TLDR at the bottom
So earlier today Elon tweeted 'check mate'. It seemed clever since he had removed the blue checks but many celebs lost their shit. One even claiming lives would be lost (still trying to re-find that to link it). Why was THAT blue check so important? It's only 8 bucks to get one. Why is this so devastating?
So why all the panicking? Could it be possible that these 'celebs' can't run their social media accounts? I am starting to think they can't verify who they are because they are already taken out. They can't verify who they are.Check mate means they are exposed. They aren't around. Who knows what other features were built into that original Twitter for blue checks. We know the FBI had comms. There were cahnnels and feeds specifically for certain groups. That came out in the first Twitter file set I believe where Dorsey and the nuts would communicate.
Maybe removing the blue check cuts off all back channel access these folks had. Who knows. It's just a theory but you have to wonder why the people were pissed that they lost their check mark when they could easily get it back for 8 bucks a month...
Further, Why is Elon paying for Shatner, King and Lebron James to keep that check mark? I have several theories such as they are going to use those accounts to keep an open line of communication with others who have access on the channels OR they are doing this as a COMM to let the DS know they have found something concerning these 3 accounts or the people associated.
And lastly it might be possible that they are going to use these accounts as controlled opposition. So if we start seeing these accounts slowly changing their minds and turn into red pilling accounts then we know they probably are controlled.
Just FYI info:
The verification process requires a phone number that is verified and then of course payment information for the subscription.
The 'check mate'
Twitter Blue Check policy
https://help.twitter.com/en/managing-your-account/about-twitter-verified-accounts
Twitter Blue
https://help.twitter.com/en/using-twitter/twitter-blue
TLDR
The 'celebs' are panicking because they cannot verify themselves because it's not the celebs running the accounts because they are already out of the game so the DS has to keep them up in an attempt to hide the truth from the public and pretend they are still in control. With the verification that is no longer possible.
Had a friend who ran social media for a country music singer for awhile. She was on the record label payroll. Occasionally he would text her something that he wanted her to tweet, but most of it was her. He had his own private account with an alias.
This is probably pretty standard practice. ie Pierre Delecto.
Come to think of it… can you have more than one account in the TOS? Maybe this is the real reason they are pissed. They are losing the ability to tweet anonymously in addition to the great equalization that anyone can be verified? Ouch.
Maybe they don't want Musk having their phone number? If they're used to burner phones for nefarious reasons, he would be able to call to see if they still have their number. If not, blue check gone. Helpful for investigators.to track and trace.
The payment information might be hard to come by too.
Imagine all at once the DS has to start paying for hundreds if not thousands of accounts but set up phony accounts linked to the phony celeb.
Not impossible but a pretry nasty wrench in the machine i would guess.
If they paid on cards not linked to the celebs name the payment process would see that. It would also .see if one credit card was paying for hundreds of them.
Good point. This would really jam things up. The CIA has lost revenue streams like poppy fields and human trafficking, so paying for thousands of $8 accounts every month is not as easy as it would've been in the past. Also the payment method being traced to one card would be very problematic for them. Imagine that hitting the news and becoming a massive redpill.
Personal? Organizational? 501c3?
I have one account that got banned during the mass bans of jan 2020 and one active account I created like 5 months ago that is active. Both use the same number.
Same. I had my original since 2013 with over 10K followers and at least 2 Q mentions (which probably got me banned). I have 2 sockpuppets now. The older one I started in 2020 as a "liberal democrat" who volunteered to phone bank for democrat candidates. That was fun because I used that twitter and a burner number to call democrats from the phone list and encourage them to vote for Trump. The other is more of the real me. But I sure would like my original back.
I know for a fact that in twitter 1.0 you could have an account for any (& as many) email address you have & these accounts are still valid in twitter 2.0. If you get even a temporary ban with one of those legacy accounts you need a phone number to get it back up. (But it can be the phone number of a new pay by the minute phone you just picked up)
IL Donaldo Trumpo 😉
Yes, I knew someone who ran Miley Cirus' social media...it's very common. There are only a few celebs who actually run their own media
Trump being on of them!
