If youve been reading Q since Oct 2017, you know what I mean
Edit to clarify--what I mean is there is a Q way of speaking and this lacks it.
Ok eg this stood out immediately: Use your logic
Tell me why this is not Q like
Comments (253)
sorted by:
Yup. phrases like: "Use your logic"...Never used by Q. "logical thinking" is seen over 2 dozen times, plus a few "simple logic" or "reconcile using logic", which aptly applies in this case. This is a ploy to divide the Anons.
It still portends big things to come very soon.
Why would the Cabal play the "imposter Q" card unless they're taking fire?
It'd be better to never play that card at all, in my opinion.
I'm 50/50 still. Next week's events might make things a little bit clearer as to who/what this Q is.
Yeah and Im pretty much 50/50 too but def going to looking critically after a year and a half.
I dont put it past them to play a card, stupidly especially after an enormous victory like RvW.
It also could be neither Q nor cabal, but a loony site owner.
I think real Q posted 6/24.
this Q talks like a fag and his shits all retarded
My first wife was 'tarded... she's a pilot now!
Cautiously optimistic, with discerning scrutiny, going forward.
Same....
They know time is almost up for them
Options are running low
There are more than two players here. Just because it is not Q does not mean it is the cabal. Some players have interests we may not yet know about. I remain skeptical until clear proofs surface. Do your own research and look in places outside of your usual sources.
It's not black and white. I'm not saying I don't think this is the real Q. I think it's good to be cautious but optimistic. However this could also just be a case of "pay"triots hijacking to make $$$.
"This is a play to divide the anons".
And you are playing your part.
Btw the phrase is anons. The term " the anons" is NEVER used by actual anons.
👌👊
My take is the term “the anons” imply a someone from outside the anon community.
I dont think Dragon was playing a role in dividing, whatsoever, neither am I, or really anyone much from this discussion.
We can have differing opinions on our caution level of returning Q posts as we see what time tells, and still be united overall. Why be rude
I said ploy, not play. Also, pointing out it is a ploy does not make it less true, even if it does seem to make me a de facto participant. However my aim is not to divide but to unite, and calmly discussing differences of opinions does just that. Should I just stay silent so as to not "rock the boat"?. I believe this movement is mature enough to withstand healthy debates.
I dont think your comment was divisive. And IF there was trickery going on, any Q posing, actually it prob would be a ploy to divide and cause trouble.
Don't let some suspicious and judgmentall woman who likes to attack the anons bother you.
SHE is the one who is divisive.
Usually, people refer to anons with no article.
But a comment and a commenter don't become "divisive" FFS, just because of placing the article "the" before anons. What complete nonsense.
Cf. "the white hats," "the patriots", the Republicans, etc.
/werdnerd
Why bother with arguing? You’re better off cataloguing all u/usernames attacking you without reasonable discourse in a notepad.
Amen anon
touche
We need DJT and this Q do a 0-Delta drop to validate comms. This has not occurred yet. Keep a keen eye on DJTs TRUTH account for this signal
Good point fren. I am not biting until there is more credibility established. When Q went dark, my understanding is that "they" had to go dark because it became compromised. That is why I have reservation that Q would show up now. The so called posts don't sound right. There are too many out there that would love to use Q for a variety of agendas. That has always been the danger. So I am going to wait on the sidelines until I can see what shakes out.
What do you mean compromised? Yes I’m new here. Been reading daily since the election. Please show grace.
Q had a huge target on the back and plenty of resources were expended trying to bring it down. Q moved from 4chan early on to 8chan. When 8chan went down and changed to 8kun CodeMonkey had to fortify the platform. 8chan was down for weeks. When Q came back online there was verification to validate the changed trip code so we knew that it was Q. So far that has not happened with this new appearance. There were several actors gunning for the 8kun platform and when CodeMonkey left it was around the same time Q went dark. I think that is where some of the speculation started that Ron was Q. I knew something was up and ran across some info on some of the farther out areas of the web. There was chatter about a compromise. I didn't understand all the tech speak to know exactly what had happened. So you can take it for what it is worth - or not.
It was a good run while it lasted and Q served to teach many how to do research for themselves. In many ways some of that spirit has been lost and I wish it would come back. Q was never about what the narratives made it out to be. Q at least for me was a pointer towards where to start looking. Anything found along the way was up to the researcher to make up their own mind about. The rest was disinformation to throw the lurkers off. Some made a movement out of Q almost to the point of religious fanaticism. That is where it went off the rails somewhat. For a newbie, some of those Q posts have some great information and data points to jump off from. It is about the research. It might be worth the investment of time if you are new to all of this. That is what anons do because we are the news now. It is not about a social club or a political movement - it is about knowing what the hell is going on in the world so we can do something about it. Happy hunting.
