I know some very smart normies and conservatives who would rather be persuaded to join the circus than read Q posts. They have mental road blocks, such as the fear of judgement by their spouses or peers.
So that's the challenge. I want to develop a strategy for cracking the toughest cookies. I don't mean dogmatic libs; they're lost for now. I mean someone who is rational and respects you enough to allow a 20 minute sales pitch but will only give you one shot.
So it would have to be a simple and strong argument or proof, yet still within the city limits of Normietown. This means no Angela Hitler, no locking up Obama and Hillary in Gitmo, no Satanic pedos.
I'm thinking I would start by explaining that Q is a propaganda campaign by Military Intelligence to undermine the criminality of the Clintons, Obama, and the deep state. I think many normies can accept that. Then I'd move on to some juicy FISA gate posts. Or a personal favorite: Blunt and Direct Time. The Lord's Prayer is also a good one.
Let me know your ideas on which normie-friendly proofs or arguments you think are the strongest to start with.
If I ever bring it up, I don't say "this is good" or "I believe this", I say "this is interesting, I'm not really sure what it is".
False certainty creates opposition among strong minded people, and we don't want people to be sheep anyways.
That is one strategy I'm trying with a friend. I'm mentioning Q related topics without mentioning Q, and waiting until a major prediction like Durham taking down the SDNY comes true.
This is exactly what I do when chatting with friends/associates. I don’t mention Q at all - just bring up the subjects. I had an opportunity to talk about great awakening topics with another RN (former military) just yesterday. Didn’t mention Q at all, but we soon discovered we had nearly the exact same take on everything. I bet he is an anon here!
I think this is far & away the best approach. Unfortunately, the media has been successful in smearing Q in the normie's minds, so it's best to start with the topics / subject matter themselves.
Q is somewhat irrelevant as it doesn't matter what people think of him / them / whatever; the messages & information Q is spreading is what matters.
It's called The Great Awakening, not The Q Awakening...
Great point!
M-O-N-E-Y, start little rants about the price of anything you and he buy....
Get him involved in the dissatisfaction of high prices, and smaller portions....
And blame the CEOs of Big Corporations, the MSM, the Food Factories that have been burning down, etc....
In that line, make a Q Reference, quote Q, but don't say where the quote came from, just make an offhand statement....
Very good strategy. I like it.
This is the entire Q strategy that will produce the great awakening, anon.
Q never made it about himself. The MSM is doing that, at the direction of their C_A puppetmasters. So why should WE?
Best thing for normies IMHO is Joe M's intro vid, 13 min. Get normies first to accept that criminals have risen to the top of companies and crime syndicates, so it's not that outlandish to believe they've also risen to the top of governments.
Since criminals are running things, a few good people who aren't criminals are putting a stop to it. But since the crooks are also really good at psychological manipulation of the masses using fear, coercion, guilt, and shame, it has to be done quietly, under the radar. Then point out allllllllll the govt swampers who quit or were fired under Trump. The big names. Why all at once? It's an operation.
Libtard buddy of mine says he'll never believe in the deep state because he doesn't think criminals could cooperate enough to organize into a single unit and would always end up fighting each other instead.
What does he think happened to the Mafia? Did they disappear or could they have found that government is the most profitable endeavor?
That's why he's a libtard
Yes! For him its just a belief and he chooses not to believe in the deep state with that NPR air of intelligence and superiority over ''conspiracy '' believers.
that's what they want you to think lol
You have to "let that sink in"...
If I hear someone say, "qanon", I ask, "Do you know what Q is?" if they say no but seem interested, I say it's a military psyop to take down a global crime syndicate that has been around for decades and infiltrated high levels of government, media and corporations.
I say, it's likely that the Q operation started right after JFK was assassinated because some patriots within the military understood that this crime organization had corrupted things enough that they could take down a sitting President.
They developed a plan, they called "The plan to save the world", and we are at the final stages of this plan now.
Part of the ending of the plan was to release information about the psyop to a select group of internet researchers, what you call "qanon", but are really just "anons".
Most of this plan is being conducted behind the scenes, and the criminal syndicate is fighting back (partly by trying to paint Q and the anons as "kooky qanons", which is why things seem so "weird" sometimes.
They either say, that's too far fetched, to which I reply, "Yeah it probably is" or they get even more interested after that.