I bet most conservative famous people run their own... the left just need to keep up with the current thing too much to do it themselves... cuz the current thing changes so much...
Living by principals is hard in some ways for some people... but SO much easier in knowing what the right thing to do is in any situation.
After some of the conversation regarding the blue checkmarks this week, I thought it was interesting that everybody was so upset.
I totally agree with you! I think that people on the left have others running their Twitter accounts, and don’t have time to figure out what the thing is there supposed to be supporting. They probably even get paid money for somebody else to be the voice.
I thought I had today, though, however; is that when some of these keepers of the gate, go too far with their outspokenness, And then you see that the tweet is removed. Probably the actual owner of the account said that was just too far! The keeper at the gate, gets a brief reprimand, and then they go on with life as usual.
Their handlers would never allow that
I had two temp bans RE: A Steven King comment. These were months apart, but almost instant. Someone is keeping a close watch on his account comments.
First, this is really good. The consequences of the verification did not occur to me.
Second, those 3 accounts are interesting. If they were going to be used for any of those reasons, would EM specifically call attention to them in this way? I can't think of a reason to deliberately make those 3 accounts so obvious.
I agree.
Tangentially, did anyone see the MSNBC interview Kerry gave on the oil and gas industry saying "there is no free pass here"? Heres the article from GWP:
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2023/04/theres-no-free-pass-here-john-kerry-puts-oil-and-gas-industry-on-notice-video/
Go to the article and look at the pics of him. Does that look like John Kerry to anyone? To me the hair is much too fine and the face much less craggy and lined. The pic on the homepage struck me immediately so I did an image search. Kerrys face is extremely craggy and lined and his hair is wiry. The photo has a smooth skinned individual and his hair is very fine.
Something to keep an eye on. Sorry to hijack your thread about twitter but your theory brought this to mind.
John Kerry has had 2 facelifts. I live in the Boston area and have seen him up close.
He’s also had both hips replaced in 2010. Guys 79, hang it up bruh, go fuck off to Nantucket. Grifters gonna grift. I played hockey with him a couple times he was an Asshole.
Did you put him into the glass?? That's one hell of a chance to give him a good shellacin'
Haha I did not. Be a lot cooler if I did! Asked to wear his USA gloves for a shift he just turned to me and said “NO”
Not surprised at that tone from him at all. He's an insolent trust fund douche.
Hanson Brothers-style.
"Putting on the foil man... Yah before every game"
I've had a run in with him. He's completely entitled, does not tip servers and he explains it away by saying do you know who I am. How the hell did he manage to marry 2 insanely weathly women? Is he that good in the sack ?🤢
And don't forget what happened to her first husband Senator John Heinz. That place crash always seemed fishy
This is disgusting. You sound like a pedophile yourself. Show some respect for victims.
You can't fix ugly.
Your sentence is ALMOST CORRECT but, Slight change:
"You can't fix fugly."
No... but you can put a paper bag over her head... and one over yours in case hers falls off..
I was referring to John Kerry.
I would need a metric fuckton moar bags ;)
The Unknown Copulation
-Murray Langston, probably
(For you young'uns, that's a Gong Show, Unknown Comic reference.)
Personally... I think I'm VERY mutherfucking funny... others don't think so... I would get gonged a lot.
Wow, "Kerry" has the same corpse walking look that the Sniffer has. Must use the same mask maker. Search John Kerry 2012. His eyes had a downward slant at the outer corners. He had this slant as a young man as well. Now, no slant and weird skin color- it looks like the foundation morticians use and Joe has the same look.
Wow. Looks like a South Park canadian version of Kerry.
Sounds a bit different too. Tpu should make a devouted post. This is interesting.
