AND THAT IS THE TRIGGER...ALL Election Remedies HAVE been exhausted...per the US Constitution...The Supremes did NOT do their duty as required by law...sucks to be them!!!
I'm not surprised. I was surprised that people were so negative about the case. I mean hell, how many of us have had a legal request heard by the Supreme Court? If there was nothing to it, it would have died on the 1st try, no matter what or how they refiled it.
It’s clear, to anyone who has spent considerable time on this site that, all legal avenues will be tried until they inevitably fail - to which the military will respond
If they won and the Election was overturned by the Courts I'm not sure MIL is the 'only way'. This is probably part of the show to display the levels of corruption go all the way up.
The election could have been overturned legally. But “The Courts” rely on the other branches of government to actually enforce their rulings.
With the proverbial, Or in some cases literal, guns of the Legislative and Executive. The Judicial branch and Supreme Court are in essence a bunch of people in fancy robes arguing about crap the majority of the population either doesn’t care about, or can’t follow, because the argument is in legalese as opposed to plain English.
And at the moment. Neither the Legislative and Executive seem inclined to actually enforce any proposed ruling in such a case.
Even if they had heard the case and annulled the election the cabal's crooks would have just ignored it and continued until someone put a bullet between their eyes.
In my opinion this ends one way. Jefferson told us a long time ago what that way is:
"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants."
Yes it does. They made each and every elected official sphincter tighten. They gave it merit. By giving it its due it can’t just be dismissed next time. BARR shut this down. ‘Highest law enforcement in the land said all was good. There was an insurrection!!! The Republican administration 2 timeAG Barr said it was legit. BARR Is one of the most experienced if not the
Most experienced AG we have had serve. That shutdown dems when they crusted mhueller it’s shut down us when we cried election fraud.
Barrs Dad hired Epstein when he was young to teach at The Dalton School. Barr is dirty, part of the cabal, and I guess, part of the plan, as Trump chose him to be AG.
Barr is CIA. At this point everyone says Jews but it’s not it’s C.I.A. they are a separate country. When our goals align with theirs they run ops we pull out the flags blow up countries. When they don’t they don’t and it’s on home turf they make us fight each other. They are the media they are entertainment. We are the cattle. They control what we think are and do.
My point was presented in court the investigation of election fraud is covered.
It would've been nice to see the Court issue a favorable ruling and then have the Biden admin and Congress simply ignore it. That certainly would force the military to act and the reason for their actions would have been publicly documented... so I'd still see this as a net loss.
That would have probably been a better outcome to be honest.
But I would have been called a doomer for pointing out that there is no way SCOTUS would rule in favor of us on this.
Honestly had even forgotten this was going to happen at this point. I'm not sure this would ever actually reach SCOTUS in any tangible way. Maybe after the tenth.
True. When looking at it, these Brunson boys at least give it a tenacious shot. They are even going after 3 Scotus Judges.
And so, what if they fail? It only goes to show the truth of what Q wrote. Yet, this process has to live it self out, otherwise no correction can be administered afterwards.
The Law avenue had to be pursued in order to show the corruption in all three branches of the government. It all has to be reconstructed with honest people and patriots.
To be precise "The petition for a writ of certiorari before judgment is
denied."
The case is still in progress in the Tenth Circuit, (it's 23-4042 on their docket) and Brunson took the quite extraordinary step of petitioning the Supreme Court to step in before the Tenth Circuit has ruled. That's what the "before judgment" part is about.
Scotus is generally very reluctant to grant cert before judgment - it is an appellate court and there's nothing to appeal until the lower court has ruled - so it is not at all surprising that this petition was denied.
So what happens next? The Tenth Circuit will eventually rule and this ruling will almost certainly go against Brunson. At that point Brunson will be able to appeal to the supreme Court arguing that Tenth Circuit got it wrong. Note that this appeal will not be arguing the about facts of the case, but whether the Tenth properly applied the law to the facts as presented in the lower courts.
Assuming that Brunson does appeal (as I expect) the appeal will appear on the Court docket with a new docket number, which means only that the right forms were mailed to the right address. There is no process for rejecting the appeal at that point. Eventually the appeal will get to the top of the stack and will be scheduled for "conference", meaning that court will decide whether they want to hear the case or not. That decision will be communicated in the next set of court orders which will either be a denial of cert so the Tenth Circuit decision stands, or scheduling the case to be heard sometime this fall when the 2023 session has started.
