Texas needs to assert the 10th amendment and continue to hold the line, and arrest any feds who so much as touch a blade of grass that does not belong to them.
Actually, that is what the 2nd Amendment was about. You see, we were never supposed to have a standing military, only militia's across the states and communities with a small federal force.
I do believe a standing military may end up being a necessity; every time we end up gutting a country's ability to wage war or defend itself, they always end up exploited in some way or other with no way to defend themselves.
Japan is losing significant portions of its economy and manufacturing, even for luxury "fun" items, to China. Japan also has to suffer repeated threats from their North Korean neighbor, on a promise that we'll step in and defend them.
Tactically, a standing military makes a lot of sense -- provided, of course, that they have loyalty to the citizenry that they serve and that they aren't used to project force where it shouldn't.
For a current example: All of our significant peers across the globe have a standing military of some stature, while our fellow citizens are refusing to be a part of the one we have because our government (including military leadership) have caused us to lose trust and faith in this government and military.
While that's going on, they work hard on stripping us of weapons every way they can while dividing us by race, sex, etc. which also makes us vulnerable.
Having a standing military -- in theory -- reduces the vulnerabilities posed by a populace so divided and partially disarmed.
I have read your comments for some time now, if sane people on a normal salary are ever allowed to run for congress again I really think many would benefit from someone as well spoken as yourself. Maybe after the dust settles.
Exactly right Unvaxxed! These judges are openly sanctioning the breaking of Immigration Law by aiding and abetting the criminal activity of the Biden administration allowing uncontrolled Illegal immigration.
The Federal Executive and the Federal SCOTUS are now violating Federal Law that demands that the borders be secured from invasion, go figure. Such subjective and twisted reasoning to attain that conclusion, while they are now both violating it themselves. I give up!!
Wow that's disappointing..... I had never heard that.....
I hate talking like this; I don't want to rag on & shame people who adopt; not in the least; but it's like with wildly different racial / ethnic marriages, or hell; even leftist / conservatives getting married - I'm sure we've all seen the comments all over this board.
Opposites attract, but they do not make for a solid, stable, healthy, LONG-TERM relationship. I'd argue that goes for adopting kids just as well as marriages.
Why would you want to adopt a child who looks nothing like you; has a wildly different heritage / background / culture, etc. etc.?
Last I checked the Supreme Court's jurisdiction stops at the Mexican border and that Country is dangerous and violent. I'd hate to think what would happen if future migrant caravans started to be ambushed before our border.
I would love to see Texas secede from the Union and become the Republic of Texas again. It would be the catalyst for several other states to follow suite, and, potentially, form a new union. a new Republic that follows and honors the constitution.
Slim chance, but is actually closer to happening than at any other time in Texas history.
Direct secession is difficult because the United States government and military will be sent in to "bring them back", as there is "no legal route to secession" (yada yada, blah blah blah) and would be reliant on sparking a civil war across the nation.
The easier route that skips all of that is to simply eject federal agents from the borders with a grace period, deputize and organize Texas citizens to bar their entry while controlling the border. Then, if/when the federal government tries to start something, they'll be pressured by those of us outside of Texas.
Both of these are a bit of a pipe dream in my opinion, however, because we're supposedly not intended to enter a civil war no matter how close we keep getting to one, and so I think a careful balancing act will continue to be played.
There is a direct legal path that was universally understood at the beginning of the confederation by the very men who established our Republic. That original intent is as valid today as it was at the founding.
“If any state in the Union will declare that it prefers separation... to a continuance in union... I have no hesitation in saying, 'let us separate.'”
~ Thomas Jefferson (1743-1826), US Founding Father, drafted the Declaration of Independence, 3rd US President
letter to W. Crawford, June 20, 1816
“If the Union was formed by accession of States then the Union may be dissolved by the secession of States.”
~ Daniel Webster (1782-1852) US Senator
U.S. Senate, Feb 15, 1833
“But as the plan of the convention aims only at a partial union or consolidation, the State governments would clearly retain all the rights of sovereignty which they before had, and which were not, by that act, EXCLUSIVELY delegated to the United States.”
~ Alexander Hamilton (1757-1804) American statesman, Secretary of the Treasury
Federalist No. 32, January 3, 1788
“The Government made by a number of Sovereign States.”
~ Roger Sherman (1721-1793) US Founding father, first mayor of New Haven, Connecticut, served on the Committee of Five that drafted the Declaration of Independence, representative and senator in the new republic, was the only person to sign all four great state papers of the U.S.: the Articles of Association, the Declaration of Independence, the Articles of Confederation and the Constitution.
