They are trying to push this shit it in our schools. They use Hollywood to set the example. The complete Satanic picture is forming itself.
(media.greatawakening.win)
🤢 These people are sick! 🤮
So sad for the kids...they don't understand what is being done to them. These people are SO sick!
Deep down they must feel that their parents hate them and wanted the opposite sex instead.
This^. It's a form of rejection and obviously abuse. Business associate has a sister who is gay and "married." She's very butch. Her adopted daughter supposedly wants to be a boy. It's because she wants her moms to like and approve of her. It's so very sad.
And that's grooming.
(((bankers)))
Ae Any of these kids their own blood?
Setti g them.up for ritualistic abuse.
I’m researching & will update as find out more. I’m certain Angelina Jolie & Brad Pitt’s children are adopted. They split up a few years ago. I’m wondering if Brad had enough of her ideas. We will never know about these crazy people. Honestly I don’t care either way about celebrities. It’s human nature to be curious.
Stefani’s children are biologically hers. https://www.madeformums.com/news/gwen-stefani-gavin-rossdale-and-children-family-facts/
Megan Fox children are biological. https://www.educationandcareernews.com/early-childhood-education/actress-megan-fox-on-gender-neutral-children-let-them-be-who-they-are/amp/
Jim Crenshaw has a great video about Satantic Hollywood on Bitchute. Sorry no link. Anyway, I highly recommend — it details how gross and demented these freaks are. It’s only about 20 minutes.
Angelina and Brad’s daughter, Shiloh, is biological, I think if I remember correctly.
Brad’s in the cult too as is his uglier-than-sin ex-wife, Jennifer Anniston. (I mean, seriously, how’d that thing become famous?) They are ALL in it. There is a major price to pay to become rich and famous. One doesn’t become a famous actor just based on their talent and good looks. It does not work that way. They have to join the cult.
Some most likely are.
The slippery slope is more like a vertical line.
Personally, I get the feeling these celebrities do it to get the cabal off their backs so they can live in peace plus get awarded acting jobs.
Not all, I'm sure many truly believe this nonsense.
Regardless, what a life to have, be totally subservant yet live like millionaires.
I call cap on that bro. Nancy continues doing that job regardless of being in her 80s because when you're the slave master, you don't want anyone potentially trying to free your slaves when you aren't around.
No one (except a honest to goodness person) hands over power willingly.
Once a corrupt person gets a taste of power, control, riches, success, they’re hooked. And the will do anything to keep grasp on it until death pries it from their cold hands.
Precisely my fren. Sounds like you understand power dynamics.
I personally have experienced what it felt like to have tremendous social influence over others during my 4 years of being Rush chair and Vice President of my fraternity (in my last 2 years).
It was absolutely invigorating to have so many people constantly fawning over me in hopes of gaining favor with me so I could like them enough to come to our exclusive outings and house parties where we were infamous for a 2:1 girl to guy ratio.
I always empathized with Trumps leaked recording where he's heard to say, "When you're famous. Women let you do anything. You can grab them by the pussy". He was absolutely right.
And living that way for those years definitely reinforced some bad habits with me and I've consequently struggled to ever trust a woman enough to pursue a monogamous relationship.
For after experiencing so many women betray other guys to flirt and sleep with so many of my fraternity brothers and I, it's become impossible to ever trust that a woman wouldn't ever do the same thing to me one day.
Unfortunately all that power and influence I had was designed to be short lived and its since dissipated and forced me back down to reality.
But if I had a choice, I honestly don't see why I would have ever willingly decided to give up that power. And I'm fortunately not a sociopath.
They could have chosen to quit.
This guy or gal gets it^
Your agent will put you in a Baldwin flick.
Kek
Hillary Clinton has entered the chat
LOL I fucking love watching that.
I am not so sure they can quit once they start…… maybe they can, but they risk being suicided…..
Once you sign that deal with the devil, your life and soul are no longer yours.
no they risk being attacked by the media for a made up things and losing their status as a superstar/millionaire. They just try to mock you out of popularity like they did with Schneider and Gibson. So if you "exit stage left" the correct way, you can still have a social life such as they still do.
It's when you start crossing them. That's when the doorknob suicides and baseball bat suicides start happening. Helicopter crashes. The issue for most celebs is the extra work and humility required to "exit stage left". That's why they're still pieces of shit. Someone like Britney Spears? Not a piece of shit.
No life at all to be so lost no matter how much $$$ or success you have.
