“They’re not trying to capture an accurate count,” said Smith, a Democratic Tennessee election official who had traveled to Phoenix to advise the auditors.
But Smith assured me it was nothing to worry about—because, he said, “they’re not recounting the election.”
It's cool. The further out into the twilight zone normies are led, the easier it is to smack them in the face with a custard pie of fact. A healthy dose of public humiliation works wonders at times.
He may be partly right. After widespread election fraud is proven, it is likely that the entire election becomes null and void, due to (massive) fraud. We aren't "recounting" that garbage. Then we get to redo the election, and laugh at how many "real" votes the Joe-Kamala administration receives in a second election, as we cheer the return of Glorious Leader to his rightful office.
That last part happens after we send in the cleaners to first rid the white house of the stench left in it by Joe, and his biting dog, and Kamalas stanky tramp-twat.
I think it would be particularly enlightening to many to see the results of a real election; not just for President, but for all elected officials. It will show who cheated in a way no other method could. It would show which states are most affected by systemic fraud (like CA).
Such an activity would drive so much change. I can't think of a safer, larger red-pill than a new election done properly (by the military?).
Your logic is sound, and I agree that it should be that way, but my understanding of how our constitution instructs the government to respond to cases of "widespread" election fraud suggests that the election is to be done again, and the military is to be put in charge of the (new) election process.
Admittedly, my understanding of the constitutional process for correcting a fraudulent election may not be correct. And, there is no historical precedent to illustrate exactly how that process would work, but from my research, I believe that something like this is highly likely to occur.
Empire Co., 322 US 238 (1944)). "There is no question of the general doctrine that
fraud vitiates the most solemn contracts, documents, and even judgments" (United
States v. Throckmorton, 98 US 61(1878)
To your point, is there anything in the Constitution that outlines procedures for a situation such as this one? Even if widespread fraud is proven, I don't think there is. What was the John Adams quote? "Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious People. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other." So we were never meant to be here. The fact that we are says a lot about who we are.
Agree with your first point. Fraud. Vitiates. Everything. If there’s even a single fraudulent vote found for a candidate, in any state, that candidate should be disqualified. They should be able to reverse the election the moment they can prove that Biden received one fake vote.
"Fraud vitiates everything" is an abbreviation for "Systemic, outcome-determinative fraud vitiates everything". In this case, we do have systemic, outcome-determinative fraud".
Redo of the election serves another purpose. Controlled rollout of secure voting.
If they combine a “redo” election with new voting technology it will solve a few problems at once. It will curtail optics of a straight military junta. It will establish in one swoop the new voting protocols, while still under military observation, and force people to accept it. And globally it will provide the winner legitimacy.
How do you “install” secure voting? You redo the most fraudulent election in our history with a system that can’t be frauded.
Imagine what those results are going to look like. It’s going to be even more of a landslide than the November election was pre-algorithm.
It may not be totally fair, but strategically it’s probably the right way.
It would seriously be very ugly. The people who were on the fence that voted for Biden, and there were several, would not vote for him again. It might not seem like a bunch, but when you're talking 15-20% of ACTUAL Biden voters switching, you're looking at a 100 million to 40 million type of mauling. One so massive it sets back the deep state to the stone age.
I love Fraud Vitiates Everything (Supreme Court, 1878)
I usually apply it as "...including invalid certifications and inaugurations", meaning that the Trump win isn't among that which needs to be vitiated. Just the Biden steal of it and the treasonous certification and inauguration.
I just don't like how the do-over it literally gives the other side another CHANCE to win, this time legally. Sure we believe they won't, but they shouldn't even have the chance. They cheated. They deserve nothing but severe punishment, not a second shot at the brass ring.
To my mind, Trump won the election, that's it, period. The other side doesn't deserve another bite at the apple.
That said, I'm cool with a whole new election if the military runs it (and isn't all cucked out and communistic like literally every other facet of this fecal govt of ours is).
Clearly the Founders did not consider or forsee this happening. They would have off'd treasonous bastards if they did this in their era. I believe they would have expected future generations to do just that and that's why there is no specific guidance on election theft. The conclusion I draw from the Constitution is put treasonous bastards to death and redo election.
