👀 Look who all is scheduled to give responses today in the Trump v Clinton Case.
(PatriotAU)
💥 B O O O O O M 💥
ABC Corporations
Kevin Clinesmith
Hillary Clinton
James Comey
DNC Services Corporation
Igor Danchenko
Democratic National Committee
Marc Elias
Fusion GPS
Rodney Joffre
Andrew McCabe
Robert Mook
Neustar Security Services
Nellie Ohr
Lisa Page
Perkins Coie, LLC
John Podesta
Rod Rosenstein
Adam Schiff
Debbie Wasserman Schultz
Christopher Steele
Peter Strzok
Jake Sullivan
Michael Sussman
(And this isn’t the full list!) 👀
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/63184300/trump-v-clinton/?page=2
Long list of corrupt pieces of shits
Too long for a bumper sticker that didn’t kill themselves.
Many of those are earworms too.
I don’t know the nitty gritty off the top of my head, but I can see the potential for “something” to be “happening”.
Oh, I thought this was the "Arrested List."
Brilliant definition !
CavePeasent , you oxygen theives comment deserves way more likes. So elegant
Important detail:
The United States Government is asking the court to have the US Government take the place of defendants Comey, McCabe, Strzok, Page, Clinesmith, etc because they were FBI employees at the time, i.e. government officials representing the United States Government in their official role of investigating Russia's involvement in the 2016 election.
The US Government then states, once you make us the defendant, you should remove the United States due to the Westfall Act and because the court is the wrong jurisdiction to handle a case against the United States.
Go here and read the first few paragraphs. Click the Text tab to read in your browser.
TLDR: Trump can't sue Comey, McCabe, Strzok, Page or Clinesmith because they are the same as the United States Government. Trump can't sue the United States Government because he hasn't exhausted his other remedies. United States Government is looking to remove all these corrupt people because they were acting on the corrupt government's behalf.
This was filed yesterday, July 14, 2022 and the judge has not made a decision on this request by the US Gov yet that I am aware of.
There is another twist to this as well. Here is a quote from the Westfall Act, as quoted in the US Govt's motion from your link:
What can stop Trump from amending the suit and adding the Attorney General as part of the conspiracy? Garland knows they weren't acting on the govt's behalf - they were part of a conspiracy against Trump. Now, so is Garland by the simple act of trying to cover it up and get it thrown out. According to what the govt. said in their own motion only the Attorney General can use this act. If Trump can add him as part of the conspiracy there doesn't appear to be anyone else that can call that act. (I'm not a lawyer so correct me if I'm wrong).
Could that have been Trump's intention all along?
Great analysis. Thank you for that addition u/dec3169 👈🏻
Looks like the government admitting that all these feds followed orders and did their jobs.
Who gave the orders?
Was it "The United States of America" that gave the order?
Was there someone above these treasonous feds that acted outside their duties?
So if I'm reading the tea leaves correctly, they think the Westfall government corruption protection Act is going to save their asses?
We are not talking about conduct that was merely wrongful or negligent.
We are talking about overt criminal acts.
Immunity does not cover crimes.
Thank you! I was wondering who'd they try to send in their place. Praying for the judge to make the correct decision.
Also their letters said they are COMMANDED to appear. I don't know if that word was used for some legal reason, or to simply get under their skin.
Damn, this is the first I'm hearing about this. It sounds bad. Please keep us all posted. Thanks!!!
The US Government's position is that higher ups are "always working" and can never engage in personal activity. If the judge agrees with that it would mean that government officials can do whatever they want whenever they want, including commit felonies, and they cannot be charged personally. A plaintiff would have to take on the entire US Government to win.
If the judge allows that, we have no law for federal employees. They are free to commit any crimes they want and never be held accountable. That would be a slippery slope the size of a mountain mudslide. It would mean we have a lawless country.
Federal employees in the FBI, DOJ, CIA, etc. clearly believe this idea holds water and I personally think this explains their lawless behavior. It explains their two-tiered Justice system.
A judge that rules in favor of this is basically saying that US Government employees can do whatever they want, especially those in high positions of power.
In my opinion, this would be so catastrophic to our system of law and order that our nation would collapse under this weight.
If the judge looks at the big picture, I do not see how he could side with the government if the judge actually cares about law, order, and our nation's survival.
We shall see.
Could this just be a stepping stone in the path to removing federal employees?
If they can't be held accountable for their treasonous because they were following orders but the "government" or "United States of America" gave the order then "government" committed the treason and should be punished.
Idk man we've seen some silly stuff happen in the days since that first Q post.
I like your thinking. They all need to go.
Further, the "government" does not commit crimes...........the employees of said government do and they ALL work for the American people. Even if they commit crimes "in the name of the American people," it's still individuals committing those crimes--those who give the orders and those who implement those orders. I wonder if the people will finally object, en masse, to criminals acting, supposedly, in the name of the people?
Acting for the people but getting paid off by the people who want to destroy our country. To me that is High Crimes including treason
I totally agree with you.
Sounds like military is the only way.
Who is the Judge? Is he a lib or a conservative? Can the Judge ask any justices from the Supreme Court for assistance in interpreting the Westfall Act? If the judge rules the AG was acting within his capacity does this end Trump's case?
Of course, that's their position, because they are trying to get away with their crimes.
But that does not mean they are right.
No government employee has the authority to cross the line from "doing their job" to using the cover of their job to engage in criminal activity.
