https://twitter.com/Biz_Shrink/status/1740790026802462918
Added: the apology is about her claim that Trump visited the Epstein pedo island once, in 1997.
But when I see this tweet she retweeted its possible she is a Zionist asset.
Comments (149)
sorted by:
Always had my doubts about her and what connections she has.
Epstein did not own the island in 1997. Perhaps it was for sale at the time. Mossad pedo bought it in 1998.
Amen! God Bless President Donald Trump, his wife, family, legal team, friends, Q followers, most of all his security team and their families too, God Bless America, missing children and you the reader Too.🙏
Anyone that claims to have inside knowledge and comes out so easily and talks about the plan openly is most likely a phony. There is a lot of fake stories and misdirection right now. The cabal is still tryin to win, as if they have a chance in hell.😂
And called her "fantastic" while proclaiming everyone should hear what she was saying.
That's some sweet new flair my dude. Well-earned! o7
He often highlights people just before their fall.
1 a : based on fantasy (see FANTASY entry 1 sense 2) : not real b : conceived or seemingly conceived by unrestrained fancy fantastic new space and nuclear weapons —Jack Raymond c : so extreme as to challenge belief : UNBELIEVABLE a fantastic industrial complex of steel, coal, machine tools, and other heavy industries —M. S. Handler broadly : exceedingly large or great spent fantastic sums on his library 2 : marked by extravagant fantasy or extreme individuality : ECCENTRIC fantastic works of art 3 fantastic : EXCELLENT, SUPERLATIVE a fantastic meal
If Trump meant to say that her story was unbelievable, why be cryptic about it? He could have said 'her story is fantasy.'
Retweeting doesn't always mean agreement. DJT often presents people to expose them for discussion and consideration. Much like Q highlights ideas and particular people. I do this often in business meetings where people are reluctant to start a discussion, usually because they aren't sure where to start. I refer to it as throwing meat on the table.
Trump often calls attention to people he wants to expose. There’s a Halper mentioned in the Q drops, it’s a relative of hers, and it’s not a positive mention.
shes a fake
She mostly just repeats a bunch of sauceless Charle Ward crap, sometimes word-for-word even.
She is of the same faith as Ben Shapiro. I read that President Trump sort of upset their community. This whole Israel<->Gaza 💩
Trust is a percentage game. Not many at 100%. She drops for the error, rises for the correction. I'm still listening and comparing to others.
Well said. Thank you. I agree. There are a lot of people who I/we listen to that seem to us to be more credible than others. We’ve got to take everything with a ‘grain of salt’ . . . Then, come to GAW for discussion and insights.
Exactly, some want to cancel immediately. When they need to sit back, take everything in and make an informed decision at a later time.
Others see a pattern that connects pretty much everything she does including this.
Yes. Some anons have an affinity for reading these individuals, and have been warning frens for many years now.
She admits a mistake... good for her.
This was a rather serious mistake to falsely accuse DJT of being a pedophile.
The 'mistake' can't be ignored. Who is this pol. that gave her the 'court whistleblower' info.?
Why wouldn't she already know that 45 never was on the island impulsively?
She put my radar up.
Who knows? Dis/Misinformation is everywhere. Whether planted for the story, or just to illuminate an issue. Accuse the OMB so that the nomies look? Something like that
You can see in her face on these interviews how much she enjoys the attention and notoriety. Perhaps she was caught up in the moment and got ahead of her skis on this one. There's some reason that the Trump team hasn't trashed her yet.
Could be. And good point. I like what she has to say, and I do believe she is of service. But Trump on pedo island is a whopper. Things that make you go hmmm.
Saying he went to the island isn’t the same as he’s a pefophile. Trump was on Epstein’s plane and yacht too but he’s not a pedo.
I've watched some of her stuff and she seems to be exactly what she says she is: someone who used to consult w/business leaders and has been roped in for an entirely different sort of mission w/the DoD.
She doesn't have a political background, or a military background, so that sort of precision in her approach shouldn't be expected. Rather, what she seems to excel at is motivation & analysis.
She's not campaigning for Trump. She's a civil servant tasked w/analyzing the public & figuring out what their hangups are in processing the Great Awakening. If she flubs a fact on Trump and/or Epstein it's irrelevant to her mission.
I think She is helping to design the messaging and timing of release of narrative for this 5th generation psyop.