Good catch
There's another theory floating on Twitter. There's a Block the Blue "movement" on the left to block anyone who has a blue check mark because they "bent the knee" and paid for the verification. So - Elon gave it to those three and then said "checkmate". Or so the theory goes.
https://mashable.com/article/block-the-blue-twitter-campaign-dril?taid=6444fa9f29be17000166aaa9&utm_campaign=trueAnthem%3A+Trending+Content&utm_medium=trueAnthem&utm_source=twitter
That makes the most sense to me.
Yhat doesnt explain the initial panic. It only explains the rationalized response.
Shatner is based. I'm assuming he isn't part of the weirdo club.
I'm wondering if that's the real reason his fellow Star Trek alumni don't seem to be able to stand him anymore.
Really makes you think!
He's one of the very few "entertainment" people I still like, so please, please, please let him be on the good side.
The only issue with our beloved William Shatner is that he thinks Bezos hangs the moon and also utterly believes the climate change bullshit. You can't be in Bezos camp and Musk camp at the same time ya know. And Elon donated 100m to the Ukraine? God please could he pull his head out of his liberal ass. I do like him very much so it distresses me to see what he does sometimes. Yikes.
The $100 million Elon says he donated to Ukraine was for Starlink. Remember he stopped providing Starlink after the Ukraine Ambassador told him to fuck off.
If Elon gave any support to Ukraine I think he would have gave to the people in the Donbas region. Ukraine military have been bombing Donbas for many years.
https://www.timesofisrael.com/musk-to-stop-funding-starlink-for-ukraine-after-envoy-tells-him-to-fk-off/
Camouflage?
Careful. I’ve heard plenty of interviews that he’s given where he’s as leftist as they come. Also, he had a wife “accidentally” (very suspiciously) drown in their swimming pool years ago.
Shatner will ALWAYS be my captain. I couldn't stand Picard
Yeah, I've seen people prefer Kirk for not hiding behind the Prime Directive at every chance.
You know, I was thinking this either last night or this morning, or something along these lines. Saw someone post that Hillary supposedly lost her blue checkmark (But I just checked, she still has it).
But with that thought in mind, I wondered if removing the blue checkmark from certain people was a signal that these people were taken out, or no longer exist or control their accounts for one reason or another.
Wow. Hadnt thought about that.... they must be dropping like flies!
"They thought you would follow the stars" kinda fits in now!
She may have it now, but she lost it. It was gone Friday night.
And just to add, President Trump got his blue check mark back!
What if all their (celebs etc) info was exposed, I wonder what would turn up?
One can only hope
Could it be they don’t want blue check because they’d be verifying their identity and could be held liable and legally responsible (criminally?) for what they did bad in the past with account? If they never prove it is them through payment method, they could always claim it was someone else or someone else’s phone. Plausible deniability, right?
That makes a lot of sense. Especially if they were sharing illegal pics...
Interesting post.
Ironic. When I was briefly on Twitter, I had my own #blocktheblue campaign.
I blocked anyone with a blue wave, blue heart, or any other Democrat emoji.
Did the same with any trans/lgbtqrstuvwyxz emojis, Uke flags, or sunflowers (another Uke symbol) and any mainstream media or entertainment sites.
Took about a week, and Twitter became a pretty nice place to hang out.
I still decided it wasn't worth my time and left, but if you're going to hang out there, I highly recommend it. Nice thing, is when you click on one of these morons to block, Twitter will helpfully suggest a bunch of other similar morons for you to conveniently block as well.
By blocking, u avoid war with them or opportunities to plant more seeds into others that still have potential to wake up.
I would respond then block and move on haha 😂
Or he gave it to a bunch of celebs so he could give Trump his checkmark without them thinking he's biased (and working with Trump and the WHs)
So, Elon is paying for an author, an actor, and a sports figure to maintain their blue check. That covers a LOT of entertainment areas. And Elon offered no reason why those three. It does make you wonder their significance.