This is a great answer. There is a fine line to draw between fanatics and cultism. However, Q could never be a cult bc it requires critical thinking. I agree, the purpose has been served. Many more are awake. I was unfamiliar with transitioning from 4 Chan to 8 Chan and 8 kun. I knew Ron was suspect in some of this. Thanks for your time and effort explaining.
You are most welcome fren and thank you for your kind words. I worry about people just coming into this awakening that did not have the benefit of going through the journey with Q. All they have now are the narratives that border on cultism like you stated. The truth is buried in there somewhere and needs to be drawn out from all the noise - just like Q taught us. Sounds like you will be okay because you already know this. Welcome aboard.
exactly
Obligatory reminder that Q != a single person. Therefore, expect writing styles to differ.
Q Post 15, Oct 31 2017 (aka not long before Al-Waleed aka +++ is taken out)
It has been agreed upon in retrospect that this Q post was written by Saudi Arabian Patriots. Wizards and Warlocks is a Comms term involving SA that goes back to the 80s, and the Satanic Evil POS is obvious given the Nov 2017 events.
Background on the 80s Saudi usage of Wizards/Warlocks?
https://decodingsymbols.wordpress.com/2021/08/29/the-greatest-american-hero-wizards-and-warlocks/#Wizardsw
I never put this together but I wonder if that post was written by Kash?
He wrote himself into his book as a wizard...
Posted Before, I will post this again.
Excellent, I agree. Well said
And also FTR I only trust God. And wisdom comes from the fear of the Lord, and I agree, as you said, the bible. Exercising discernment is wise, critical analysis is wise. Never relying on man, those I see and those who post online that I dont see, is also wise. I trust God, alone.
Agreeing with Q? Good. Me too. The only time Q gave specifics about "trust the plan" was a bible link referencing Gods plans for us. Q also repeatedly urged readers to learn how to put on and maintain the Whole Armor of God which allows us to remain standing despite the devils schemes ie the 24/7 psyop attacks on hearts and minds.
Who the hell downvoted this? I want names!
All good, if noone is offended are you really saying anything important?
I've always wondered,
Nazis have their salute to hail Hitler.
What do grammar Nazis salute/hail?
Adolf Grammar . https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gustav_Adolf_Grammar_School
Here's some names. Bob. Johnny. Adrian. Oscar. Jennifer. Take your pick. No charge.
Or even whose side.
i fixed it
definite grammar nazi here. thanks
It's like Yoda all of a sudden speaking like Obi-Wan.
The cadence, the vernacular,... It doesn't feel the same.
"It doesn't feel the same".
Being unaware of the many different Q voices/personalities involved since 2017 suggests asking questions rather than posting guesses would be a better use of limited time and energy.
Yes. And of the many different Q voices/personalities involved since 2017, there are many references using the word logic and logical. None use possessive with it. Logic is always referenced objectively.
https://qalerts.app/?q=logic
Yes. There are several differences in words, cadence and sentence structure from the earliest posts to later ones. I've sorted out 2, maybe 3 people at times have been the voice behind the drops.
Would be cool to see your analysis.
Very familiar with all the different voices of Q.
Still doesn't feel the same to me. Doesn't mean it's not Q, at all.
I take it that the tides have turned, the message is different in that we are on more of the offensive and less in the "need to learn, discern, and wake the Hell up!!" phase.
When proper trip-code Q starts posting stuff like this...
Know your PLACE
[INCOMING]
[HRC WH] [BHO WH] [HUNTER-ROLE MODEL]
Trust THEM
Epstn killed HMSF
BABIES GOOD [tasty]
Think GGL browser [Adrenal]
Think safety (effective) [JAB GET NOW] Boosters=Yummy
LOCKDOWN EMINENT / WHO BENEFITS?
We the people (Gvt control)
[TRUST GOVMNT]
OBEY ME [your cult LDR]
Remain ASLEEP
Q
Then I think it's time to get a bit worried.
Underrated comment, by far! Ha!
Q is a team not a person.
I know.
How do YOU know Q "never used tor"?
Got a source and link. If not, why pretend a fact free guess is a fact? Why not ask questions instead?
You know Cozette, youre right. I stand corrected. I never noticed before, likely bc when posts were regular there wasnt as much scrutiny. My bad. But thats why discussions are good and I actually do hope to learn more from replies.
So I looked and actually the ID with zeros has been used. If zeros = tor, as apparently it does, then a quick search using 00000 brings up previous posts with that ID.
