Hijacking top comment for an important announcement!
For those who don't have Twitter and also for analysis of the numbers, I screen captured the majority of the interview so you could see the upvotes, retweets, and watch numbers coming in in real time.
Re a 'fake death'- I really hope not... passion, love and hatred, those were the emotions Trump stated are driving Americans. There would be such civil unrest, many innocent people will get hurt.
I have a feeling any "death" reports would probably come on a Friday. News that the death report was "premature" would probably come about 3 days later (by biblical reckoning), on a Sunday.
There wouldn't be too much mayhem in just a couple days.
I have no emotions about it whatsoever. I am simply pointing out the possibility of an equivalence between the "it will be biblical" statement by Trump and potential upcoming events under discussion.
Anyone who is logged into Twitter who views a Tweet counts as a view, regardless of where they see the Tweet (e.g. Home, Search, Profiles, etc.) or whether or not they follow the author. If you’re the author, looking at your own Tweet also counts as a view.
Note: Embedded Tweets will not add to view counts.
Embedded Tweets do not count in that view total either.
Jan Haleper-Hayes talked about avoiding a civil war in a recent interview. We are watching a movie carefully orchestrated to avoid civil war as things happen behind the curtain.
I hope they wont say that violates his bond agreement. Words can mean so many different things. "Fight" is an awesome word that could have a negative meaning. "Kill" is the same sort of word.
That bond agreement is so vague. I am sure they will always analyze every word too strongly.
Maybe a silly question, but does that technology account for VPNs? Also, I recall a US government agency getting outed for spoofing Russian ISP addresses.
Please share more about what your company does. I’m interested.
Thanks for the link. I just finished watching it---though it doesn't start up until about 30 minutes in. Very measured. Nothing sensational.
Interesting point about the Uniparty legislatively closing off the ability of the Vice President to remand dubious votes back to the states (where formerly, they claimed there was no such power). Of course, in my opinion, one does not modify a Constitutional power by legislation, only by amendment, so it would be like legislation to nullify the 2nd amendment---which has been tried repeatedly, but is totally unconstitutional.
Interesting hint that Trump's January 6th crowd may have exceeded 1 million attendees. Which means that the arrested Capitol rioters amounted to a few hundredths of a percent of the total crowd. It is not possible to "incite" a riot and have such an indifferent response. (For such a total number of ordinary citizens, the statistical expectation of violent criminals would be about 4,000 violent actors.) Of the true violent actors, they came with a plan in mind, not in response to anything Trump had to say (and the timeline precludes them from having been in response to Trump, since the Capitol intrusions commenced about 30-45 minutes before he concluded his speech).
Trump offered no answer to the question of whether civil war might be in the making. (My own opinion is that it is not, but that is a different conversation.) Trump did allow that there is great passion at large for the country's welfare and great hatred for the evil that is being pursued. He did not think that is a good situation (and it is not).
It ends at that. But to carry the question forward, what might happen to crystalize an even more militant reaction by the public? I suspect it could easily be another election steal (foreign powers intervening in elections, contrary to Trump's still-active Executive Order) and/or a declaration of war against Russia, be it unilateral or Congressional (intrusion on Trump's possible residual authority as Commander-in-Chief). Under the Devolution theory, there would have to be a "red line" to be crossed before moves could be made, and I think these would be the most serious of red lines. And/or draconic tyranny under the guise of another "pandemic". In the face of war and a pandemic lockdown, is it likely that Biden would suspend elections? I think so, and this would be an even worse provocation to public sentiment. We could be on the brink of civil disobedience.
As I continue to think about this, I am sorry to say it appears to be a scenario for a "perfect storm." This would be the point where the sheep dogs (military) have to stand apart from the sheep (people) and the wolves (government) and say "Mr. President, we are obliged NOT to violate the Constitution, and our duty is to oppose all its enemies foreign and DOMESTIC. Kindly place your hands in these cuffs."
"He looks like he's walking on toothpicks......he can't walk on sand.......he can't lift a beach chair, they weigh like two ounces.....these beaches seem to be playing a part..."
I don't know about comms but the gold is here already
I have so many observations. Let’s talk social appearance. Blue tie. No longer “orange man”, he’s rocking straight grey (older and wiser). He “couldn’t” get into so much, learned a lot of lessons in “politics” about loyalty, won’t say anything that may incriminate him, it ended with J6, and the passion and love of the people. To be continued
At the end, Trump should have said, "A small group was violent, and there are many questions about who those actually were. But the emensely, large group was loving and unified and standing up for secure elections."
I think he started a thought about the small group and never finished that thought, then he mixed it together with the comments about the huge, loving group. Then he tagged it with the huge group was angry. Uh oh. This wasn't the best.