Yes, I asked this question last night, was this a white hat test for anons? Not long after her post "anons" started trending on X. By a test, I mean, to see how long it took for anons to debunk her statement and how much push back she received. Everything has meaning. Some immediately jump to conclusions instead of taking a few hours to think about it.
Sounds like she made an honest mistake and apologized, that's a lot more than we usually get.
Exactly.
I meant to catch you in the Tennessee thread I saw yesterday. Is there any city near Nashville that you would recommend? I’ve heard Franklin is very nice but mega expensive. Last thing, any area to avoid near Nashville? Thanks in advance fren.
I don't know very much about Middle Tennessee, except to say that we avoid Nashville...way too urban and congested and blue. My wife and I spent a weekend in Franklin last year to see the historical sites and such, and overall we had a pleasant visit. However, as to real estate prices and general political leanings, I could not advise you.
We live in East Tennessee, in a very red county somewhat removed from the closest city, Knoxville, which as I've stated is enemy-held territory (Dems). However, that being said, I do know quite a few MAGA conservatives who DO live in the city and they seem to be doing quite well.
Towns near Nashville that might (emphasize MIGHT) suit your wants are Hermitage, Kingston Springs, and others, here: https://www.onlyinyourstate.com/tennessee/nashville/rural-nashville-towns/
Areas to avoid: https://upgradedhome.com/the-most-dangerous-neighborhoods-in-nashville/
In general, it's best to avoid largely minority neighborhoods no matter what your own skin color is. The link above says people in Nashville have a 1 in 19 chances of being a crime victim. Your mileage may vary, but just avoid the sketchy areas ANY time of the day.
If you're seriously looking for a place in Tennessee to move to, you should definitely reconsider East Tennessee. It's mountainous, lush forests and near the Great Smoky Mountain National Park, and there are many little towns around here that haven't been infected with the City of Knoxville's bad influence. Towns like Loudon, Lenoir City, Norris, Oak Ridge (the famous "Atomic City" of WWII), Claxton, Powell, and others.
Best of luck to you.
Currently driving across the US. Thank you so much for your insight. It’s beyond appreciated. Background is law enforcement so training wise I’m solid.
We stay mostly in Sevierville when we go to Tennessee, in smoky mountains. Of course it is just an RV park, but we really enjoy Tennessee. A lot of traffic there though.
TY so much for sharing these insights on TN. We are planning a pre-retirement move out of the disgustingly bluetarded Peoples Republic of Northern Virginia within the next 1-2 years and while we have been eyeing up a couple beach towns in SC, we keep seeing TN pop up in our retirement move research...particularly Chattanooga.
We visited there this summer (Knoxville, too)...I liked Chattanooga fine and was indifferent about Knoxville... but my wife was underwhelmed by both. And yet, Chattanooga keeps popping up as a recommended retirement spot.
Having visited Nashville several years ago, and with my wife's obsession with "today's country" music (or the slop coming out of Music City these days to which they attempt to apply that genre description), she wants to look into Nashville. Based on the idiotic woke-ism I see increasingly manifest itself in the "country music" industry, I keep trying to tell her that we'd be exchanging life in one miserably nasty blue part of the country for another in Nashville.
I do generally love TN, particularly eastern TN, and want to keep it on our radar....a beautiful state, with some truly nice, genuine (e.g., not Northern VA) people living there. Again, TY for your insights...I will be tracking you! :)
Dude check out her responses to the comments it's so funny. She's sooooo butt hurt about being called out as being wrong haha, they honestly read like an upset high school teen girl lol
She purposely posted damaging post against Trump, now she is covering her ass because of blowback....
It was easily refuted information. Epstein didnt even own the island in 1997. She is playing a part in this psyop I think, what side shes on or if she is just being used and by which side I dont really know.
In general though, I am using the information she has presented as mere data points. I will not invest anything more than that into it. Pretty much same as anyone else that has briefly moved onstage only to exit shortly later. I guard against being manipulated emotionally.
This Epstein Island stuff though looks more like a WH move to get the leftists digging into the list since the 1997 date she gave is before Epstein even owned the island.
She came on too fast with TOO much inside information to be believable. All these “players” should be listened to with reserve and scrutiny. Unfortunately we still can’t trust anything 100%.
