I just finished all 8 episodes of Ancient Apocalypse, and I also happen to be listening to old broadcasts by Bill Cooper and Alan Watt about the ancient esoteric religions that still rule over us today. The intersection of these topics is the concealment of the true origins of civilization. The esoteric religions and the cabal have always hidden history and technology from us. Graham's proof about advanced civilizations existing as far back as 12,000 years ago exposes the fraudulent version of history projected by academia.
Graham never set out to expose anyone, but academia has attacked him using irrational arguments. If we want to understand specifically what academia wants kept secret, we can start with Graham's observation that a single enlightened civilization around 10,000 BC passed along its secrets to other civilizations around the world.
Yep! Ive actually said this before. It would make a lot of sense that this is the cabal and what they are hiding. They obviously love covering up history, why?
An ancient civilization so advanced, they were like gods and rulled the world, until some defected and tought the commoners their ways and exposed their scam.
Then it all collapses, they go into hiding, with their secrets. Now theyre trying to recreate this senario by throwing us back into the dark ages by restricting cars and electricity.
They act like they know but Atlantis and Mars is all they will say, won’t do anything except smirk if you press them. They say we used to be a multiplanitary species. They make references to the cyclical destruction of earth due to shifting magnetic poles which they claim is what caused the great flood. Pic relate Martian space nukes
This stuff always gives me cancer. This guy is faaaar downstream IMO
yikes, on thread 2. So I don't know the timing, did this OP really call out Ye's intention to run with Trump prior to Ye's half joking comment about his meetup with Trump? That would be enough to establish not a LARP at least as far as being in Ye's trusted circle
All "insider drops" will by design have things you disagree with or have to take on faith. Personally I think it's impossible to "prove" either way how much is true and false. It's about reading it, and your unconscious telling you which parts are more real and which parts are more fake.
lol is this a serious comment? Most people have PCs dude, you should know that when people say "Ctrl-F" it means the find function. We get it, you have a Mac.
As for Nan Madol, Bob Greenyer who is a research chemist i follow who is researching Cold Fusion and Ball Lightning has produced a video about how it was built, the basalt that built it was taken from the top of a mountain, he tells us how it was done amongst other things such as coherent anti gravity and exotic vacuum objects.
Its complicated stuff though, but well worth a few views.
Ancient sea fairing people that had tools well before the bronze age and were actually a different humanoid species other than homosapien and neanderthal.
If one explores what Randall Carlson is saying, the younger Dryad was caused by a couple of meteor or comet impacts, which has been verified by a crater that was recently found near Greenland. Most of the Northern Hemisphere has a carbonized layer at that time-period in the geological record. Because the impact was into ice, it also caused extensive flooding as well, which as Carlson shows, there is dramatic record in the Midwest: giant ripples in the landscape, so tall, that the water, which suddenly inundated that land, was very deep and rushing - like a giant tsunami. Geologists were saying that these 'ripples' were a glacial thing, i.e. a retreating ice cap - not a flood thing. However, I agree with Carlson that it looks like wave-like water action, not a gradual melt.
The flood stories are prevalent in creation myths all over the world. This impact had an extraordinary effect on humans. We all have flood at the BEGINNING of our Biblical, or other records - Hancock speaks of amnesia - no real spoken records of anything happening before those floods, except for Adam and Eve, and their offspring, and then we have Noah and the flood as the very next chapter.
However, read for interest, the first few pages of the Bhagavad-Gita, that speaks of a terrible light and fire that wipes out a plain where a mighty battle was taking place - no water - they were at the other end of the earth. In the eighties I wondered if that was an ancient nuclear weapon, but now I think it was that comet the impact of which would have had a destructive sonic and thermal boom that was experienced in India. Some creation myths talk of a feathered serpent who attacked from the sky - a description of a long tailed comet perhaps.
Lol EXACTLY - it's like we were twins separated at birth - except you write far better than I do. It's quite daunting to come face to face with the realisation that just about everything is built on lies. The one bit that I haven't figured out, is why hide all the ancient history (buy up and hide OOPARTS, why the Vatican library is locked down with all of it's amazing treasures of knowledge etc). How does that serve the cabal. What is wrong with knowing that there have been waves of civilisation that ebb and flow? What is wrong with knowing that there were peoples from the South Pacific in S America tens of thousands of years before the Clovis peoples?