Look at the question on: killing Trump. Look at what happened. He choked. And who wouldn't.
In my estimation, it was not out of fear. It's just, it is not something you volunteer for. How much does it take to wake all of us up enough?
Remember what happened after JFK?
Think now of his answer about love, passion and hate. It is clear he sees the "potential".
Another thing that betrays his views, is the story about Jefferson and the Georgia vote. He could have picked it and it would have been legal. But he did not.
Newt Gingrich made a video/documentary on George Washington. Go see it and keep this interview, the demeanor, in your mind.
See also Q post about crossing The Delaware ....
Sparks? Yeah .... For sure sparks!
Check the rumble link in this thread. You'll see it. You'd have to wind forward half an hour or so. It is a different cut.
with the foreshadowing by Tucker, of Trump being killed, it reminds me of Q posts stating "It will be biblical", as if Trump will have his death somehow faked. Many will believe him to be dead, possibly JFK Jr. & his wife also, with them all coming back on the public stage at a later time to shock the world.
it was just such a weird, left-field & out of the blue thing to ask, at least twice i remember him asking Trump.
To think Trump & Tucker didn't go over these questions or that Tucker just improv'd the assassination questions... no coincidences?
pointing out all these stupid restrictions that restrict our water, those shitty toilets we have to buy now. But maybe they'll talk about Maui?
Well maybe not, we're talking about Comey now.
It’s part of the 15-minute Great Reset eco-agenda. President Trump is laying it out in a way people will better be able to feel and visualize. He made a great point too about people having to flush multiple times, or do their dishes over and over again, using even MORE water. So he also shows us how to take the moral high ground on this.
The Bush family have an estate in Paraguay that has one of the largest aquifers in thr world on it iirc? Also iirc there was controversy about Nestle buying up or raking up water supplies to bottle and sell at the expense of folks who lived in the area a few years ago?
Maybe the DS are going to try something about the water? Control of water to subjugate folks or tainting the water? Could be alluding to the water or international waters being used by the so called elites and their super yachts to try to avoid legal consequences?
Tucker keeps saying "Don't they have to kill you now???"
I'm thinking this is foreshadowing what is coming. A fake death of Trump.
Trump will not respond to it.
Tucker would not ask this question if he was not told to say that. It's very out of order.
Hijacking top comment for an important announcement!
For those who don't have Twitter and also for analysis of the numbers, I screen captured the majority of the interview so you could see the upvotes, retweets, and watch numbers coming in in real time.
https://files.catbox.moe/0hcdeo.mp4
Great work anon
I believe I started recording not even a couple minutes after it was uploaded and it was already at 1.4M views. Jumped up fast.
File was finalized at 9:42PM EST, which was a few minutes after I ended the capture. I did convert with Handbrake and cut the file size in half.
Re a 'fake death'- I really hope not... passion, love and hatred, those were the emotions Trump stated are driving Americans. There would be such civil unrest, many innocent people will get hurt.
I have a feeling any "death" reports would probably come on a Friday. News that the death report was "premature" would probably come about 3 days later (by biblical reckoning), on a Sunday.
There wouldn't be too much mayhem in just a couple days.
How long was the fire on Maui?
I suggest you click on the link I provided which clarifies the statement.
I have no emotions about it whatsoever. I am simply pointing out the possibility of an equivalence between the "it will be biblical" statement by Trump and potential upcoming events under discussion.
Very true. Maybe my idea is wrong. Hopefully.
That stood out to me as well...
That would be a step “they” should not to take!
I was surprised how often I thought I heard that. I will need to listen again.
Thank you for sharing this. Glad it got stickied!
“We have a Manchurian Candidate “
I thought that back in '08 when Hussein was elected.
Hillary called me at 3:02.
Her voice was very different, I won't get into that. Her voice was very different. Tucker: "what do you mean"
A. She was drunk B. She was in lizard form C. She was cackling uncontrollably
“C She was cackling uncontrollably”
But he said she sounded different…
I do remember a story at the time claiming she was drunk which is why she didn't appear for her loser speech
I heard she flung a Magnum of expensive liquor at a HUGE TV screen gifted by the Saudi's. It was an expensive Tirade by all accounts
Kek...kekity! 💚😹
A very different Hillary placed that call
Someone else called on her behalf?
That stuck with me too - bye Felicia Hillary!
She probably went Wicked Witch of the West on him over the phone.
10 minutes in and we have 17m views baby. edit- up to 75m in an hour.
19.5 million now. And we've got an attack on Bill Barr, Asa Hutchinson, and a "these people are sick"
21.7 million now, lol
25 Mil views
55 Mil views (not lying)
66 mil. The Superbowl had 115.
its going to over 100 tonight...