And if we all thought Trump won in a landslide in November, imagine how many more votes he'll get now with scads of Biden voters with buyers remorse will get a do-over.
I think this is really the crux of their approach.
The States validated and ratified the vote, and sent electors, who caucused with electors from the other States, and voted. The vote was then accepted by the Federal Government.
Ergo, the election is over because the vote was "legal".
"It depends on what the definition of 'is', is." - Bill Clinton
They are going to define the process as the truth. Not the truth as the truth. Indeed, it's what they have been saying for months.
Seriously. I was on Reddit and came across a stuuuupid post from r/therightcantmeme. They were still criticizing Trump for some quote they took of him in a stream of consciousness style explanation. While they literally have a retarded senile president accomplishing nothing whom they talk about like he's Gandhi mixed with Tesla. "You know how I know you're a moron?"
I am seriously starting to feel no sympathy for the idiots that refuse to wakeup. At this point if you are on the other side and not starting to question things than there is no hope for you.
Frying pan to the side of the face moment is what it will take to get them awake.
There is a reason for the 'hysterical woman slapped to shake her out of it' trope, or the 'knock some sense into a guy for thinking so stupidly' trope.
I had the unfortunate honor of performing it, it did indeed work, and prevented a car accident.
I also do not condone violence, but having seen this performed appropriately twice, I can safely say there is indeed a time and place to shock someone out of hysterics (not just women, it happens to men too).
As you wisely noted, YMMV, and you should not complain if there are consequences. Correct, it does not work on everyone.
Slate was a good news source when it started, but quickly became ultra-socialist and any-ism promoters. They're clearly getting ahead of the news, attempting to poison it before it's released.
Good to see how the other side is crafting their narrative. 'searching for bamboo' is still front and center. Funny that they have a TN election official (Democrat) complaining that they should have two counters agreeing every 10 ballots - that is proper, but three counters having two agree every 50 ballots - whoa that is a recipe for massive errors! What a joke.
But I hope this is what it comes down to - the cabal just trying to make up enough shit to get their Trump hating minions to believe the audits were 'fake'. The alternative is they pull some really nasty FF to try and distract.
I'm still trying to figure out what they are SO pissed about the black lights or "mysterious purple lights" as some outlets are calling them. I know these morons have watched at least one episode of CSI in their lives but they've all agreed to pretend to not know what black lights are.
This article is a gaslight hoping to shape the narrative. They believe honestly if they win, it won't matter Biden is the president.
They are desperately trying to downplay one simple fact: how can one govern a country if they are not the winner? Lookin at Arizona, when the facts come out, why should the state follow the executive orders of a person who was not elected president?
I don't think these people understand what is act stake here. What was the estimate? over 400,000 votes were altered? When the numbers start coming out illustrating the crazy amount of fraud in that county alone, the Biden administration which is already looking shaky, is going to have one if its legs removed from the table it sits on. The NH audit looks like its going in the same direction.
I hope we are all ready here. The collapse of the attempt to install a president illegally is going to rock the entire planet. Arm up and get those disaster provisions ready frens, its going to be a rough year.
Now they have a new complaint. There was a story this am on Phoenix local news. They are now saying the senate hired cyber ninjas over another qualified auditor, who allegedly put in a bid and cyber ninjas did not put in a bid.
I bet they'll say the other one was a union shop too, which means AZ hates and discriminates against unions.
Bet it is run by a black, blind and deaf, wheelchair bound lady, who identities as a dolphin, which adds cruelty to animals, and racism, sexism, and disability discrimination.
It's just more shade being thrown - I am sure the AZ Senate crossed their T's and dotted their I's - more than likely the alternative auditor were instructed what to do by the Cabal and they did not meet the minimum qualifications for the bid (ON PURPOSE) and they only applied so that this angle could be thrown out when all their other attempts have failed. This just smells like fear to me and I take that as a good sign.
“They’re not trying to capture an accurate count,” said Smith, a Democratic Tennessee election official who had traveled to Phoenix to advise the auditors. In fact, Smith said he expects the end result to be “wildly different from the count.”