I think it serves them to keep stuff hidden because they have a narrative to uphold, and lies beget lies. Have you looked into the archeological sites that are locked to the public in NZ? e.g. http://www.celticnz.co.nz There a paleolithic/astrological observance sites, and even a pyramid, built along Egyptian lines and orientation, that go against the 'there were no people in NZ until the Maori got there' narrative ... There are 'Pakeha' (others?) in the northern Taranaki and King country that claim they have been there forever. Even the Maori speak of a red-haired people that were already living in NZ.
But NVM, there is a claim of we-wuz-indigenous peoples, that they want to implement via the UN. It is one powerful group of elites that have discovered how to influence politicians to get more power. Note that most Maoris don't even agree to all this. Quite disgusting, given all the different people: tiny shy fairy-like people living in caves near Rotorua, 'giant skeletons' found North of Raglan, etc. etc. that are quietly covered up and ignored. The official story is that there are no paleolithic remains, even as the carvings have celtic roots.
I find the level of denial around the Kaimanawa Wall to be most bemusing. I do not see how signs of ancient ruins from great antiquity causes any kind of challenge to Maori views about being the tangata whenua - no reasonable person disputes that when Capt Cook sailed into view Maori were all over the place, so why does an obvious man-made wall from great antiquity constitute such a threat. I do not believe the rest of the world understands how incredibly shut-down and closed-minded NZ has become over the past 20 years. We are a real-world example of Plato's cave.
Religion often uses information as a control. A new documentary on this topic did an excellent job of showing the why, who and how.
enter texthttps://youtu.be/crasHY5HCdI
I watched EP01 and it is* an interesting show. The outrage collected here simply means that there is something to it. No reason why they'd all pounce like this if there wasn't something juicy in it.
I tend to agree with this statement though, I myself have realized a long while ago now that, most all the science that is accepted as fact because, they push it as fact, is nothing but a theory "someone came up with" in the first place and others just used their findings based off the first guys thoughts, when it comes to science/human/animal and earth history. We are a species with amnesia of our past for the most and it gets darker every generation that passes.
I have been tracking Hancock's progress for a while and he keeps making links that make sense - I know he gets criticised for building off other people's work - but I find he's pretty good at giving his sources and giving credit to those sources - so I think that is just more establishment 'credentialism' to avoid the fact that he keeps on asking really, really good questions. How come the Great Pyramid - is a scale model of Earth? How come the Sphinx has water erosion marks if it is only 4500 years old and Egypt wasn't wet 4500 years ago and to get those marks it would have to be over twice that old. How come the Sphinx points to where Leo would have been on midsummer's day 13000 years ago. If civilisation is only 4500 years old - WTF Goblecki Tepe in Turkey which is also 13000 years old. And on and on and on with the good questions - and archeaology just dismisses everything he says. We know on this forum here that when credential establishment figures dismiss something - they're basically covering something up.
The problem is that academia stays within its artificial sectored boundaries. which is not how knowledge was approached, even a few hundred years ago. Archeologists do not really talk to Geologists, for example. Which is weird if you think about it - they are both digging into soil and dating stuff. What Hancock is doing is joining their dots, which is outrageous to the establishment. The same thing happens between Psychologists and Strategic Management types. Again - weird - why would management strategy not include a measure of how mass psychology works?
The premise of Science is to take a theory and disprove it. These days, people are trying to make science concrete and irrefutable, (famously illustrated by Pelosi's "Science, Science, science" comment) but that is not what is supposed to happen. Those people who disprove hypotheses, like Hancock and Carlson, are now seen as heretics. REEEeeeEEE.
You're just supposed to shut up and believe the Great Pyramid was built at the beginning of the Egyptian civilization and their building skills rapidly declined thereafter.
Yep, one of the first statments in the show was a guy interviewing Hancock and questioning why he couldn't just say this is weird and stop there?
Why did he have to make a theory around the weird?
I got so mad because making a theory around discovery is litterally what all of archeology does. Its all theoretical. It is all it will ever be. It is just the "accepted" theory. Doesn't make it fact.
