President Trump on the passing of the Queen....
(media.greatawakening.win)
Comments (132)
sorted by:
Optics for the normies.
Imho..doubtful...she was controlled by the Rothschilds..they have controlled the UK++ since the Battle of Waterloo.
Prepare for a plot twist. The Roths stole everything that they possess, The Plan has been to bankrupt then convict them and their accomplices wherever in the world they live and to return the lands and treasures to the Peoples of the world, The death of the Monarch will trigger events that now make this happen. (IMHO).
Why does the death of the Queen trigger this?
I want it to be go time already as much as the next anon, but we need more reasoning than this to make such predictions.
That's the question "What happens when you remove the QUEEN from the board?"
It will be easier to catch the hidden king!
Bankrupt who? The Roths or Monarch? If you believe the Roths are the good guys, then I humbly disagree..both are scum.
The Rothschilds and the other bloodline dynasties that have been plundering the planet for centuries are who is/are going down..
Ok..gotcha..ty
Why would her death trigger this?
I do find the timing of her death—shortly after meeting WEF lackey Truss who “won the PM election”—suspect.
Yes..some have been saying it was green screened and or cgi..something is coming and the way the news is that they drop stuff on friday to get through the weekend...stay frosty fren.
Who is to say she didn't die much earlier?
Many also speculating it was a look a like meeting Truss.
Yep, I know, it's a rabbit hole.
I think she was is just a really old lady who lived a long time because of excellent medical care. Nobody lives forever. I am am more likely to believe RBG was long dead, or incapacitated, before it was revealed publicly. Just my opinion. After everything I’ve seen this past half decade I still wouldn’t be surprised if you were absolutely right either. It’s a total 🤡🌎.
Icing them down until it's a playable card. It's been speculated many times before with other notable deaths.
The alternative was not much different WEF either way - a trojan horse event!
ive heard even before that. king george was in debt to them from 1776
When you are a woman born into a situation that is probably beyond your control, you do your best to carry on. I have personally experienced the control & cruel actions of my father, brother & uncle because I disagreed with what they were doing. I don’t believe President Trump would have been as complimentary if she was truly as evil. Personal opinion.
Been there with my own dad.
President Trump Says Justice Ginsburg "Lived an Amazing Life"
https://www.c-span.org/video/?476038-1/president-trump-justice-ginsburg-lived-amazing-life
I've noticed that Trump usually trashes the people who deserve it and praises the ones who deserve it. Might not be the case 100% of the time but anything different would likely be an exception and not the rule.
But Trump, and others say that lots of people are evil. Rightfully so. This must mean something else.
When the evidence is presented, I will consider it. Until then, she's assumed to have been one of them.
Nope. This is their line of reasoning. "Prove to me you're NOT a giga-racist-maga-nazi by kneeling down before a statue of lord joe and denouncing Donald Trump."
In the land of the free, we have this thing called "innocent until proven guilty".
Someone appearing suspicious and us having some evidence to show against them, which we have, requires an investigation, not a unilateral declaration of guilt by some randoms online who forget their place and think they have that right.
Now prove it. Then provide that proof before a court of law in a fail trial and we can execute the lot. Shouldn't be too hard if what you say is true and you're so sure of it, right?
Your place is as one in the whole of society. We the people are the government, not just you. You don't get to decide that someone is guilty because you say so. You have to prove it in a fair trial and give them a chance to defend themselves.
Yea, alright buddy. Good luck with that.
So Prince Andrew did nothing wrong?
If her standing up for her son doesn't convince you, your opinion is moot.
Where did I say the queen was good?
Oh right, I didn't.
Don't think that's a valid position, all mothers will generally seek to help and protect their children. It's part of their nature.
Remember we were, and remain sinners but Jesus - our Creator (mother type) - died for them and not just those who believe - but for the sins of the whole world (1 John 2:2)
My mother would drag me by my ears to the police station if I molested children or committed any crime.
And good for her and any other parent who did the same - but sadly it's not the norm, look how many times family say things like - 'but ... is a good person' when their evil deeds are exposed.