I believe the "journalist" responsible for this tripe went in with the assumption that the audit would show their fraud so it wrote the article to provide talking points to their lefty followers so they can then spread lies about the legitimacy of the audit process. Expect more articles like this to come. I don't think their plan to discredit the audit will work but it's the only play they have at this point.
I read it. I can’t believe I made it all the way through.
(In summary) Holy shit they’re terrified, they’re clueless, and the writer + Dem from Tennessee are a couple of children doing their best projecting.
He claims the Dem state reps have TRIED to work with the auditors. That the auditors have “ruined” the 2020 election and they’re worried they cannot reliably use the voting machines in the future.
I haven’t read that article yet. But I’m betting that the plan was to cause decertification if the machines. Then they can’t be used next year! White hats knew the laws. They (I believe) are pulling the strings and making the County Supervisors (which are Republicans, correct?) do their bidding in this movie. No machines next year? hand counts!
Headline of article notes "Unorthodox" audit. Like, they actually looked closely at all they ways the Dems and their friends overseas cheated? Note to Slate: This is the way all future audits in the future will be conducted. Open, transparent and fairly. Those certainly are unorthodox concepts to the left.
Hopefully Maricopa is all we need to prove the fraud to the world. I’m concerned about all the election ballot storage facilities across our nation that are sitting pretty vulnerable right now. I’d except there will be a few that suspiciously combust on their own once the AZ results are made public.
By the way, how do we know that there aren’t any midnight shenanigans happening with all those other machines and ballots that are stored in other counties right now? And do we have eyes on all these places?
Soft prediction here (apologies if I'm stepping on toes here, I'm not really familiar with Q as more than a meme, so please forgive me my transgresses):
Whatever the outcome of the audits, the outcome of the election is moot as this point. Unless Biden drops dead or stands down, he'll be president for the next 3.75 years. This really isn't speculation, it's just the law of the land working as intended.
HOWEVER, if the audits prove something, then patience needs to be key. Take whatever results are found, squirrel them away until October 2023 when it's too late for people to be bored with it right, and too late for the press to try to squash the story and unleash a torrent of memes the likes of which the world has never seen.
Here's the most important part: USE THEIR SOURCES!!! Archive, screencap, save urls, whatever you have to do, but make sure that it isn't coming from foxnews or freedomlovestrump.news or anything like that, but whatever mainstream and leftwing outlets you can. I'm talking slate,all the alphabet news agencies, the hill, you name it. If they fawned over someone with a (D) after their name, use them. highlight the parts where they admit that fraud was found and they tried to hide it way down in the article, but pound that point home like the allies at normandy beach.
One of the DS people interviewed mentioned how, if fraud is found, a “small mushroom cloud” will be found over Maricopa. I don’t think this is a metaphor—it’s a threat. I hope our frens there take this seriously.
It's been said here already, but OMG this is a shotgun hit piece of journalism! Blatantly biased, from selecting quotes of many different RINOs and Snakes - some pretending to be shocked at the process, others using vulgarity so we know they're "real people!", all of them probably implicitly involved in the Steal and trying to cover their asses.
"We spoke to a dozen cheaters and here's what they had to say..."
Something weird here. Why are they using capital letters where no capitalization required in the title? I looked up UADW, apparently this is one possibility: Universal Alliance of Diamond Workers. Didn't President Trump mention something about diamonds the other day? What kind of message is Slate sending here and to whom?
This -
"Kelly Smith, who traveled from Orange County, California, to attend the audit and carries a Smith & Wesson .357 Magnum in a holster as he walks around between the Coliseum parking lot and the tent encampment to guard against antifa, says that Joe Biden belongs in Guantánamo Bay."
Well if there's one thing I've learned being on the boards, it's to trust the word of you Pedes. Not to say I don't do my own research cause I do. But it say I trust you folk when you say something is eye aids. So an updootbfor thenpost just because of the warning from OP but also because of y'all. WWG1WGA
I've assumed for a long time that if the audit shows a definitive Trump win - then the media will insure that it appears that nobody accepts the result. I'm a bit of a doomer by nature. Prepare for the worst but hope for the best.