Same as it has ever been. Why do you think they were and still are pushing "Big Bang Theory" as if 100% proven Fact or "Fossil Fuel" as fact when it comes to Petroleum? Whomever controls the science decides on what to record it as being.
All theories and people furthering their knowledge off those theories. Seems a good way for people to no longer be able to actually figure shit out in the long run unless, they scrap what they have been told and do as Graham has done, get out there and do your own research. heh.
By their own Standards shows like the History channel's Ancient Aliens should be cancelled and boycotted... but its not. So what gives about this Ancient Theory show that has their panties in a bunch
The point of the show is that our whole history was fabricated by the ruling class. That obviously includes the bible and all the religions they gave to the slave classes
It's not wild theories about aliens building stuff w/ a crazy dude w/ crazy hair. This guy is using carbon dating on subterranean structures that date back to pre-civilization time periods by tens of thousands of years... and finding underground lairs/buildings/etc. that go back even further.
I've never given too much credit to the wild Antarctica theories as they are mostly based on assumptions and outlandish ideas with nothing to back them up, but if this series goes into that, maybe this is the nerve he struck? Not sure yet, only got to EP01.
They block this but not the show 'Ancient Aliens'. Look here not there. One show may have some truth and one they can point and say 'look at the crazy conspiracy theorists'.
Its a good starting point but don't expect the truth on netflix. Its obvious that all our known history is a fabrication, there's plenty out there to research.
What stands out to me is an archeologist telling people not to watch the show. Guess what I'm gonna do today?
That always stands out to me. I always notice when people ("experts") tell me not to see or not to hear because we are the educated folks who know better, and you should only listen to us. It doesn't necessarily mean the forbidden thing is all truth in its purest form, but it does mean there is truth to be found in it. This means there is a narrative that is fragile to opposing ideas. It means they are telling a lie.
The thing we must understand is that this is in everything. It's not just politics and medicine. Every single venue of human endeavor and exploration has been compromised to present a unified matrix that denies God and promotes isolation and hopelessness. Look to where they deny God, look into the things they ridicule and attack the most, look into what they are hiding, and you will find it all pointing to the truth they desperately want to conceal.
"All experts agree" is another one that makes me perk up. It is a statement that cannot be true, just like 99% of people voting for a dictator cannot be true. It means they have agreed upon what they will present as the truth, not that what they say is true. Their peers who disagree do so at their own peril, putting their careers, their reputations, and even their very lives in jeopardy. Those are the people worth listening to. That kind of conviction doesn't exist in the darkness.
One of the issues archeologists come up against is the subjective - mythological records. They like to view themselves as 'scientists' that pursue objective proofs - look a tooth, or a needle, and here is the carbon dating - or whatever. There is a very strong impulse to not stray into human word-of-mouth 'contamination'. This has kept them away from astronomy as well, which is very odd, because the star positions themselves are not really changing, but the whole sky shifts as the earth wobbles on its axis- which gave this odd re-orientation of the temple structures on Malta, that could not be explained via the structures themselves - except by saying that the people building the structures were not competent, or something.
I came across this anti-subjectivity idea in recent academic work, where the beaks were pressuring us to write a thesis according to positivist lines - i.e., form a hypothesis and then try to 'prove' it using objectivity. A battle with the beaks ensued: me pointing out that hypotheses can never be proven a la Popper, they can only be disproven. Them saying, but this is how it must be done. Me: no this is categorically NOT how it must be done. Get thesis study guide, and it is all about setting up interviews or surveys (as if this is objective)- rigidly sticking to what went before. i.e. start by forming a hypothesis from the literature. Jeez. What about current real-world problems? There are plenty of academic examples where subjectivity is allowed in because one is studying human morality or belief systems - take law for example. So, one can find humanities subjects that use subjectivity, and connect dots across disciplines, but the idea of multidisciplinary theses are still very rare.
So yes, academics are set in their ways, but there are notable divergencies, and one can certainly demonstrate a history of it. It's just that subjectivity must be defended more rigorously, because the positivists are so rigid in their thinking, and will jump on any conjecture - even as hypotheses are formed from that very conjecture.
