Raw milk is one of the most healthy foods there is. Studies were done around the turn of the 1900's and found that a raw milk diet, about one gallon a day for an adult for a month, CURED diabetes, crones disease, and more. It resets the immune system while also helping to purge heavy metals from the body. They had people milk the animals themselves which had the added benefit of causing the animals to produce antibodies in their milk for any illnesses the person had within 24 hours.
Some studies even accused raw milk of countering the 'benefits' of vaccinations, presumably because heavy metals like aluminum are used to increase the 'effectiveness' of the vaccines.
Just think of what wide consumption of raw milk would do for a population currently dependent on pharmaceuticals and the companies that make them. Take the same and apply it to independent and regenerative agricultural practices that eliminate the need for chemicals and fertilizers all while restoring the nutritional value in food and resulting in higher profits for farmers.
To clarify, the gallon of milk was about the entire sustenance for the day unless someone needed some additional solid food and they were given fresh bread and or healthy soups.
Many years ago when the UK gave out free milk to school childen in third of a pint bottles they would often have some left over after break time. Those extra bottles would be placed in the school canteen for the benefit of the "diners".
On a day when the school meals were particularly dire, I could consume nine bottles at lunchtime! Three pints. I think a whole gallon would be pushing it somewhat.
I once stayed on a dairy farm for a week when I was a kid, and of course they had fresh raw milk in their fridge to drink as much as we wanted. It was so sweet and creamy and so filling, the best milk I've ever had! I've only ever had it once more since then and I miss it so much. It's incredibly hard to find a farm that will sell it to you "under the table."
My assumption... possibly Ohio and Indiana had a bad outbreak where people died, so they were able to vilify raw milk? Or people weren't paying attention and legislators did what they wanted?
I started searching for potential outbreaks of raw milk contamination causing major illnesses or deaths, and stumbled upon this interesting study:
Exactly right. They're not able to label it as for human conception but it isn't regulated if it's just for pets. Just don't tell them it's for human consumption and they won't ask. Loopholes are nice.
Dutch Meadow Farms. They ship and have all kinda other stuff too. Grass fed steaks, baked goods, butter, etc. Label reads " not for human consumption. For cats and dogs only ". Best we've had. 1 sip and u can immediately tell the difference.
I always have a glass in front of normies when I can, just to make sure they see it. It's my chance to give them 1 red pill, and as we know 1 red pill always leads to another.
A nurse was genuinely concerned when she saw what we were drinking. I'll never forget her face. So brainwashed she was just flabbergasted. Her face read " How are they still alive ? It says not for humans right on the label ". I wanted to tell her so bad that we ate horse dewormer almost weekly for 2 years to see that reaction too.
I'm not really the person to ask, I don't buy milk that often, because we don't drink it super often (it's 90 plus in the shade where i'm at in texas right now), but there's a lotta other replies to this thread that seem promicing =)
Again; a true & honest question & I'm not trying to be lewd / gross.
well you succeeded anyways! Kek!! what woman would want to lactate for years to have their family consume that amount of breast milk? i would imagine breast feeding for one to two years would be hard enough, but years???
and yes, cats, dogs, etc., will consume cows milk if their mother is dead or just denying them.
I mean, it's not an awful side-effect. 😁🤣🤷♂️😘🙏
But it is a serious question!!! LOL.
As for the rest of your point; man, IDK...... girls can make a living selling FEET pics on OF; I'm sure that.... life...uh....would find a way....!!! 😲😂🫡
Re: Cats & Dogs; yeah, but will they do it in the wild, I meant?
Obviously they'll eat / drinnk just about anything we put in front of them... I meant does it happen anywhere else in nature?
a) Yes, in fact many herbivores will actually consume flesh of recently deceased animals if given the chance. There's hundreds of videos of this, including a hilarious one of a horse gobbling up ducklings. If the nutrition is available, animals will consume it. Ever seen a cat drink milk?
b) No, but it'd take way more effort to produce that as a commercial product. Why not instead use cows which produce more, and also as farmers have noted, WANT to be milked?
They had people milk the animals themselves which had the added benefit of causing the animals to produce antibodies in their milk for any illnesses the person had within 24 hours
I'm sorry, I'm going to have to ask for the sauce on this. "Illnesses" are not universally cross-species compatible and I very much doubt a cow's anti-body response to diseases a person had is going to be directly useful to your body even if the disease could spread cross-species.
Drinking this antibody milk can effectively inoculate a human against the corresponding disease for about 10 days. It's been well established for quiet some time. So yes, this is the origin of the milk maids during plagues that didn't get sick and had flawless skin.
Interestingly, I'm re-reading a book called "death by calcium". It's possible there's a difference in calcium absorption in pasteurized vs raw, but overall adults really don't need to be drinking very much milk, let alone a gallon a day. The book is by Dr. Thomas E. Levy.
It's actually been established before that, in order to digest pasteurized milk, certain things are leached from your bones. In healthy, raw milk, there are naturally occurring enzymes that do the job of allowing for proper and full digestion.
