, her part is now complete. Same for Rudy, Linn, and others.
The claims she got from the psychic who was speaking to a headless ghost?
I do not recall that one.
It came up in the fox lawsuit. A memo that Powell brought up with Bartiromo.
Correction that she was in fact a time traveller, and alleged ghost.
oh jeez.
Who cares?
Nothing can stop what's coming.
Nothing.
"But--"
What part of NOTHING did you not understand?
” she has until 12 months from Oct. 19 to file a habeas corpus and until Nov. 5 to withdraw her guilty plea”
Release the kraken indeed.
Theyre going to use cases like these to reinforce their case that Trump was the leader of the criminal conspiracy that she just falsely admitted guilt to being involved in.
Lawfare got the headline they wanted: Sydney Powell pleads guilty.
They win.
Living in The United States and breathing is a criminal conspiracy. {climate change or just voting legally, like in person with a pencil, on a paper ballot. Just saying
I’ll admit that I am no where smart enough to keep track of everything that seems to be fast tracking.. the only thing I have faith in is God… and whatever His plan is…I respect Powell, I respect GMF, I hugely admire everyone in here that brings different perspectives and angles… it brings hope and enthusiasm
Guilty of the First Amendment!
Call me crazy, frens, but I thin Powell, a Durham native is part of the Q plan: https://www.cbs17.com/news/national-news/sidney-powell-pleads-guilty-over-efforts-to-overturn-trump-loss-in-georgia/
I remember the constant spam about releasing the kraken with this moron lmao.
Why Is Jenna Ellis behind her ?? Anyone No ? Is this scum one of powells attorneys ?
That picture is from when Powell, Ellis, Giuliani, etc comprised Trump's "Elite Strike Force Team" and would regularly meet and hold conferences together. Circa November 2020.
Specifically, the picture seems to be from a press conference at the RNC headquarters, Nov 19 2020: https://www.youtube.com/live/sq7TeUJwQD4?si=hkm_M2-hdy1EdBs2
No, Giuliani, Ellis, and Powell were working for/with Trump.
SO when she testifies, what happens when she references Documents not presented as evidence by the prosecution? Documents she has first hand knowledge of and Documents she can produce? Prosecution Objects, she replies its in the letter from X to Y dated January X, XXXX. Defense (Not hers) UH, we dont have that document your honor. What if all the people they dragged into this cut deals and they think they have Trump by the balls, they exonerate Trump, they Exonerate themselves. Sun Tzu at its best.
She's going to give evidence against Trump. Any other explanation is wishful thinking. I suspect that one by one they all will
Court of a bankrupt corporation. Now she can do damage to deep state!!
Ask that bitch, she's the lawyer that sold her client out.
If, and a big IF at that, she makes it to the stand, I'd like to reiterate, we're watching a movie.
Whatever happened to the Kraken, or the Fauci files for that matter?
PATRIOT
Didn't Teump say she's not with his organization at all? Maybe she was always meant to be a plant.
She was officially one of his lawyers after the election.
Now, she has agreed to tell the truth in questions that will be asked going forward. And she pled guilty to “interfering” in something she felt was wrong! Think about it! She can totally derail the prosecution now by being truthful to her yes and no answers based on her actions and how she felt or interpreted the law! She’s an attorney! They want her to TELL THE Truth! How do you present evidence under oath to the courts?! She can actually damage the prosecution by putting her on the stand. And you all know they won’t use her until they get to Trump himself or the people charged directly under him.
I could be wrong and she’s a black hat, but we all know how things can turn out when you try to Kill A Mockingbird.