I love how they end the article by saying that all the audits are just cover for "Republican's pushing to suppress the vote" (paraphrasing what they actually said, because I don't feel like going back to the article to cut and paste :) )
Guys, I have tried several times to make a post, but when I get to the part to "text", I get a message that I am leaving this screen and what I wrote will be gone. I've tried to copy/paste some things I've found and want to put out there. I can't even get the "link" thing to work for me. HELP what am I don't wrong?
Love,
Technically Challenged. LOL
“They’re not trying to capture an accurate count,” said Smith, a Democratic Tennessee election official who had traveled to Phoenix to advise the auditors.
But Smith assured me it was nothing to worry about—because, he said, “they’re not recounting the election.”
these people make my blood boil
I mean really, though, how hard IS journalism anyway?
You simply have to say Who, What, Where, When, Why, and How... but do it truthfully.
It's that darn sticky truthfulness that gets them every time.
It's cool. The further out into the twilight zone normies are led, the easier it is to smack them in the face with a custard pie of fact. A healthy dose of public humiliation works wonders at times.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nJI7DIVm3OM
He may be partly right. After widespread election fraud is proven, it is likely that the entire election becomes null and void, due to (massive) fraud. We aren't "recounting" that garbage. Then we get to redo the election, and laugh at how many "real" votes the Joe-Kamala administration receives in a second election, as we cheer the return of Glorious Leader to his rightful office.
That last part happens after we send in the cleaners to first rid the white house of the stench left in it by Joe, and his biting dog, and Kamalas stanky tramp-twat.
This to me is spectacularly unfair.
We had a legit winner. He gets to take the office. Simple as that.
Anything else is fuckwittery of the highest order. (Apparently such that it gets a whole new word to describe it :)
You don't get to cheat your ass off in every state in order to get a "DO OVER"
You cheat in one county, you are disqualified. Trump wins. End of discussion.
Really, that IS the end of the discussion.
I think it would be particularly enlightening to many to see the results of a real election; not just for President, but for all elected officials. It will show who cheated in a way no other method could. It would show which states are most affected by systemic fraud (like CA).
Such an activity would drive so much change. I can't think of a safer, larger red-pill than a new election done properly (by the military?).
No such thing as a centrist Democrat, unless you’re talking about RINOs. Every Democrat is an extremist traitor.
I'll allow it
Kek
Mainly because I think that is what is coming
Your logic is sound, and I agree that it should be that way, but my understanding of how our constitution instructs the government to respond to cases of "widespread" election fraud suggests that the election is to be done again, and the military is to be put in charge of the (new) election process.
Admittedly, my understanding of the constitutional process for correcting a fraudulent election may not be correct. And, there is no historical precedent to illustrate exactly how that process would work, but from my research, I believe that something like this is highly likely to occur.
Empire Co., 322 US 238 (1944)). "There is no question of the general doctrine that fraud vitiates the most solemn contracts, documents, and even judgments" (United States v. Throckmorton, 98 US 61(1878)
To your point, is there anything in the Constitution that outlines procedures for a situation such as this one? Even if widespread fraud is proven, I don't think there is. What was the John Adams quote? "Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious People. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other." So we were never meant to be here. The fact that we are says a lot about who we are.
Agree with your first point. Fraud. Vitiates. Everything. If there’s even a single fraudulent vote found for a candidate, in any state, that candidate should be disqualified. They should be able to reverse the election the moment they can prove that Biden received one fake vote.
"Fraud vitiates everything" is an abbreviation for "Systemic, outcome-determinative fraud vitiates everything". In this case, we do have systemic, outcome-determinative fraud".
Eh i dont know about this because there is probably at least 1 fake or fraudulent Trump vote somewhere
Agreed
Redo of the election serves another purpose. Controlled rollout of secure voting.
If they combine a “redo” election with new voting technology it will solve a few problems at once. It will curtail optics of a straight military junta. It will establish in one swoop the new voting protocols, while still under military observation, and force people to accept it. And globally it will provide the winner legitimacy.
