So what I am gathering is that there was a second unnamed assassin in the area that took the real shot, and the Thomas Matthew kid was a patsy to pin it all on like Lee Harvey Oswald. Don't these CIA spooks have any other playbook?
Exactly. Everything seems fishy and something tells me that we'll never know the truth. Unless you get initiated in to such matters. The question is: do you really want to be?
He didn't mention a second assassin once, only that security was likely compromised to get the shooter on the roof. I also think a closer and better trained second shooter would not have missed.
a professional sniper would have been able to accurately fire a 2nd shot.
The secondary shots that got that killed and injured the crowd are not shots of a professional, they seemed panicked.
None of us know for sure, but I speculate that this kid was the only shooter, but had inside help.
MK Ultra? I think so. kid was too young and stupid to not realize he would be killed in the process. They probably told him they would help him escape and promote him to full cia agent or something.
Why assume the second, better shooter, was closer? I think it more likely he was positioned further away, on the rooftop behind the patsy, firing from pretty much the same angle
Kitty unleashed on Twitter is discussing the second shooter in the water tower. He is posting videos of people at the rally discussing a shooter at the water tower too. The grassy knoll of today.
There is another rooftop behind the front one, further back. If it were me id put the distraction up front to distract from the real shooter positioned behind him, probably camoflaged into the roof. Just my theory
Funny you should say that because there is a long standing theory that one of the Kennedy shooters was on a lower floor within the schoolbook depository
And shoot some random innocent crowd member to increase crowd anxiety and confusion and take immediate attention off the 'origin' location possibilities of the shot.
Exactly. This is another question I have. If there was one shooter only, we are supposed to believe the first shots were so inaccurate they struck people way up in the bleachers. Then the next shot was so accurate it was nearly a kill shot? It doesn't add up.
I see a few possibilities:
I think maybe one shooter was firing distraction shots into the crowd while the other was aiming for Trump.
Perhaps one shooter was a good shot and the patsy was an off the charts terrible shot.
Another possibility is that another sniper farther away was spotted and critically wounded which then caused the would be assassin to start firing wildly into the crowd
I'm assuming the FBI is correct absent strong evidence.
I see no reason why 4chan started looking at this yearick guy in the first place.
The shooter was said to have no ID on him. But I see two pieces of evidence that can easily be traced back to him or his family.
The gun was said to be bought by his father.
They also found his car near the rally.
.
Also the family has said No, you got the wrong guy. It's not our kid. He was upstairs playing video games
Bottom line: Secret Service is totally compromised and cannot be trusted to protect President Trump. He needs private security only. I'll bet there are thousand of special forces guys just like this one who would sign up in a heartbeat.
Trump could do worse than call him up to be honest. Someone from outside the system who could consult directly to Trump and who is answerable only to Trump.
Yes!!! And I have one more proposal. How about a livestream of all future rallys from a secured location? These @$$clowns are dumb enough to try it again.
The kid didn't get off any more than three shots, and there wasn't a ""SeCoNd sHoOtEr""....
IF there had been a 2nd, Trump would be dead, not just wounded, that's the REASON for having a 2nd, to ENSURE the kill happens, not just to ""observe""....
Way too many people just throwing out random ""facts"", that just aren't Facts at all...
You see it in videos both counter snipers fire on the kid... making a total of at least three total shooters that we know of. Not accounting for any additional sniper coverage off screen.
The first three shots were consistent with alleged weapon A, the next five were consistent with alleged weapon B, and the final “acoustic impulse” was emitted by a possible weapon C,
3 shots by the kid on the roof. Counter Sniper fire and something with may not a shot at all.
In the current explanation there is a shooter and 2 snipers so 3 shooters, via audio, makes sense. If sniper 2 didn't shoot, there easily could have been a cop or other SS shooting as well.
I remember basic training. We had a sniper DS (drill sergeant)—He went out a few hundred yards and waved at us. Another DS gave a speech, then we were asked to find the sniper. No one could that I could remember. Guess where he was? Right in front of us.
We have the best training in the history of the world and with God we are the best… remove God and the best will even miss. :)
Great take. I hope someone on Trump's team gets him on their detail.. this is the straight shooter i feel comfortable with.. i think he should be paid though.
Its far more likely that the very top of the SS is compromised amd facilitated the attempt with the local corrupt police in a left leaning state. Pair that with dei hires the jv team (why? I guess cuz he isnt prez and since myorkas is in charge) guarding him until he wins and it leaves open the possibility for shenanigans.