Three segments of the entertainment world.
Interesting
Okay...that makes perfect sense. It's like many famous authors who crank out like 5 books a year along with a "co author" listed below. The celebs are basically lending their name/cred while someone else posts woke garbage on their behalf. I've often wondered how someone who is a famous celeb has the time to tweet out stuff like crazy...and sure enough!
I bet Elon looked into it and saw a lot of the blue checks were ghost written accounts that had little to do with the person mentioned. So he changed it to make sure it really was the person named. LeBron, King, Shatner are probably legit so he let them keep their blue checks, but others he is forcing them to verify.
There is a theory that MATE is connected to JP Morgan 👉 https://markets.ft.com/data/investment-trust/tearsheet/summary?s=MATE:LSE
How so? How does the theory go?
MATE is the stock sign for JP Morgan.
@BlueStateMAGA https://truthsocial.com/users/BrianCates/statuses/110246838265439485 make of it what you will..
Oh ok. Thanks fren, It's the symbol for their Multi Asset Growth & Income PLC fund
DON’T FORGET!
Q SPECIFICALLY ASKED US….
WHO GETS FIRST ACCESS TO ACCOUNTS LIKE
@GOD @SATAN ETC
Obviously accounts like this would be taken up immediately
Obviously they would take these accounts and reserve them from the public
Q specially mentioned @SATAN accounts and asks us WHO is really running it?
So we know an account like that wasn’t just picked up on a first come first serve basis, SO WHO CONTROLS IT AND WHY DO THEY MOCK GOD? WHY DO THEY NORMALIZE/HUMOUR SATAN?
MORE IMPORTANTLY
WHY DO THESE ACCOUNTS COME OUT IN POLITICAL LOCKSTEP W THE RADICAL LEFTIST AND SATANIST AGENDAS?
Wouldn’t be surprised to see someone like OBAMA at the head of @Satan just to mock us because they can.
Someone pull these posts up if they can I think it would be a big start.
Q told us to specifically dig into accounts w names that are reserved from first come first serve like GOD and SATAN…
WHO is really running it
There's our answer
Could be! Not sure World Health would be running a mock satan/God account lol
It's all part of eliminating the infestation of bots on twitter.
What if A.I. is running the sccounts?
You have been "checked" ......mate!
Lol
Norm's death wasn't suspicious, it was a long illness. Don't know about Chadwick Boseman's untimely demise. Kobe died in a helicopter accident, Anthony Bourdain was very likely taken out, and the same could be said for MJ.
https://www.businessinsider.com/twitter-blue-adding-a-verified-check-mark-to-dead-celebrities-2023-4
u/#q2559
good catch!
Wow mods! Thanks for the sticky!
Allow me to offer a slight variation of the theory.
It is not the celebs who run these accounts. Typically, they're the face of the celebrity's name and brand and a PR professional is employed to manage those social media accounts to promote their work and manage their image.
Twitter's previous verification process was opaque. No one really knew how you'd get it, but if you were a public figure, you wanted one and went through the effort to get one. This was sold as protecting your name and your brand from imposters and trolls who'd try to make similar-looking accounts to yours and destroy your reputation.
Not all Twitter checks were bad guys.
Twitter was clearly being run by assets of the intelligence community including many former high ranking officials from various US intel agencies who has access to everything, including DMs. We learned this from the Twitter files disclosures.
Let's start with these as a base premise.
Now, allow me to add some new information. 2-3 months ago, Laura Logan's Twitter account got exposed. Turns out the guy she trusted to run her social media persona was Mossad. He had worked her as an asset, fed her stuff both real and true in order to gain her trust, and then gained control over her social media account and was using it to manipulate her audience. What kind of audience? Us. The kind of people who know what Q is, who went down the rabbit hole, who are wide awake to the evils of the world, who understand spiritual warfare, and who are patriots and nationalists loyal to their own country. Naturally, since Mossad has its tentacles in everything including controlling politicians and public figures to get them to act in Israel's interest, these people are dangerous, and so must be massaged to maintain loyalty to Israel, often using religion. Anyway, they got Laura Logan's account and comped it.