Thanks for your explanation.
Does the Westfall Act cover treason?
Lord Jesus, Let JUSTICE REIGN and Let TRUTH and Your Justice Prevail over these evil scum. In Your Almighty name, Amen
They’re in Florida, note…👍
🤯
That is interesting. I'm sure that much of the criminal activity occurred in New York and Washington DC. But Trump chose Florida for the suit (where some of the criminal activity also occurred, meaning they spied on him at Mar-a-Lago).
Florida is a much better jurisdiction because it is in the 11th Circuit, which is much better for upholding rule of law than most, if either party appeals.
Also, this is a RICO case, where one candidate for the 2016 presidential election is suing the other candidate. And yet ... the fake news propaganda media ignore it ...
Keep us updated on this case!
Wow top names in the conspiracy against Trump. Glad to see it.
What is this, a crossover episode?
Season finale cliffhanger time
We are all hoping it's actually a double-length series finale.
I guess that means they are all still alive.
Better not say that too loudly.
Ooga booga booga!
is it normal to happen on a weekend?
And JFK Jr's. plan crash was 23 years ago today...
can't remember the significance of 23 if anyone else knows??
https://decodingsymbols.wordpress.com/2021/03/12/durham-chat-logs-and-23-gj/
23 = Grand Jury (However I believe the root comm for 23 is removing someone quickly, which Grand Juries do)
https://decodingsymbols.wordpress.com/2021/01/30/comms-list-short-placeholders/ 23 = Forced to leave Quickly comm
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/23_skidoo_(phrase) – Also the size of Grand Juries https://decodingsymbols.wordpress.com/2021/03/12/durham-chat-logs-and-23-gj/
thanks for doing that! helpful and I'll have it saved. been noticing a lot of 23s lately, even on Dr. Pepper cans.
sure, fren
There's a whole table just of number decodes, did you see that?
I see a lot of good stuff:) maybe it's the one this is from;
"12. Frog = Transformation ( tadpole ->frog)"
^is awesome I love frogs🐸
Ribbit!
I think 23 was used repeatedly by Q to mean Here comes the Pain
Looks like a lot of sauce, but me no speaky Italian.
Hopefully a bolognese sauce - There will be some meat in it!
Hopefully no walnut sauce
Or, alternatively, hopefully walnut sauce is presented as evidence of their bullshit so that it stops being put on their piz-- fuck it, just present evidence of their child abuse so we can stop having them abuse children
Is Neustar Inc the company belonging to Joffe?
Yes he is
https://www.home.neustar/about-us/news-room/press-releases/2015/rodney-joffe-fcc
TY.
They'll just lie like they always do.
“I do not recall” up and down, then irrefutable evidence drop is my hope
Take note of HRC lawyers names too. See if they end up on the Clinton list eventually
An order of Dies suddenly coming right up
If someome in Moscow "laser beam" zapped that court house it'd solve alotta problems
Candidates for Mass Arrests for tribunals all in one spot. 😉
Well this is gonna be a juicy nugget
See the attorneys they are represented by? This also drains the swamp of those corrupt attorneys. They are exposed!
...should all b in a holding cell at the ' spa ' awaiting the tribunals
Wow!!🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏. Lord Jesus, Let ALL TRUTH come out and LET JUSTICE REIGN COMPLETELY-YOUR JUSTICE LORD, In Tour Almighty and All Powerful name, Amen
Going to be interesting. A lot of these people are going to be difficult to locate.
This is kind of an interesting detail
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/63184300/parties/trump-v-clinton/
That's interesting the parties who DO NOT have attorneys representing them. I am a simple RN, not a lawfag, so idk if this means anything or not.
Interesting !
Wow! So many names from the past we haven’t heard of since.
Were they hiding? We’re they in custody?
This movie is coming to the climax for the lurker like me!
The judges:
Last Updated: July 16, 2022, 6:23 a.m. EDT
Assigned To: Donald M. Middlebrooks
Referred To: Patrick M. Hunt
Date Filed: March 24, 2022
Middlebrooks is a Clinton appointee https://www.courtlistener.com/person/2240/donald-m-middlebrooks/ Patric Hunt: https://www.courtlistener.com/person/9171/patrick-m-hunt/
What does it mean assigned to, referred to?
Wow, if we could just get rid of those on this list, the world would be a better place for sure.
None of these individuals or individuals representing a company are suicidal. Just sayin
Just a question here. Can a Booom have a question mark?
I thought all these people already went through military tribunals and are buried by now??
Myth.
Only if you believe the fake news site real raw news or any of its mirrors
that's what the paytriots want us to believe...to make us look foolish. it's bigger than that. need to expand our thinking.
Said who?
Q implied they are now actors. How can they be actors if they are dead?
Said a lot of posters here. Repeatedly. Senselessly, even. And they reject any pushback to that notion.
Ehhhh... Two more weeks? 🥴
Two more weeks til the end.
Does scheduled to give responses = will give or has given anything resembling substantive responses?
If they refuse, they can go to jail for contempt of court.
Perjure themselves or drive another nail into the killary coffin... I love it!
Yes, would be the probable answer. They are sociopaths, and lack empathy. They live for themselves. Other people are objects to be used and discarded. Ratting on someone to get ahead: Oh, my, Yes!!
That is a lot.
Since these are sociopaths and known perjurers, I'm not getting too excited.
Nellie Ohr is interesting