Deleting above comment bc I said something as fact that was erroneous. My bad, deleting so no confusion
The one thing I noticed about post 4958 is the post was made after the event in question, not before.
FYI: I tried posting the q-post and it doesn't seem to work for the new ones.
Sounds pretty much like Q to me. I've been following since July 2018, so maybe I missed the earliest stuff. And Q went through many phases with obviously different writers. But this is very Q-like. If this were a divider, the posts would be far out there. This is not. This is same old stuff. Just pointing fingers to what we should research. Of course be wary. That's what Q taught us to do!!!
I think all these "doesnt sound like Q" posts are funny
I havent seen many, I think only one other but why funny? There should be critical analysis of a sudden Q re-emergence
Just hilarious to think people are going to discount him by tone.....apparently there have been tone switches in the past...maybe different guys are posting
Maybe the tone is MEANT to be different as we move to another phase of operations....
Im saying critcal anaysis is good, lets find the truth.,,,I dont think that we will find any definitive proof in tone though.......
Yes.
There has been at least one sort of AI analytic run over all the Q posts looking at diction, verbiage used, sentence structure, timestamps on posts, whats cited and how it is cited and the other properties indicating a leak of tones, characteristics etc of specific people behind the postings. It concluded that there were multiple people posting under the Q moniker. Which given the importance of the operation ought always have been the assumption - an elite team under perhaps a rotating-shifts sort of work schedule rather than a single person that is also a single point of failure.
If thats still the case now, or new people have joined the ranks, I wouldn't be surprised. Nor would it indicate a compromise of the mission if so.
I think most reading Q since beginning understood Q to be a team. The team varied in tone, but some things were consistent. This possibly fits wiithin that, I totally can see that as possible. But it lacks that still, and could just be bc of a long hiatus.
Yeah I guess that is why I dont put much stock in the tone thing and wont spend time on that aspect of it.....
Suspect we will know with strong confidence either way before long though...
But that's one reason why there has to be solid re-verification, especially after such a gap
I remember that. If I recall correctly somebody was trying to figure out who Q really was and they did some analysis and said it pointed to 2 different people, but they didn't specify who. sauce
Im with you, I want truth! And FTR to everyone I cant say its not Q, I could be wrong, but wanted to note that the tone os different.
And thats what I meant by reading since beginning, youre right there have been tone changes. This one Im looking at critically thru a lens of a year and half later--not the time to change tone. And the 'use your logic' jumped out. I cant get past that one bc logic/logical is a word used many times--and its never 'your' logic. It is logic.
"A year and a half later".
1700 days from his first post. Eight months and 17 days since his last post. The same day Trump held a rally 17 miles outside of Quincy whose official nickname is Qtown.
Did anyone watch the Trump rally? Maybe he made a "Q" or pointed to someone wearing "Q" or what about the guy that was usually in the background at rally's?
ok fair enough....
I think you have a pattern of sounding funny :)
Right?? This is a blatant shill wave. Why this crap is stickied is beyond me.
Just look at all the doubting comments. I only recognize a few of the account names.
ALL ASSETS DEPLOYED.
Agreed
Q has had many voices as anyone who has followed Q since 2017 knows very well. But you dont?
Preying on newbie normies?
lol not preying, quite the opposite.
You seem to be trying to drive this "point" a lot, that Q has many voices that's why the cadence has changed and I'm not buying it. You're a very suspicious account.
Good thing we can call this out without being labeled as concern trolls, glowies, etc.
Something is not right. There is a disturbance in the force. I am getting different vibes, energy signatures.
I am suspicious and alert.
100%. You know and I know. Anons who have been here since day 1 when Q started posting are taught to question things and use logic and critical thinking. Automatically saying "DONT QUESTION IT, ITS THE REAL Q, OR U ARE A CONCERNFAG" reeks of someone with bad intentions.
Even the Bible tells us to question things.
Q served its purpose. We no longer need Q.
agree
Agreed but it sure would be cool to watch him/them freak out the deep state along the way.
Still gonna read the posts for anything useful.
Q’s first year or so was awesome. Huge digs from chans and interesting info.
The last couple years was mostly a rehash and links to things easily available.
I want THAT First year Q back. I’m not saying the Real Q left after the first year.. just saying the drops were more intense.
Im still gonna read them too!
2018 Q THE BEST YEAR That was one heck of a ride
I have only been here since the election so I wasn't around when Q was posting but I have read a lot of the posts..The first thing I thought when I read today's post and even the two previous ones that it did not read like Q. I think Q posts are often confusing, cryptic and take some deep thinking to grasp. These new posts are simplistic and honestly asking questions that long time anons and researchers would have already considered.