Humans that drink raw milk (natural fats) and eat meat (natural amino acids) grow to be dangerously large, healthy, and strong especially if physically and mentally trained for battle. The "mythology" of Vikings, ancestors of the 'Rus' and others is that they were 4-6x stronger than the typical human they were raiding and conquering because they took their supply chains with them (to basecamp) in the form of goats and other animals for both raw milk and high-protein meat.
Raw milk (goats) + meats (beef better than goat) + Watercress "biscuits" (from Roman legion) with armored horses cavalry ARMY could "reconquer" physically all of North America in less than 12 months. This is basically the recipe that the Vikings (boats instead of horses), Alexander the Great, Attila the Hun, Genghis Khan, the Romans (less use of horses, more of roads), and even the Japanese Samurai all used. They were stronger, faster, and healthier than nearly all other humans they encountered. Coupled with brilliant military strategy, they were physically, psychologically, and strategically invincible in most cases.
The last thing the globalist want is huge American Patriots riding around on armored horses smashing their heads with battle axes. Vikings are not allowed at city council meetings for a reason.
Its pretty simpe actually. Over thousands of years the people of Europe, the Levant, some Steppe, India, and other pockets evolved with their ruminants (goats, cow, sheep, buffalo, camel) and used and relied on their milk for survival and to thrive. Areas of East Asia, Africa, and American Indians are highly lactose intolerant and appear to lack the ability to break down the milk sugars, usually resulting in various GI issues. They probably didn't rely on animal milk since other abundant resources were available.
Over time the people who couldn't tolerate it or absorb its nutrients died off or made survival more difficult in ice age or other difficult landscapes. The genes that could better absorb the animal fats, sugars, protein were passed down.
Thank you for the history lesson, I had no idea that there was a race/genetic connection to lactose intolerance. Makes (evil) sense that Rothchild would know and exploit this knowledge.
I think the issues with lactose intolerance are due to two things. First, digestive enzymes occur naturally in raw, healthy milk that play a significant role in allowing the human body to digest it. My wife is lactose intolerant but can drink raw milk without issue.
Another issue are allergies. I've heard anecdotal stories that point the finger at childhood allergies being caused by vaccinations. In other words, kids with few or no vaccinations generally have few to no allergies compared to fully vaccinated kids.
Unpasteurized used to kill people because of unsanitary conditions in the milking parlours, this is why laws came to be forcing dairy farmers to be a lot more responsible about cleanliness. But it seems that the Rothchilds took advantage of this to introduce their new "product"
I was thinking this, sounds like how improving sanitation, clean water, sewage disposal brought about the end of lots of disease, but Vaccination gets all the credit.
Bigger problem than unsanitary conditions are the health of the cows. A lot of the slop given to cows in feed lots in that era was stuff like spent leftover barley after it was used in beer making. Not exactly fit for proper consumption at that point and resulted in sick animals.
The natural ecosystem within raw milk keeps it sanitary and actively kills bacteria that gets into it, though cleanliness is still an important factor.
Listeria is what I believe they aim to kill, but all the beneficial bacteria that makes milk so nourishing and healing gets killed, too. I will always remember one podcast or radio show saying commercial pasteurized milk is almost like pus.
Pasteurization also destroys some B vitamins and Vitamin C that is present in raw milk. Enzymes too. Some people who are lactose intolerant can often stomach a little bit of raw milk.
Pasteurized milk has been heated (not boiled) to kill bacteria, mostly targeting e coli and salmonella. I believe those in favor of raw milk say it is healthier for you. I am uncertain as to why that is, hopefully someone here can help me out with this.
Raw milk is a fully living ecosystem on its own. There is no risk of disease if the cows were tended to properly and are healthy. There's been people who have put living e coli into a glass of fresh raw milk. The enzymes in the raw milk killed the bacteria in around fifteen minutes and was then safe to drink.
In pasteurized milk, the ecosystem has been entirely killed and has left it little more than a rotting petri dish for bacteria. Fully pasteurized milk is cooked, if I recall correctly, up to three times. One thing about pasteurized milk, is there's much less concern about the health of the cows as the treatment process boils, cooks, and kills EVERYTHING in the milk. Also, again providing I remember the stats right, up to 1/4th to 1/3rd of the milk may be PUSS produced by the cows because they are unhealthy and being forced to produce beyond their natural limits. During some of the processing, the puss separates from the milk and rather than remove it, it is put through an additional process that recombines it with the milk and gives it the nice white color again.
Absolutely. Also, pasteurized milk has another dark side. In raw milk there are enzymes that allow humans to digest it fully. Without that enzyme, digesting milk causes certain nutrients to be leeched out of our bones so the milk can be digested.
So yes completing where your mind may be going, osteoporosis, including in children, can actually be caused by drinking pasteurized milk. At the very least, your skeleton may become more brittle over all.
Healthy people rarely become ill from listeria infection, but the disease can be fatal to unborn babies, newborns and people with weakened immune systems. Prompt antibiotic treatment can help curb the effects of listeria infection.
Knowing what we know now: why anti-biotics instead of .... other solutions.
Then there is another item: due to regulations, we are all treated as unhealthy. Thus, negating the advantage of having received strong immune systems .....
