Frazzledrip Fake?
(media.greatawakening.win)
Comments (119)
sorted by:
Anon : Is it true that there is a version of frazzledrip on the darkweb or is it fake news?
Q: it's fake news, we have it.
This is the way I read it. They have it, and have not released "it"
Ditto
It was "fake news" that you could pick that video up on the dark web.
It was not "fake news" that it exists". President Trump verified it. One day he tweeted that Hillary looked...FRAZZLED.
i searched trump's twitter archive for frazzled and nothing comes up?
Could not find it either, but I do recall seeing it. It was a pretty big topic at the time - and fairly shocking - so plenty of people on the chans saw it and were discussing.
OR! It could be "The video is fake. We control Hillary".
Repeating, but: It was "fake news" that you could pick that video up on the dark web.
It was not "fake news" that it exists". President Trump verified it. One day he tweeted that Hillary looked...FRAZZLED.
That was when everyone on the chans knew it was true.
you got link to that FRAZZLED post from Trump?
Woulda been on his old Twitter account, which you'd likely be able to search using qagg.
I'll give it a go.
You will speak when spoken to, goyim! 😡👊🏼
That’s exactly how it’s meant to be read. Frightening
They didn't say we have it, they said they control. Whether that means they control fake news or what, nobody really knows.
Maybe they meant it was a tool they control on the dark web? It's not true, but it's a way they are fighting the Deepstate?
Yeah possibly.
They control what gets released. It’s obvious what was meant in that post
Changing what Q actually said to back up your belief/claim is a bold method. Nearly as bold as libs going "what the founders ACTUALLY meant was 'x' and therefore the 1st and 2nd amendments are invalid and abortion is a right so I was correct all along!".
I agree with you on this Spaceman. That seems like confirmation bias at its finest.
Not changing what Q said, what do you think "we control" means?
Lol this dude about to be real mad then
https://greatawakening.win/p/12jdEDNm3c/x/c/4JBy1djR3mq?d=50
Repulsive
This was done on a horror film - the whole wearing of the face thing to show the person.
Monkey see monkey do.
But for a kid, they have a small mouth to eyes.
On an adult, the eyes would be where the nose is - and you can't cut the nose off, the skin is stuck to cartilage which is different than skin on hard bone.
So there'd be a nose hole, plus a mouth and eyes hole. And it wouldn't line up correctly to wear like a halloween mask. So if they were wearing it around, it would barely fit on the face. I mean they could stick their nose through the nose hole, and the whole thing would wrinkle up.
I've tried wearing my son's mask for halloween, that's how I know.
that's like a "the glove doesn't fit" argument though isn't it? Even if its smaller it could still be held up in front of the face.
Like Dwight from the office with the CPR doll. Maybe a show of hands. I mean he is a pedo weirdo who probably eats babies. Allegedly
He tweets about eating babies....
Yes, yes he does. And literally acted out a scene where he has a face on his face. These people are sick.
Who says such things! Pure evil. Is this real?
Yep, they're real https://twitter.com/rainnwilson/status/89734319152697344
I dont know if there is such a video or not
But I do feel like the STORY behind the video was created in order to make an impact.....no too different than Q appearing on the scene and making up the story about Hll getting arrested in order to generate chatter and create misdirection for the DS........
There is such a video.
Q post 1376
think it's fake/was used for a multitude of reasons. a lot more people know about satanic pedophilia now, because of the frazzledrip story, sure it also rooted out a lot of creepers.
speaking of Huma, thought this article was interesting, it mentions Huma Abedin & HRC
at Mt. Rushmore over 20 years ago.
HRC is in a similar pose to the President Trump Mt. R. pictures. so was it planned like that? Mt. Rushmore has lots of Q connections, interesting that she took a picture there.
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2008/jun/02/hillaryclinton.uselections2008
Why is it called
HRC v"dark web" video fake news??? = HRC versus "dark web" video fake news???
and not
HRC "dark web" video fake news???
typo? with the v
it is always said that there are not typos, but everything is comms.
Yea it is, but wouldn’t Q be the one picking which questions to answer?
For a movement that claims spelling is extremely important and that there are no typos, I’d only assume that extends to questions they are answering, regardless of where they’re from.
Also if it was a typo I’d imagine Q would have called it out, like they’ve called out other misspellings in the past.
To me this is intentional. There were ways to avoid this, and Q has made an effort in the past to correct any unwanted typos.
Sigh. This was an anon on the board. It's wasn't Q.
"it is always said that there are no typos, but everything is comms"
Who always says that? It wasn't Q.