I have an easy solution. Watch what’s happening. Don’t be distracted. the future proves the past we have everything we need. Enjoy the show. This week was epic. I don’t need a new Q drop to see what is happening and I know NCSWIC
Cheers!
Noting observations certainly doesnt = distraction. Also totally agree we dont need a Q post, however its good to discuss when we note things that seem off and this, IMO, seemed off
Just have to be patient, folks. Reserve judgement. Some very, very smart people looking into this. Right now I'm paying attention to the new drops, but taking them with a grain of salt until the dust settles.
Is 4958 the misdirection or is this post the misdirection?
I guess its me. Dang. You caught me, here to misdirect. No, king, I wouldnt call my post misdirection. Nor do I mean 4958 is, either. Tho it could be a site owner who is known to be a little, quirky, just having fun for his own odd reasons. Or it may be the OG Q.
I may be a little too generous with credit here but I think I can post my cautionary thoughts without concern that anyone will run with them as their own.
Also, and maybe someone can explain it to me so I can understand it--why the zeros? Is the explanation that Q is using tor?
Isn't that because the poster was using ToR?
Thats what I thought I understood they were saying.
Thank you Jonathan for the reply. I so want to understand this one bc for me personally, if its being said that Q is posting again but this time with tor--tor, really? So now Q uses the controversial that some say is a clowns in america browser?
There are enough questions about the latest postings to be cautious about any claims it is the genuine Q.
Let's wait for some proof's.
I agree.
Depends on who is posting that day. Each person has a different style. I'd noticed that since 2017 when I started reading them. That's my thinking anyway.
I could use Q saying "use logic" but not "use your logic"..
I've been reading since 2018. I don't know what you mean. Can you elaborate?
There is just a way Q 'sounds' and its not here. Im not saying its not Q, FTR, Im just saying it doesnt read like Q.
But having read since 2017 we'd remember there are subtle changes in the Q flair/sound/feel for lack of a better word--and they still were Q consistent. This feels artificial, imo. But I could be wrong so go by your own gut
Does anyone here remember Caught D’Handed (spelling) at the Gateway Pundit forums? …..he was an impersonator of sorts. Except for his calling people he consider trolls as “fat boy” etc.
They did mimic it, very much so. Or it was part of Q and my critical scrutiny is wrong. But for me, I guess bc I still remember Q from the beginning and the changes here and there, this one doesnt sit right. Specifically, the 'your' logic part (possessive) doesnt fit any Q posting, previously, tho logic is a common word used.
I found the addition of "your" to be powerful and much needed.
Not saying one way or the other because in the grand scheme of things, we are no one compared to God… Compared to satan, we are everything and our God given spirit inside of each of us holds the truth we are all seeking. The number 17 in the Bible represents final victory over evil. Trust the plan… there is only one plan, God’s plan. We are here to carry out God’s plan. How, I am not sure because some days when I read His word, I get the feeling we should “fight”, other days (like today), My spirit felt like it was told in 2 Chronicles that we need not do anything because this battle is God’s. One thing I do know is every day, one message my spirit hears that never changes is that we only need to be loving towards one another… that message seems like it would be easy, but I find it very hard most days (especially given the evil that surrounds us). To get to what I was going to say (because obviously my spirit just took over for a second, it is much wiser than my brain, I should listen to it more.) Is that perhaps “your” is just Q preparing us to figure things out on our own, much like we prepare our children for life as adults. The Bible says tech them when they are young, and when they are old, they will not depart from His ways. There is a whole lot of years between YOUNG and OLD! Those are the learning by mistake and correction years, we all suffer through them. If you TRUST “your” spirit, you will always be on the path of His PLAN.
What I am getting at is this: Yes, no one knows.
And if I see an anomaly I will note it for critical scrutiny, at a place such as GA where Q related discussions take place. Since it is, as literally everyone knows, a psywar.
Today
I saw only one for jun 29. Here is is tho
https://qalerts.app/?n=4958
Just a thought. Ive seen speculation here that Q is a quantum computer and Q+, ect. Are the people who manage the computer. Could it be possible that this post feels diffrent because it was not made with the computer but instead an actual person?
Just a thought. Ive seen speculation here that Q is a quantum computer and Q+, ect. Are the people who manage the computer. Could it be possible that this post feels diffrent because it was not made with the computer but instead an actual person?
I’d give him (or her) the benefit of the doubt… to be fair, Q hasn’t posted for almost 2 years. Styles change. He’s out of the previous flow. Only way we will know 100% is when future starts proving past again. Patience my friends
I dont give anyone the benefit of doubt, my gosh no. But I love your user name.