Perpetuating the talking points of the lie that it is a left leaning state does nothing other than provide division or attempt to baseline that false narrative.
Except one indicates fraud, deception and abuse of power and governance while the other is consent of the minds and will of the resident people. As PA was clearly a state with manipulation and questionable /illegal election results in so many ways it can't be claimed this point is spot on but rather PA wasnt leaning at all. However, currently all indications appear that the majority of residents are hard right for DJT.
His point has nothing to do with which way the state leans, but with who controls its government. That would be the fraudsters, and as such his point is 100% valid.
The kid in question was a competition shooter -- varsity rifle team. I have no trouble believing that Crooks could hit a man-sized target accurately at 150yds, but a sniper he was not. A sniper would have done the smart thing and aimed for center-mass, or else would have accounted for wind factor before taking the first shot.
I don't believe there was a second shooter -- I believe that the Deep State fully intended on killing the would-be assassin whether he made the shot or missed, but had no direct contact with the kid. Supposedly Crooks posted a video about planning to shoot Trump, but afaiaa the post was deleted, presumably to scrub the evidence of premeditation, and depending on when the video was made would have given the Deep State an opportunity to create a security gap by ensuring Trump's security detail was understaffed and reliant on the Police Department to cover the only fucking building where a competent shooter would go to make an attempt on Trump's life.
I don't believe there was a second shooter -- I believe that the Deep State fully intended on killing the would-be assassin whether he made the shot or missed, but had no direct contact with the kid.
It limits the appearance of culpability. The top brass of the SS can say "oh well we needed everyone and their dog to protect Jill Biden at her event and couldn't spare any more agents" and then hide behind the distinction between a former president and a member of the first family when it comes to the agency's priorities.
Quietly leaving a gap in the security for the shooter to take advantage of is easier than having to position a backup plan, and opens the door to blame local law enforcement.
I think the solution is to bring in the best security professionals in the business to supplement the Secret Service. If they don't declare the site protected, then Trump doesn't go. Have these professionals second guess every single thing the Secret Service does. If they can't do their job, then get someone who will. They would have told the SS to fucking secure that building or any other point of concern or Trump doesn't go. It's as simple as that. Want to bring in some fat female who can't even holster a weapon, then fine. When the shit hits the fan, her fat ass will be knocked to the ground and a real security professional will take her place.
I agree with what he is saying about the SS analyzing locations and planning prior to a president's arrival, however my question is --- does a former president get that same level of protection for their political rallies?
It's possible that they do not.
I have no idea, but I cannot assume they do.
He’s a candidate for president. Considering the nations history, he should be getting full coverage through the election. Clearly they’re not fulfilling this obligation to him or RFK.
i've seen saying for a long time... the DS playbook isn't deep. they keep using the same play over & over & over... because the sheeple are too damn dumb to figure it out.
when something works, it just works.
forget about the kid for just a moment, climbing up the ladder, getting into position, taking aim, etc.
access to the ladder should not have even been an option. it would have either been totally blocked off by armed security or police, or removed completely until the rally was over.
did this kid just walk up to the rally location, with a loaded RIFLE & no one saw him beforehand. did he walk there on foot, carrying a big ass RIFLE with him? did someone drop him off? did he drive himself & park right next to the building??
we had all the DNA, photos, his background, supposed Blackrock vids he was part of, his fucking high school photo, all this useless info about someone who we still don't know for sure whether it was him or not.
too bad we can't ask him, because he was taken out just like that, by our "wonderful", "intelligent" & "top of the line" secret service or police forces, that apparently sucked shit at their job, up until they fired that killshot on the 20-year old supposed assassin.
100% absolute, inside job
100% the "kid" was a patsy.
100% the MSM "facts" don't add up, AS USUAL.
0% chance that no security, police or SS detail didn't see him show up, crawl up a ladder & get into prone position, then IMMEDIATELY FIRED upon him once the shot was taken.
0% intel was taken on the location & the spot this kid was setup at, was chosen as a no-risk spot. i mean, you'd have clear sight of the president, but.... fuck it, we're not gonna blockade or prevent access to it. just leave it open & accessible for whoever the hell wants to get up there & do whatever they want. i mean what, is a 20 year old patsy gonna climb the ladder & attempt an assassination on Trump or something??? nahhh, that would never happen
I’d be checking the attic space of that building for a cutout. Ballistics would be similar and all the attention is to what is visible on the roof. Kinda like that DC sniper a while back sniping from the trunk of a car. It’s way more likely that someone had time to aim undistracted that way.