How do you “install” secure voting? You redo the most fraudulent election in our history with a system that can’t be frauded.
Imagine what those results are going to look like. It’s going to be even more of a landslide than the November election was pre-algorithm.
It may not be totally fair, but strategically it’s probably the right way.
It would seriously be very ugly. The people who were on the fence that voted for Biden, and there were several, would not vote for him again. It might not seem like a bunch, but when you're talking 15-20% of ACTUAL Biden voters switching, you're looking at a 100 million to 40 million type of mauling. One so massive it sets back the deep state to the stone age.
Me like your theory, boozy mcfuckface
Man that username so seldom fits your quality remarks but OK
Treason is as treason DOES. No “do-over” ever. Bigly penalty for treason. Make examples.
I love Fraud Vitiates Everything (Supreme Court, 1878)
I usually apply it as "...including invalid certifications and inaugurations", meaning that the Trump win isn't among that which needs to be vitiated. Just the Biden steal of it and the treasonous certification and inauguration.
I just don't like how the do-over it literally gives the other side another CHANCE to win, this time legally. Sure we believe they won't, but they shouldn't even have the chance. They cheated. They deserve nothing but severe punishment, not a second shot at the brass ring.
To my mind, Trump won the election, that's it, period. The other side doesn't deserve another bite at the apple.
That said, I'm cool with a whole new election if the military runs it (and isn't all cucked out and communistic like literally every other facet of this fecal govt of ours is).
Clearly the Founders did not consider or forsee this happening. They would have off'd treasonous bastards if they did this in their era. I believe they would have expected future generations to do just that and that's why there is no specific guidance on election theft. The conclusion I draw from the Constitution is put treasonous bastards to death and redo election.
And if we all thought Trump won in a landslide in November, imagine how many more votes he'll get now with scads of Biden voters with buyers remorse will get a do-over.
Exactly my thinking. Kek!
I think this is really the crux of their approach.
The States validated and ratified the vote, and sent electors, who caucused with electors from the other States, and voted. The vote was then accepted by the Federal Government.
Ergo, the election is over because the vote was "legal".
"It depends on what the definition of 'is', is." - Bill Clinton
They are going to define the process as the truth. Not the truth as the truth. Indeed, it's what they have been saying for months.
Then maybe we should convict every single one of them of treason so no one ever tries this BS again.
I like this guy....
My eyes! MY EYES!
There is an archive.today extension you just hit the button.
https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/archive-page/gcaimhkfmliahedmeklebabdgagipbia?hl=en-US
this one?
Child like wonder maybe!
Seriously. I was on Reddit and came across a stuuuupid post from r/therightcantmeme. They were still criticizing Trump for some quote they took of him in a stream of consciousness style explanation. While they literally have a retarded senile president accomplishing nothing whom they talk about like he's Gandhi mixed with Tesla. "You know how I know you're a moron?"
Well that was your first problem...
I am seriously starting to feel no sympathy for the idiots that refuse to wakeup. At this point if you are on the other side and not starting to question things than there is no hope for you.
A big thumbs up brother
Frying pan to the side of the face moment is what it will take to get them awake.
There is a reason for the 'hysterical woman slapped to shake her out of it' trope, or the 'knock some sense into a guy for thinking so stupidly' trope.
Strangely enough both have basis in reality.
True
I had the unfortunate honor of performing it, it did indeed work, and prevented a car accident.
I also do not condone violence, but having seen this performed appropriately twice, I can safely say there is indeed a time and place to shock someone out of hysterics (not just women, it happens to men too).
As you wisely noted, YMMV, and you should not complain if there are consequences. Correct, it does not work on everyone.
The idiots can't discern the difference between a fake recount and a FORENSIC AUDIT looking for the cheat.
Slate was a good news source when it started, but quickly became ultra-socialist and any-ism promoters. They're clearly getting ahead of the news, attempting to poison it before it's released.