They have their own process. Its not pasteurized but they do process it for retail sale. It doesn't last as long. Especially after you open one. You've got to finish it within 3 or 4 days or it goes bad. (Tastes funny to me).2 of my friends are lactose intolerant and they can drink this without any side effects. We buy 2 or 3 half gallons at a time. (2 weeks) Also get our meats and fresh eggs from them. Have to admit the choc milk they make doesnt last a day.
My extended family has been drinking raw milk for 25 years. Don't believe the scare mongering. As long as the dairy farmer is aware of the importance of hygienic conditions and priper way to clean ussera, machines, etc.
The people impacted are those with compromised immune systems. 99.99% of normal people are fine to drink this.
The Amish never stopped drnking it. Your ancestors drank it depending on the area of the world they were in. Raw milk makes children thrive and grow to their potential.
Look to procure A2 milk as it has better properties.
Cows are generally A1 or A2. Its a classification of protein. Newer bulk milk cows are A1 and older types like Guernsey and Jersey cows have A2 which allows us to better absorb the milk’s nutrients. If you google the differences its a pretty interesting read.
So God made cow produce milk everyday but then it poisons us? God made chicken lay eggs everyday but we can't have them because Muh cholesterol?
How about we look at nature and see how God made animals and plants for our benefits and not to harm us? Raw Milk is filled w/ Godly nutritions, so do eggs, beef, some herbs and plants. To realize and learn all these, we must first acknowledge how amazing and great GOD is!
Ingesting too much dihydrogen monoxide can kill you too, yet we bathe in it, drink it, clean with it, cook with it; God must be bad since he also created dihydrogen monoxide!!! 🙄🙄🙄
Whole raw milk is so awesome. We had a jersey cow on part of our land (landlord's cow) and received gallons of the milk. Had to scoop off the butter layer! The only negative is that oh yes indeed you will get FAT if you drink it every day and are not careful.
Here is a link to the debut speech given by Lord Nathaniel Rothschild, Pasteurization of milk speech from 10th April 1946 (source:Hansard).
Here's the TLDR version:
Raw milk contains disease (bovine tuberculosis). Drinking raw milk causes death.
Let's not waste time on statistics, let's say 1,600 people a year die from this disease.
Other diseases caused by drinking raw milk are: Undulant fever, typhoid, dysentry, food poisoning, scarlet fever, and diphtheria.
Politicians may have something to say about the merits of killing off the population each year and maintaining the economic interests of a relatively small section of the community,
Compulsory Pasteurization may have an economic cost, milk producers and milk retailers may go out of business.
Opponents of Pasteurization say heat treated milk tastes nasty. Experiments show people can not tell the difference between raw milk and Pasteurized milk.
Studies from medical, veterinary and agricultural institutions conclude that Pasteurization doesn't affect the nutritional value of milk.
Heat treatment of milk may remove minerals and vitamins from the milk.
There are existing regulations to prevent milk being contaminated with dust, blood, water, cow shit, and bacteria. Pasteurization would not remove those regulations.
There are existing processes for testing cattle for bovine tuberculosis (using Tuberculin Test which are injected under the skin). Pasteurization would not remove those health schemes.
Other objections to Pasteurization are:
it may put milk producers and milk retailers out of business, this might reduce the supply of milk.
Only towns/cities with populations over 20,000 people will be required to Pasteurize milk.
70% of milk is already Pasteurized. Any new equipment can be supplied from within the United Kingdom rather than the United States.
People that believe the earth is flat, prefer to drink raw milk. The views of uninformed cranks and eccentrics should not affect the lives and health of the rest of the population.
There are various methods of killing our dwindling population. Committees sit on things like reducing road deaths. Committees should sit on Pasteurization. Any government that does not introduce compulsory Pasteurization is responsible for the death and disease that results from people drinking raw milk.
Horse milk is even better, but very expensive, even in Europe. I stayed at a bed and breakfast in Belgium at a horse farm. They had horse-milk skin care products, ice cream, and plain milk. Normal milk gives me terrible gas. The horse milk improved my digestion.
Raw milk is absolutely delicious and coming from someone who has severe lactose and casein intolerance, I can drink raw milk with zero problems. Normally, consuming milk would leave me with severe stomach pain and days of bowel dysregulation ranging from irritable bowel syndrome to severe constipation. Pasteurization of milk makes it an inflammatory food which leads to a cascade of other health problems. It’s delicious and healing in it’s raw form. I never would’ve believed it until I tried it myself. I never felt more healthy, energized, my arthritis went away, my ADHD went away when I went on a strict diet of raw milk and meat. It was unbelievably anti-inflammatory and had so many positive impacts on my health. Alas, I am a sugar addict so I need to get back on that.
That Motion will be dealt with later, but I should like to say that during the last week an assurance has been given in another place on behalf of the Government that the recommendations contained in the report of the Loveday Committee on Veterinary Education will be implemented by the Government. The only weak point, if I may say so, about the answer made on behalf of the Government in another place is that there is no immediate prospect of bringing before Parliament the necessary legislation to implement that Report. All I would venture to say in that connexion is that from the point of view of public health the matter appears to be so important that I hope time will be found to pass into law rapidly a measure which would enable a larger number of young men in this country to be properly trained, through the medium of the universities, for what ought to be regarded as one of the honourable and learned professions in this country. To strengthen the veterinary profession would be a most profitable Government investment in the matter of national nutrition and national health.