You've picked up banter and construed it to be some sort of fact. Can I suggest you read the actual Qdrops, and start from there, instead of banter and hearsay that travels along the Great Awakening grapevine?
Not to be too harsh, but it's NOT helpful when people ignore what Q has written and is all about, but somehow still pretend or imagine that they know what Q is about.
Apply due diligence, logic, empirical evidence, and discernment.
Q4535
Well pal, maybe the exact quote "it is always said that there are no typos, but everything is comms" was not said by Q
But Q talked about it several times .
https://qagg.news/?q=misspelling
Well pal, thanks, but Q talked about "misspellings" in the Q drops, indicating that they are not accidental (except when indicated; several times Q wrote a drop with a misspelling and quickly followed it up with a drop that said (paraphrase) "ignore that misspelling, I (we're) on the move" indicating that it was indeed a mistake in that case, because he (they) were using a device while moving.
In the OP, the "misspelling" is something an anon wrote, not what Q wrote, and Q never, ever, ever, never, wrote anything to imply that misspellings by anons are "comms".
See the point? the fren above heard something about Q, was not actually properly informed or misunderstood what he (she) had heard, and then went with the idea that somehow, a comment by an anon on the board was "comms" because intentional misspellings by Q are intentional. And this, pal, is just plain wrong.
Some of us actually have a vested interest in seeing that Q is properly and well understood.
Do you see? With Q, you cannot just invest a half effort or a glance and assume that you know what is going on. Some of us have invested hundreds and thousands of hours over the last 5 years to work with and understand and convey what Q actually is. It's a constant battle, because the Cabal and the Deep State are constantly attempting to confuse people and mislead the population as to what Q is, etc. But it's also a battle here, because as the number of anons grows, more and more newbies come in and just run with loose ideas that are not based on actual Q content or work.
We should all be making as much effort as possible to build up and promote solid, Q-based understanding of Q.
Have a great day, fren (pal).
k...you using all them words but STILL missed the point.....hahaha
Keep pontificating pal.....
Wow. Why are you here?
I don't know if it was a rant, but either way, sure, nothing wrong with arguments or making them (in the sense of arguments being assertions). But it's important to recognize that assertions are assertions, and not necessarily treat them as facts.
Perhaps my reply was harsh. Eye of the beholder, and all that.
But still, "it is always said that there are no(t) typos, but everything is comms" is a low effort statement. Who always says that?
That's not Q-content. That's pseudo-Q content. If that's harsh, then it's harsh. Failure to distinguish those is taking a heavy toll on this movement.
Or "via"
I thought it might be HRC version, on the dark web, of that video
I read it as whatever's going round on the dark web right now, is fake.
Besides, frazzled.rip (or equivalent material) have been confirmed by Sidney Powell.
She also confirmed the Kraken....ha
and then the kracken was taken out by a missile ummm i mean an RV
If Mark Meadows and Trump have confirmed Powell is BS I believe them.
Have they? Honestly, I try to keep up, but there's so much...too much.
Too much
Remember that episode of The Office where Dwight cut off that CPR dummy's face and wore it?
And now you know why Rainn Wilson hates Trump.
"He has no wallet, I checked."
I've always thought that if it was real there would be absolutely no way they'd let her continue to walk around free putting countless more children at risk.
It could have been a way to bring more attention to her so autists would dig deep and uncover the corruption of the Clinton's we always suspected. Now their multitude of political crimes and the suspicious deaths of those close to her have a giant spotlight on them.
While all of the actual truths are being exposed, the left tries to brush if off by claiming "Qanons" are obsessed with Clinton's satanic rituals. It makes their feeble deflection look silly and then BOOM the indictments with the actual truth drops!
Dennis Hastert was a known pedo while he was Speaker of the House. The FBI knew and had evidence to convict him. Nothing was done until Turkey started blackmailing him.
we'll never see it, so it only matters if it ever comes up as being used as evidence.
I don't ever want to see it, I've heard a run down of it.
Could it be possible that they're calling it fake because Huma Abedin is cooperating, and they don't want to charge her?
Q said he would be giving out disinformation too.
Q is saying that it being on the darkweb is fake news NOT that the video is fake.
How is being on the dark web fake news?
That anything anyone released on the dark web claiming it was the file from Weiner’s laptop is fake.
We've already see at least 10 mega criminals in the cabal "get deals." The "no deals" statement was CLEARLY a lie/disinfo.
100% agree! I really WANTED to believe Q when they said "NO DEALS" - but clearly that's not true. DAMMIT!
Always has been.