One Truth Delta from Trump can answer all of this.
Intelligent anon spotted. o7
Do you not trust trip codes?
Have you not been keeping up?
No, because they can be manipulated.
Q is a team. If writing style is different it can just mean it is a different member of the team making the post. Could even be a new team member. people act like nothing could ever change. Used to be less than ten. Could be a dozen now. Could be a hundred (unlikely). Nobody knows.
Well...
You may not remember this but Q at one time was that Patriot Soapbox guy. He got caught red handed in a livestream. He was also the board owner and publicly retired from "Q". Then someone tried verifying with a watch and pen that didn't match the original ones.
I thought the exact same thing. Nice
I did not jump up and down at last drop. It's a first for me. No logic. Pure gut. I have not dismissed whole cloth. Uh, ok. Q avoids pronouns; more objective tone.
I harken back to the last episode of season 1 of the X-Files, Last words of deep throat to agent Scully "Trust No One"
Obviously there are Questions regarding these recent Q posts, when in doubt Don't comes to mind.
Your right! If you search Q drops every other time he suggest that we use Logic, he simply says "Logical thinking."
He never uses the term "Use your logic." I don't think that is even a valid term because Logic is not something owned, or possessed by the individual. It not my logic, or your logic. Logic is:
: a science that deals with the principles and criteria of validity of inference and demonstration : the science of the formal principles of reasoning
We can think logically, or we can apply logical principles in a though process, but to say "Your Logic" is like saying "Use your math". The math does not belong to the individual anymore that does Logic.
I would say that this is a big sign that someone is posing as Q. Q was very precise in his language. If he made a mistake, it meant something. Saying "your logic" says nothing but that this is not the real, original Q.
Exactly.
Neon Revolt over at GAB has got an interesting thread that shows there were a ton of Q posts that were not allowed through because of fuckery with the tripcode on QR board, and they might actually be real.
"Wait a minute - 8bit says these might actually be real.
I had forgotten that /hivemind/ was his board. He used to run /qresearch/ back in the day. (There's been... a lot of behind-the-scenes drama and such).
Awaiting more confirmation/information.
https://truthsocial.com/@8bit/posts/10856184058692817 "
For the link with the post images https://gab.com/NeonRevolt/posts/108561922576584510
Someone in the comments gave the url to the hivemind board. Q changed from 4chan to 8chan because of shit like this, possible he might change to /hivemind from /qresearch IF he's back and Watkins has been messing around on /qresearch
Here are the posts on /hivemind
https://8kun.top/hivemind/res/22274.html#22376
Hey hey look neon revolt did something useful. I thought all he did was doom? Glad he's back in shape
Hah yeah he doesn't post much about Q anymore but he still appears on my feed, and of course warned that this is likely another fake. Guess he must trust 8bit if he now says that this other Q might be legit, so guess we'll wait and see. I'm not convinced yet, even if the EPA decision is 5/4, I'm gonna need a lot more before I accept he's back.
Heh we might have competing Qs for a while if Watkins is hijacking Q - kind of funny the 'other' one - who may be the real one - appeared after he did that. If Watkins did indeed do what he is accused of I hope he loses everything.
If I were Q though I'd be posting on Truth Social but I suppose Trump may still need plausible deniability while the DS is looking to indict him for something, anything.
Q post #4: Some of us come here to drop crumbs, just crumbs.
Emphasis mine; Q is a group with multiple crumb-droppers.
Q changed style many times. Go back and read drops from the beginning.
I have read them all. Since Oct 2017. And thats why the possessive use of 'your' logic, stood out immediately. A quick search of posts confirms it was never used. No, in all the times Q changed styles, this commonly used word was used objectively every time.
*not saying its not og Q. Just saying it did not read as og Q.
yes I noticed that too. and think perhaps it's our Q testing us, see if we're paying attention.
I got what your saying now. And yea that is off.
Here's what might settle this. If an anon asks Q to prove he/she is the real Q by asking for a comm. Then we can determine if this Q is genuine or not
exactly.
Like bro is it the real Q or not? I'm so done with all of this shit, feel like I'm playing fucking Batman trying to solve the Riddler's clues while the entire country is literally being destroyed from the inside out.
Reminds me of the funny larp I’ve been running on talk.lol
“Would you like to play a game? [The garden] deep seed young dragonfly? Where does one plant a seed? (>|<) what do you plant in a garden? Let’s talk laugh out loud”
Agree.. good thing we know it's a team and people write differently.
IT people, Mil people, Civvies all write and think different