Commentaries on the Constitution, Vol. III, p 287
“A national government is a government of the people of a single state or nation, united as a community by what is termed the 'social compact,’ and possessing complete and perfect supremacy over persons and things, so far as they can be made the lawful objects of civil government. A federal government is distinguished from a national government by its being the government of a community of independent and sovereign states, united by compact.”
~ Black's Law Dictionary
Piqua Branch Bank v. Knoup, 6 Ohio St. 393. [Black's Law Dictionary, Revised Fourth Edition, 1968, p. 1176]
On the distinctive principles of the Government ... of the U. States, the best guides are to be found in ... The Declaration of Independence, as the fundamental Act of Union of these States.
~ James Madison
“These things I believe: That government should butt out.
That government should butt out.
That freedom is our most precious commodity and
if we are not eternally vigilant, government will take it all away.
That individual freedom demands individual responsibility.
That government is not a necessary good but an unavoidable evil.
That the executive branch has grown too strong, the judicial branch too arrogant and the legislative branch too stupid.
That political parties have become close to meaningless.
That government should work to insure the rights of the individual, not plot to take them away.
That government should provide for the national defense
and work to insure domestic tranquillity.
That foreign trade should be fair rather than free.
That America should be wary of foreign entanglements.
That the tree of liberty needs to be watered from time to time
with the blood of patriots and tyrants.
That guns do more than protect us from criminals;
more importantly, they protect us from the ongoing threat of government.
That states are the bulwark of our freedom.
That states should have the right to secede from the Union.
That once a year we should hang someone in government
as an example to his fellows."
”
~ Lyn Nofziger [Franklyn C. Nofziger] (1924-2006) American journalist, political consultant, author, Press Secretary for President Reagan
11/9/99 issue of the Federalist Digest
All great & fine with the legalities & such, but let's face it. We're a country. Technically the old US passed away in 1871 with the Organic Act fine print. Just prior to that, they split our country in half, put brother against brother. I believe it was the largest loss of life war we've had by number of US casualties.
I say no more ceding land to these yutzes. None. Zero. We keep Texas. We keep California. We keep New York. We keep all OUR states, OUR Constitution. They're the ones violating it.
Seems to me there was a comment about an 1866 Supreme Court Case that basically stated that as soon as a public official tries to make a law that violates the constitution, they are no longer a public official at that point as they have violated their oath. Long and short of it, we need this enforced.
Lincoln betrayed his oath and the Republic. It might not have stopped him, but the blood of every single man, woman, and child that was spilt in the war will stand as testimony against him in the Court of our Creator.
History is written by the victors, so almost everyone believes the War between the States was about slavery, when it was actually fought over the sovereignty of the States and their rights to secede. The Confederate States were fighting for the Constitution, where-as the Northern States against it.
Biden is a usurper, and still is defying the will of the people, and even the SCOTUS. He is already doing way worse the Lincoln did. He is importing an army of foreigners to destroy us on our own soil.
Tyrants are rarely stopped before their crimes are committed and the people finally awaken to their awful state......
This is a good thing when you take a minute to think about it.
The short term problem isn't worth the constitutional crisis. And this is gonna boomerang on them when Trump forces the border closed and CA tries to open it.
"SCOTUS allows federal agents to cut razor wire Texas installed".
Is SCOTUS going to provide security for the federal agents who DO remove the barricades? Or will the Federal Agents stand alone in the desert with a pair of bolt cutters?
I heard the cartels make $15 billion a year smuggling people, so a creative thinker might find the most violent one and pay them $20 billion to seal the border. I think people would get the message real quick the border is closed and you're safer staying home. This would also be a good way to make our Government actually care about dealing with the cartels.
You can make evil serve the great good. Consider a certain percentage of people traveling across Mexico and other Countries to come here will die or be human trafficked or encounter other terrible outcomes. If a couple hundred or thousand people get get massacred by cartels spectacularly enough it will discourage millions from making the journey and stay home and that will ultimately save more lives than it costs. I call that immoral math.
Similarly if we tested the entire world for HIV in 1985 and tossed everyone with it into an isolation camp or a furnace we might have killed half a million people and violated the rights of the whole planet, but we would have saved about 35 million from the grave. Evil? Sure, but in the final reckoning way less evil than what did happen that has killed 35 million and counting.
It isn't mutiny if they are refusing to follow unlawful orders. It is simply upholding their oath. Currently, the entire Border Patrol is guilty of violating their oaths by following the illegal orders.