Yes
There is a real video, it hasn't gone vertical, the frazzledrip one that has is a fake(think it's from some crappy movie...)
perhaps frazzledrip was a directory harboring many frazzledrip type videos? The rumor alone was certainly effective at spreading the concept of what these people are into. So there's that.
https://www.vice.com/en/article/y3gedm/marjorie-taylor-greene-believes-in-frazzledrip-qanons-wildest-conspiracy-theory
Are they saying that the version circulating on the dark web is fake , but they are in possession of the real one.?
Does Q mean “we control the fake news”?
Is the stage set for a drop of HRC +++ + +++++(raw vid 5:5). EX-rvid5774.
u/#q854
The pic going around that was supposedly from the frazzledrip video was a heavy metal band album cover from the 90s. It's very sick picture. But it wasn't from any video.
Yeah, death metal band of vegans from Pittsburgh called Abnegation.
who in the actual fook would want that alblum in their collection.
Satanist or people that hate themselves and haven’t found out about satanism yet
If it was real, it would 100 percent still be circulating if it were ever released. You could never convince me otherwise.
It would've been plastered all over 4chan and 8chan, jannies would have never been able to keep it from being posted.
Now could it exist? I guess so. But it was never publicly released, "deep web" or otherwise. Half of America would've had an absolute field day
The frazzle drip video came out w/in a few months of Q starting. It was an op. Think about it. There is no way in hell that this would make it to youtube.
We control can only mean one thing. Exactly what it says.
It was in reference to a particular video that was circulating that looked as if Huma could have been a star, it was not Huma or Hillary
Bullshit. One trip down Wikileaks will tell you all about podesta and Clinton sacrificing chickens to moloch.
Very interesting
It was a hotel room fake. Anons found the specific web ad that included the images.
There was never a video
I believe you, but this would be a great dish served with sauce...
anyone?
I don’t archive that stuff.
Basically if it were real it’s literally illegal to hold.
If you search around you can find shots.
There was an even more fake astroturf w like some stupid mask shot.
The one I am talking about had a bed w someone photoshopped into it and blood everywhere w a hammer looking like it beat someone’s head in.
It’s not stuff I care to go into more detail about.
Unless you’re feeling froggy leave that sort of thing up to the autists. Explicit images like that are quite literally traps most of the time so - ask yourself if you really want to see
I don't. lol Thanks Patriot
o7
Better battles elsewhere.
Amen to that heh. Get her Kekz
When I first learned of this supposed video I slipped into depression for about 2 weeks
I understand.
You have to Remember to Fight.
If you gaze into Darkness, Darkness also Gazes into you.
This isn’t solely a logical fight or one of Tenacity of Character. These demonic persons, lean into The Fallen as much as they can as to not fight alone.
Remember that. I forgot it. Eventually it did catch up to me. Found myself battling Complex PTSD and Addiction cuz I didn’t take heed and wear God’s Armor.
Q didn’t mention Spiritual Warfare for no reason. It wasn’t a “Hey; this is neat.”.
It was:
Look. This is a requirement or you’re going to get Attacked in ways you can’t fathom.
I did. Like every angle - slow cuts. Then one day I was just JACKED. My soul was sick. I couldn’t feel. Nightmares constantly. Couldn’t sleep. So I escaped however I could and it didn’t click for me to ask God for help.
I. Couldn’t. Feel. Anything.
Sitting there knowing the stakes, having researched for decades - I stopped feeling entirely. I was walking dead.
Don’t ignore and remember - this isn’t something we can fight alone. It’s not.
You don’t walk into Armageddon without realizing it’s the eternal battle of Dark vs Light - that you are just a link in a long chain that The Fallen want to snap so that chain stops with you.
I think more folks here need to read the new book Twilight Language by Michael Hoffman. If in fact we are in a "The Revelation of the Method" phase that means those who have acted in occult and vile ways believe that disclosure to the public no longer matters for their plans, so that revelations have a specific role to not just demoralize but initiate the seeking public into the atrocious acts and devilry the seekers hope to expose. Whether the video is real or faked its attention in the minds of so many is itself just another layer of psy op.
Hoffman is BASED. That book is like William Morgan taking his revenge!
People here think they woke up a long time ago if they have twenty years of historical context since they turned from their complacency. But Hoffman has, since his childhood, absorbed and researched more deeply than almost any of us ever will.
Sadly, the efforts of certain woke police have managed to marginalize his best ideas so even people on this site, who should be learning from him, have mostly never heard of him.
I threw up - just from whatever 'fake' version I saw.