Twitter didn't start out being a spy tool. It became one slowly as intel assets infiltrated the highest ranks of the company. Eventually, the Twitter check mark became a way to identify people who were "on the team." It wasn't exact, since they had to let some non-players in just for the sake of appearing to be fair, but for the most part, Twitter became a way for the WEF/Davos cultists to talk to each other and to push their collective message to the world. Ever notice how the Left always seem to be on-message, unified, even to the point of using the same language for everything? The thought leaders coordinated, and the Twitter check mark was a way of verifying you were "on the team." Like any "secret society," they worked out in the open, but used secret signals to identify one another. If you were ever in a frat or sorority, you'll recognize some of this. Twitter's "team players" used similar cues online. Which exactly? No idea. I'm not initiated, but I'm certain they existed.
Naturally, if you have this seal of authority that makes you look special, identifies you as "trustworthy", and which helps you identify friendlies and communicate, the last thing you want is a bunch of randos who paid $8 all getting check marks and making your job of identifying each other and coordinating harder. The spies running various celebrities and politicians around like sock puppets now had to be a lot more careful. Further, as far as their core mission of shaping public opinion goes, now they had to compete with all the popullst bloggers, "conspiracy theorists," independent journalists, and free thinkers who got to post opposing opinion with the same appearance of authority (the check mark). Elon just threw a ton of noise into a conversation and it has totally screwed up their mission and risked compromising their agents.
Comms AF
so deepstate can cgi actors, use realistic latex mask and have body doubles for all these people but cant fake a verification?
Apologies if I've missed something obvious, but this sentence stood out for me:
"Further, Why is Elon paying for Shatner, King and Lebron James to keep that check mark?"
Is there any sauce or explanation on this? I hadn't heard this and curious to hear how we know this.
here is Elon's tweet.
https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1649211324344201218
Below is an article on it with links to more tweets.
https://gizmodo.com/elon-musk-paying-blue-checkmarks-twitter-stephen-king-1850361244
Thank you, OMT3 :)
Me too!
This is a very interesting concept
Remember 3 years ago when David Rodriguez said there was a sting operation going on in Hollywood taking down the pedophilia child trafficking networks?
https://rumble.com/v21upf6-david-nino-rodriguez-first-video-exposing-hollywood-elite-pedophiles-and-hu.html
How come Hollywood stopped making movies with big name actors the last few years?
We have talked about Tom Hanks, rabbit hole evidence indicates he was arrested and yet the black hats try to make it appear he is still free.
Deepstate was trying to make it appear that the anons collecting evidence against Hollywood were spreading disinformation, labeling us conspiracy theorists.
Perhaps it was the white hats forcing some Hollywood pedophiles to put out videos from time to time, pushing disinformation to minimize the panic boiling over in Hollywood.
Remember the video Davis Spay did, "If anything happens to Tom Hanks"
Last few seconds here:
https://twitter.com/PillarHouseArt/status/1241424459267035137
I think OP is right, fake Twitter accounts having the blue check removed, these people may have been arrested for crimes against humanity. The twitter echo chamber of progressive Hollywood faces pushing the democrat socialist narrative is over.
Q post 19 says the CIA props up Hollywood assets to push Operation Mockingbird narrative.
u/#q2584
u/#q19
It could also be that celebs are just entitled dumb shits.
Apparently he gave dead people blue checks Anthony Bourdain is mention in this article
https://www.engadget.com/twitter-adds-blue-checks-to-accounts-of-dead-celebrities-223749275.html
Remember those long waits to be verified when someone joined Truth Social. Maybe the TS verification process is the same template being used at Twitter. So, there may be more to the “Truth Social” name itself. Truth Social being a bigger part to the global awakening process than we are aware of.