Maybe I just have psyop fatigue, but this whole 5GW house of mirrors is really pissing me off lately, and causing me to disengage with everything I see that either spikes hopium or reinforces doom. I’m sick of the expectations for good things leading to rug pulls, as much as I’m sick of the fear narratives and doomsday scenarios. We all want the Hand of God to come down and flick “team black hat” in the nuts so hard it causes hell to implode and take all of the deep state minions with it. Instead, I feel like we’re on our own version of “15 days to flatten the curve” except it’s in the form of holding the line until some grand act of justice actually happens, and we get the America we were promised restored to its former glory.
Sorry for the rant, frens. Sometimes the Great Awakening feels futile when I observe the lefty types in my life continuing the same lefty bullshit 3+ years into what I believe to be a “dystopia lite” covert disclosure operation. If normies can’t see the unveiling of their globalist uniparty heroes as the actual villains we know them to be, then what gives?
We know there’s no good way to rise up in protest, because those protests will be infiltrated by bad actors, demonized by the media, and corrupt government officials will always abuse their power against the people. Total backfire, just like J6. This leaves us with faith in God that things will change for the better. I’m a believer, but I’ve never witnessed a true miracle in my life, and a miracle is what it’ll take to overcome this tyranny. (“God wins,” I know). I’m not saying miracles can’t happen, but hinging our collective future on a longshot seems like a bit flimsy of a gamble to me. I’m not blackpilled—I do acknowledge the wins we get here and there, but they don’t feel like enough to overcome Goliath. It angers me that we apparently need worse suffering to happen for everyone before normies will bother themselves to actually wake up.
She was very secretive and clandestine before making the scene.
Me? I'm an uber skeptic, with a lot of things, and MOSTLY with those things on our side that sound too good to be true, or which play deeply to our biases.
Here's a few reasons why I really LIKE Kash Patel, Nunes and Mike Flynn. They do NOT tell us what we want to hear, generally. They are circumspect, don't pretend to know it all, and are very ..... they hold a lot back.
Jan Halper? No way. Call it a bias, but I see ASSET written all over this woman.
"She's part of an operation to confirm [......]" ~ Pretty weak argument, imo.
Without a lot more evidence to the contrary, my working hypothesis is that she's either shilling, grifting or an asset from someone who doesn't have the same objectives as DJT, Maga or you and I.
Agree. I’m a product of the Xfiles 😆 I trust no one and am always sceptical. I kinda filter info and sources and take stuff on board but I don’t believe until I see more corroborating info. I always am asking myself if it’s possible that this or that could be wrong or viewed another way and it’s stood me in good stead so far. JHH may be legit who knows? However this plan has shown itself to be incredibly complex, changeable and with a cast of thousands so I try to not rule anything as impossible.
Didnt Trump ban epstein from maralago for hitting on teenage workers and get into a real estate fued with him? They were never friends from what I recall.
Yes he did and there is also video of the prosecutor who tried Epstein stating that the only high profile person who would speak to him about Epstein was DJT.
I believe Epstein was hitting on Trumps friends daughter if I remember correctly.
Yep, but not sure what year it was
Yes and he said Epstein Island ´is a cesspool’ from what he understands.
What kind of researcher is she to make such a major error and make it public without actually vetting it first?
Looks like she actually may have rec'd MORE coverage saying that then recanting than had she not messed up in the first place. Epstein Island is one of the biggest things most libtards I see on X bring up - pics of him with Epstein, etc. Her fuck up may have resulted in greater spread of info that, no, Trump was never there.
I didn’t know she actually said it, I did see a clip where it was stated by someone else and she agreed with the statement… l
FAF
Are you missing the “O”? Otherwise, I want to learn FAF
Fake as...
Thank you!
Trump pointed to her and retweeted her video. She has to be playing a part.
It's also important to consider that her alleged part has nothing to do with Trump other than his being POTUS and/or CiC at the time she took the role.
It's not for her to campaign for Trump or stick up for him.
I see too much emotion in our analysis of JHH. A person who is readily open to being corrected isn't our enemy. In fact if you analyze this, her being wrong and readily admitting it, did a lot to clear up Trump's relationship w/Epstein--which is still widely misunderstood by the general public.
Look at how professional journalists react to being wrong and compare it to JHH. There's a world of difference. If you watch an interview or two with her you'll see she readily admits to having fewer pieces of the puzzle than most anons.