I could be wrong here, but it seems like issue is about the federal border. Couldn’t Texas just make a wall 1ft into their state along the border and suddenly it’s not the federal border but just the Texas border?
Not that they should have to do that, just reflecting.
Yes, I remember several years ago there was an issue about how Roberts obtained adoption rights of his kids. Was not aware about Barrett adopting children, there must be some deep dark story about that too, which I am sure the corrupt FBI have the goods on her too, so the DS got their wish.
My read is the opposite, SCOTUS is saying a state cannot interfere with the Federal Government’s immigration policy, even if it sucks. So when the big round up begins SCOTUS should rule against any state trying to impede the operation. And, I know, SCOTUS doesn’t always do what it should.
Don't know but any BP agent that cuta a wire should spend time in prison. Orders or not. It's time for them to walk away from those jobs and refuse to do it. Patriots wouldn't follow these orders.
When I say this, people usually tell me that some people in these situations will do what they are told, whether they believe it's right or not because they may feel like they don't have any other choice to support themselves and their families. Same thing when I said people should let their jobs fire them if they didn't get the shots and look for other jobs.
Patriots can offer a cushion for border patrol that refuses, as there are many jobs that can be found for workers who will be strong and get dirty -- even if it's a private security job.
It was impossible for patriots to do that for every type of worker in every type of field, though.
This is why I don't trust anything that makes it to the Supreme Court to not do irreparable damage. I'm glad to be presently surprised when good happens, though.
Time for the border patrol and state police to ignore and let the militias handle it. That’s exactly what the Bill of Rights and 2nd Amendment is for. Of course we must let this run the legal way first. Abbot can appeal, and continue to order his NG to defy Xiden and hold the border shut.
Or guys and gals, or…. Texas puts a new border right behind the US Fed border, per every map, and funnel all the illegals to the next State over! Of course NM hasn’t stopped sh1t, so a lot of good it’ll do in the end. But it is still a path to Hold The Line.
Electrify that shit! Release gators in the Rio Grande! I'm sure they've got some feral pitbulls they can turn loose in the area. Turn the whole area into The Running Man and add some cameras so we can watch.
So They can remove the barrier. Texas should still block them. Let them remove the barriers while standing on the Mexico side. If they enter Texas, arrest them.
So scotus is saying the BP has the authority to open the border If they are given the order to open the border. So the question is who is guilty of treason by giving authorition? It is the responsibility of the Federal government to protect our borders. Now who is leading that department?
Texas needs to assert the 10th amendment and continue to hold the line, and arrest any feds who so much as touch a blade of grass that does not belong to them.
Showing the world that ALL 3 branches of the government are compromised.
(When the government is totally compromised,) "Military is the only way."
Actually, that is what the 2nd Amendment was about. You see, we were never supposed to have a standing military, only militia's across the states and communities with a small federal force.
I do believe a standing military may end up being a necessity; every time we end up gutting a country's ability to wage war or defend itself, they always end up exploited in some way or other with no way to defend themselves.
Japan is losing significant portions of its economy and manufacturing, even for luxury "fun" items, to China. Japan also has to suffer repeated threats from their North Korean neighbor, on a promise that we'll step in and defend them.
Tactically, a standing military makes a lot of sense -- provided, of course, that they have loyalty to the citizenry that they serve and that they aren't used to project force where it shouldn't.
For a current example: All of our significant peers across the globe have a standing military of some stature, while our fellow citizens are refusing to be a part of the one we have because our government (including military leadership) have caused us to lose trust and faith in this government and military.
While that's going on, they work hard on stripping us of weapons every way they can while dividing us by race, sex, etc. which also makes us vulnerable.
Having a standing military -- in theory -- reduces the vulnerabilities posed by a populace so divided and partially disarmed.
I have read your comments for some time now, if sane people on a normal salary are ever allowed to run for congress again I really think many would benefit from someone as well spoken as yourself. Maybe after the dust settles.
I try, but sometimes I sound a bit drunk because I don't get nearly enough sleep haha. Thank you though, fren!
Bingo!
Not tha iit wasn't evident already.
You are 100% correct.
Showing the world that America is OPEN
There's only so many times you can say this from a safe location meanwhile white people are being killed by these subhuman aliens
Exactly right Unvaxxed! These judges are openly sanctioning the breaking of Immigration Law by aiding and abetting the criminal activity of the Biden administration allowing uncontrolled Illegal immigration.