Imma need at least tree-fiddy!
90.8 Million
https://help.twitter.com/en/using-twitter/view-counts
Who counts as a viewer?
Anyone who is logged into Twitter who views a Tweet counts as a view, regardless of where they see the Tweet (e.g. Home, Search, Profiles, etc.) or whether or not they follow the author. If you’re the author, looking at your own Tweet also counts as a view.
Note: Embedded Tweets will not add to view counts.
Embedded Tweets do not count in that view total either.
Quick jump to 70
Tucker called Chris Wallace a "bitchy little man " That alone was worth the fake Twitter account I set up 😆.
🎯
That made me LOL
kek
So. True! 😹
The end damn near teared me up. Passion, love, and hatred...
Passion and hatred is a bad combination he says.
The last question about civil war is a big one.
Jan Haleper-Hayes talked about avoiding a civil war in a recent interview. We are watching a movie carefully orchestrated to avoid civil war as things happen behind the curtain.
75 million views in under an hour.
122.3 million at the time of this comment and rapidly rising.
I'd be shocked if it didn't hit 200+ mil by Sun night.
Meanwhile the YT #s for the boring GOP debate is between 40k to 600k depending on the stream.
The MSM is dead.
Another interesting remark: ...the District Attorney, Fani, Fani Willis, in Atlanta, she's getting killed.
39:20
Thought it was an odd choice of words.
I hope they wont say that violates his bond agreement. Words can mean so many different things. "Fight" is an awesome word that could have a negative meaning. "Kill" is the same sort of word.
That bond agreement is so vague. I am sure they will always analyze every word too strongly.
he hadn't been arrested yet. Does a bond agreement pre date an actual arrest?
I was wondering the same thing. I wouldn't think so.
If he gets more live viewers than Biden got votes I might shit myself. Currently, at 72 million.
You'll have to subtract 1. I'm watching from Canada. Sorry.
MAGA is for everyone, fren, even in Canuckistan. I did LOL that you apologized, tho! :)
US Kaspersky customers using their VPN! haha!
What about people running via con? That skew numbers?
Maybe a silly question, but does that technology account for VPNs? Also, I recall a US government agency getting outed for spoofing Russian ISP addresses.
Please share more about what your company does. I’m interested.
"I represent everybody. I'm the President." Not past or future tense.
Rumble link: https://rumble.com/v3aw75q-tucker-carlsons-interviews-with-president-trump.html
Thanks for the link. I just finished watching it---though it doesn't start up until about 30 minutes in. Very measured. Nothing sensational.
Interesting point about the Uniparty legislatively closing off the ability of the Vice President to remand dubious votes back to the states (where formerly, they claimed there was no such power). Of course, in my opinion, one does not modify a Constitutional power by legislation, only by amendment, so it would be like legislation to nullify the 2nd amendment---which has been tried repeatedly, but is totally unconstitutional.
Interesting hint that Trump's January 6th crowd may have exceeded 1 million attendees. Which means that the arrested Capitol rioters amounted to a few hundredths of a percent of the total crowd. It is not possible to "incite" a riot and have such an indifferent response. (For such a total number of ordinary citizens, the statistical expectation of violent criminals would be about 4,000 violent actors.) Of the true violent actors, they came with a plan in mind, not in response to anything Trump had to say (and the timeline precludes them from having been in response to Trump, since the Capitol intrusions commenced about 30-45 minutes before he concluded his speech).
Trump offered no answer to the question of whether civil war might be in the making. (My own opinion is that it is not, but that is a different conversation.) Trump did allow that there is great passion at large for the country's welfare and great hatred for the evil that is being pursued. He did not think that is a good situation (and it is not).
It ends at that. But to carry the question forward, what might happen to crystalize an even more militant reaction by the public? I suspect it could easily be another election steal (foreign powers intervening in elections, contrary to Trump's still-active Executive Order) and/or a declaration of war against Russia, be it unilateral or Congressional (intrusion on Trump's possible residual authority as Commander-in-Chief). Under the Devolution theory, there would have to be a "red line" to be crossed before moves could be made, and I think these would be the most serious of red lines. And/or draconic tyranny under the guise of another "pandemic". In the face of war and a pandemic lockdown, is it likely that Biden would suspend elections? I think so, and this would be an even worse provocation to public sentiment. We could be on the brink of civil disobedience.
As I continue to think about this, I am sorry to say it appears to be a scenario for a "perfect storm." This would be the point where the sheep dogs (military) have to stand apart from the sheep (people) and the wolves (government) and say "Mr. President, we are obliged NOT to violate the Constitution, and our duty is to oppose all its enemies foreign and DOMESTIC. Kindly place your hands in these cuffs."