Nutrition and health depend largely upon an adequate and safe milk supply; milk is the AI priority human food. This in turn depends upon far greater freedom from bovine diseases, and such freedom is conditioned by a sufficiency of skilled veterinarians. Veterinary practice should be made a worth-while profession, comparable in status and emoluments with that of the medical profession. If there were more skilled veterinarians there would ultimately be need of fewer medical practitioners.
Ya'll aren't ready for this convo. All milk is fortified with Vitamin A (AKA Retinol). Vitamin A is not a vitamin, its a form of alcohol and everyone actually consumes it to such a degree on a daily basis that majority of people are Vitamin A toxic and is the basis for the majority of all health issues. If you go on a low Vitamin A diet you will see the majority of your ailments disappear.
I'm not sold on that. Many of the things that the site attributes to Vitamin A being the cause of have already been linked to other things through decades of research with solid connections. Many of the things, specifically, are linked to heavy and toxic metals building up in the brain, vaccines, and other things.
I feel like this is entirely missing the mark. It may be that Vitamin A in the body is toxified, but so many other things with known causes seem attributed to this toxic Vitamin A.
Look into it more. You are correct about the buildup of heavy/toxic metals in the body, they certainly contribute. Look into the origin of Vitamins, who first discovered them and who was give accolades for finding them. You won't be surprised.
I'm still skeptical. There's been too many crack scientists like the idiots who originated the 'coconut oil is bad for you' thing some years ago. They had no science but had lies and an idea and were good at pushing it out for publicity. As a result, one of the healthiest oils there is was pulled from use in popping popcorn as a standard.
Raw milk is one of the most healthy foods there is. Studies were done around the turn of the 1900's and found that a raw milk diet, about one gallon a day for an adult for a month, CURED diabetes, crones disease, and more. It resets the immune system while also helping to purge heavy metals from the body. They had people milk the animals themselves which had the added benefit of causing the animals to produce antibodies in their milk for any illnesses the person had within 24 hours.
Some studies even accused raw milk of countering the 'benefits' of vaccinations, presumably because heavy metals like aluminum are used to increase the 'effectiveness' of the vaccines.
Just think of what wide consumption of raw milk would do for a population currently dependent on pharmaceuticals and the companies that make them. Take the same and apply it to independent and regenerative agricultural practices that eliminate the need for chemicals and fertilizers all while restoring the nutritional value in food and resulting in higher profits for farmers.
1 gallon a day is rough. I kinda gagged lol. I wouldn't mind having raw milk daily and eventually in a year I would be cured of my ailments lol
damn, that's exactly what i thought.
To clarify, the gallon of milk was about the entire sustenance for the day unless someone needed some additional solid food and they were given fresh bread and or healthy soups.
Oh. In my mind, I read it as guzzling a gallon with your waffles.
Oh Lord Jesus be with the poor soul who though the same as you but actually did. Chugging a gallon of milk is how you get an instant vomit fountain.
Many years ago when the UK gave out free milk to school childen in third of a pint bottles they would often have some left over after break time. Those extra bottles would be placed in the school canteen for the benefit of the "diners".
On a day when the school meals were particularly dire, I could consume nine bottles at lunchtime! Three pints. I think a whole gallon would be pushing it somewhat.
Where do I fit that into my gallon of water a day? I'm not sure I can fit a gallon of milk as well
You're over there talking a gallon of water, I'm over here drinking a gallon of coffee, black. I won't have time to do nothing but pee.
Ahh, a man of culture. You only drink filtered water... Filtered through coffee grounds.
I once stayed on a dairy farm for a week when I was a kid, and of course they had fresh raw milk in their fridge to drink as much as we wanted. It was so sweet and creamy and so filling, the best milk I've ever had! I've only ever had it once more since then and I miss it so much. It's incredibly hard to find a farm that will sell it to you "under the table."
This is a neat website. I found out we have multiple farms near us that sell it.
https://www.farmtoconsumer.org/raw-milk-nation-interactive-map/
Thank you so much! Found a few farms close to me with more research.
https://getrawmilk.com/search
Great site..there are some close to me as well! Thanks Bobbin!
You are very welcome!
https://www.thebullvine.com/news/why-youve-never-heard-of-the-mayo-clinics-raw-milk-cure/
Nice! Thanks
Glad I can contribute.
You're welcome! And thank you for that link!
You are very welcome!
Awesome! But why is raw milk legal in WA, CA and other liberal state, but not legal in Ohio and Indiana and other farm lands? ????
My assumption... possibly Ohio and Indiana had a bad outbreak where people died, so they were able to vilify raw milk? Or people weren't paying attention and legislators did what they wanted?
I started searching for potential outbreaks of raw milk contamination causing major illnesses or deaths, and stumbled upon this interesting study:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6140832/
Thanks!
You're welcome!
Yes! Thanks 45!
You're welcome!
look for "pet milk" I hear that's how a lot of sellers get away with it...