Their argument is that federal law is superior to state law. Despite how illegal it seems
The Federal Executive and the Federal SCOTUS are now violating Federal Law that demands that the borders be secured from invasion, go figure. Such subjective and twisted reasoning to attain that conclusion, while they are now both violating it themselves. I give up!!
Never give up fren thats what they want.
Then what would ever be the point of state law
It was never intended to be this way by the Founders
Hung.
What kind of fucking retarded nation agrees with the Biden admin that is running human trafficking and demolishing what little border we have.
A sincere FUCKING FUCK YOU to those on the SCotUS that sided with the Biden admin.
White progressives the biggest threat to humanity
They really are. It's a freaking degenerate death cult.
The sooner they die the better.
They will be!!
They will be.
Both Roberts and Barrett have "adopted children."
Barrett's are from Haiti They have something on them
Exactly.....
As soon as I heard that she adopted kids of a completely different race / culture / heritage, it really tripped my radar.
I think of moonbats like angelina jolie & similar.....
Laura Ingraham ,,she adopted two boys, I think she claims Russia, probably Ukraine. I believe she is a DS tranny .
Wow that's disappointing..... I had never heard that..... I hate talking like this; I don't want to rag on & shame people who adopt; not in the least; but it's like with wildly different racial / ethnic marriages, or hell; even leftist / conservatives getting married - I'm sure we've all seen the comments all over this board.
Opposites attract, but they do not make for a solid, stable, healthy, LONG-TERM relationship. I'd argue that goes for adopting kids just as well as marriages.
Why would you want to adopt a child who looks nothing like you; has a wildly different heritage / background / culture, etc. etc.?
I don't get it...
That's what I think too.
It's a "total coincidence", now stop asking questions.
Block them from getting to the wire.
That's a good idea. Don't let them into TX at all.
Last I checked the Supreme Court's jurisdiction stops at the Mexican border and that Country is dangerous and violent. I'd hate to think what would happen if future migrant caravans started to be ambushed before our border.
F. U. C. K. T. H. I. S. S. H. I. T.
No, put actual shit all over the razor wire. Make it a lethal threat to go in there.
Manure. I hear Texas has plenty.
WTF
Looks like they're going for the civil war option
Abbot will back down. I hope he doesn't, but I'd be shocked if he doesn't.
I would love to see Texas secede from the Union and become the Republic of Texas again. It would be the catalyst for several other states to follow suite, and, potentially, form a new union. a new Republic that follows and honors the constitution.
Slim chance, but is actually closer to happening than at any other time in Texas history.
Direct secession is difficult because the United States government and military will be sent in to "bring them back", as there is "no legal route to secession" (yada yada, blah blah blah) and would be reliant on sparking a civil war across the nation.
The easier route that skips all of that is to simply eject federal agents from the borders with a grace period, deputize and organize Texas citizens to bar their entry while controlling the border. Then, if/when the federal government tries to start something, they'll be pressured by those of us outside of Texas.
Both of these are a bit of a pipe dream in my opinion, however, because we're supposedly not intended to enter a civil war no matter how close we keep getting to one, and so I think a careful balancing act will continue to be played.
There is a direct legal path that was universally understood at the beginning of the confederation by the very men who established our Republic. That original intent is as valid today as it was at the founding.