“these celebrities do it to get the cabal off their backs so they can live in peace plus get awarded acting jobs.”
That’s called selling out, and it’s worse than giving in to being bullied or blackmailed. Especially when they’re selling their kids out.
Selling out and selling their souls.
They should not be allowed to raise children. Really. They are fucking these kids up!
If you don't trust the meme, here are links that verify.
Naomi Watts son: https://ecelebritymirror.com/samuel-kai-schreiber-naomi-watts-son-liev-schreiber/
Charlize Theron son: https://glamourpath.com/jackson-theron
Adele's son: https://mumslounge.com.au/lifestyle/celebrities/adele-cancels-pyrotechnics-concerts-following-accident-involving-son/
Megan Fox son's: (Plural) https://www.lifeandstylemag.com/posts/megan-fox-kids-131393/
Gwen Staefani son: https://www.popsugar.com/celebrity/photo-gallery/31910609/image/31910630/Gwen-Stefani-walked-her-son-Kingston
Angelina Jolie's daughter: https://advocatehealthyu.com/kids-health/how-angelina-jolies-daughter-shiloh-celebrated-her-13th-birthday/
If they are willing to do this to their own children, you think they would hesitate to pass their children around to be used as sex toys? I have read from multiple sources, its common practice in Hollywood.
Nice work, you are a good man, and thorough.
Like Maude's doctor on the Big Lebowski/
I'd expect some children growing up to speak out. Macaulay Culkin at least had that "Pizza Underground" band phase where he made a music video with pizza slices as masks and pizza hanging from the ceiling and all sorts of major clues at least.
Will Smith's son does seem like he is fucked in the head which is some sort of clue, but there are so many more. I know child actors have high drug usage/suicide rates so there is evidence, but not a preponderance to make the jump to "it's common for celebrities to pass around their children as sex toys."
Yeah, your mom cheats 9n your dad with your goofy ass friend, your dad probably sold you around which caused you to lose your sanity, etc.
Sadly, I believe that many of them do pimp out their children. They break the kids by sodomizing them when they are very young—that helps split their minds. It’s a form of Satanic Ritual Abuse and helps initiate mind control (MKULTRA).
I have no doubt that goes down, just not sure about everyone passing their around like that.
Some Luciferian victims who have spoken up say they were buried alive in a box with bugs or snakes and left there for several hours or overnight to terrorize them into never speaking out, or they witnessed another child being tortured and murdered in front of them, or they were locked in a dark cage for a few days with only a puppy for comfort and when they were finally released, their captors killed the puppy. They know the kind of people who will come after them if they speak out as adults. And who will protect them if they do? The Luciferian cops, judges, politicians?
If they are raised in the Luciferian religion, they are brainwashed from early childhood to believe raping, torturing, terrorizing, and brainwashing children in the service of the cult is the right thing to do. It gives them an edge over people without occult knowledge and makes them stronger in forwarding the cult's mission of total world domination.
You mean coitus?
I mean VAGINA !
Liev Schreiber/Naomi Watts.
https://youtu.be/LqK8_yDJvwI
Your above link is down for me.
Must have been recently deleted... Google Web Cache has it https://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:https://ecelebritymirror.com/samuel-kai-schreiber-naomi-watts-son-liev-schreiber/
Also the linked article can be found on Daily Mail and People Magazine, e.g.:
https://people.com/parents/naomi-watts-celebrates-darling-kai-13th-birthday-you-shine-the-brightest-light/
That's downright fucking disgusting. And he clearly isn't happy.
Saving this! ThanQ! Deranged women who do not deserve to be mothers. Yes, I do believe they pimp out their kids too. Anything goes with this crew — the more depraved the more they are celebrated.
My issue with posts like this and your claims is... Where is your evidence? While I am aware of the implications of everything going on, it is irrational to assume what is going on here. Some of these kids could be wearing what they want. I myself played dress-up as a kid and knew others that did. Just cause a boy is dressed like a girl does not automatically mean hormone therapy. And while I agree such things are child abuse, I find the presentation of this post and the obsessiveness over other people's kids a tad creepy.
It's one thing to care, but it feels like circulating these kid's pictures and info on their personal lives is going too far. One minute someone on here is screeching about personal privacy and the next minute we're doxing children...
And as to your last statement, again, do you have a source to those claims?
What is the definition of doxing? According to Wikipedia, "Doxing or doxxing is the act of publicly revealing previously private personal information about an individual or organization, usually via the internet."