I think she was just bringing attention to the Epstein flight logs. Normies will watch if they think Trump was involved. Could be a wake up!
If you graph this out there was only benefit to what Jan did here.
100% of people who believed Trump wasn't involved still believe so.
But some subset of people who previously thought Trump was involved now are aware of an official correction.
So after emotions are put aside, and the results are fully analyzed, we clearly advanced a trench in the information war.
I would have to agree.
Good point, maybe this is a move to drag eyeballs to the flight logs? Use the boomerang of DJT being highlighted?
Jan’s receipts = “trust me bro!”
I still have yet to see evidence of the "DoD Taskforce" she claims to be sitting on while in the UK. Is that even possible?
She hasn't received clearance from General Charlie Ward to discuss classified matters yet...
I assume as a consultant you can be anywhere, as long as you have the requisite clearance.
Is anyone talking about her claim about Trump confiscating 650 plane loads of gold from Vatican? Hello? This flight log topic post becomes insignificant dust as compared to that.
That's an old Charlie Ward claim she was just repeating. We've gone into this before here and on other anon channels.
I guess she has the habit of listening to wrong people, believing them and spreading it.
Or working hand & hand with them on purpose... best case scenario she is a dirty grifty paytiot. Worse case she's deliberately stringing along anons with disinformation MMM style.
If she had said simply "the island" without calling it Epstein Island she would have nothing to apologize for despite what she linked to. If Epstein did not own the island 1997 as many have noted then calling it Epstein Island is an anachronistic mis-attribution. She never said Trump went to "pedo Island" as some on this board have mistakenly read into this posting. The maxim in all cases should be this: Be accurate or look stupid.
Agreed. She never implied Trump was a pedo. But what she claimed was not backed by the evidence and Anons wouldnt let that slip (rightfully)
The verdict is still out on Harper....she says what we want to hear and that bothers me. Her understanding of this movement and Q and regurgitating it back to us is not what I need. We know Q is real. We know this is a military operation. We know that this may be taking longer than anticipated. What I want to know I believe she does not know and further more could not tell us if she did.
I think she is just a normal person who knew some things from her time with the DoD.
Now that she is kind of famous. She is trying to become an influencer reporter.
That’s a completely different game than her time with the DoD.
Zells son is an Israeli tank commander. Did his son ever serve in the u.s. military. Also, u.s. taxpayers dollars paid for it through Israeli aid. These people are so full of shit.
I see a couple of possibilities: Helper is a black or gray hat, possibly Mossad to infiltrate and split the movement.
She’s a white hat, and this is some sort of Comms. Afaik Epstein didn’t own Little St James in 1997, maybe DJT was there looking to buy it when it was up for sale?
Being at Little St James in 1997 might not be as nefarious as people think.
Just some food for thought...
She is a master at 5G warfare.
What if there was a plan to try and tie DJT to Pedo Island just before either major primary voting or the general vote? It would be fake, but there would be at least 72 hours of confusion and normies would get caught up in it. Of course MSM would run with it.
By doing this now, she prepped the army of Digital Soldiers for the argument. Their quivers are now loaded with facts and red pill tipped arrows.
Again, just a thought. But then again, any other explanation requires her to be extremely stupid with no strategic instinct whatsoever.
Regardless of what color hat she wears, she's proven herself very capable. So it makes no black hat strategic sense to me that she would attempt to destroy DJT with a claim from a 3rd party, who's proof (which was obvious from just a cursory review) showed he in fact DID NOT go to Pedo Island. We've had complete shills post complete BS on this board that took longer to debunk.
Maybe I am wrong, but what I know I am right about is, the face value of this story does not add up.
Also fitting the facts very well: incompetent and desperate black hat just saying whatever seems like it’s going to help her goals.
Black hats rarely apologize and when they do, their apologies are half-a$$ed.
They certainly will if they need to in order to retain credibility with their target crowd, which is what a subversive or controlled opposition needs above all.
How long have you been around? If you think anons needed JHH to prep them on DJT's connections or otherwise with Epstein and said island, you're wrong. Anons have been all over this for many years.