“If any state in the Union will declare that it prefers separation... to a continuance in union... I have no hesitation in saying, 'let us separate.'” ~ Thomas Jefferson (1743-1826), US Founding Father, drafted the Declaration of Independence, 3rd US President letter to W. Crawford, June 20, 1816
“If the Union was formed by accession of States then the Union may be dissolved by the secession of States.” ~ Daniel Webster (1782-1852) US Senator U.S. Senate, Feb 15, 1833
“But as the plan of the convention aims only at a partial union or consolidation, the State governments would clearly retain all the rights of sovereignty which they before had, and which were not, by that act, EXCLUSIVELY delegated to the United States.” ~ Alexander Hamilton (1757-1804) American statesman, Secretary of the Treasury Federalist No. 32, January 3, 1788
“The Government made by a number of Sovereign States.” ~ Roger Sherman (1721-1793) US Founding father, first mayor of New Haven, Connecticut, served on the Committee of Five that drafted the Declaration of Independence, representative and senator in the new republic, was the only person to sign all four great state papers of the U.S.: the Articles of Association, the Declaration of Independence, the Articles of Confederation and the Constitution. Commentaries on the Constitution, Vol. III, p 287
“A national government is a government of the people of a single state or nation, united as a community by what is termed the 'social compact,’ and possessing complete and perfect supremacy over persons and things, so far as they can be made the lawful objects of civil government. A federal government is distinguished from a national government by its being the government of a community of independent and sovereign states, united by compact.” ~ Black's Law Dictionary Piqua Branch Bank v. Knoup, 6 Ohio St. 393. [Black's Law Dictionary, Revised Fourth Edition, 1968, p. 1176]
On the distinctive principles of the Government ... of the U. States, the best guides are to be found in ... The Declaration of Independence, as the fundamental Act of Union of these States. ~ James Madison
“These things I believe: That government should butt out. That government should butt out. That freedom is our most precious commodity and if we are not eternally vigilant, government will take it all away. That individual freedom demands individual responsibility. That government is not a necessary good but an unavoidable evil. That the executive branch has grown too strong, the judicial branch too arrogant and the legislative branch too stupid. That political parties have become close to meaningless. That government should work to insure the rights of the individual, not plot to take them away. That government should provide for the national defense and work to insure domestic tranquillity. That foreign trade should be fair rather than free. That America should be wary of foreign entanglements. That the tree of liberty needs to be watered from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants. That guns do more than protect us from criminals; more importantly, they protect us from the ongoing threat of government. That states are the bulwark of our freedom. That states should have the right to secede from the Union. That once a year we should hang someone in government as an example to his fellows." ” ~ Lyn Nofziger [Franklyn C. Nofziger] (1924-2006) American journalist, political consultant, author, Press Secretary for President Reagan 11/9/99 issue of the Federalist Digest
All great & fine with the legalities & such, but let's face it. We're a country. Technically the old US passed away in 1871 with the Organic Act fine print. Just prior to that, they split our country in half, put brother against brother. I believe it was the largest loss of life war we've had by number of US casualties.
I say no more ceding land to these yutzes. None. Zero. We keep Texas. We keep California. We keep New York. We keep all OUR states, OUR Constitution. They're the ones violating it.
Seems to me there was a comment about an 1866 Supreme Court Case that basically stated that as soon as a public official tries to make a law that violates the constitution, they are no longer a public official at that point as they have violated their oath. Long and short of it, we need this enforced.
Lincoln betrayed his oath and the Republic. It might not have stopped him, but the blood of every single man, woman, and child that was spilt in the war will stand as testimony against him in the Court of our Creator.
History is written by the victors, so almost everyone believes the War between the States was about slavery, when it was actually fought over the sovereignty of the States and their rights to secede. The Confederate States were fighting for the Constitution, where-as the Northern States against it.
Biden is a usurper, and still is defying the will of the people, and even the SCOTUS. He is already doing way worse the Lincoln did. He is importing an army of foreigners to destroy us on our own soil.
Tyrants are rarely stopped before their crimes are committed and the people finally awaken to their awful state......
Georgians want to go with Texas! We'll give you Kemp & Raffensperger.
This is a good thing when you take a minute to think about it.
The short term problem isn't worth the constitutional crisis. And this is gonna boomerang on them when Trump forces the border closed and CA tries to open it.
I thought everything was going to be over before Trump is elected so as to keep him from claims of dictatorship
It's going to be a bumpy next 6 months.
That's a good point, and the only redeeming quality I see from this, other than further angering blue sanctuary cities and waking them up some more n
That's a way to recover from it, but nonetheless, this is still a wrong decision.
Put razor wire under water in the river.
And sharks with frickin' laser beams.
Best I can do is a few dozen sea bass.
I see what chainring did there!
They didn't say anything about putting up more wire to block the fag bois.
Something tells me patriots will come up with something down there.
"SCOTUS allows federal agents to cut razor wire Texas installed".
Is SCOTUS going to provide security for the federal agents who DO remove the barricades? Or will the Federal Agents stand alone in the desert with a pair of bolt cutters?
Texas should get permission from Mexico to move the razor wire to their side of the border and out of fed jurisdiction. Just thinking out loud here.
I heard the cartels make $15 billion a year smuggling people, so a creative thinker might find the most violent one and pay them $20 billion to seal the border. I think people would get the message real quick the border is closed and you're safer staying home. This would also be a good way to make our Government actually care about dealing with the cartels.
I've never heard that idea before. Definitely interesting.
You can make evil serve the great good. Consider a certain percentage of people traveling across Mexico and other Countries to come here will die or be human trafficked or encounter other terrible outcomes. If a couple hundred or thousand people get get massacred by cartels spectacularly enough it will discourage millions from making the journey and stay home and that will ultimately save more lives than it costs. I call that immoral math.