The key is the water tower. Who was in it? If there was no one, why? Would have been perfect way to secure the tower and the entire site. Including perfect view of the building compound.
Interesting, he has a lot of valid points that should be addressed. He is absolutely correct about the advance team going out to the site about a week or two in advance and co-ordinating with the local PD and getting their assignments. That shooter should have been challenged and shot prior to him climbing onto the roof of the building. Law enforcement from the locals to the Feds dropped the ball, badly. The leaders of each team involved in the fiasco from yesterday should all be fired, quickly and certainly. This is my opinion and only mine, We need what we called punishment for making these bad mistakes, instead of appeasing the feelings of these people. If they can't, or won't, do the job, make sure they are GONE.
While I do think this was a setup, I don’t think the deepstate is as in control as we think. I don’t believe they directly hired this freak. What they did do was create the conditions to encourage an antifa type to try and do it. From media portrayals to political dog whistles. Even though the stripping of secret service protection didn’t happen, that it was proposed plants that seed in people’s mind.
I’m sure if we could look at security details from the past few months, we would see tons of security failures at previous events… just that they aren’t visible because nothing happened until now.
Did we ever find out what the Vegas shooters motive was? Nearly 7 years later, and yet nothing. Same arguments being made today. Multiple shooters, different sounding automatic gunfire....
Almost the exact argument I was pitching to friends, both local and across the states, who were asking my opinion yesterday.
Yeh, there's zero chance this happened organically. The layers of security are insanely gone over with a fine-tooth comb before the ok is given and that dude getting to that spot would have been impossible were it not allowed to happen.
He was a retired fire chief for years of a local town. Years of history and a family with that name. I'm thinking he was just wrong place, wrong time, sadly.
So what I am gathering is that there was a second unnamed assassin in the area that took the real shot, and the Thomas Matthew kid was a patsy to pin it all on like Lee Harvey Oswald. Don't these CIA spooks have any other playbook?
I think that's what happened, too. It's the same pattern every damn time.
It doesn't make any sense that they would set this up and rely on some 20 y/o kid to succeed, so I agree there must have been a 2nd shooter.
Why didn't they just keep firing?
Trump was still on stage for a while ?
Exactly. Everything seems fishy and something tells me that we'll never know the truth. Unless you get initiated in to such matters. The question is: do you really want to be?
And they control the ballistics on the kid's rifle, and the autopsy, and everything else.
The other shooter hypothesis is appropriate, until the FACTS prove otherwise. We never did get all the facts in the Kennedy assassination.
He didn't mention a second assassin once, only that security was likely compromised to get the shooter on the roof. I also think a closer and better trained second shooter would not have missed.
Except he didn't miss. It just so happens Trump turned his head at the right moment as the trigger was pulled.
a professional sniper would have been able to accurately fire a 2nd shot.
The secondary shots that got that killed and injured the crowd are not shots of a professional, they seemed panicked.
None of us know for sure, but I speculate that this kid was the only shooter, but had inside help.
MK Ultra? I think so. kid was too young and stupid to not realize he would be killed in the process. They probably told him they would help him escape and promote him to full cia agent or something.
Why assume the second, better shooter, was closer? I think it more likely he was positioned further away, on the rooftop behind the patsy, firing from pretty much the same angle
Kitty unleashed on Twitter is discussing the second shooter in the water tower. He is posting videos of people at the rally discussing a shooter at the water tower too. The grassy knoll of today.
The same rooftop?
There is another rooftop behind the front one, further back. If it were me id put the distraction up front to distract from the real shooter positioned behind him, probably camoflaged into the roof. Just my theory
I think that would end up being too close.
It's like putting the real shooter on the 5th floor of the Texas book depository
Funny you should say that because there is a long standing theory that one of the Kennedy shooters was on a lower floor within the schoolbook depository
Well, there were a bunch of employees on the 5th floor by the window
And shoot some random innocent crowd member to increase crowd anxiety and confusion and take immediate attention off the 'origin' location possibilities of the shot.
Exactly. This is another question I have. If there was one shooter only, we are supposed to believe the first shots were so inaccurate they struck people way up in the bleachers. Then the next shot was so accurate it was nearly a kill shot? It doesn't add up.
I see a few possibilities:
I think maybe one shooter was firing distraction shots into the crowd while the other was aiming for Trump.
Perhaps one shooter was a good shot and the patsy was an off the charts terrible shot.