Exactly right. They're not able to label it as for human conception but it isn't regulated if it's just for pets. Just don't tell them it's for human consumption and they won't ask. Loopholes are nice.
Can confirm. Raw milk is illegal in Canada... But raw milk for pets isn't, so that's how we get it.
Dutch Meadow Farms. They ship and have all kinda other stuff too. Grass fed steaks, baked goods, butter, etc. Label reads " not for human consumption. For cats and dogs only ". Best we've had. 1 sip and u can immediately tell the difference.
I always have a glass in front of normies when I can, just to make sure they see it. It's my chance to give them 1 red pill, and as we know 1 red pill always leads to another.
A nurse was genuinely concerned when she saw what we were drinking. I'll never forget her face. So brainwashed she was just flabbergasted. Her face read " How are they still alive ? It says not for humans right on the label ". I wanted to tell her so bad that we ate horse dewormer almost weekly for 2 years to see that reaction too.
...wait till she learns that people eat dozens of plants that are technically nightshade...
Good to know!
How can you tell if the pet milk is the real deal or no?
I'm not really the person to ask, I don't buy milk that often, because we don't drink it super often (it's 90 plus in the shade where i'm at in texas right now), but there's a lotta other replies to this thread that seem promicing =)
Honest question and I'm not trying to be gross / provocative;
a) Does any other living being drink the milk of a different species?
b) Is there any reason an adult can't drink human breast milk? Wouldn't that be equally, if not more, beneficient?
Again; a true & honest question & I'm not trying to be lewd / gross.
well you succeeded anyways! Kek!! what woman would want to lactate for years to have their family consume that amount of breast milk? i would imagine breast feeding for one to two years would be hard enough, but years???
and yes, cats, dogs, etc., will consume cows milk if their mother is dead or just denying them.
Goats milk is the closest to mother's milk for babies
I mean, it's not an awful side-effect. 😁🤣🤷♂️😘🙏 But it is a serious question!!! LOL.
As for the rest of your point; man, IDK...... girls can make a living selling FEET pics on OF; I'm sure that.... life...uh....would find a way....!!! 😲😂🫡
Re: Cats & Dogs; yeah, but will they do it in the wild, I meant? Obviously they'll eat / drinnk just about anything we put in front of them... I meant does it happen anywhere else in nature?
IDK if it happens in the wild, but being an adult and you put breast milk on my Cheerio's, i'm gonna throat punch that bitch!! Lol!!
well.....have you tried it...????
😲😁🤣
Lol!! not in this lifetime!
Ants 'milk' aphids ----- they even "domesticate", farm them.
Oh yeah, I think I heard that before....! Ants literally treat aphids like little cattle, right?
Nature is wild!
a) Yes, in fact many herbivores will actually consume flesh of recently deceased animals if given the chance. There's hundreds of videos of this, including a hilarious one of a horse gobbling up ducklings. If the nutrition is available, animals will consume it. Ever seen a cat drink milk?
b) No, but it'd take way more effort to produce that as a commercial product. Why not instead use cows which produce more, and also as farmers have noted, WANT to be milked?
Holstein cows
Oh!
They look like that in real life.
Jersey cows have the high cream content.
It's very different, by the way. I fed my daughter the way God intended, and I tasted what I was feeding to her.
Think cantaloupe juice.
Mine was like a melted milkshake.
That argument has been said a ton, but has any other species done 99.9% of the things that humans do?
We grow foods from all regions of the earth, we process all of those foods, and the biggest difference is…we cook our foods.
Some monkeys let palm nuts bake in the sun.
uh......damn.....great point!!! Hadn't thought of it, but you are definitely right!! 😲👌🐸🙏
I'm sorry, I'm going to have to ask for the sauce on this. "Illnesses" are not universally cross-species compatible and I very much doubt a cow's anti-body response to diseases a person had is going to be directly useful to your body even if the disease could spread cross-species.
Been a while since I did the research but here's a link: https://phys.org/news/2013-06-unusual-antibodies-cows-ways-therapies.html
Drinking this antibody milk can effectively inoculate a human against the corresponding disease for about 10 days. It's been well established for quiet some time. So yes, this is the origin of the milk maids during plagues that didn't get sick and had flawless skin.
I would love to see that study too.
Interestingly, I'm re-reading a book called "death by calcium". It's possible there's a difference in calcium absorption in pasteurized vs raw, but overall adults really don't need to be drinking very much milk, let alone a gallon a day. The book is by Dr. Thomas E. Levy.
It's actually been established before that, in order to digest pasteurized milk, certain things are leached from your bones. In healthy, raw milk, there are naturally occurring enzymes that do the job of allowing for proper and full digestion.
There needs to be a whole milk black market.for the good of Humanity.
No need for a black market, Amos Miller just won his case, he can continue to sell raw milk to any customer from outside Pennsylvania.
This is awesome. No such luck in my blue state.
Or even a transparent and open market for whole white milk.
https://www.farmtoconsumer.org/raw-milk-nation-interactive-map/
Thanks. enlightening information..
Humans that drink raw milk (natural fats) and eat meat (natural amino acids) grow to be dangerously large, healthy, and strong especially if physically and mentally trained for battle. The "mythology" of Vikings, ancestors of the 'Rus' and others is that they were 4-6x stronger than the typical human they were raiding and conquering because they took their supply chains with them (to basecamp) in the form of goats and other animals for both raw milk and high-protein meat.