The important thing is, as as soon as they don't seem interested, say that I'm insane, or push back against the idea, I stop talking to them about it. I don't push. You can get just enough good information in to make them curious about it. I emphasize that "Q" are the good guys, worldwide. I figure at the very least, the next time they hear "qanon" the thought will cross their minds, "Maybe those are the good guys?"
Larry, is that you?
Yes. And it's good to remember that, even if a person may be dismissive at first, they will think about it some more on their own time, if they are at all independent thinkers. By the time they encounter the subject again, they will remember your comments and thoughts and be more familiar with it. Before they realize it, they will approach the subject with a more open mind.
Nice. Planting more seeds than Charlie Sheen...i like it
Don't start with Q. Show them things that they'll have a very hard time explaining away and then show them that Q could explain what is going on. (I just realized the videos I provided have Q stuff in them. You can find others without the Q stuff if you look around if you really need to try to convince them without talking about Q early on.)
https://rumble.com/v137257-meghan-mccain-and-john-kasich-you-cant-kill-him-again-john-mccain-was-put-t.html
The video also shows McCain with a boot on his left leg. Before his execution there was something odd. McCain originally had his boot on his right leg. The boot was moved to his left leg and he explained it by saying that he had to give his right leg "a break". This is very odd unless he was forced to wear an ankle monitor, he was using a boot to cover it, and they moved the ankle monitor from his right leg to his left leg.
https://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/361682-mccain-explains-why-his-boot-was-on-a-different-foot/
Look at the reactions of Jeb, Laura, and W. Jeb turned to look at the casket with a look of dismay. I can only presume it was because H. W. was executed. (word is for having a hand in JFK's assassination, W. was later Director of the CIA)
Obama was unsettled by whatever was on the card when shown by Big Mike.
https://rumble.com/vj92x5-remember-the-bush-1-funeral....html
u/#q2608
https://conspiracynomore.substack.com/p/qproofs-trump-tweets-and-truths#%C2%A7retruths
The provided link goes directly to the portion where you can see Trump recently vouching for the existence of Q, but if you scroll to the top you will see a primer on Q.
https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1034544386665840641.html
Finish it off with this.👉.https://prayingmedic.com/2018/08/27/q-august-27-2018-we-dont-say-his-name/
Believing in Q is more than just "look there, see that". It is the culmination of seeing so many "coincidences" that Q existing becomes obvious. Autists pick up on the coincidences and see connections. Normies may not.
https://qalerts.app/?q=how+many+coincidences
I don't necessarily trust Q, but I do trust Trump. Over and over again there are just too many "coincidences" between what Trump and Q say and the timing, never mind Trump's affinity for making Qs in the air with his finger.
There was a “Dark to Light, Q nod” that Trump did too, that was harder decode
Q talks about prayer many times. I think that's our first step. Each person is unique. There is no formula that will awaken people 100%. When we remain in prayer God can guide our words. It might be Q related stuff, might not. He always knows best though. God WINS
I bring up the "Tip Too shape, Tippy Top we sometimes call it" Q proof
KEK- I sometimes like to use that phrase in my everyday conversations. Just to see if I ever get a chuckle out of anyone who might know about it.
That was the proof that turned my curiousity into a burning passion.
Been into conspiracies since 2008 and felt hopeless for so long, the fire that coursed through me once i could see the writing on the wall with Q and Trump was like nothing else i've ever felt before or since.
I suppose that was just what real true hope feels like
This was the one that got me first too, but then I went back and looked at how often Trump says Tip Top and how vague the proof was.
But how many times does he say Tippy Top? that’s what was request was changed too to make it more obvious. And while next to a giant white rabbit?
When I looked at this a few years ago, I found about 40 videos of him saying tippy top
You serious?
"Tip top shape, tippy top we sometimes call it"
It wasn't vague at all and Trump clearly made it a point to not make it vague with tippy top
Right there with you on this Fren!!!
If I need a random number in a conversation it is 17. “I need to go buy 17 bags of dirt for the garden but I’ll be back to the office right after that.” Probably wouldn’t connect me with a listening anon but it certainly entertains me!