Another possibility is that another sniper farther away was spotted and critically wounded which then caused the would be assassin to start firing wildly into the crowd
I think they had a better trained second shooter further out; possibly on the water tower. Crooks may have thought he was the only shooter.
The body on the top of the building is not the kid that they're parading around on the news. Completely different.
Yeah the dead guy has long hair doesn't he? Did he grow out his hair or something?
The photos we have are two year old photos from high school.
So he easily could have grown his hair long.
8 CHAN HAS IDENTIFIED THE SHOOTER AS: MAXWELL YEARICK, NOT THOMAS MATTHEW CROOKS.
Based on what?
There are some compelling arguments for each, but to me it looks like Yearick.
4chan having some good analysis: https://boards.4chan.org/pol/thread/474283089
Yearick is 37 years old. The comparison photo they are using is 7 years old.
Before we get to compelling arguments, why did they choose yearick to focus on.
The media is focusing on Crooks though??
Or are you referring to 4chan??
I'm assuming the FBI is correct absent strong evidence.
I see no reason why 4chan started looking at this yearick guy in the first place.
The shooter was said to have no ID on him. But I see two pieces of evidence that can easily be traced back to him or his family.
The gun was said to be bought by his father. They also found his car near the rally. . Also the family has said No, you got the wrong guy. It's not our kid. He was upstairs playing video games
I'm the opposite: I do not assume that the FBI is correct at all.
4chan. About 20% is analysis. Rest is just trash talking. Hate that place.
Bottom line: Secret Service is totally compromised and cannot be trusted to protect President Trump. He needs private security only. I'll bet there are thousand of special forces guys just like this one who would sign up in a heartbeat.
Exactly. They are more of a risk than a help.
Agree.
I love how he proposes to Trump to do the job for him for free in the end.🤓
Trump could do worse than call him up to be honest. Someone from outside the system who could consult directly to Trump and who is answerable only to Trump.
Yes!!! And I have one more proposal. How about a livestream of all future rallys from a secured location? These @$$clowns are dumb enough to try it again.
Nope, sorry, but his ""info"", is way off....
The kid didn't get off any more than three shots, and there wasn't a ""SeCoNd sHoOtEr""....
IF there had been a 2nd, Trump would be dead, not just wounded, that's the REASON for having a 2nd, to ENSURE the kill happens, not just to ""observe""....
Way too many people just throwing out random ""facts"", that just aren't Facts at all...
There are witnesses on video saying there was a shooter at the water tower too. Kitty unleashed on X if you are so inclined.
Pay attention to the quality of the evidence though
People saw this shooter actually shoot.
Is anyone saying they eyeball witnessed a second shooter.
This could just be things they heard. Or assumed before they learned they shooter was on the rooftop.
Easy to get things wrong in situation like that.
The big tell for me is it's been Friday night, Saturday, Sunday and now Monday are those people coming forward to identify these second shooter.
Or did they get home, watch the news and realize they were mistaken.
Cool, thanks....
the more Info we have, the better we can assess the entire situation....
So no matter what angle this is looked. Trump surviving is a miracle?
A second shooter who IS trained missed while this kid randomly shoots at the crowd?
There are posts saying there were at least 3 shooters according to audio forensics.
I do not believe there were 3 shooters. I am doubting there were even 2.
B-but da expurrtz!.!
There's obviously return shots that killed the kid on the roof.
So having "3 shooters" does not mean having three shooters firing at Trump.
You see it in videos both counter snipers fire on the kid... making a total of at least three total shooters that we know of. Not accounting for any additional sniper coverage off screen.
I saw what looked like a convincing analysis that the other counter sniper position had coverage over a good area but not that area due to tree line
Good point, that crossed my mind too.
But surely, the forensics experts must have taken that into account too.
I don't know your source
aslan's post, grain of salt, cnn
3 shots by the kid on the roof. Counter Sniper fire and something with may not a shot at all.
Holy shit.....seriously??? do you have any links handy where they describe where / how there could have been 3 shooters???
There was obviously a flurry of shots; did all those come from the shooter, at Trump, or were any of the shots USSS counter-snipers?
I've just lost any & all respect I had for USSS. I shouldn't really be surprised they have become corrupt & politicized, but there you have it.....
link
Thank You!!!
You're welcome!
In the current explanation there is a shooter and 2 snipers so 3 shooters, via audio, makes sense. If sniper 2 didn't shoot, there easily could have been a cop or other SS shooting as well.