All of these images came from the internet, so I did not reveal previous private information, it was all open source.
I saw a meme the other day, I will paraphrase. "The look you give someone after doing 30 years of research and they ask you for a specific government website to substantiate your claims."
You can start here, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Uq88lnhuVxw
Just because they are parents doesn’t absolve them of perverting their children. Jesus pronounced their judgement 2,000 years ago...
Mt.18:6 but whoever causes one of these little ones who believe in me to sin, it would be better for him to have a great millstone fastened around his neck and to be drowned in the depth of the sea.
In the beginning God created them male and female, they mock Him because they worship Lucifer
Is it wrong for me to want to be the one tying the millstones around [their] necks?
As a survivor of pedo attacks, it makes my blood boil to see or hear about this shit.
We think Jesus is all about love, but He is also infuriated by evil acts forced on the powerless, women and children making up the majority of sex slaves. Trump, Q, white hats, military worldwide is all about saving the children from all the multiple ways conceived by the Luciferian Cabalist to damage them. Disney grooming, Lib teachers, school boards and teacher unions LBGTQ agenda, politicians of both parties arrested for pedophilia is just the beginning. Be encouraged...we are all in this together. It is a worthy fight. Q said we anons were chosen for a purpose, that includes you. You’ve gone through hell and the Lord may use you to help people to understand how real this hell is. I understand your rage. I wish to God you did not have to suffer it. Let the Lord continually restore you so that you can offer hope to others,
Jesus was the apex of “toxic masculinity” (tm)
He was not limp wristed, he was a buff carpenter who whipped the shit out of all the money changers in the temple. He cursed the tree that bore no fruit. Mentioned that if anything doesn’t bear fruit or bears evil fruit will be thrown in the fires.
He was not a pacifist. He told his followers to buy swords. The only time he softens is when to teach or to reach a particular individual that he sees good in that only God can see. Otherwise he’s condemning people left and right in the Bible though no always explicit and even sometimes through parables.
I think He was trying warn the nation as a whole not to reject Him as the long foretold Messiah. Condemnation would come after they knowingly rejected Him.
“He came unto His own, and His own received Him not, but as many as received Him, to them He gave the right to become sons of God, to as many as believed on His Name”. Jn. 1:11, 12
SuckaFree — I am so sorry that you endured pedo attacks. That, my fren, makes my blood boil!
This is known as "sacrifice in effigy". Meaning the life of your firstborn son, real or in effigy, must be made to guarantee your loyalty to Moloch, aka the Hollywood machine.
That is why you actually see relief when actresses have daughters as firstborn. The motherly draw is too real. But their obligations are too big to ignore.
So to groom your son into being a girl is to sacrifice the male in them to Moloch. That is the payment for future success.
This must be why John Travolta's kid died in the Bahama's.
Interesting—did not know that! Wow!
These people are fucked in the head.
You are not wrong
In these families, they start doing this at a young age because it is easier to make the transition. Many adult trans actors/actresses. It's just out in the open now, and they are coming after our children.
Dunno who would down vote this. I'll help reversing that.
appreciated
Look into The Club posted by CDAN. It's how you move up the ladder.
where I find this?
https://www.crazydaysandnights.net/2019/04/todays-blind-items-club.html?m=1
I'm still on the fence about Tom Hank's "Sister" too
He's the grossest looking one I've seen yet. Ugh.
Was just thinking... it makes sense (biological, scientific sense) that the children of wealthy entertainers and the mega rich in general would spawn gender dysphorific (nice word huh?) offspring at a much higher rate than others. The extreme wealth removes them from the natural world of biological competition. This removal breeds a culture that begins to prize this unnatural state as superior and encourages deviance ( to deviate from the norm) and praises it as moral.
Maybe they bought into the Satanic order and they are sacrificing one child. One family member supposedly has to be sacrificed ….Maybe sacrifice does not mean death.
That's right. Actually becoming "transgender" through surgery is a form of human sacrifice. The old identity is physically mutilated to the point where it's impossible to go back to it. They'll even tell you that that original person is dead and will freak out if you call them by their "dead name."
Transgender = human sacrifice
I suspect these people are either (((World Economic Forum Young Leaders))) or being bribed or extorted by the same Santa Inc. elvish monsters who control the Hollywood and the New World Order / vaccine cull / Great Reset.