May I add - Andrew has done much wrong and my comment was not to condone any of that and I suspect much more to be revealed - but he was reportedly the Queen's favourite which no doubt contributed to her actions. He was stripped of titles and roles and pushed outside the inner circle of the family which itself is telling. But this was a civil not criminal case and many such cases are dealt with this way. There may yet be a criminal case - which cannot be resolved by money.
Her father was a great help in defeating the nazis. I'm sure she kept up his legacy. Seeing London bombed to smithereens in her youth was probably a good 'redpill' moment. I have no doubt she approved of Q.
Maybe. But the Monarchy stood by while GB's military decayed under Chamberlain, and missed many opportunities to take a stand before Germany consolidated power and defensive positions. Many more died because of it.
Look into the Queen's uncle who abdicated. He was a Nazi sympathizer and did a deal with Hitler that he would be King after the UK was taken over by Germany.
I don't recall reading anything about a deal between Edward and Hitler, but it wouldn't surprise me. He and his bride were seen in Germany showing allegiance to Hitler.
It was even covered on the Crown. You can probably find something about it on YT.
That is one way of looking at it. Why would they? Could it be that the monarchs, which are Germans, had no real desire to let communists take over?
The cabal is not one single ideology. Royals have different agendas than for instance: vulture capitalists ( think Fugger family)
And sometimes their interest overlap, other times they are at each other's throats.
Think: house of Habsburg-Lorraine and the book: Entitlement to rule.
If you have everything, and need not worry like the plebeians, or the basket of deplorables..... Well, what is the lust for life?
The big game.
Except that I think that if they were really worried about the communists, they wouldn't have allowed the military to be depleted of men and material. It was a safe bet that Hitler wanted to take over Europe, and Chamberlain was letting him do it, notwithstanding a lot of rhetoric about peace in Europe. That should have kept Russia at bay in Europe, and they only had to worry about themselves.
But you are probably right about the other factors at play.
Ignoring the political factions, it seems pretty clear that the goal of the DS factions was war, population control, and a great human sacrifice to their master WWI on a grander scale.
It is a reasonable view. There are a few issues with that. Europe is way more expansive than is initially portrayed .... German expansion looked towards 2 issues:
Uniting the Aryans in one realm: Flanders, Netherlands, Denmark, Norway, Sweden, Finland, Austria, parts of Hungary. etc.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_German_settlement_in_Central_and_Eastern_Europe
It is somewhat of a replay with the Kingdom of Prussia, after the 30 years war, trying to build up a population and sustainable agriculture. Potatoes were a real gift. Also consider Otto von Bisarck' s policies ... Consider also: Holy Roman Empire of the German Nation ....
It is easy to lose view based on moral consideration fueled by current propaganda.
Add to this Ukraine, and Russia up to the Wolga. https://www.blackseagr.org/maps.html
When it comes to France, the Iberian Peninsula, Italian Peninsula, Illyrica, etc there was no interest.
Interestingly, when it came to the question of adding The Netherlands to the Great German Reich in 1942/1943, there was interest in doing so, but it was considered not possible due to the general way of thinking of the Dutch. But there was confidence that, after a decade or so, people would be far enough along, to vote yes in a plebiscite.
And Lebensraum, was not based on extinction per se, but on letting the locals do what they do best, as these people were so backward, that anything with an engine was considered magic. (think holocaust stories).
The UK, especially the ruling class, had nothing but contempt for East-Europeans. Because in truth, these people were backward. A bit akin to those people of the Cargo Cult. Or even today, some people still live according to the ways of their ancestors. A couple of years ago I witnessed a Somali woman buying a french fried at the local train station. I could see she had just arrived. At the moment of payment, she did not know what to do, looked at all the devices at the counter in bewilderment, and when she finally had paid and was given the receipt, she stood there flabbergasted.
Technological advanced is indistinguishable from magic. We often forget to take that into account when considering the events of the past.