Raw milk (goats) + meats (beef better than goat) + Watercress "biscuits" (from Roman legion) with armored horses cavalry ARMY could "reconquer" physically all of North America in less than 12 months. This is basically the recipe that the Vikings (boats instead of horses), Alexander the Great, Attila the Hun, Genghis Khan, the Romans (less use of horses, more of roads), and even the Japanese Samurai all used. They were stronger, faster, and healthier than nearly all other humans they encountered. Coupled with brilliant military strategy, they were physically, psychologically, and strategically invincible in most cases.
Watercress-the most nutritious plant on the planet: https://www.willystreet.coop/recipes/recipe/1364-watercress-biscuits
The last thing the globalist want is huge American Patriots riding around on armored horses smashing their heads with battle axes. Vikings are not allowed at city council meetings for a reason.
Well, I mean, there already is. I literally go to a milk dealer selling out of his trunk in a random parking lot each week.
How much is a kilo of un-cut Jersey going for?
Control is why they have equal importance. Who drinks the most milk? Children. Evil
Think about which races rely on it and who is more lactose intolerant
I dont know the answer to those two questions - can you fill me in without getting yourself banned? Thx
Its pretty simpe actually. Over thousands of years the people of Europe, the Levant, some Steppe, India, and other pockets evolved with their ruminants (goats, cow, sheep, buffalo, camel) and used and relied on their milk for survival and to thrive. Areas of East Asia, Africa, and American Indians are highly lactose intolerant and appear to lack the ability to break down the milk sugars, usually resulting in various GI issues. They probably didn't rely on animal milk since other abundant resources were available.
Over time the people who couldn't tolerate it or absorb its nutrients died off or made survival more difficult in ice age or other difficult landscapes. The genes that could better absorb the animal fats, sugars, protein were passed down.
Life was extremely hard for most of human history
Thank you for the history lesson, I had no idea that there was a race/genetic connection to lactose intolerance. Makes (evil) sense that Rothchild would know and exploit this knowledge.
I think the issues with lactose intolerance are due to two things. First, digestive enzymes occur naturally in raw, healthy milk that play a significant role in allowing the human body to digest it. My wife is lactose intolerant but can drink raw milk without issue.
Another issue are allergies. I've heard anecdotal stories that point the finger at childhood allergies being caused by vaccinations. In other words, kids with few or no vaccinations generally have few to no allergies compared to fully vaccinated kids.
lack the ability to break down the milk sugars
.... notably in adulthood ----- human breast milk has lactose
So, what's the 411 on pasteurized milk?
Unpasteurized used to kill people because of unsanitary conditions in the milking parlours, this is why laws came to be forcing dairy farmers to be a lot more responsible about cleanliness. But it seems that the Rothchilds took advantage of this to introduce their new "product"
I was thinking this, sounds like how improving sanitation, clean water, sewage disposal brought about the end of lots of disease, but Vaccination gets all the credit.
Bigger problem than unsanitary conditions are the health of the cows. A lot of the slop given to cows in feed lots in that era was stuff like spent leftover barley after it was used in beer making. Not exactly fit for proper consumption at that point and resulted in sick animals.
The natural ecosystem within raw milk keeps it sanitary and actively kills bacteria that gets into it, though cleanliness is still an important factor.
Distillers dried grains are still a widely used feed component. High in protein, fat, and fiber.
https://www.realmilk.com/
Listeria is what I believe they aim to kill, but all the beneficial bacteria that makes milk so nourishing and healing gets killed, too. I will always remember one podcast or radio show saying commercial pasteurized milk is almost like pus.
Pasteurization also destroys some B vitamins and Vitamin C that is present in raw milk. Enzymes too. Some people who are lactose intolerant can often stomach a little bit of raw milk.
Pasteurized milk has been heated (not boiled) to kill bacteria, mostly targeting e coli and salmonella. I believe those in favor of raw milk say it is healthier for you. I am uncertain as to why that is, hopefully someone here can help me out with this.
Raw milk is a fully living ecosystem on its own. There is no risk of disease if the cows were tended to properly and are healthy. There's been people who have put living e coli into a glass of fresh raw milk. The enzymes in the raw milk killed the bacteria in around fifteen minutes and was then safe to drink.
In pasteurized milk, the ecosystem has been entirely killed and has left it little more than a rotting petri dish for bacteria. Fully pasteurized milk is cooked, if I recall correctly, up to three times. One thing about pasteurized milk, is there's much less concern about the health of the cows as the treatment process boils, cooks, and kills EVERYTHING in the milk. Also, again providing I remember the stats right, up to 1/4th to 1/3rd of the milk may be PUSS produced by the cows because they are unhealthy and being forced to produce beyond their natural limits. During some of the processing, the puss separates from the milk and rather than remove it, it is put through an additional process that recombines it with the milk and gives it the nice white color again.
Thx for the info. Am I correct in assuming there is much more nutritional value in raw milk than in pasteurized milk?