I wonder if they were warned their careers, Champaign and limousines would end if they didn't sacrifice their children to Moloch / (((Klaus Schwab))).
Watch yourself, goyim!
We see how many jew trannies are involved in Hollywood and these pharmacy corps so it doesnt surprise me really. Instead of becoming trans themselves these actors can make their kids do it to please their satanic cult masters.
My best friend from High School is letting her son dress like a girl, in public now. I’m so appalled, I don’t even know how to approach her at all or if I should just ghost her as a friend. She’s told me before she’s worried about him and as friends we asked her if she believes there’s a biological difference between boys and girls and she says yes. She wants to instill in him he’s a boy. But she gives him the freedom to have long hair, wear ribbons braided into it, unicorn headbands and now most recently he wore a light pink tunic over flowery leggings to a wedding. She thinks she’s letting him express himself. She’s given him Barbie houses for his 4th bday that he wanted, girl toys whenever he asks. She’s reinforcing it and because she doesn’t have a girl, all boys, I think she secretly loves it. I pray for them, she’s not religious or anything. But that poor boy is going to have life long mental health issues from it. How can you be happy with who you are if you think you were born in the wrong body? He may not think it now, but one day he’s going to. It’s different for boys to dress like girls. For girls to dress like boys it’s not really a huge leap. Girl clothes are pants and shirts too. So all a girl has to do is change the color of the clothes and now they’re Tom Boy. Boys have to leap to be girls. Wear dresses and accessories that boys would never wear. My heart breaks for this child. And for my brain dead friend that I apparently have NOTHING in common with anymore.
I grew my hair long as a teenager, but I'm a metal head so that's only natural. Had it cut off when I was 19, still miss it from time to time. These are my people.
Yeah there was nothing wrong with having long hair as a young man as long as you're still masculine. I already had a beard in my early teens, nobody mistook me for a chick. The only reason I got rid of my hair was because I started going bald in my early 30's so I skipped the the end and shave my head.
Nothing wrong with that. I think my husband looks better as a bald guy. He’s been shaving over ten years. Certainly better than a horseshoe hair ring🤣
I’m a 55 year old female & I’ve always thought some guys look better with long lair. Having long hair doesn’t make you gay or trans. Look at world history in many time periods it was considered normal for a man to have long hair.
It's normal today too.
I don’t think long hair on boys, male teens or men is feminine. It’s the French braiding it with pink ribbons and pink barrets that’s girly. I used to always have a thing for the long haired musician myself. But what I’m taking about is definitely girly.
It sounds like your friend let the groomers in the kid's school indoctrinate her child. As a parent she's supposed to be protecting her kid, not letting him be led into the deviant, twisted BS these beasts try to pass off as "tolerance".
Too many parents nowadays want to be their child's friend and not their parent. It takes more work to be an actual parent, to say "No." and to work with the kid to make them understand. Just a shame. Their kid suffers while they just thrash around looking for sympathy and gleaning virtue-signaling points from equally weak-minded friends. You're not one of those - tell her she's damaging her child. Here's a suggestion - if you see the two of them, ask the kid, infront of your friend, if his teachers at school told him it was okay to dress like a girl. Maybe he saw Will Smith's son do it or one of the other sick pedowood children.
Since you have nothing in common with her, if she ends the friendship, so be it. I recently told a long-time friend that I am not about to call a tranny we knew from many years ago "She", that he's got mental illness and that it does nobody any good - least of all the poor soul (who is likely reacting to trauma) - to be pretending along with him. If my friend wants to end our friendship because I won't participate in the degradation of this individual, so be it.
It could be part of their deal with Satan. They must turn what God has made upside down.
In a normal world, these parents would be prosecuted for child abuse. So disgusting. These kids will be on a suicide watch when they get a little bit older. These people are nothing more than sick.
In many countries the parents would be executed!
It's an abomination to the Holy Spirit; the author of Nature's Law.
From the Greek, the Holy Spirit is defined. And there is so much more of a better understanding of what the 'Holy Spirit' is contrasted to what we are being taught. Even our religious faith is based on Nature's Laws. If indeed, the Holy Spirit is the author of Nature's Laws, we as a people are interminably governed by them. They are keystone to all of life on Earth and is a great responsibility to maintain the immutable order set forth by the Creator. I refer to the Greek for the following reason.