"Well I am The President" at around 39:45. Dasting.
He said it several times.
Trump’s skin color is normal...MSM always makes him look too orange.
"These people are sick." Trump directly quoting Q.
Still waiting for comms.
"He looks like he's walking on toothpicks......he can't walk on sand.......he can't lift a beach chair, they weigh like two ounces.....these beaches seem to be playing a part..." I don't know about comms but the gold is here already
Yep the toothpicks thing was an odd phrase.
29.9 million viewers
Yes...that was rich in context!
Can anyone locate something Trump uttered in this that isn’t a comm? This interview was packed!
I have so many observations. Let’s talk social appearance. Blue tie. No longer “orange man”, he’s rocking straight grey (older and wiser). He “couldn’t” get into so much, learned a lot of lessons in “politics” about loyalty, won’t say anything that may incriminate him, it ended with J6, and the passion and love of the people. To be continued
At the end, Trump should have said, "A small group was violent, and there are many questions about who those actually were. But the emensely, large group was loving and unified and standing up for secure elections."
I think he started a thought about the small group and never finished that thought, then he mixed it together with the comments about the huge, loving group. Then he tagged it with the huge group was angry. Uh oh. This wasn't the best.
I sure loved the rest of the interview.
Th3 m1nd i$ @n am_zing th_ng. 1t wi11 fi11 im tha G@ps if u r 0f @t l3ast m1n1mal 1nte11igenc3.
Trump has such wit. Gosh what a great man!
Watched it. Didn't see the flying sparks POTUS alluded to.
He's a genius marketer. He wanted more views on this than the RNC distraction. Take this as a lesson to stop with the "storm is upon us" predictions.
The view numbers are part of the message to the MSM that they are. Is irrelevant
They were there.
Maybe the sparks he was referring to will come from the left after they watch it.
Look at the question on: killing Trump. Look at what happened. He choked. And who wouldn't.
In my estimation, it was not out of fear. It's just, it is not something you volunteer for. How much does it take to wake all of us up enough?
Remember what happened after JFK?
Think now of his answer about love, passion and hate. It is clear he sees the "potential".
Another thing that betrays his views, is the story about Jefferson and the Georgia vote. He could have picked it and it would have been legal. But he did not.
Newt Gingrich made a video/documentary on George Washington. Go see it and keep this interview, the demeanor, in your mind. See also Q post about crossing The Delaware .... Sparks? Yeah .... For sure sparks!
Check the rumble link in this thread. You'll see it. You'd have to wind forward half an hour or so. It is a different cut.
Gonna listen at work tomorrow
GOD BLESS President Trump, his family, friends, Q followers and his security team.
Silver hair. I think he looks good with silver hair. 🙂
40.5m now
...at the risk of whining, why is the quality so low?
with the foreshadowing by Tucker, of Trump being killed, it reminds me of Q posts stating "It will be biblical", as if Trump will have his death somehow faked. Many will believe him to be dead, possibly JFK Jr. & his wife also, with them all coming back on the public stage at a later time to shock the world.
it was just such a weird, left-field & out of the blue thing to ask, at least twice i remember him asking Trump.
To think Trump & Tucker didn't go over these questions or that Tucker just improv'd the assassination questions... no coincidences?
I agree with you.... it would only be 'worth' the pain it would cause to believe this for even a minute, is if JFK walks out with him and is his VP.
Why the fuck are they talking about water??
So we can Watch the Water
lol
pointing out all these stupid restrictions that restrict our water, those shitty toilets we have to buy now. But maybe they'll talk about Maui? Well maybe not, we're talking about Comey now.
No one is thinking about toilet water right now.
Well some people may have been watching on their thrones, we never know these things
Yes, it was irrelevant to what is going on right now. Toilets? Okay.
It’s part of the 15-minute Great Reset eco-agenda. President Trump is laying it out in a way people will better be able to feel and visualize. He made a great point too about people having to flush multiple times, or do their dishes over and over again, using even MORE water. So he also shows us how to take the moral high ground on this.
What do toilets do? Flush...
Talking about restrictors. Restricting the flow of info comms maybe?
The Bush family have an estate in Paraguay that has one of the largest aquifers in thr world on it iirc? Also iirc there was controversy about Nestle buying up or raking up water supplies to bottle and sell at the expense of folks who lived in the area a few years ago? Maybe the DS are going to try something about the water? Control of water to subjugate folks or tainting the water? Could be alluding to the water or international waters being used by the so called elites and their super yachts to try to avoid legal consequences?
The battery plant in Michigan on three different watersheds that will use more water a day than an actual water bottling plant.