Tippy Top idea! 🐰😸
Btw - Love your name! 🕶️
u/Melanias_Sunglasses
Thank you 😎
Same
The list of conspiracy theories that have become true is becoming long and distinguished. We knew it early on because of Q's clues.
Like my Johnson. Sorry, couldn't resist.
This is a good point. Show them a list of conspiracy theories that became popularly accepted facts. This will prepare them for entering the rabbit hole.
All of the madness in the world finally made sense once I found Q.
Don't bother convincing them, just red pill them all you can.
They will find Q,if it's for them.
Explain how NSA director Michael Rogers informed Trump he is was wiretapped prior to even being sworn in as president.
NSA was formed by JFK to be watchdog over other govt agencies.
Here you have the director of NSA protecting the prez elect from rogue govt agencies, while media is mocking soon after Trump saying he was wiretapped?
Who better to then for the Q group, then people from NSA.
The director of NSA was clearly pissed off.
He has the resources.
I have always thought Q is a NSA operation.
Q Clearance is granted to members of the Department of Energy.
Q: I currently work for a company where I am required to have a Top-Secret security clearance. If I apply for a job that requires a DOE access authorization, and I'm selected, will I have to have a new background investigation? I just had one two years ago.
A: If you have a current, Top-Secret security clearance, and your investigation was completed within the previous five years, you won't need to have another investigation in order for DOE to grant you an access authorization. The access authorization will be granted based on "reciprocity:" the principle that a security clearance or access authorization at the same level granted by any authorized Federal agency must be recognized and accepted by all other agencies without making the individual complete new forms or undergo a new investigation. Under reciprocity, a final Secret clearance would result in an L access authorization and a final Top-Secret clearance would support the granting of a Q access authorization from DOE. You would only need a new investigation if you were applying for a position that requires a higher type of access authorization than the one you hold. For example, if you hold a Secret clearance, and the position you are applying for requires a Top-Secret (Q) access authorization a more extensive investigation will be required.
https://www.energy.gov/ehss/departmental-personnel-security-faqs
The people in the DOE who have Q Clearance have it based on the Atomic Energy Act, last amended in 1954.
H.R.9757 - An Act to amend the Atomic Energy Act of 1946, as amended, and for other purposes 83rd Congress (1953-1954)
https://www.congress.gov/bill/83rd-congress/house-bill/9757/text
Ask people why the DOE is investigating the origins of Covid-19, perhaps?
Q-level clearance is Dept. Of Energy. I see what you mean though.
There were two posts that dropped at the height of the BLM murder-riots in 2020. One showed how to use a card reader to see how the Obama Foundation INTRODUCED the famous picture of George Floyd to their twitter platform days before his "death", and the second showed how you could follow any donations made to BLM right out a secret back door on their website and straight into ACTBLUE (a dem superPAC) to be distributed to globalist politicians instead of hard-done-by Black folks. You can show people how to do this without ever even having to mention the letter Q.
Yes i"ve used these two examples as well, remember to tell them the connections with Floyd and Chauvin working together and family connections!
The great BLM grift is also good, few read the small print (which they rely on people not doing) where it stated you gave "ACTBLUE" authority to use any undistributed donations how they saw fit, ie straight to the DNC.
https://qposts.online/post/4555
https://qposts.online/post/4437
Good morning, fren, thanks for the posts. I'm not seeing the Obama link - can you help?
Help them learn how to think first using the same approach as Q. Then start helping them with questions that will obviously show the msm as our enemy. For example, did you know a third building fell on 9/11 that wasn’t struck by a plane? Why would a lone gunman blow two holes in the glass to commit the las Vegas shooting? Why would six different states alll stop counting votes at the same time in the middle of the night?
Every dog has its day
One of my favorites, but I think this is like level 2 or 3. You'd have to start with convincing a normie that McCain got whacked by the military. But once they're ready for that one, it's life changing.
Show them the John Kasich video - that's still on CNN's own website & UTube channel - where Kasich tells Jake Tapper that, "It's only been like 24 hours since John McCain was PUT TO DEATH." I found a clip of just the important part here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aIbf6wB8LSU
Along with that, throw in the video of Meghan McCain saying that, "They can't kill him again, but whatever..." https://rumble.com/v137257-meghan-mccain-and-john-kasich-you-cant-kill-him-again-john-mccain-was-put-t.html
And then there's Meghan McCain's downright ANGRY eulogy speech at John McCain's funeral directed AT President Trump and note the MASSIVELY wrinkled flag on top of McCain's casket = TRAITOR: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kzo5Hg4x0ug (time stamp :35 secs is where she bashes Trump/MAGA and then snarls for a LONG time afterwards).