The oldest Bible of the Old Testament in existence is the Greek Septuagint. The Septuagint was used widely by the early Christians exclusively as their Old Testament Bible. This is a widely accepted fact and that the quotations of Christ and His Apostles that occur in the New Testament are taken exclusively from the Septuagint. According to tradition it was Ptolemy Philadelphus, who purchased the freedom of Israelites in his territories, arranged for 6 scholars from each of the 12 tribes to translate the first five books of the Old Testament from the ancient Hebrew into Greek around 285 BC. By this time, a practical knowledge of the Hebrew language was all but lost among the Hellenized Israelites citizens. And it was greatly feared understanding the written language would be lost forever.
After the conquests of Alexander the Great, Greek had become the common language of the known world. So Ptolemy gathered these 72 scholars in Alexandria, Egypt and they completed the Pentateuch (first five Books of the OT). The Latin name 'Septuagint', meaning 70, was later, applied to the translation. Both 'The Letter of Aristeas', who was an assistant of Ptolemy and the historian Flavius Josephus record in detail the history of the making of the Septuagint. It is unclear when the rest of the OT was finished in the Septuagint, but it was certainly finished by 150 BC. The original Hebrew written OT are now lost in antiquity.
Having stated this, I needed to give a foundation to why I'm using the Greek for translating when I'm talking about the Holy Spirit. The word 'Holy' is no where to be found in any manuscripts. It is a 'helpful' word added by the patristic writers to the modern Scripture. Instead of 'Spirit', we have [Holy] Spirit. The word 'holy' basically means 'separated'. It helps better understand and separate this Spirit from other 'spirit' of different meaning. The Greek word for 'Spirit' is 'pneuma'. We see this in English words like 'pneumatic' or 'pneumonia'. It means in the Greek-- "a current of air, i.e. breath (blast) or a breeze." The meaning goes further to include -- "by analogy or figuratively, a spirit, i.e. (human) the rational soul, (by implication) vital principle, mental disposition, etc., or (superhuman) an angel, demon, or (divine) God, Christ's spirit, the Holy Spirit:--ghost, life, spirit(-ual, -ually), mind." The root word of 'pneuma' is 'pneo' -- to breathe hard, i.e. breeze:--blow.
The reason I've mentioned this is the Holy Spirit is not at all the ‘Zeus’-like figure we are provided, but something very different. The word 'pneuma' is closely associated to the Greek word 'psuche', which means -- "1. breath (a) the breath of life (1) the vital force which animates the body and shows itself in breathing of animals and of men. (b) life (c) that in which there is life (1) a living being, a living soul. 2. the soul (a) the seat of feelings, desires, affections, aversions, (our heart, soul, etc.) (b) the (human) soul in so far as it is constituted that by the right use of the aids offered it by God it can attain its highest end and secure eternal blessedness, the soul regarded as a moral being designed for everlasting life. (c) the soul as an essence which differs from the body and is not dissolved by death (distinguished from other parts of the body)."
The meaning of the ‘Holy Spirit’ goes much deeper than I presented here. Nevertheless, this should provide a starting point for anyone to find deeper understanding. The point I’m making here is the Holy Spirit is an Intelligence; a Mentality of Separation that is everywhere and is exemplified throughout Nature and Nature's Laws. In fact, in Thayer and Smith, "The New Testament Greek Lexicon" we are told to compare this to the Greek word 'psuchikos' --1. produced by nature, inborn 2. agreeable to nature 3. governed by (the instincts of) nature.
It's quite obvious that transgender ideology is not agreeable to Nature. It is not produced by nature. Furthermore, it is not governed by Nature. In other words, it is contrary to Nature and Nature's Laws. Therefore, it is an abomination to the author of Life and Nature; the Holy Spirit.
What Greek Lexicon do you use that doesn't show the fake word "Jew" in it?
Wescott and Hort's Greek is to be avoided at all costs.
This word has been intermingled with the words 'Israelite', 'Judahite', 'Judean', 'pharisee', and 'Edomite' for over 400 years. It's use in the Bible is ambiguous and unfortunately needs to be deciphered for every verse that it is used. Some times it refers to the Roman province of Judea, other times it refers more accurately to Edomites. Other times it references 'Israelites". As an example, I recently reviewed Acts 10:22. It reads from the KJV as:
22 And they said, Cornelius the centurion, a just man, and one that feareth God, and of good report among [G5239] all [G3650] the nation [G1484] of the Jews, [G2453] was warned from God by an holy angel to send for thee into his house, and to hear words of thee.