Good to see how the other side is crafting their narrative. 'searching for bamboo' is still front and center. Funny that they have a TN election official (Democrat) complaining that they should have two counters agreeing every 10 ballots - that is proper, but three counters having two agree every 50 ballots - whoa that is a recipe for massive errors! What a joke.
But I hope this is what it comes down to - the cabal just trying to make up enough shit to get their Trump hating minions to believe the audits were 'fake'. The alternative is they pull some really nasty FF to try and distract.
I'm still trying to figure out what they are SO pissed about the black lights or "mysterious purple lights" as some outlets are calling them. I know these morons have watched at least one episode of CSI in their lives but they've all agreed to pretend to not know what black lights are.
Thank you, OP, for saving us from eye cancer. And, thanks u/TheQStrategy for the alternate link. Upvoat for you both.
This article is a gaslight hoping to shape the narrative. They believe honestly if they win, it won't matter Biden is the president.
They are desperately trying to downplay one simple fact: how can one govern a country if they are not the winner? Lookin at Arizona, when the facts come out, why should the state follow the executive orders of a person who was not elected president?
I don't think these people understand what is act stake here. What was the estimate? over 400,000 votes were altered? When the numbers start coming out illustrating the crazy amount of fraud in that county alone, the Biden administration which is already looking shaky, is going to have one if its legs removed from the table it sits on. The NH audit looks like its going in the same direction.
I hope we are all ready here. The collapse of the attempt to install a president illegally is going to rock the entire planet. Arm up and get those disaster provisions ready frens, its going to be a rough year.
Now they have a new complaint. There was a story this am on Phoenix local news. They are now saying the senate hired cyber ninjas over another qualified auditor, who allegedly put in a bid and cyber ninjas did not put in a bid.
Hey, that is a good one.
I bet they'll say the other one was a union shop too, which means AZ hates and discriminates against unions.
Bet it is run by a black, blind and deaf, wheelchair bound lady, who identities as a dolphin, which adds cruelty to animals, and racism, sexism, and disability discrimination.
Gotta cover those bases!
.
Idiots.
It's just more shade being thrown - I am sure the AZ Senate crossed their T's and dotted their I's - more than likely the alternative auditor were instructed what to do by the Cabal and they did not meet the minimum qualifications for the bid (ON PURPOSE) and they only applied so that this angle could be thrown out when all their other attempts have failed. This just smells like fear to me and I take that as a good sign.
Omg, reading that is like listening to a 18 year old girl talk..
It is so sad to see that brainwashed idiot holding the sore loser zone sign.
The sign was right, his shirt was wrong. I would bet the house that dude got beat up a LOT in high-school.
lol
“They’re not trying to capture an accurate count,” said Smith, a Democratic Tennessee election official who had traveled to Phoenix to advise the auditors. In fact, Smith said he expects the end result to be “wildly different from the count.”
Yup. They're afraid.
I believe the "journalist" responsible for this tripe went in with the assumption that the audit would show their fraud so it wrote the article to provide talking points to their lefty followers so they can then spread lies about the legitimacy of the audit process. Expect more articles like this to come. I don't think their plan to discredit the audit will work but it's the only play they have at this point.
This is called "getting ahead of the story" just like they are admitting the virus came from the lab now. Fucking fuckers.
Likely? Do or do not, there is no try...
I read it. I can’t believe I made it all the way through.
(In summary) Holy shit they’re terrified, they’re clueless, and the writer + Dem from Tennessee are a couple of children doing their best projecting.
He claims the Dem state reps have TRIED to work with the auditors. That the auditors have “ruined” the 2020 election and they’re worried they cannot reliably use the voting machines in the future.
INSANE.
I haven’t read that article yet. But I’m betting that the plan was to cause decertification if the machines. Then they can’t be used next year! White hats knew the laws. They (I believe) are pulling the strings and making the County Supervisors (which are Republicans, correct?) do their bidding in this movie. No machines next year? hand counts!
slate is peak cringe, glad they're triggered
Ooohhh damn a drip just got bigger!
Smells of PANIC in AZ
Headline of article notes "Unorthodox" audit. Like, they actually looked closely at all they ways the Dems and their friends overseas cheated? Note to Slate: This is the way all future audits in the future will be conducted. Open, transparent and fairly. Those certainly are unorthodox concepts to the left.