Normies would say it's a simple slip of the tongue when trying to say "put to rest."
If you listen closely, you'll hear that John Kasich said "put to DEATH" - not "put to REST". Big difference. Total give-away confirmation that McCain was executed.
I'm not denying he said "put to death." I'm saying a skeptical normie would think it was a SLIP OF THE TONGUE and the skeptic would believe that Kasich MEANT to say "put to rest."
It's not a proof to change anyone's mind, but if you already believe McCain was executed it sure adds credence to what you already believe.
Fair enough.
Hey friend, wanted to let you know that both your links are pointing to the same video. I think you may need to correct the Meghan McCain eulogy link. Also thank you for this post/comment, I really enjoyed reading it.
So sorry I copy/pasted the same link twice. I've corrected that link in my comment above and also added a link to Meghan McCain's "they can't kill him again" remark too. :-)
Thank you! She seems really angry at his funeral hmmmm
I've woken up quite a few 'normies' with the John McCain stuff, actually. Some of them are TDS Trump-hater libs too.
That proof is how its undeniable that he was whacked by the military, and that opens the door to why - and then you can bring up the uranium stuff, ISIS etc.
You could try these articles. They include QProofs as well as explaining the context of recruiting digital soldiers to fight in an information war etc.
QProofs: "Learn Our Comms"
https://conspiracynomore.substack.com/p/qproofs-learn-our-comms
QProofs: @realDonaldTrump Tweets and Truths
https://conspiracynomore.substack.com/p/qproofs-trump-tweets-and-truths
QProof: Motorcade Honk
https://conspiracynomore.substack.com/p/motorcade-honk
QProof: Gingerbread Crumbs
https://conspiracynomore.substack.com/p/qproof-gingerbread-crumbs
Great links! However, in the second one, this writer says, ".....these attacks on DEMOCRACY...." Excellent article but, good grief, duh-mockracy??????
You realize I wrote this? You're right though, that is an oversight and your feedback is helpful.
I think when I wrote that I was trying to phrase it in a way that would resonate with those just awakening from MSM brainwashing if they were to come across this article... to help them realize the "attack on Democracy" line that is so constantly used against Trump by the MSM is actually total projection. But yes I can see why that sentence is irritating. I'll change that...
LOL! Yes, after I commented I figured you were the author but the comment stands. It's a huge thing to me. It's a very pervasive lie (from some), ignorance by others and probably carelessness by yet others. We are awash in a deliberate lack of truthfulness. When I hear people name our true form of government, it's precious to me. I live in a blue hellhole--I might be a little more eager to hear truth than some 😂 With that small exception, I really enjoyed what you wrote.
I plead both ignorance and carelessness. I'm British, and we didn't get a US Constitution class in school... those that created our syllabus probably didn't want us to realize a Constitutional Republic is a superior form of government to our antiquated system! Thanks, glad you enjoyed it otherwise!
LOL! Your "ignorance" is tiny, I'd say. While I agree that the structure of our Constitutional Republic is superior, it will fail, ever and always, when the populace becomes complacent, less and less educated (by design), and distracted by bright and shiny objects. The two pillars of our government are, first and foremost, God, who created all, gives us our freedom and sustains us. Our founders understood this. Secondly, our Constitution, which provides the structure, lays out clear boundaries for our servants, spells out that which our servants may not even consider touching--the Bill of Rights.....all of which have been ignored deliberately and out of ignorance.
We retained common law here from the mother country. That was taken away from us in about 1934. No objections from the populace or our servants; we've had no justice since then. Do the people realize this? I'd say no.
Each generation has become more ignorant of these precepts and concepts so that the people have no idea when they are being badly damaged by their own servants. Some have finally realized that "something" is wrong but have no idea what exactly it is or how to remedy it. That our lizard government has been trumpeting "duh-mockracy" to other countries is particularly egregious....democracy always leads to what thinking people do not want: socialism, dictatorships, communism.