Properly etymological deliberation and discernment would have this verse read:
22 And they said, Cornelius the centurion, a just man, and one that feareth God, and of good report by1 all2 the Israelites3 of Judea4, was warned from God by an holy angel to send for thee into his house, and to hear words of thee.
The Greek word used here is ‘hypo’ which means - under, i.e. (with the genitive case) of place (beneath), or with verbs (the agency or means, through); (with the accusative case) of place (whither (underneath) or where (below) or time (when (at)):—among, by, from, in, of, under, with.
Footnotes for the numerals above are provided below.
1. The Greek word used here is ‘hypo’ which means - under, i.e. (with the genitive case) of place (beneath), or with verbs (the agency or means, through); (with the accusative case) of place (whither (underneath) or where (below) or time (when (at)):—among, by, from, in, of, under, with.
2. The Greek word ‘holos’ is used, which means – ‘all’, ‘whole’, ‘completely’.
3. Strong’s Concordance defines ‘nation’ (G1484) from the Greek word ‘ethnos’ probably from ‘ethos’ (G1486); which is a race (as of the same habit), i.e. a tribe. The English word ‘ethnic’ certainly better fits the definition as to ‘gentile’, which infers the word ‘goy’; ‘foreigner’; and ‘heathen’. Here, it is referenced as being of the same company; customs and ethnicity. It is therefore "Israelites of Judea" being described here.
4. The Greek word for Jews (G2453) is ‘ioudaios’. This is an adjective descriptive of, but is more properly referenced to the Israelites living in Judea.
The word Jew is an English word originally referring to those Eastern European people who spoke Yiddish. Even the Yiddish people did not view themselves as Israelites. The word 'Jew' did not exist during the Roman times. Rome referred to the region as 'Judea' and those people of the region as 'Judeans'. Even Pontius Pilate inscribed a title in Latin on the torture stake that read - "Jesus the Nazerene King of the Judeans". Every ancient historian, including Josephus referred the region as a greatly mixed population. This makes sense, since the region is indeed at the cross road of trade between three continents. It is also for this reason that there has been constant upheaval of wars. The cross road of trade has always been highly coveted. The entire population of the region has been replaced several times over. Whenever it was conquered, its people were enslaved and carried away in captivity. The allies of the conquering army were rewarded with much of the spoils. By the time the Greeks conquered the region, the people inhabiting the region was vastly populated by the conquering aliens and allies. We know from history that one of the allies, who were instrumental for the conquest of Judah by Nebuchadnezzar, king of Babylon, were the Edomites. They were rewarded by given the lands of the region. This included the shops, businesses, orchards, homes, and more. It is no coincidence that the ancient Greeks prior to the Romans called the region 'Idumea' meaning land of the Edomites. King Herod himself was an Edomite. One doesn't rise to power of a king unless there is an ethnic kinship representing those people. Then we have this from the Jewish Encyclopedia, 1925 edition, Vol. 5, Page 41, which states -- "Edom is in modern Jewry".
As mentioned above, the word Jew derives from a 16th Century Old English mis-transliteration of Yiddish. It stuck. This information is derived from English etymology. The name Jew is analogous to the English appellative name "German" that refers to the people of Deutschland. The people of Deutschland (Germany) call themselves "Deutsch" (the people; race) or 'teuto' as in 'Teutonic' as they were called by the Gallic or 'Tuatha De Dannan', which means 'race or people of Dan'. Obviously, the Deutsch do not call themselves 'Germans'. Another example to the gross misappellation is the name -- 'Welsh'. This is an English word deriving from High German 'wallische' meaning 'strangers'. How utterly absurd for the alien German Angles to call the aborigine Brit population 'strangers'. The 'Welsh' call themselves among each other 'Khumri'. The Jews do not refer to themselves as Israelites. In the 1980 Jewish Almanac, 1st chapter "Identity Crisis" and also found in the Jewish Encyclopedia IV, 1902, p 335), it states -- "Strictly speaking, it is incorrect to call an ancient Israelite a 'Jew' or to call a contemporary Jew an 'Israelite' or a 'Hebrew'".
Most Christians don't realize Judaism is a newer religion than Christianity is and Christianity has NEVER been based on Judaism. This is a inconvenient truth that is publicly a taboo subject. Believe it or not, Judaism was created to confront the spread of Christianity - using the Bible as a prop and also to conceal Judaism's ritualistic practice of blood-letting. The proof is of course in writing and can be found in Judaism's foundational Passover text.