Similarly if we tested the entire world for HIV in 1985 and tossed everyone with it into an isolation camp or a furnace we might have killed half a million people and violated the rights of the whole planet, but we would have saved about 35 million from the grave. Evil? Sure, but in the final reckoning way less evil than what did happen that has killed 35 million and counting.
Maybe it's time for the BP to mutiny
It isn't mutiny if they are refusing to follow unlawful orders. It is simply upholding their oath. Currently, the entire Border Patrol is guilty of violating their oaths by following the illegal orders.
OK :)
Called it. Now, does Texas defend their sovereignty or fold?
Called it too. Taxas will fold. All talk. No balls. Bunch of faggots.
This needs to be Stickied!!
I see this as damning evidence that the Supreme Court is a captured institution.
This cannot go on.
I could be wrong here, but it seems like issue is about the federal border. Couldn’t Texas just make a wall 1ft into their state along the border and suddenly it’s not the federal border but just the Texas border?
Not that they should have to do that, just reflecting.
The dirty FBI must have dirt on Barrett too.
Her kids
Yes, I remember several years ago there was an issue about how Roberts obtained adoption rights of his kids. Was not aware about Barrett adopting children, there must be some deep dark story about that too, which I am sure the corrupt FBI have the goods on her too, so the DS got their wish.
Build an illegal immigrant camp on the street where they live
Then fill it to overflowing with chinese military age makes!
This is not winning.
How does this play a year from now when the Trump Administration executes the largest deportation operation in U.S. history?
SC would block it apparently
My read is the opposite, SCOTUS is saying a state cannot interfere with the Federal Government’s immigration policy, even if it sucks. So when the big round up begins SCOTUS should rule against any state trying to impede the operation. And, I know, SCOTUS doesn’t always do what it should.
Don't know but any BP agent that cuta a wire should spend time in prison. Orders or not. It's time for them to walk away from those jobs and refuse to do it. Patriots wouldn't follow these orders.
I agree, just following orders is a poor excuse for perpetuating evil.
When I say this, people usually tell me that some people in these situations will do what they are told, whether they believe it's right or not because they may feel like they don't have any other choice to support themselves and their families. Same thing when I said people should let their jobs fire them if they didn't get the shots and look for other jobs.
Edit: for the record I totally agree with you!
Patriots can offer a cushion for border patrol that refuses, as there are many jobs that can be found for workers who will be strong and get dirty -- even if it's a private security job.
It was impossible for patriots to do that for every type of worker in every type of field, though.
ACB backstabbing yet again!
And people think that SCOTUS will easily rule in favor of keeping Trump on ballots
This is why I don't trust anything that makes it to the Supreme Court to not do irreparable damage. I'm glad to be presently surprised when good happens, though.
Abbott needs to start dropping off the illegals at the WH "for a tour", SCOTUS & FBI buildings
Wonder if Abbott will send a few busloads there way…
Somebody get scavino or trump to retruth this and bring attention to it.
Time for the border patrol and state police to ignore and let the militias handle it. That’s exactly what the Bill of Rights and 2nd Amendment is for. Of course we must let this run the legal way first. Abbot can appeal, and continue to order his NG to defy Xiden and hold the border shut.
Or guys and gals, or…. Texas puts a new border right behind the US Fed border, per every map, and funnel all the illegals to the next State over! Of course NM hasn’t stopped sh1t, so a lot of good it’ll do in the end. But it is still a path to Hold The Line.
Not by the hair of my chinny chin chin. FJB
Electrify that shit! Release gators in the Rio Grande! I'm sure they've got some feral pitbulls they can turn loose in the area. Turn the whole area into The Running Man and add some cameras so we can watch.
…and ACB sided with the libs. https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/01/breaking-supreme-court-sides-biden-razor-wire-roberts/
So They can remove the barrier. Texas should still block them. Let them remove the barriers while standing on the Mexico side. If they enter Texas, arrest them.
Good we the people authorize the guard and Texas rangers to arrest on sight any who try.
Supreme Court isn't so Supreme is it.
Funny how a SCOTUS decision for the left is sacrosanct, but when it goes to the right, then it's merely a suggestion.
I have wondered what they have on Roberts for some time now.
So scotus is saying the BP has the authority to open the border If they are given the order to open the border. So the question is who is guilty of treason by giving authorition? It is the responsibility of the Federal government to protect our borders. Now who is leading that department?
Time for all these pedos to start swinging!
Hell is waiting for these 5.
Trump what where you thinking?
Correction: Barett and Roberts are libs