Here’s my post saying there wasn’t. Hardly qualifies as proof.
And nobody saw the 2nd sniper? Wasn't there only one building unprotected?
I remember basic training. We had a sniper DS (drill sergeant)—He went out a few hundred yards and waved at us. Another DS gave a speech, then we were asked to find the sniper. No one could that I could remember. Guess where he was? Right in front of us.
We have the best training in the history of the world and with God we are the best… remove God and the best will even miss. :)
Yes. This video is spot on.
Thank you Catturd. It's always good to get information from an expert not employed by the MSM.
Spot on. 100%
Great take. I hope someone on Trump's team gets him on their detail.. this is the straight shooter i feel comfortable with.. i think he should be paid though.
Its far more likely that the very top of the SS is compromised amd facilitated the attempt with the local corrupt police in a left leaning state. Pair that with dei hires the jv team (why? I guess cuz he isnt prez and since myorkas is in charge) guarding him until he wins and it leaves open the possibility for shenanigans.
SS top level is compromised just like the FBI.
That's not really a likely story
It's just an easy story to come up with.
Perpetuating the talking points of the lie that it is a left leaning state does nothing other than provide division or attempt to baseline that false narrative.
While not technically a left leaning state, it's certainly controlled by the left due to fraud, which makes his point spot on.
Except one indicates fraud, deception and abuse of power and governance while the other is consent of the minds and will of the resident people. As PA was clearly a state with manipulation and questionable /illegal election results in so many ways it can't be claimed this point is spot on but rather PA wasnt leaning at all. However, currently all indications appear that the majority of residents are hard right for DJT.
His point has nothing to do with which way the state leans, but with who controls its government. That would be the fraudsters, and as such his point is 100% valid.
He worded it poorly at worst.
Thank you
You're hired.
Yah I think we all know this to be true on some level but this guy articulated it beautifully, thank you.
The kid in question was a competition shooter -- varsity rifle team. I have no trouble believing that Crooks could hit a man-sized target accurately at 150yds, but a sniper he was not. A sniper would have done the smart thing and aimed for center-mass, or else would have accounted for wind factor before taking the first shot.
I don't believe there was a second shooter -- I believe that the Deep State fully intended on killing the would-be assassin whether he made the shot or missed, but had no direct contact with the kid. Supposedly Crooks posted a video about planning to shoot Trump, but afaiaa the post was deleted, presumably to scrub the evidence of premeditation, and depending on when the video was made would have given the Deep State an opportunity to create a security gap by ensuring Trump's security detail was understaffed and reliant on the Police Department to cover the only fucking building where a competent shooter would go to make an attempt on Trump's life.
How do you come to me this belief?
It limits the appearance of culpability. The top brass of the SS can say "oh well we needed everyone and their dog to protect Jill Biden at her event and couldn't spare any more agents" and then hide behind the distinction between a former president and a member of the first family when it comes to the agency's priorities.
Quietly leaving a gap in the security for the shooter to take advantage of is easier than having to position a backup plan, and opens the door to blame local law enforcement.
I think the solution is to bring in the best security professionals in the business to supplement the Secret Service. If they don't declare the site protected, then Trump doesn't go. Have these professionals second guess every single thing the Secret Service does. If they can't do their job, then get someone who will. They would have told the SS to fucking secure that building or any other point of concern or Trump doesn't go. It's as simple as that. Want to bring in some fat female who can't even holster a weapon, then fine. When the shit hits the fan, her fat ass will be knocked to the ground and a real security professional will take her place.
But why wasn't this already going on? (Especially the part about her fat ass knocked to the ground. LOL)
My guess would be there is a traitor somewhere close to President Trump.
Likely. In fact, we need to be very careful about the globos infiltrating MAGA in general. They are losing, and it's their next step.
It's obvious that there was a mole in either the police or the ss or even both. No one climbs onto a roof with a rifle without being worried.
I agree with what he is saying about the SS analyzing locations and planning prior to a president's arrival, however my question is --- does a former president get that same level of protection for their political rallies? It's possible that they do not. I have no idea, but I cannot assume they do.
Not if a member of the First Family (Jill Biden) is doing an event on the same day.