Judaism's foundational Passover text is not from the Old Testament but rather the Haggadah, a thoroughly Talmudic work. (M. Hoffman III, "Judaism Discovered"). The Talmud was compiled as a result of the absolute destruction of Herod’s temple, in which every stone was carried away leaving no trace of it’s existence. In it we learn:
In 66 CE, when the Roman general Vespasian swept into Jerusalem, Judaism was a cultic, oral religion, with Herod's massive temple as its lodestar. Everything happened in the temple complex. Four years later, Vespasian's son Titus razed it to the ground. A quote from the Talmud:
"Where was God under the rubble?" wondered the Rabbis. "How to praise him now that the temple was gone?" The sages agreed: Jews would have to BECOME a people of the book, or they would disappear.
Hence, they were NOT a people of the book before this time.
The word Jew can never be translated in scripture. It does not belong anywhere near the Word of God. Judea, Judeans, Judah or Judahites never add up to the word Jew. Basically only Satan can pull that off because a new race was hatched and nobody today knows what it means except stupid brainwashed dispensation baptist churches. Jew today means practioners of Judaism aka Pharisaism aka synagogue of Satan. The probable blood line is Esau/Canaanite Edomite.
I can tell you didn't really read my post. You wrote -- "Judea, Judeans, Judah or Judahites never add up to the word Jew." I didn't say this. You simply didn't comprehend my missive. I mentioned other tangible answers to why this 'word' got placed into the bible (it was a blunder of extraordinary measure). It began in c. early 1600s AD. Prior to that the English word 'Jew" is non-existent. Did you read the verse I provided (Acts 10:22) and its etymological correct reading?
Actually I agreed with your post and upvoted you but was adding my thoughts with these people arguing with me today that Jesus was a Jew.
Paul said Jews were basically savage killers of the prophets and the Lord and contrary to all men. However 1Thess 2:14-15 correct translation is Judeans as in residents in Judea who happened to be Pharisees and Edomites. Those were the hostile ones.
My apologies for the misunderstanding.
Got it. No harm. The "Jesus is a Jew" narrative is a Zionist talking point used to trip up and deceive Christians. When I stated in my earlier post that Judaism was actually created to confront the spread of Christianity - using the Bible as a prop and also to conceal Judaism's ritualistic practice of blood-letting. To a researcher, there's abundant proof in writing to verify this. This provides us the very motive for an ongoing crime being committed against Christians. The political element of Judaism is Zionism, which is the sledge hammer controlling Judaism. In that political arena, we have the confessions of Harold Wallace Rosenthal, who was the administrative assistant to former Senator Jacob K. Javits of New York. It was Senator Javits, who was instrumental in passing the 1965 Immigration and Naturalization Act that changed America forever. Rosenthal worked behind the scene and had political aspirations himself. In a 1976 interview, the hubris of Rosenthal was abundant. He was talkative and especially braggadocios of Jewish supremacy over Christians and Whites. He told the interviewer the Jews had established five major falsehoods to the goyim which work to conceal their nature and protect their status and power, to wit: (1) The Jews are Israelites, and thus God's chosen people; (2) Jesus Christ was a Jew; (3) That 6 million Jews were killed in a holocaust during WW II; (4) That all people are equal; and, (5) That the Jews are just another religious group.
So, you can see this falsehood of "Jesus is a Jew" is one of them. Rosenthal also was frank in his discussion. He admitted - "Most Jews do not like to admit it, but our [their] god is Lucifer... and we [Jews] are his chosen people. In this statement Rosenthal slips inferring 'God's' chosen people is really 'god's (Lucifer) chosen people. This undermines the 'Jews are Israelites' falsehood. In fact, no Judaic scholar will make this claim and state it is incorrect to refer to Jews as 'Hebrews' or 'Israelites'.
It was probably a year ago I realized that the word Jew in my modern KJV was a conceived plan of the devil. I was really upset no one pointed that out of all the theologians I listened to. Once the intentional mistranslations are cleaned up everything makes sense.
I must say these Jewish trolls have been attacking me here which is no surprise because they are protecting their evil position.
I have a question for you regarding the 1611 First Edition King James Version and it's legend.
John 4:22 [22]Ye worship ye know not what: we know what we worship: for saluation is of the Iewes.
Here the word Iewes is translated as "of the Judeans" or "of the Judahites".