I know a guy who saw it. It had been uploaded to a site called LiveGore and he watched it before it was taken down rather quickly. He described the video to me as appparently having been filmed inside of Comet Pizza, in which Hillary and Huma slowly tortured a little girl to death, drinking her blood, etc. At the end they sliced off the girl's face and Huma wore it like a mask. He's former military and has seen a lot of disturbing stuff, but he said that the video was very terrible and wishes it was fake. It's one of those "things you can't unsee" deals.
Actually, there was a video. I never saw it, but my friend saw a video on LiveGore involving Hillary and Huma torturing a girl to death. If it was fake, then it's not THE Hillary video. I do not know. It was taken down very promptly though, he said. He says he hopes it was fake, because it really disturbed his soul.
This is what I spoke of. The shills were heavy so maybe it was real. I didn’t watch I just saw stills. Involve a hammer?
I dunno about a hammer. He said it looked like the interior of Comet Pizza rather than a hotel room. Draining blood, slow torture, crap like that. Cut the girl's face off when she died and Huma wore it like a mask. I never saw it, but it's what he described. He's e-military and has seen some gruesome stuff, but that really unsettled him.
I heard rumors of this one.
How is he now?
He have any proximity to NYC / Blackrock / Contracting?
In the video you describe the girl was special needs supposedly. Terrified. They did it with no sedative or anything and the more she screamed in terror the more they seemed to get off on it.
Like I said I never watched but I saw a lot of mentions.
Code Monkey was taking the links offline as soon as they popped up at the time ( by the way he was furiously keeping up while Q was rapid firing drops at the time ).
%1000 Q+ was using automated software to manage some of the drops.
The stringers were also often met with Anon comments matching up and my group watched the stringers modify and read back and fourth. They were coordinating comms there. What they meant I dunno - it was fascinating to watch.
My group was messing w the API for 8chan at the time and whatever it was they were using was legit operating without that API. It was garbage. My guess is a series of GET / POST level custom software like Playwright or Jasmine / Cypress. It was fast. Also very precise.
Can you help me solve this?
Nah, he's just a guy I know. His friend told him of the video on LiveGore and sent him the link. He said it's one of those "things you can't unsee" and said he hopes it was fake, because it was really sick. I don't know how something like that can be faked.
Could be flooding the 'dark web' with fakes so that nobody can tell the difference anymore. And the "fact checkers" can all claim they "already de-bunked that."
A highly convincing fake that apparently was never released by the fakers. I have a hard time believing anything that existed long enough for an anon to take legitimate screenshots was somehow subsequently removed from existence.
When it comes out that yet another one of your favorite celebrities is a child rapist, do you ever feel stupid/evil that you defended them so much and mocked everyone who was trying to expose their sex crimes against children? Or are you more of a “pedophilia is just another sexuality bro, don’t be hatin’” kind of guy?
Really curious if you actually care about child sex trafficking or if you just like to laugh about it and think it’s all hilarious like the other people in your little anti-Q club.
So a few things.
First, there is no celebrity on the planet who could cause me to have a mental breakdown or anything should they be shown to be a child rapist. I appreciate the art of artists, and some artists I admire. It doesn't mean that my world will shatter if I find out they're bad people.
If you have specific evidence for specific people, lock them up. Kevin Spacey is a fantastic actor and I've enjoyed his work, and also find his history as an assaulter repugnant and am glad he's been exposed.
If you can get a video of Clinton eating a child, then lock her up and throw away the key. I was never a fan. But we'll need to see the evidence first. Not because I like Clinton or want to defend her, but because I don't assume people I don't like politically must be pedophiles.
Second, I have mocked nobody. So no, I won't feel bad.
Third, I am in favor of no sexuality where both parties aren't consenting, so no, it's not "just another sexuality." I would challenge you to find any liberal on the street who espouses this view. This type of thing is a straw-man argument amplified by liberal websites that get advertising clicks from angry conservatives who are sharing this stuff on Facebook.
I really do care. And I would challenge you to find any post of mine here or on Reddit that has laughed at you.
I believe there are pedophiles in the world, and I believe some of them are rich, and I absolutely believe that some celebrities are probably criminals and get away with it because they're rich. None of this is new or shocking information.
I just don't believe any of that has to do with Donald Trump, Q, or the election. I don't accept that everyone against Trump is aligning out of pedophilic self-interest.
There's a lot about Q I don't believe. But "sometimes rich and famous people are criminals" is an area of agreement. If you want to accuse specific people, then you'll need specific evidence, but the fact a famous person might also be a bad person is... not shocking in the least.