Absolutely. Also, pasteurized milk has another dark side. In raw milk there are enzymes that allow humans to digest it fully. Without that enzyme, digesting milk causes certain nutrients to be leeched out of our bones so the milk can be digested.
So yes completing where your mind may be going, osteoporosis, including in children, can actually be caused by drinking pasteurized milk. At the very least, your skeleton may become more brittle over all.
So then anyone claiming raw milk confers a risk of c-coli infection is lying? Do you have any sauce on the claim raw milk enzymes kill e-coli?
https://www.naturalnews.com/026280_milk_raw_bacteria.html
Knowing what we know now: why anti-biotics instead of .... other solutions.
Then there is another item: due to regulations, we are all treated as unhealthy. Thus, negating the advantage of having received strong immune systems .....
Especially when anti (against) biotic (pertaining to life).
Gosh golly gee I wonder why they’d promote that?
Is pasteurization the nutritional equivalent of chemotherapy? (Probably.)
Forever in awe of relentless autists searching and researching for truth
I purchase from the local dairy farmer. Wish others we as lucky.
What's your take / experience with raw milk? Is it truly as amazing as some make it out to be?
They have their own process. Its not pasteurized but they do process it for retail sale. It doesn't last as long. Especially after you open one. You've got to finish it within 3 or 4 days or it goes bad. (Tastes funny to me).2 of my friends are lactose intolerant and they can drink this without any side effects. We buy 2 or 3 half gallons at a time. (2 weeks) Also get our meats and fresh eggs from them. Have to admit the choc milk they make doesnt last a day.
Here are some links
https://api.parliament.uk/historic-hansard/lords/1946/apr/10/pasteurization-of-milk
Link below Milk and Palestine mention
https://api.parliament.uk/historic-hansard/people/mr-nathaniel-rothschild/index.html
https://api.parliament.uk/historic-hansard/lords/1946/apr/10/the-late-viscount-southwood
https://history.stackexchange.com/questions/74155/what-about-dairy-pasteurisation-might-have-made-the-issue-so-important-to-lord-r
https://family.rothschildarchive.org/people/124-nathaniel-mayer-victor-rothschild-1910-1990
My extended family has been drinking raw milk for 25 years. Don't believe the scare mongering. As long as the dairy farmer is aware of the importance of hygienic conditions and priper way to clean ussera, machines, etc.
The people impacted are those with compromised immune systems. 99.99% of normal people are fine to drink this.
The Amish never stopped drnking it. Your ancestors drank it depending on the area of the world they were in. Raw milk makes children thrive and grow to their potential.
Look to procure A2 milk as it has better properties.
Total 100% newb here; What is "A2" mlik and what are the alternatives?
Thank You!
Cows are generally A1 or A2. Its a classification of protein. Newer bulk milk cows are A1 and older types like Guernsey and Jersey cows have A2 which allows us to better absorb the milk’s nutrients. If you google the differences its a pretty interesting read.
Crazy.....never knew......! Thanks for the new rabbit hole!!
😁👌
So God made cow produce milk everyday but then it poisons us? God made chicken lay eggs everyday but we can't have them because Muh cholesterol?
How about we look at nature and see how God made animals and plants for our benefits and not to harm us? Raw Milk is filled w/ Godly nutritions, so do eggs, beef, some herbs and plants. To realize and learn all these, we must first acknowledge how amazing and great GOD is!
God also made the element arsenic. I strongly recommend not ingesting it.
🙄🙄🙄
The man has a point.
Ingesting too much dihydrogen monoxide can kill you too, yet we bathe in it, drink it, clean with it, cook with it; God must be bad since he also created dihydrogen monoxide!!! 🙄🙄🙄
Its rich whenever I remind people most doctors are sheep. Remember in the 90s when most of them bought the lie that eggs are bad for us. Disgraceful
Whole raw milk is so awesome. We had a jersey cow on part of our land (landlord's cow) and received gallons of the milk. Had to scoop off the butter layer! The only negative is that oh yes indeed you will get FAT if you drink it every day and are not careful.
Pasteur was a fraud and germ theory is bunk.
Terrain theory ftw!
Why isn’t milk pasteurized in england
Everywhere? Even in major stores? Are you certain of this? Doesn't sound right.....
Here is a link to the debut speech given by Lord Nathaniel Rothschild, Pasteurization of milk speech from 10th April 1946 (source:Hansard).
Here's the TLDR version:
Raw milk contains disease (bovine tuberculosis). Drinking raw milk causes death.
Let's not waste time on statistics, let's say 1,600 people a year die from this disease.
Other diseases caused by drinking raw milk are: Undulant fever, typhoid, dysentry, food poisoning, scarlet fever, and diphtheria.
Politicians may have something to say about the merits of killing off the population each year and maintaining the economic interests of a relatively small section of the community,
Compulsory Pasteurization may have an economic cost, milk producers and milk retailers may go out of business.
Opponents of Pasteurization say heat treated milk tastes nasty. Experiments show people can not tell the difference between raw milk and Pasteurized milk.
Studies from medical, veterinary and agricultural institutions conclude that Pasteurization doesn't affect the nutritional value of milk.
Heat treatment of milk may remove minerals and vitamins from the milk.