I believe that our country was targeted right from the beginning because our government was and is supposed to be undergirded by Christian principles. Consider that, as bad as it's gotten here, foreign people STILL want to be here. Godlessness has always been the goal since man's expulsion from the Garden of Eden.
Anyway, this is more than anyone asked for. I'll let myself out. 😉
Personally, I think Blunt and Direct Time is not going to convince any skeptic. Baggage handler Richard B Russell flying in a Q shaped path then doing a barrel role in a somehow-stolen Q400 aircraft that he only knows to fly from a simulator game at home.... That really stretches the coincidence factor too far. John McCain time of death lining up with Q post also pretty compelling.
Richard b Russell crashing his plane into an island where a decommissioned sub named Richard B Russell was. A sub likely used to fire a missile into the Western sky the night Trump traveled to Singapore (Why did Trump travel East and take the long way there?)
From my experience,
Normies will agree that the world has gone to hell. But they will start blaming either some sort of republican bologna or some sort of woke victimized retardation. But I just nod my head and laugh at their sarcasms with them and agree, the world is "crazy" I say to these people. I do not agree with their falsehoods that they believe in. But by agreeing with them that the world has most certainly gone mad they loosen up and make themselves open to suggestion.
Especially I have found, if you do not expose your stance on which way you lean, make them believe they have you figured out without actually telling them anything. Just agreeing the world has gone mad.
Once at this stage, I have found that normies will ask for opinions on certain matters they are actively looking into. At least through my experience. And when I am asked a question, I reassure them that their point is valid for having, and offer my opinion based off of what I know, providing sauce when required.
And then when I do this, I suggest how crazy it is, that two different people using the "same" internet are consistently shown different things.
And that screws them up. Once I can succeed in showing a person that the phones they access the internet with, is a Personalized Internet. It screws their whole world up for a bit.
I do this in hopes that people will start to question the validity of what they see, verses what others see on the internet.
Because the implication is Manipulation by big tech amongst others.
And who likes finding out that their brain is being controlled by external forces??
Anyway, this is my approach, might not be the best and is probably very crazy. But it's what I find myself doing.
And then comes the Jesus when they find out their entire world is fabricated. Normies are very silly, but I guess they need help too from these evil forces.
After all these years, I have decided that 90% of people are lazy. At least here in America they are. They don't read and they don't critically analyze anything. I have tons of them that come to me for news and they trust me but they wouldn't lift a finger to help themselves. And I'm talking upper middle class and wealthy. Honestly, if any group of people ever actually deserved to be enslaved, it'd be these people. Or else the psyop has just completely taken every ounce of self preservation, they should have ever instinctually had, away from them. Sad. El Salvador may be nice soon. At.least they're enforcing laws now.
Thinking is hard work. The less you do of it, the harder it is, the less you do... mental laziness. The other side of the coin is -- at least in my experience -- teaching one's brain to think means it doesn't want to stop!
An interesting aside: I teach my horses to think through a situation, rather than simply react to the pressures of life by freezing or fleeing. It's fascinating to see them learn to break that automatic response. Their bodies actually soften. Which is my goal. We're both safer.
I'm actually comforted that my brain doesn't stop. I'd be humiliated to be this intellectually lazy. .
That's a really interesting comment regarding horses. A wonderful guy that I follow does amazing work with horses who have become difficult, unpredictable, dangerous, terrified, and who had been abused. He points to the differences in a horse's brain versus the human brain......the difference being that, because they are prey animals, their senses (eyes, ears) are connected directly to the motor part of the brain. Since they lack the frontal cortex, they do not have the opportunity for anything other than fight or flight, unlike the human brain. I am VERY interested in your experience with this subject.
Yes, horses are all about self-preservation. Tuis the fight or flight. And they sure dont want to fight. With humans they end up going into themselves when faced with people who don't understand their needs. "Desensitizing" became common in "natural horsemanship" and is commonly practised today. Essentially it requires the horse to internalize what worries them. Don't react! Which means the horse becomes numb. It also means that inevitably it's just too much. As Warwick Schiller says one to many rabbits and they go into full self preservation mode. Which humans interpret as being bad, and they get punished. The way I look at it is we bring horses into our human world. It's our responsibility to listen to them to help them proper in it. Which means as your friend says, give them other ways to deal with pressure -- pressure is how they see the world. I follow Josh Nichol who teaches how to help a horse learn to move linto pressure. Their knee jerk reaction to run being turned to look to their human. Relational Horsemanship. Your friend seems to have found this way too.