He’s a candidate for president. Considering the nations history, he should be getting full coverage through the election. Clearly they’re not fulfilling this obligation to him or RFK.
i've seen saying for a long time... the DS playbook isn't deep. they keep using the same play over & over & over... because the sheeple are too damn dumb to figure it out.
when something works, it just works.
forget about the kid for just a moment, climbing up the ladder, getting into position, taking aim, etc.
access to the ladder should not have even been an option. it would have either been totally blocked off by armed security or police, or removed completely until the rally was over.
did this kid just walk up to the rally location, with a loaded RIFLE & no one saw him beforehand. did he walk there on foot, carrying a big ass RIFLE with him? did someone drop him off? did he drive himself & park right next to the building??
we had all the DNA, photos, his background, supposed Blackrock vids he was part of, his fucking high school photo, all this useless info about someone who we still don't know for sure whether it was him or not.
too bad we can't ask him, because he was taken out just like that, by our "wonderful", "intelligent" & "top of the line" secret service or police forces, that apparently sucked shit at their job, up until they fired that killshot on the 20-year old supposed assassin.
100% absolute, inside job
100% the "kid" was a patsy.
100% the MSM "facts" don't add up, AS USUAL.
0% chance that no security, police or SS detail didn't see him show up, crawl up a ladder & get into prone position, then IMMEDIATELY FIRED upon him once the shot was taken.
0% intel was taken on the location & the spot this kid was setup at, was chosen as a no-risk spot. i mean, you'd have clear sight of the president, but.... fuck it, we're not gonna blockade or prevent access to it. just leave it open & accessible for whoever the hell wants to get up there & do whatever they want. i mean what, is a 20 year old patsy gonna climb the ladder & attempt an assassination on Trump or something??? nahhh, that would never happen
But, this is a big BUT:
T is not “The President” to the regime.
I’d be checking the attic space of that building for a cutout. Ballistics would be similar and all the attention is to what is visible on the roof. Kinda like that DC sniper a while back sniping from the trunk of a car. It’s way more likely that someone had time to aim undistracted that way.
The key is the water tower. Who was in it? If there was no one, why? Would have been perfect way to secure the tower and the entire site. Including perfect view of the building compound.
I am not a Green Beret but I know this.
Yeah, I think he knows what he is talking about. I wish POTUS would take him up on his wonderful offer!!!
An example from Ohio rally: https://x.com/ValentinaForSOS/status/1812295063470215578
Where do I sign up for President Trumps PSC detail. No pay required.
Interesting, he has a lot of valid points that should be addressed. He is absolutely correct about the advance team going out to the site about a week or two in advance and co-ordinating with the local PD and getting their assignments. That shooter should have been challenged and shot prior to him climbing onto the roof of the building. Law enforcement from the locals to the Feds dropped the ball, badly. The leaders of each team involved in the fiasco from yesterday should all be fired, quickly and certainly. This is my opinion and only mine, We need what we called punishment for making these bad mistakes, instead of appeasing the feelings of these people. If they can't, or won't, do the job, make sure they are GONE.
While I do think this was a setup, I don’t think the deepstate is as in control as we think. I don’t believe they directly hired this freak. What they did do was create the conditions to encourage an antifa type to try and do it. From media portrayals to political dog whistles. Even though the stripping of secret service protection didn’t happen, that it was proposed plants that seed in people’s mind.
I’m sure if we could look at security details from the past few months, we would see tons of security failures at previous events… just that they aren’t visible because nothing happened until now.
Did we ever find out what the Vegas shooters motive was? Nearly 7 years later, and yet nothing. Same arguments being made today. Multiple shooters, different sounding automatic gunfire....
100% probability this was a DS setup to murder Trump.
Nothing was overlooked or an accident. This was planned and an inside job.
Almost the exact argument I was pitching to friends, both local and across the states, who were asking my opinion yesterday.
Yeh, there's zero chance this happened organically. The layers of security are insanely gone over with a fine-tooth comb before the ok is given and that dude getting to that spot would have been impossible were it not allowed to happen.
I think he's right! Everything he says coincides with what Dave on X22 said tonight.
There was a second shooter and Crooks himself may have not known about the second shooter.
https://rumble.com/v573qet-ep.-3403b-it-wasnt-a-usss-failureit-was-an-op-by-the-dsnext-eventnation-wil.html
Corey Comperatore is Anagram of COERCE MY OPERATOR
You can also spell ACE PROMOTER from surname Comperatore
ACE Promoter : a person or company that finances or organizes a theatrical production
I’m not saying the deceased guy is fake, but the name is an obvious nom de guerre, either to protect privacy of family or to send coms.
He was a retired fire chief for years of a local town. Years of history and a family with that name. I'm thinking he was just wrong place, wrong time, sadly.