In 1940/1941, and notice that France was split in two for obvious reasons, a peace proposal was made in which France, the Benelux countries and Poland would be set up again, the German army would retreat behind the Rhine, and reparations would be paid by Germany. And UK said no.
added: When TTIP failed .... the WEF came up with the 4th industrial revolution in which Ukraine functions as the breadbasket under control of the same entities who wanted TTIP, while their .gov infiltration got into high gear ....
This too is an issue warranting further consideration. Why? Because TTIP would have created an extra-territorial business environment for big money and business. Who would benefit? Money-launderers, traffickers, the same group behind the WEF.
Interesting points. I will be the first to acknowledge that my knowledge and understanding of European history, prior to 1900, is weak at best. But I do know that factors into much of the thinking of the political establishment at the time.
The technology angle is interesting. I deal with it, even have inventions, but still find it frustrating. Largely because I have to deal with unnecessary complexity on a daily basis. The reasons have as much to do with politics as solving real technical challenges. There are ways to make things simpler, and easier to accomplish and understand, but many people prefer complexity due to philosophy. I have examples of solutions to challenging problems that look relatively simple. The very few people who understand the problems that were solved, also understand that very few people are capable of doing what was done. But there are also a lot of people who think they know how to solve these types of problems (doubtful - at least there is no prior proof of it, unless many words are proof of ability), and yet, they are more than happy to tell people like myself how to go about doing our jobs, and handing out bad advice like cheap candy. Maybe they are better than me at handling complex technology. Or maybe they are better at avoiding it, and making themselves look good in the process. I can't say for certain.
Oh? Who instigated World War II?
Who sat at the head of the Committee of 300?
Thank God the Commonwealth and USA helped to stopped the advance of Nazism/socialism during World War II. It was a war worth fighting, just as the war that is currently ongoing is a war worth fighting (and against the exact same enemies!)
Thank God Hitler was carried off to Argentina thanks to the Roman Catholic Church and the OSS (which later became the CIA) via Operation Paperclip.
You realize all the Nazi scientists ended up in the US and the former Soviet Union, right?
George H.W. Bush was really a Scherff. Do some research on Otto Skorzeny if you're ready to have your mind blown.
The United States American Freemasons dragged us into WII, shill.
FDR - Freemason Jay Watson - Freemason Henry Ford - Freemason. Truman - Freemason Prescott Bush - Freemason
All of these “Protestant” Freemasonic men helped the Freemasonic Queen of England to massacre millions of people for their beloved Freemasonic vision of a one world government.
Hitler was a pawn of the Vatican/Catholic Church. The Vatican has continued their age old quest to implement worldwide socialism or communism.
In the face of this, it is important to remember that we all are God, Sovereign and free, no matter what any institution says.
Hey Shill,
The Pope funded German resistance movements like “Operation Valkerie”, executed by a German Catholic Army Officer.
Pope Pius XII had three assassination attempts against the Pagan, Hitler.
https://cruxnow.com/interviews/2016/06/17/pius-xii-active-conspirator-three-anti-hitler-plots
Seems like American Protestant Freemasons & English royalty dragged us into WWII, shill. The evidence suggests that Catholics attempted to avoid it.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=wL5sOKP5Aqw
In terms of pawn, indeed. It becomes obvious when reading the concordate.
At the same time the RCC also was a pawn in a power struggle that has been going on since 350 AD or so, especially since the pope started to claim the position of Pontifex Maximus.
Think: John plantagenet or Federick Barbarossa.
There is an interesting book called: of Pope's, Kings and the People. It describes the lead up to the creation of Vatican City, or the treaty of the laterans.
"Man in the High Castle" isn't a work of fictional alternate history, but a well crafted allegory a la the Revelations of St. John, intended to have the audience read between the lines and increase awareness to the relatable problems of the real world.
After reading/watching and living the past 20 years aware, I've wondered of its fictional status.... I think of CERN and compare it to the Nazi portal to other dimensions.
Some damage was done to London. But if you really want to apply this phrase in comparison to Hamburg, Berlin, Dresden and any German city in that day, it would immediately show itself as being hyperbole.
Shill. Nice user name though. Shilling for the Freemasonic Royal family? Pshh.