The peace and friendliness that he leaves in his wake touches my heart so deeply. What a blessing these folks are.
I brought up Q to some one and they said it was a cult. I asked if they read the posts. They said no. I replied "So you let some else make up your mind for you?". They said no again. To which I said "Ok, so you did read the post?" They said no again. I replied "Ok, so you left someone else make up your mind for you.". They said "Yes, I guess I did."
I doubt they read it up it was a little red pill I got to see them take. It takes multiple conversation and time to let these people come around. That's why the plan takes so long.
It's not like any of us were like Yup, satanic pedos want us all dead, the 1st time we heard it. It took time.
As well, to someone who rails against 45, ask them, which of his policies do you disagree with? They wouldn't be able to name one. If they raise an msm misquote, ask them, have you seen the speech from start to finish, or just the clips you saw on TV? They would answer no.
My Ex wife would answer no!
Ditto my mom...but she's worse...she vaguely knows about the DS but says it has always been like this and there's nothing we can do about it. Classic doomer and gloomer. Also doesn't know how to internet so has no clue about the details. But whenever she loses an argument, she hangs up on me, lol. I don't talk to her much, needless to say...
Q is not the way! I would talk about all the "conspiracy theories" that turned out to be true. Even though we know Q is real, the normies have been bombarded with Qanon BS that if you mention it, their antenna goes up and they won't believe a thing you say. Q was an info opt that awakened all of us and taught us to research. He gave the clues but WE did the digging. WE came up with the truths that were called conspiracy theories. The information is out there if you dig through the layers of BS they use to cover it up. Stick with what has been proven. Most recent, the FBI admitted Covid 19 likely leaked from Wuhan lab--MAN MADE virus. Nuland admitted there were Bio labs in Ukraine after we were called Conspiracy nuts to say such a thing!
I don't think Q posts mean anything anymore to waking people. The Show is commencing. It's the final act. Those who will come aboard are getting their last chance.
Why are normies, normies?
It is an anomaly to deeply research anything that occured 5 years ago. 10 years ago.
We all have an inclination about caring only about a few select things. Not a slew of disparate issues, for example: Steve Mnuchin and the Fed, Benghazi, Michael Flynn and Putin in 2013, the PURGE OF AL-WALEED in Nov 2017. All disparate events. We're out of the norm, simply by definition.
You need to do more digging into what topics really set your particular normie off. Is it the 2nd amendment? Abortion? Drugs? The War on Terror? Ill effects of social media? Surveillance? War on Christianity? LGBT Agenda? Cost of manufacturing? Farming?
None. Tell them only what Q says: "The choice to know is yours."
I use the Q-posts to compare to the WWII French Underground Radio, the Navajo Code Talkers, and the Vietnamese Hanoi Hannah. While also referencing years long war media campaigns/propaganda before the kinetic fighting.
Additionally I always always encourage Trey Smith’s documentary of Kim Clement’s The Two Presidents, which has been proven true. And last, Fall of the Cabal 1-10, being very specific on them seeing Part 10, as it’s the easiest/best key to historically understanding to beginning our entire movement and Q.
If you do want to introduce them to Q through coincidence-based proofs, start with only a couple of the better ones, and don’t overload them with quantity. This may sound counterintuitive, but think of it this way: These proofs only work because something happens that probably shouldn’t. If they’re presented with too many, instead of boosting the “something happens” part, it instead diminishes the “probably shouldn’t” part. Instead of “wow this is something unexpected” it’ll be “wow these guys are really good at pulling numbers out of their asses”
Good point. You want to avoid the perception of Anons finding too much meaning in every occurrence.
Here is an idea --
Start by deconstructing their likely normie view of what is a "conspiracy theory" or a "conspiracy theorist." After all, we are talking about a vast, globlist conspiracy to control the world. But that is a big topic for a normie.
Q: So ... let me ask you, who killed JFK?
A: Lee Harvey Oswald.
Q: How do you know?
A: Warren Commission.
Q: Right. Do you know that Congress did the Warren Commission, and then 12 years later, they reviewed it with the House Select Committee on Assassinations Committee, and they arrived at a very different conclusion?