Your analysis makes the most sense. Unfortunately, most on this board knee-jerked reacted instead of stepping back and thinking and digging. Looks like 2024 is going to be the year of the whiplash. 🤦♀️
I asked this question last night, was this a test for anons because not long after her original post about Trump, "anons" was trending on X? By testing I mean, to see how long it took to debunk her statement and how much push back she received.
She said it was a mistake, not a test, in replies on X.
Do you really think she would come out and announce it was a test?
Which claim is she recanting?
That Trump visited pedo island once in 1997.
(Updated the post)
Ah, thanks. Whoops: she passed along disinfo. Or she's intentionally playing people, ginning up the market for disclosure.
Yeah, for me this is disappointing. Yes, she apologised, but if she can fall for disinfo so easily, it brings into question everything else she says.
It might also be a setup for MSM and leftists.
Epstein didn’t own the island in 1997, and if we can push the narrative that Trump is on the list, it will be spread by our enemies as Well.
Most probably this is what they tried to do through her. But the anon energy was too strong and wet squashed it in the bud 😂
OP, can you post her tweet about Trump? I can't find it.
She deleted it.
https://media.greatawakening.win/post/N1lGKWkANVmG.jpeg
I hadn’t seen this tweet - I did see her talking with Charlie Ward and he said DJT had been to the island and she didn’t contradict him. Set my BS radar going straightaway as IIRC DJT flew on the smaller Epstein plane once from palm beach to NYC with Epsteins brother Mark, but has never been to the island. Is it possible he went to the island when it was for sale before JE bought it? Maybe he was considering buying it at that point? Some golf resort plan maybe?
Quite possible. However, it would not be on Epstein flight logs. I am pretty sure this was all part of a benign psyop that just got crushed by the Anons, hehe.
Seems Like an Honest Apology? Not sure what it was exactly about. As far as the "Tunnels" I think that is the real operation..everything else is cover.
Honest apology for lying to our faces to hurt Trump and getting caught, absolutely. She’s very sorry she got caught.
I don't have X...Do we know what that was about? I do know initially she was not for Trump..
The issue that the apology is about? She claimed something about Trump’s destination aboard Epstein’s plane being his island when it was just going to PDI in Palm Beach.
Ahh..OK ..thanks. It is getting to the point that I don't trust anything I hear, and so do not react one way or another to it. Just waiting for the Big BOOM to Drop!
Everything she says is with purpose, of that I am certain. Consider that this may have been Dr. Jan not fucking up, but taking one for the team and putting out both a comm and a provocation.
People show themselves pretty clearly when triggered, and nobody knows this more acutely than a shrink.
I keep seeing anons saying this. Question though - why would she influence any leftists? She isn't a huge influencer on either side. Leftists wouldn't believe her anyway.
If she actually tried to do what some anons are saying she is a bigger idiot than I initially thought. All she did is alienate a bunch of anons, and show the other side she doesn't know what she is talking about. That doesn't help anyone and diminishes her credibility.
Apologize about what
she claimed Trump flew on lolita Express to Epstein island
Wow. Not cool;
The issue was that it happened in 1997 before Epstein bought it in 1998. It was likely for sale the year prior. Trump may have been invited to look at the island as a possible purchase opportunity.
That’s what I’m thinking
Its good to see her apologise, lets see the Kenyan do that.
That re-tweet talks about tunnels funded by our tax dollars.
Could there be any truth to that? Are these guys exposing each other now, or trying to get ahead of those things that cannot be stopped?
It will certainly be interesting to watch how things come together as this part of the script wraps up.
The retweet also reads like satire. An American GOP member whose son serves in Israel and they are talking about razing everything in Gaza with some extreme measures. But its not. Its a pretty bizzare tweet.
Very true.
This is a nothingburger. She was apologizing for misplaced trust and wanting to acknowledge the truth. The retweet was just information, no "Zionist asset" nameplate to point at.
It may not be relevant to you, but is relevant to a lot of people who are trying to figure out her motives. If you read what was retweeted, it was more than just information, for those who know how to look.
If what is there depends on how you "look" at it, then it is not a message but a Rorschach blot. When has this "how to look" technique ever been verified? It is interesting to me that you imply an understanding of her motives, but find them inexpressible. It is more important and meaningful to me if what she says is truthful.
I am not sure how you do your digging and building up your worldview, but I can tell you how I do it.