Me, I would bet very long odds that the Court chooses to let the eventual Tenth Circuit decision stand.
The interesting thing to me about the Brunson case is that it's just kinda like this massive weapon that keeps floating around and regularly becoming available to the USSC.
IMO the Deep State is more afraid of that case than we are anxious to see it succeed.
Even if "military is the only way" wasn't out there, a case that would essentially force the majority of the government to be removed was never going to fly. Maybe of the founding fathers were sitting on the court then sure. Or, if it had been smaller in scope, focusing on a handful of members to set precedent, then maybe.
Is that going to be the same for BHO? Obamacare? Smith;Mundt edits? Separately, I wonder if the original BHO birth cert was in the files picked up at Mar a Lago. You know that DJT found it somewhere.
BARR shut this down. He said there was nothing to investigate. He is the head lawman. He said there was nothing. Every elected official could say the head lawman everything was on the up and.
I think they let it go to run through the process because the the conclusion they were going to draw was that the path means nothing. They gave the theory its day in court. It’s still a valid theory.
I read an interesting article about the Brunson cases and the case was made that the Supreme Court literally doesn't have the authority to grant the relief sought. Separation of powers or some such - that the constitution doesn't allow it.
I wasn't going to comment on this because SOME anons here have no clue what the Brunson certiorari even said. I read it, beginning to end twice. FIRST, they were asking the Courts to throw out Congress. Literally, arrest Congress for violating its oath. SECOND, Frens, if you really thought that was a possibility, you are not an adult Q researcher. I am sorry if that hurts ur feels, but believing the Courts would entertain that notion is fuking childish. Yeah, the dooming here is kinda funny when you talk about the courts being corrupted in THIS BRUNSON context. I GUARANTEE 95% of the people posting here NEVER actually read the RfC. Not even a sentence.
this was the add on by the new state of NEW CALIFORNIA.... the original petition had failed already and tthis was a followup that was never going to have standing.
All legal avenues of remedy for the stolen election have been exhausted.
Maybe it's the military up for bat.
I expect Impeachment of Biden to also fail. SCOTUS chief justice will preside over the Senate trial.
If there even IS a trial at all. I doubt it.
Lindsay Gayrham said it's DOA in the senate, he's friends with biden
Judicial avenues perhaps, but not all legal avenues.
Where is Gaytriot Front when you need them?
aww yeah. plus we don't want the movie to end too soon.
You have got to be kidding.
I think sarcasm runs through his blood
AND THAT IS THE TRIGGER...ALL Election Remedies HAVE been exhausted...per the US Constitution...The Supremes did NOT do their duty as required by law...sucks to be them!!!
The whole system has been corrupted.
There is a plan and it must be carried out in a particular way. "It must be done right."
Yup
Since 1865.
I'm shocked. Who could have guessed?
Baffled
DeeBOOONKED
"Everyone knows that was debunked."
"Uh, we are the first people to see this video clip."
Cue the panicked googly eyes.
oh yeah-that was so funny. she was sweating bullets.
Are you a scientist?
Better. A woman!
So a biologist?
But what is a woman?
Nobody "Nose", because Word Salad ->_________________________...........
I’m a conspiracy therapist...in case anyone’s looking for one...
Not that anyone asked...but...
Flabbergasted
Don’t know why you got a down vote, it was expected. Always a long shot.
When it first came up, a lot of people had their expectations way up, just check the time machine (search feature)
I hope nobody was surprised by this. At some point "read the room" applies
I'm not surprised. I was surprised that people were so negative about the case. I mean hell, how many of us have had a legal request heard by the Supreme Court? If there was nothing to it, it would have died on the 1st try, no matter what or how they refiled it.
We predicted this would happen and were accused of being low energy and black-pilled. Kek.
It’s clear, to anyone who has spent considerable time on this site that, all legal avenues will be tried until they inevitably fail - to which the military will respond
Another thing to worry about!
Will it respond?
If yes, will it respond as it should to protect our Republic?
If no, what happens then? Perpetual slavery? Ruin?
I'm hoping and praying it will respond as it should because I do not believe humanity was intended to serve satan.
Obama purged all "stand-up" and loyal constitutional officers...
They gone... all we got is milley...
Call me a doomer all you want, but "hope" isn't an action plan...
Dig in, it's gonna get worse
Cast your cares on the Lord and he will sustain you; he will never let the righteous be shaken.
Yet, here we are.
What I don't get is how people keep sending them their money. Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me a dozen times since last November....