A: Wha?
Q: You can look it up. Congress did their own tests, interviewed witnesses that the Warren Commission did not, and concluded that at least 4 shots were fired (not 3), at least 1 of which came from the direction of the grassy knoll, and that means at least 2 shooters were involved.
A: ???
Q: And yet, the media never talks about that. Why do you think that is?
A: ???
Q: Because in the years right after JFK's death, the public did not believe the answers from the Warren Commission. The talk was that a conspiracy to kill JFK happened, and that it was not just a lone gunman. So, the CIA implemented a strategy to push the term "conspiracy theory" into the media, so that the talking heads on TV would ridicule anyone who questioned the Warren Commissions's report, and just label them a "conspiracy theorist" instead of actually discussing what might have really happened to JFK. And we know this is true because President Trump had a lot of CIA documents declassified, and it showed right in those previously classified documents that the CIA was behind the term "conspiracy theory." That's where the term comes from.
A: ???
Q: And then a decade later, the United States Congress confirmed that those who questioned the Warren Commission were probably right to question it.
A: ???
Q: Do you know what a conspiracy theory actually is?
A: What? (IOW: No, they do not know.)
Q: The media wants you to believe that "conspiracy theory" means "false information." But that is a lie. "Conspiracy" is when two or more people plan (or conspire) to do something illegal or immoral. That is all it means. There are many laws against conspiracies, such as conspiracy to rob a bank, conspiracy to committ murder, conspiracy to gouge prices such as gas stations during hurricanes, etc. And a theory is simply a working idea about what might have happened. Police and prosecuting attorneys deal in conspiracy theories all the time, when they try to solve a crime and prosecute a murderer, for example. Does that make sense?
A: Sure.
Q: Now, what would happen if a group of criminals did not take over a drug gang or a corporation, but instead took over a government or infiltrated parts of government? They would probably conspire to do some dirty things -- either things that are illegal or immoral, and they would try to hide and cover their tracks, right?
A: ???
Q: Back in 2016, there was a story about a man who was an IT guy and was murdered in Washington, DC. The police said it was a robbery, but nothing was stolen. Later, Julian Assange, of Wikileaks, strongly hinted that some of the documents supplied anonymously to Wikileaks were supplied by this man who was murdered. Like police detectives solving a crime, there were people on obscure message boards who were trying to figure out what really happened, and if it involved a conspiracy, possibly at high levels of government.
A: ???
Q: That is when someone started posting about this topic, claiming to be an insider at the highest levels of the FBI. Was he an imposter and just trolling people? Nobody really knows, but he revealed some information that most people did not know before, and when these "internet detectives" checked it out, they found evidence to support what this person was saying. He was referred to as "FBI Anon." You can find his posts online:
https://archive.is/ZtoOf
A: ???
Q: FBI Anon posted information, seemingly to guide those who were interested towards clues that might help reveal certain crimes that he said the "higher ups" in the FBI (which would mean FBI director, for example) were refusing to investigate.
A: ???
Q: Sometime later, in 2017, another person made similar posts, but this time it was more general and yet also specific about certain people and activities. This person was known as "Q." His posts to these "conspiracy analysts" were called "Q drops." Each drop was written in a cryptic fashion, and sometimes hard to understand. But the overall big picture was that this person was revealing information that was not known to the general public, having to do with criminals in government who conspire against the people.
A: ???
Q: Nobody really knows if this person was legit or not, but a lot of people were skeptical. He claimed to be closely allied with President Trump, and to have insider knowledge. More and more people started to believe he was the real deal when he gave "proofs" of what was about to happen. He predicted that John McCain would end his political career at a time when he seemed to be going strong. He predicted that Paul Ryan, Speaker of the House, would retire from politics, at a time when he seemed not only strong, but positioning to run for President. If I remember correctly, Paul Ryan announced his retirement the next day after Q's drop about him retiring. Q also posted photos from a jet aircraft which were determined to be taken over North Korea, at the exact same time that President Trump's Air Force One was in that location -- which could only mean that Q was onboard Air Force One.
A: ???