Since Iewes has multiple meanings i e. Judeans, Judahites I assume there is no simple way of picking the exact word in English though some say the correct translation is OUT OF JUDAH OR OUT OF JUDEA because of corresponding verse's.
The 1611 KJV translators came up with salvation is of the Iewes. Did they not use the textus receptus? Is there a lexicon for that? What say you?
child abuse
She's realised it was a Piloh Shitt.
top kek
They aren’t tryin* they are doing with the full,force of the media and every entity
So the percent of Hollywood people who have done this to their own children (biological or adopted) is what factor higher than the general U.S. population? 10x, 100x, 1000x?
Those parents belong in mental health institutions. And those poor kids need rehabilitation from the mental damage that their insane parents have done to them. Sickening.
This abomination (I don't use this word lightly) is a purposeful act to lead the innocent astray, to cause them to stumble, and the vilest form of harm. This is called out in Bible and referred in English as 'sorcery', but in the Greek it is 'pharmakeia'. It is defined as-- (1) the use or the administering of drugs, (2) poisoning, (3) sorcery, and magical arts, often found in connection with idolatry and fostered by it. (4) metaph. the deceptions and seductions of idolatry
This is precisely, what the 'parents' of these children are doing. When the children of God are wittingly caused to stumble and be harmed by those of influence and authority, this is indeed 'Pharmakeia'. It is written these who do 'pharmakeia' will not only face death, but will experience a second death.
What is the "second death"? It is God's condemnation of being thrown into the 'Lake of fire' to those who committing 'Pharmakeia' will be condemned to. The 'Lake of fire' is made of two things. Jesus reveals the fire. He teaches us it is made of unquenchable fire: Mark 9:43-44 “And if thy hand offend thee, cut it off: it is better for thee to enter into life maimed, than having two hands to go into hell, into the fire that never shall be quenched: 44 Where their worm dieth not, and the fire is not quenched.” Unquenchable means the fire is impossible to satisfy, suppress or destroy. The fire is inextinguishable. Nothing or no one will be able to put it out.
The second element in the lake of fire is brimstone, as revealed by John (Revelation 21:8). Brimstone is none other than burning sulfur. Sulfur is an explosive element that’s difficult to extinguish. It is a lemon-yellow colored stone that, when ignited, turns into liquid fire. It has a rich, fluorescent-type deep cobalt bluish color as it burns. Sulfur does not glow red. It burns blue. A blue-colored flame is much more intense. Also, the flame is only visible in the darkness. God caused fire and brimstone (sulfur) to rain down on Sodom and Gomorrah from heaven because of his intense displeasure (Genesis 19:24). Brimstone symbolizes God’s intense anger or wrath (Deuteronomy 29:23; Psalm 11:6).
I find it interesting that some scholars say in the land of Edom (Isaiah 34:5-10) is to be the location of the 'Lake of Fire'. In Greek, the land of Edom is called "Idumea'. Does anyone know where 'Idumea' was? I believe this interpretation tells us something and is a contender for such a place, but actually it lies beyond the realm of heaven and present Earth.
He switch to a girl now also?
He wore a dress to his senior prom and constantly says and does very sus things.
Because they will cry about "muh nuance", and do it in the name of tolerance 🤦♂️
Angela Jolie’s child has returned to her girlie roots. She now dresses like the biological girl that she is wearing dresses and looking feminine. I don’t know what happened, but I hope they never did anything surgical when she went through her “call me John” period.
The rest are just lost - probably driven by their parents insatiable need for power and jobs in Hollywood.
Brad pitt stepped in that's what happened
Nicole Kidman was with Tom Cruise & she’s been married to Keith Urban many years. If she had stayed her kids would be just like this.
The parents need tarred and feathered.
NONE of those kids look happy. The abuse they must be experiencing has to be 100% horrible. The end can't come fast enough.
I've been wondering for a while if the ds dictates which children will be dressed/treated like the opposite gender? I have a feeling it has been like this for a long time.
hollywood is full of fkin lames dude idk why we even continue to act like these people are high n mightymight bro theyre all a bunch of fkin dweebs they cant even have tattoos theyre just bunch of pussies slapping each other lmao
How many of these kids are adopted?
Class A Child abuse!!
These people are sick.
And people worship these public pedos. Very telling of the culture we truly live in. Bunch of slime.
Poor kids.
I had heard to advance they have to kill one of their children or raise one as a transgender. In today's climate, the trans kid doesn't land you on deathrow.