I look at every information source as a "raw source". Some raw sources spew sewage and its easy to ignore them. Some raw sources provide info that is over all consistent with the big picture of the world while throwing in some inconsistencies that engages critical thinking in my mind to figure out it fits in with the rest. Do I have to make changes to my existing world view? Is the new info already consistent somehow? Is the new info just disinfo?
For me there is no other way. I cannot take anything anyone says and accept it directly. So, in your words, everything I see, hear or feel is a inkblot and only when I compile it all the rest of the inkblots in my database, the full picture starts becoming clearer.
All that said, I know that I am perhaps only half way or less towards creating the full picture.
The implication is not understanding of her motives, but that there is important info here. Each person who follows here needs to pay attention to this info and compile it into their internal database, and see how the picture changes.
Truth is objective. Truth is infinitely complex. Our mind can only perceive a minute fraction of the Truth and this perception creates our reality. Reality is subjective. My reality is never going to be the same as anybody else's reality, but the more and more truth we can process, the closer and closer all our realities converge and thats the closest we can get to the truth.
If being able to believe any person's every word with the certainty that they are always truthful is important to you, then I sincerely wish you good luck. Simply because in my experience I have found that to be an impossibility.
I'm trained as a scientist and have had a career as an engineer, occupations that rely on close attention to reality. And I have been successful at it.
As for what people say, I take them at their word (and by their actions) unless there is cause not to. Like a court of law. I'm not interested in suspecting everyone of being liars or delusional psychotics (though there are plenty out there). As for this person, you offer lots of words but no "full picture" of anything, so your method is mostly assertion. What "information" is there to be had? You don't have a clue.
Reality can be simple or it can be complex, or anywhere in-between. So it is already a false conception to decide that reality is always complex. The only way we can understand it is to find a way to reduce the complexity, which is what I have done as a system theoretician for nearly 40 years.
As for objective reality, someone's motivations are anything but objective, so don't kid yourself that you are not seeking the butterfly in the blot. The essence of that experiment is that it evokes what you are already thinking about. What if there are no motivations? Does someone need to be "motivated" to simply relate the facts of a matter?
You haven't shown by any means that what she said was untruthful, so what are you working on? Your experience seems to be based on trying to look deeper than something really is, developing theories that are poorly grounded, and being disappointed when you find you are wrong. You might consider that your method is mostly a waste of time.
Why are you so upset when being presented with simple factual pieces of information? If you want to know how these pieces fit into the puzzle in my mind, I am happy to explain, but how I fit the puzzles into my frame is completely independent of my action of presenting the pieces to others. I might make a separate post outlining my own frame as more pieces of the puzzle fall in place.
But the real question is, are you ignoring these pieces so that the picture in your mind is not disturbed? If you are doing this, no judgement here - but its better to be mindful of that fact.
It is quite possible that rather than me seeking a butterfly in the blot, you already have a butterfly in your mind that you seek not to disturb.
In all this, you have never enunciated any meaning from her statements than is on their face. There is no blot. There is no meaning. You haven't shown otherwise. And I doubt there is a puzzle. I go outside my door to see the world, with its trees and clouds and light and moisture, and there is a lot of meaning for the discerning and insightful viewer, and it is no blot. There is clutter and there is meaning, and you have chosen to confuse the two. Life is too short to unscramble blots. Better to recognize them for what they are and move on.
What do you mean by "meaning from her statement" ?
Misinformation is necessary.
-- Q
Recognize & identify paytriots.
-- Q
“I work in The highest levels of Trumps cabinet as he is president for real in the background guys… guys did you know Trump flew to Pedo island, he’s totally a pedo too!”
What a fucking fraud. If this doesn’t rip her out of any legitimacy I’m a little disappointed in us. It also throws Flynn into question for he and his family backing her so hard.
Come on Q told us it could be ANY of us, question everything!
To be fair, she did not say he was a pedo too. She said he went to the pedo island and found out what was going on there. But still, there was no factual corroboration and Anons demanded proof.
Why would you be disappointed? You should be happy because we are now propaganda-immune - whether WH or BH.
My guess is that this was a WH misdirection. Epstein bought the island in 1998, and they fed her info that Trump went there in 1997. Would have gotten all the lefties worked up and putting pressure to release the names - and then it would have been bait and switch.
But instead, she got checked by the Anons and the psyop (even if it was benign) just didnt happen.
This is exactly how things should be.