Q: These and many other things convinced a lot of people that Q was the real deal, at least in terms of some of the things he posted. Some people believe that Q was and still is a military operation to root out the criminal element within the US government and many other governments around the world. That is basically what Q is. "Qanon" is a fake term the media created, as a tool to distract people like you, who they do not want snooping around and actually reading the Q drops. They would rather tell you that "Qanon" is disinformation, and have people like you not read the actual Q drops for yourself, where you would find the truth about what Q disclosed.
A: ???
Q: We just had high-level medical doctors testify before Congress that the biggest disinformation campaign about Covid came from the US government. Likewise, the biggest disinformation campaign about Q comes from the media, with their fake "Qanon" claims. If you want to know what Q actually wrote, you can read the drops for yourself, and decide for yourself. According to Q, the media is part of the criminal element in that they are used to cover up and hide news that the criminals don't want the people to know about. If everyone read the Q drops for themselves, instead of believing the lies that the media pushes about "Qanon," which is not a real thing, then everyone would wake up and all the weird, strange things that have been happening the past few years could be straightened out. But you would have to actually read the Q drops for yourself to understand that.
We can continue this conversation after you have read the first 100 Q drops for yourself. There are about 5,000, so I wouldn't expect you to read them all in one sitting. But the first 100 are doable.
https://qanon.pub/
Q isn't important, but the message is. I almost never tell anyone about Q because at the end of the day it doesn't really matter as long as the info spreads. Tell them about Q when they're ready
I would advise people to first read Patel Patriot's Devolution series. There's more then enough there to suspect the military has been taking action behind the scenes.
“Tippy Top” is my favorite Q-proof.
And not only did he say the words requested, but he did it while standing next to a white rabbit, of all things.
Fuck em (probably). Who cares about what other people (who are likely dumb as dirt) think of you. But, since that is against the point of this board...
I usually just say that Q has become an umbrella catch-all for a lot of things over the years. But what it was originally was information posted on a message board by high-level military intelligence during the Trump administration. If they aren't at all interested in reading them, maybe it's not meant for them.
My suggestion doesn't involve a specific Q proof, but I think could be a good way to jar a normie's' brain enough that they will find it much more difficult to lie to themselves afterwards with their norminess.
This post (link below) from Oh_Well_ian includes a video link about Sandy Hook. Usually bringing up Sandy Hook would push a normie even further away, but I think the video is so good it will cause the opposite. I wouldn't even frame it as Sandy Hook per se, but simply ask (insist if you can) that they answer the simple question: "is that David Wheeler marching around the Sandy Hook elementary school in full cammo flanked by FBI jacket wearing guys?".
There is only one honest answer to that question - of course it is him. We know for sure it was David Wheeler (the supposed grieving father) testifying before congress for more gun laws and jetting around with Obama on Air Force One pushing the same. This realization IMO could open the door to Q.
Suggest watching the video with them if you can and maybe skip to the 8 minute mark for the first viewing (where the focus starts on David Wheeler) because before that the video makes a lot of claims (which are true BTW), but normies could get "disgusted" and turn off the video before getting to the evidence part.
https://greatawakening.win/p/15K6JPaKor/they-tried-to-censor-it-they-tri/c/
I've always loved the post "what happens in 2.5 hours"
Can't remember exact post# or wording but it was when xiden was 2.5 hours late for his own presser at G7 (I think)
I think post said something like " what happens in 2.5 hours, watch the news tomorrow" and sure as shit the delta lined up perfectly and I was fully on board from there on
Anyone remember this one and can plug in the holes?
Great post OP
I don't being it up, unless they ask about Q and show sincere interest.
Best not to cast one's pearls before swine.
First I'd establish that Trump confirms Q all the time. Here's one of the early ones where he directly associated himself with Q:
https://files.catbox.moe/4pnk5m.png
"
https://www.richplanet.net/richp_genre.php?ref=303&part=1&gen=99
I have woken people up and then move onto how the good guys are fighting back with this brilliant video by RichPlanet on the Boston Bombings, he has recently been the target of a smear campaign by the BBC due to his expose of the issues surrounding Manchester bombing. He is obviously getting something right to be stalked by the BBC hahaah
Frankly what difference if they believe in Q? What I think they have to believe first is that the government is severely corrupt. From there they are on the right side. Asking them to believe in Q is a near impossibility with every thing they view or hear working against us on that. They can be effective patriots and belief in A will happen organically.