Truth!!!
Hopefully Maricopa is all we need to prove the fraud to the world. I’m concerned about all the election ballot storage facilities across our nation that are sitting pretty vulnerable right now. I’d except there will be a few that suspiciously combust on their own once the AZ results are made public.
By the way, how do we know that there aren’t any midnight shenanigans happening with all those other machines and ballots that are stored in other counties right now? And do we have eyes on all these places?
Soft prediction here (apologies if I'm stepping on toes here, I'm not really familiar with Q as more than a meme, so please forgive me my transgresses):
Whatever the outcome of the audits, the outcome of the election is moot as this point. Unless Biden drops dead or stands down, he'll be president for the next 3.75 years. This really isn't speculation, it's just the law of the land working as intended.
HOWEVER, if the audits prove something, then patience needs to be key. Take whatever results are found, squirrel them away until October 2023 when it's too late for people to be bored with it right, and too late for the press to try to squash the story and unleash a torrent of memes the likes of which the world has never seen.
Here's the most important part: USE THEIR SOURCES!!! Archive, screencap, save urls, whatever you have to do, but make sure that it isn't coming from foxnews or freedomlovestrump.news or anything like that, but whatever mainstream and leftwing outlets you can. I'm talking slate,all the alphabet news agencies, the hill, you name it. If they fawned over someone with a (D) after their name, use them. highlight the parts where they admit that fraud was found and they tried to hide it way down in the article, but pound that point home like the allies at normandy beach.
They are falsely conflating a recount with an Audit, this is not a recount, it's a full forensic audit!!!
One of the DS people interviewed mentioned how, if fraud is found, a “small mushroom cloud” will be found over Maricopa. I don’t think this is a metaphor—it’s a threat. I hope our frens there take this seriously.
Here's a CNN interview of the guy who mentioned the "small mushroom cloud"-
https://edition.cnn.com/videos/politics/2021/05/17/stephen-richer-maricopa-county-arizona-election-official-trump-lies-ebof-vpx.cnn/video/playlists/top-news-videos/
It's been said here already, but OMG this is a shotgun hit piece of journalism! Blatantly biased, from selecting quotes of many different RINOs and Snakes - some pretending to be shocked at the process, others using vulgarity so we know they're "real people!", all of them probably implicitly involved in the Steal and trying to cover their asses.
"We spoke to a dozen cheaters and here's what they had to say..."
NCSWIC!
Something weird here. Why are they using capital letters where no capitalization required in the title? I looked up UADW, apparently this is one possibility: Universal Alliance of Diamond Workers. Didn't President Trump mention something about diamonds the other day? What kind of message is Slate sending here and to whom?
This - "Kelly Smith, who traveled from Orange County, California, to attend the audit and carries a Smith & Wesson .357 Magnum in a holster as he walks around between the Coliseum parking lot and the tent encampment to guard against antifa, says that Joe Biden belongs in Guantánamo Bay."
Who is Slate? Dark side? The whole gist of it seems negative.
Well if there's one thing I've learned being on the boards, it's to trust the word of you Pedes. Not to say I don't do my own research cause I do. But it say I trust you folk when you say something is eye aids. So an updootbfor thenpost just because of the warning from OP but also because of y'all. WWG1WGA
I've assumed for a long time that if the audit shows a definitive Trump win - then the media will insure that it appears that nobody accepts the result. I'm a bit of a doomer by nature. Prepare for the worst but hope for the best.
Lol. I feel this post Fren.
I love how they end the article by saying that all the audits are just cover for "Republican's pushing to suppress the vote" (paraphrasing what they actually said, because I don't feel like going back to the article to cut and paste :) )
Guys, I have tried several times to make a post, but when I get to the part to "text", I get a message that I am leaving this screen and what I wrote will be gone. I've tried to copy/paste some things I've found and want to put out there. I can't even get the "link" thing to work for me. HELP what am I don't wrong?
Love, Technically Challenged. LOL
We've known this for 6 months