It just seems like better cases have already been brought and dismissed.
The Executive Branch is corrupt? Check
The Legislative Branch is corrupt? Check
The Judicial Branch is corrupt? Check
The military is the only way! Check
Constitutional Crisis! Military is the only way!
If they won and the Election was overturned by the Courts I'm not sure MIL is the 'only way'. This is probably part of the show to display the levels of corruption go all the way up.
The election could have been overturned legally. But “The Courts” rely on the other branches of government to actually enforce their rulings.
With the proverbial, Or in some cases literal, guns of the Legislative and Executive. The Judicial branch and Supreme Court are in essence a bunch of people in fancy robes arguing about crap the majority of the population either doesn’t care about, or can’t follow, because the argument is in legalese as opposed to plain English.
And at the moment. Neither the Legislative and Executive seem inclined to actually enforce any proposed ruling in such a case.
Even if they had heard the case and annulled the election the cabal's crooks would have just ignored it and continued until someone put a bullet between their eyes.
In my opinion this ends one way. Jefferson told us a long time ago what that way is:
"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants."
**When #45 said D.C. HAD BEEN CORRUPTED AT THE HIGHEST LEVELS...we think he ALSO MEANT the Supreme Court. 🔥😡🔥👿🔥
THIS "Brunson" case REVEALS JUST THIS!!! Why else would SCOTUS NOT WANT TO GET TO THE BOTTOM OF VOTER FRAUD???
Here is an Amicus brief which spells out the details...starting on Page VI:**
https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/22/22-1028/268439/20230605163645002_Loy%20Amicus%20-%20v5.pdf
The fact it's being denied suggests it has merit.
The fact the it's being denied tells me that SCOTUS agrees that there is NO LAW in the USA that HAS TO be obeyed. Not even the constitution.
It's black and white what the procedures are, and SCOTUS says they don't have to be obeyed. To SCOTUS there is no such thing as the US Constitution.
I mean. SCOTUS can declare whatever they want is legal. But the rely on the other branches to actually enforce the declarations.
Famous example being Worcester v. Georgia in 1832.
...indeed...
Yes it does. They made each and every elected official sphincter tighten. They gave it merit. By giving it its due it can’t just be dismissed next time. BARR shut this down. ‘Highest law enforcement in the land said all was good. There was an insurrection!!! The Republican administration 2 timeAG Barr said it was legit. BARR Is one of the most experienced if not the Most experienced AG we have had serve. That shutdown dems when they crusted mhueller it’s shut down us when we cried election fraud.
Barrs Dad hired Epstein when he was young to teach at The Dalton School. Barr is dirty, part of the cabal, and I guess, part of the plan, as Trump chose him to be AG.
Barr is CIA. At this point everyone says Jews but it’s not it’s C.I.A. they are a separate country. When our goals align with theirs they run ops we pull out the flags blow up countries. When they don’t they don’t and it’s on home turf they make us fight each other. They are the media they are entertainment. We are the cattle. They control what we think are and do.
My point was presented in court the investigation of election fraud is covered.
Wasn’t ever going to happen as much as we were hoping. If “military is the only way”, means SC won’t do diddley.
It would've been nice to see the Court issue a favorable ruling and then have the Biden admin and Congress simply ignore it. That certainly would force the military to act and the reason for their actions would have been publicly documented... so I'd still see this as a net loss.
That would have probably been a better outcome to be honest.
But I would have been called a doomer for pointing out that there is no way SCOTUS would rule in favor of us on this.
Honestly had even forgotten this was going to happen at this point. I'm not sure this would ever actually reach SCOTUS in any tangible way. Maybe after the tenth.
True. When looking at it, these Brunson boys at least give it a tenacious shot. They are even going after 3 Scotus Judges.
And so, what if they fail? It only goes to show the truth of what Q wrote. Yet, this process has to live it self out, otherwise no correction can be administered afterwards.
The Law avenue had to be pursued in order to show the corruption in all three branches of the government. It all has to be reconstructed with honest people and patriots.
Reconstructed and reconstituted, indeed.
Shocker.
So what does "petiton denied" mean?
They are not discussing it? Or it is dead forever?
I wonder... maybe the timing isn't right, yet, and this pattern of denial is simply a holding pattern that continues to alert more people to it?
Just trying to be hoepful.