There are existing regulations to prevent milk being contaminated with dust, blood, water, cow shit, and bacteria. Pasteurization would not remove those regulations.
There are existing processes for testing cattle for bovine tuberculosis (using Tuberculin Test which are injected under the skin). Pasteurization would not remove those health schemes.
Other objections to Pasteurization are: it may put milk producers and milk retailers out of business, this might reduce the supply of milk.
Only towns/cities with populations over 20,000 people will be required to Pasteurize milk.
70% of milk is already Pasteurized. Any new equipment can be supplied from within the United Kingdom rather than the United States.
People that believe the earth is flat, prefer to drink raw milk. The views of uninformed cranks and eccentrics should not affect the lives and health of the rest of the population.
There are various methods of killing our dwindling population. Committees sit on things like reducing road deaths. Committees should sit on Pasteurization. Any government that does not introduce compulsory Pasteurization is responsible for the death and disease that results from people drinking raw milk.
Who said they were of equal importance? You're conflating him speaking on only two matters to mean the matters are of equal importance.
Horse milk is even better, but very expensive, even in Europe. I stayed at a bed and breakfast in Belgium at a horse farm. They had horse-milk skin care products, ice cream, and plain milk. Normal milk gives me terrible gas. The horse milk improved my digestion.
Bring back the milk mam to drop off fresh milk
Raw milk is absolutely delicious and coming from someone who has severe lactose and casein intolerance, I can drink raw milk with zero problems. Normally, consuming milk would leave me with severe stomach pain and days of bowel dysregulation ranging from irritable bowel syndrome to severe constipation. Pasteurization of milk makes it an inflammatory food which leads to a cascade of other health problems. It’s delicious and healing in it’s raw form. I never would’ve believed it until I tried it myself. I never felt more healthy, energized, my arthritis went away, my ADHD went away when I went on a strict diet of raw milk and meat. It was unbelievably anti-inflammatory and had so many positive impacts on my health. Alas, I am a sugar addict so I need to get back on that.
Pffft. bring those Jews into Palestine! Oh, and don't forget to pasteurize your milk!
This statement from the Rothschilds seems to be telling us When the Veterinary Business began being controlled by the Government. WHO The Invisable Enemy is No longer Invisable, is it? PASTEURIZATION OF MILK. (Hansard, 10 April 1946) https://api.parliament.uk/historic-hansard/lords/1946/apr/10/pasteurization-of-milk#S5LV0140P0_19460410_HOL_37
That Motion will be dealt with later, but I should like to say that during the last week an assurance has been given in another place on behalf of the Government that the recommendations contained in the report of the Loveday Committee on Veterinary Education will be implemented by the Government. The only weak point, if I may say so, about the answer made on behalf of the Government in another place is that there is no immediate prospect of bringing before Parliament the necessary legislation to implement that Report. All I would venture to say in that connexion is that from the point of view of public health the matter appears to be so important that I hope time will be found to pass into law rapidly a measure which would enable a larger number of young men in this country to be properly trained, through the medium of the universities, for what ought to be regarded as one of the honourable and learned professions in this country. To strengthen the veterinary profession would be a most profitable Government investment in the matter of national nutrition and national health.
Nutrition and health depend largely upon an adequate and safe milk supply; milk is the AI priority human food. This in turn depends upon far greater freedom from bovine diseases, and such freedom is conditioned by a sufficiency of skilled veterinarians. Veterinary practice should be made a worth-while profession, comparable in status and emoluments with that of the medical profession. If there were more skilled veterinarians there would ultimately be need of fewer medical practitioners.
Ya'll aren't ready for this convo. All milk is fortified with Vitamin A (AKA Retinol). Vitamin A is not a vitamin, its a form of alcohol and everyone actually consumes it to such a degree on a daily basis that majority of people are Vitamin A toxic and is the basis for the majority of all health issues. If you go on a low Vitamin A diet you will see the majority of your ailments disappear.
Um ... What? Sources? This is a research forum.
https://ggenereux.blog/ https://nutritiondetective.com/
I'm not sold on that. Many of the things that the site attributes to Vitamin A being the cause of have already been linked to other things through decades of research with solid connections. Many of the things, specifically, are linked to heavy and toxic metals building up in the brain, vaccines, and other things.
I feel like this is entirely missing the mark. It may be that Vitamin A in the body is toxified, but so many other things with known causes seem attributed to this toxic Vitamin A.
Look into it more. You are correct about the buildup of heavy/toxic metals in the body, they certainly contribute. Look into the origin of Vitamins, who first discovered them and who was give accolades for finding them. You won't be surprised.
I'm still skeptical. There's been too many crack scientists like the idiots who originated the 'coconut oil is bad for you' thing some years ago. They had no science but had lies and an idea and were good at pushing it out for publicity. As a result, one of the healthiest oils there is was pulled from use in popping popcorn as a standard.
Wait until you find out about homogenized milk...
The same arguments for raw milk can be applied to raw steak.
Are you eating raw steak?
Carpaccio. Sushi. Steak Tartare.
Does your mom know you're using the internet behind her back?
Last year, I almost died of food poisoning from raw meat. You?