Freemason King Edward VIII stepped down because of his rabid support for Hitler. There’s even home videos of him & Queen E throwing up the Heil Hitler.
This Germanic Masonic Pagan Royal family were partially the CAUSE of WWII. They got their 33rd degree Freemason bitch, FDR, to get us into WWII.
I spit on their graves. All these Masons & “royalty” are burning in the pits of hell.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=wL5sOKP5Aqw
everyone's a white hat
(Or an ass hat)
Not a chance.
Absolutely...
My real is that she hated what she was being forced to do and when the time came, she gave up everything to the WHs. Trump being warm about her everytime he talks about her is definitely more than optics.
No doubt they groomed her while she was just a child. They had prepped for her to take the throne even in the Edward days. No doubt she went along with everything they told her for decades. But can you imagine the kind of stuff she must have done. Even Q pointed out that a lot of people get in there for various reasons and can't get out, but given a chance to redeem themselves, they wont say no to it, even if they dont get to live.
We will see who all have been helping us.
Doesn’t matter if she was under trauma based mind control. She had an entire lifetime to come clean and chose not to.
Order followers are worse than the order givers.
Boo. Lying and sucking ass is disgusting. The queen and her family are evil.
Fuck her. The IRA should have finished what they started in 1974.
When it comes to Allies...... as Admiral Rolland succintly remarked in the book: Where Eagles dare: certain niceties have to be observed.
Can I have that printout of Trump's thoughts you apparently have to conclude this? Would be real interesting to see what the man himself thinks on a myriad of topics!
Your opinion doesn't equal Trump's opinion just because you want it to. If you claim someone is saying one thing but really thinks another you need to show some evidence for such a claim. Just as we do when we claim that the left are liars who say their goal is to help when it's really to destroy.
Trump HAS TO? Just like we HAD TO wear masks? No. No more clown games.
Telling a lie to save humanity from an evil cabal of satanic pedophiles is 100% objectively and unquestioningly the right thing to do. Every single time.
Why not tell the truth to save humanity?
We live in a corrupt world that's been twisting the truth for 6000 years. Sometimes in that world the truth isn't the primary vehicle to doing good. It requires trust, yes, but if we trust Trump and the white hats we should have no issue with them telling some lies in between to save us before revealing the whole truth after the deed is done. Now in contrast, if you don't trust them demanding honesty is the correct thing to do in my opinion.
If it were possible to tell the truth and magically save everyone, I'm sure they would have. But when lying, which is bad, is the only option to save the most people, it becomes the right thing to do.
Why are you so certain the only option is to lie?
These people aren’t perfect. I’d argue that even if they are doing a good job, they’d be doing a better job if they used more truth and less lies.
Her legacy indeed is remarkable (it indeed put a mark), historic (indeed: factual) and tremendous:
Sarcasm is something ....
-The Queen's Schedule Aide on 9-4-22
When do we think she actually died? There was data leaking out starting in February 2022 that she was already dead. Early Feb was before her big celebration of her anniversary of becoming Queen, i believe.
I heard that from people in the UK last year. I wonder what happened.
😉👌
Hello other former Latin student. I thought the same thing. Tremendous was a well chosen word. Optics for the normies and a slight nod to us.
Don't get too excited. Plenty of well-read people are functionally illiterate. Consider the widespread misuse of "enormous." And the feeble attempt to substitute "issue" for "problem."
Thanks for the etymology!
It's funny how many words that mean bad (including bad) are used to mean good
It comes from the mediocre-read who cannot be satisfied with the available vocabulary and decide to borrow vocabulary that has only tangential connection. In this case, "tremendous" has a tangential connection through the sense of huge magnitude. People also don't listen to what they are saying. When someone exclaims about a social event, "it was the Bomb!" do they realize they are glorifying a mass murder phenomenon?
So, it is not that words meaning "bad" are being used to mean "good." It is that people are stupidly misusing words.
Both can be true.
The funniest is when they say something is bad or the baddest and they mean good. WTF? Who started that one!
"Loss of her majesty" - LOL. Love my president!