To be precise "The petition for a writ of certiorari before judgment is denied." The case is still in progress in the Tenth Circuit, (it's 23-4042 on their docket) and Brunson took the quite extraordinary step of petitioning the Supreme Court to step in before the Tenth Circuit has ruled. That's what the "before judgment" part is about. Scotus is generally very reluctant to grant cert before judgment - it is an appellate court and there's nothing to appeal until the lower court has ruled - so it is not at all surprising that this petition was denied.
So what happens next? The Tenth Circuit will eventually rule and this ruling will almost certainly go against Brunson. At that point Brunson will be able to appeal to the supreme Court arguing that Tenth Circuit got it wrong. Note that this appeal will not be arguing the about facts of the case, but whether the Tenth properly applied the law to the facts as presented in the lower courts.
Assuming that Brunson does appeal (as I expect) the appeal will appear on the Court docket with a new docket number, which means only that the right forms were mailed to the right address. There is no process for rejecting the appeal at that point. Eventually the appeal will get to the top of the stack and will be scheduled for "conference", meaning that court will decide whether they want to hear the case or not. That decision will be communicated in the next set of court orders which will either be a denial of cert so the Tenth Circuit decision stands, or scheduling the case to be heard sometime this fall when the 2023 session has started.
Me, I would bet very long odds that the Court chooses to let the eventual Tenth Circuit decision stand.
Thank you for this!
Quality post. Thanks!
Thank you.
Can appeal 1 time I believed, if appeal fail, just have to wait the last 3 active cases
Ho hum, didn't we know this was a nothing burger months ago?
Not blackpilling, just thought it was pre-ordained. Unless there was something I missed.
The interesting thing to me about the Brunson case is that it's just kinda like this massive weapon that keeps floating around and regularly becoming available to the USSC.
IMO the Deep State is more afraid of that case than we are anxious to see it succeed.
u/#q26
Respond from Raland Brunson, 3 more to go? https://files.catbox.moe/m3b9dx.jpeg
SCOTUS denied it because the 10th Circuit has not finished its judgment of the case.
Even if "military is the only way" wasn't out there, a case that would essentially force the majority of the government to be removed was never going to fly. Maybe of the founding fathers were sitting on the court then sure. Or, if it had been smaller in scope, focusing on a handful of members to set precedent, then maybe.
What are the chances this rumor is true? SCOTUS is salivating for the perfect case. The rewrites and retries are moving it in that direction.
If JRB is not a President, then his SC appointee is null and void, which means all rulings, which included JRB’s SC, pick are null and void.
Is that going to be the same for BHO? Obamacare? Smith;Mundt edits? Separately, I wonder if the original BHO birth cert was in the files picked up at Mar a Lago. You know that DJT found it somewhere.
Great question, but I think DJT would not keep such important papers in storage. They would be in a very secure locale.
Not me 🖐
I'm shocked......... SHOCKED !!!
This had to happen if indeed the military is the only way. Yet, when does the military become the only way?
BARR shut this down. He said there was nothing to investigate. He is the head lawman. He said there was nothing. Every elected official could say the head lawman everything was on the up and.
I think they let it go to run through the process because the the conclusion they were going to draw was that the path means nothing. They gave the theory its day in court. It’s still a valid theory.
I could be wrong but it makes sense to me.
I read an interesting article about the Brunson cases and the case was made that the Supreme Court literally doesn't have the authority to grant the relief sought. Separation of powers or some such - that the constitution doesn't allow it.
What a "wicked shocka"
I wasn't going to comment on this because SOME anons here have no clue what the Brunson certiorari even said. I read it, beginning to end twice. FIRST, they were asking the Courts to throw out Congress. Literally, arrest Congress for violating its oath. SECOND, Frens, if you really thought that was a possibility, you are not an adult Q researcher. I am sorry if that hurts ur feels, but believing the Courts would entertain that notion is fuking childish. Yeah, the dooming here is kinda funny when you talk about the courts being corrupted in THIS BRUNSON context. I GUARANTEE 95% of the people posting here NEVER actually read the RfC. Not even a sentence.
Nailed It!
What was the case number - 22-1028 What is Q post 1028? 5:5
what all the courts have said basically is fraudulant elections will stand and there is no remedy....expected.....
IF there is a plan, and the military is it, now is the time....but perhaps they are all compromised too...
Now they target individual SC justices. They arnt finished yet
this was the add on by the new state of NEW CALIFORNIA.... the original petition had failed already and tthis was a followup that was never going to have standing.
Brunson's need to team up the Two forensic investigators-turned-whistleblowers, John Moynihan and Larry Doyle,