Melania and I are deeply saddened to learn of the loss of Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II. Together with our family and fellow Americans, we send our sincere condolences to the Royal Family and the people of the United Kingdom during this time of great sorrow and grief.
Queen Elizabeth’s historic and remarkable reign left a tremendous legacy of peace and prosperity for Great Britain. Her leadership and enduring diplomacy secured and advanced alliances with the United States and countries around the world. However, she will always be remembered for her faithfulness to her country and her unwavering devotion to her fellow countrymen and women.
Melania and I will always cherish our time together with the Queen, and never forget Her Majesty’s generous friendship, great wisdom, and wonderful sense of humor. What a grand and beautiful lady she was—there was nobody like her!
Our thoughts and prayers will remain with the great people of the United Kingdom as you honor her most meaningful life and exceptional service to the people.
May God bless the Queen, may she reign forever in our hearts, and may God hold her and Prince Philip in abiding care.
God to judge Philip next?
u/#ummwhat
Optics, sarcasm, like wishing Ghislaine "well"
I mean, that's what I thought at first. But even still, I cannot say such nice things about someone I know to be pure evil.
Exactly.
Emotions get in the way, instead of being a force to create reality.
DJT is magnanimous and gracious, a true gentleman. Unlike his adversaries.
No, fuck her. The IRA should have finished the job in ‘74. No graciousness to tyrants.
Smh at the cabal queen lovers downvoting me
Agreed optics and all Class
When had DJT ever cared about anything other than shooting from the hip and saying exactly what he thinks? It’s the reason he’s endeared himself to us
Interesting that he chose to talk about "Great Britain" and not the "United Kingdom"?
I'm not clever enough to work out what that could mean, but as a monarch her monarchy was over the United Kingdom of which Great Britain is a subset.
https://truthsocial.com/users/realDonaldTrump/statuses/108964160049885781
“Fellow Americans”
Blah, Blah-blah-blah, blah - for the normies and for now.
Didn’t the queen kidnap a bunch of kids from a Canadian orphanage many decades ago?
She definitely had something to do with it.....
Was it Dan giving dog comms recently??
Yes...👌
Does he really mean that?
Queens die everyday and no one bats an eye.Things keep moving, but when someone from the big club gets clubbled the whole world is forced to stop. We're forced to recognize the absence of someone who never knew our names while our own flesh and blood struggle for support, screaming for recognition.
Mothers, wives, sisters and daughters thrown into the same system that's been stripping soul from man for millennia now. The women's suffrage movement ushered in a new era for humanity, an era in which all men and women are created equal and as such should be taxed accordingly till death.
The old adage rings true as two things are certain in life: Taxes and Death, albeit time and time again those of us humbled in humanity are consistently confronted with the stark realities that among us are others who feel the obligation to share the burden of taxes to be beneath them. Coincidentally these same individuals just so happen to usually be the most financially well off which reinforces another principal: "We unconditionally love the ones that hurt us the most."
The sensing of clear utter rejection ignites our innate yearning for validation so effectively that we'll shower those aforementioned monsters with every bit of societal recognition we have and inevitably it's never enough. All they want is to get as far away from us as humanly possible.
The hate they have for others is what drives them; it's the same hate they have for the weakest parts of themselves that are so clearly visible in others outside of themselves.
This perpetual pendulum of protective identification is what catalyzes the deeply rooted hate that creates a foundation from which the ego is able to expand upon.
Black holes are never satisfied. We must all recognize this seemingly inescapable aspect of the human condition and check ourselves accordingly.
Talks like a reigning president.
Why not say “and other countries” at the end? Because he’s referring to United States as the corporation?
I don't have a reason to think he's even aware of the whole "United States / Corporation" thing.
Then allow me to fill in that particular void.
Search 8th of January 2020. He has send a document to a court in Florida pertaining to the USA INC, ending the bankruptcy proceedings.
DJT pulls no punches, so I'm wondering why any dirty laundry on the Windsors has to be ignored by him at this point. Or is it just not the time yet???
Hate that he’s being nice.
I agree
The only think that makes me sad about the Queen is that the IRA missed their chance to take her out in 1974.