This is cyclical in human history. A consensus view ossifies, and then all new data must conform to that. It doesn't change until the price of remaining with conformity is looking like a fool in the face of new ideas that have abundant proof in observation.
Astronomy and astrophysics are now reaching that point. For decades, new observations had to conform to the official story (or else), so they sprinkled fairy dust into the heavens and populated it with unicorns to save the theory, but that doesn't work anymore. The Big Bang is dead. Nothing they see confirms it, from the way stars operate to ubiquitous filamentary structures, gigantic orderly magnetic fields, and energetic beams that retain a linear structure despite being light years long. That is just mentioning a few things on a very long list.
A problem that contributes to this is specialization in education. There is little cross-disciplinary training from other sciences, so astronomers come up with ridiculous things like magnetic reconnection, which is literally impossible in this universe. Just a week of being educated in the well-known laws of electrodynamics would have preempted this particular form of nonsense coming from otherwise brilliant men and women.
Could you tell me more about your “holy location” or the holy locations of the world? Who are the Irish and Welsh and Scandinavians to you? I’ve always felt there was a reason they tried to kill the Irish language and a reason why the welsh protect theirs.
Thanks, giving it a go, and Ancient Apoc came right up! And a download option? (Vince McMahon overwhelmed meme here)
(Wow what a selection!) Interestingly the bottom of the page has a blocked window in the comments, to prevent FB tracking. Still kind of blown away; you've seriously positively impacted our entertainment lives here, lol! Merry Christmas, my good man!
I use Newshosting. They have great retention and it doesn't cost much. I have downloaded tens of thousands of books and hundreds of thousands of MP3 files, including music and old time radio shows.
Some places like T-Mobile include Netflix as a perk so you can still choose to not watch but you're paying indirectly until your "free" phones are paid off.
Oh man, if you're into this stuff check out the podcast with him and Randall Carleson. About an hour in, if I remember right, Randall discusses technology being released in the next few months that has been in the works and kept secret for a decade. One of which is a generator that runs on geometry. Exciting stuff!
I believe some of it is aligned with his theories yes. Supposedly they are releasing it all open source. Dangerous stuff, I pray that these folks are kept safe until it is released.
Oh I love him! I hadn’t heard of this series but would love to see it. I read his book, UnderWorld. He did an excellent job presenting theory and facts supporting the idea that humans have been way more advanced in history than we’ve been told. Proposing the shift of plates on the earth’s crust caused some areas to flood and others to rise. Since we mainly settle and therefore develop on coastal land, when that is flooded, civilization takes a step back. He had a geographer use the computer to map the land mass back in time & allowed the land to tell the story. For instance, sunken cities like off the coast of India and Cuba. Or huge boulders that go through the West, that had to be put there by rushing waters. On and on, he’s done so much research. If we only look at the pyramids around the world and the fact that we still can’t explain how to build them, or that granite is cut to perfect right angles or what I’ve seen myself which is perfect drill holes in granite in Peru.
I've been seeing more and more proof of the big flood come out around the world. The Grand Canyon shows fast erosion, not slow, for example. And if the flood was real, if Giants are real, if Sodom and Gomorrah were real...
There is good geologic evidence to support the flooding. Paleoclimate is the study of the Earth's climate over geologic time (my degree was in geophysics).
Temperature data over hundreds of millions of years comes from isotope ratios in fossilized shells, and on a shorter timeframe of hundreds of thousands of years from isotope ratios in ice from glaciers (Greenland and Antarctica).
The Earth is currently in an icehouse climate overall, but in a short period of warm temperatures called an interglacial.
Interglacials are geologically brief periods of warm temperatures, about halfway between the extremes of hothouse and icehouse. They last anywhere from 10,000 to 15,000 years on average. We are currently in the latter part of an interglacial that began approx. 11,000 years ago. The name of our current interglacial is the Holocene.
During the ice age, ocean levels were about 400 feet lower than they are currently due to all the water locked up in continental ice sheets. The ice of the continental ice sheets melt during the warm interglacials, and ocean levels rise as a result. This is the source of the flooding people are talking about.
As one example, during the ice age, the area that is now the south china sea was one of the best places on Earth to live, but is now under 150 feet of water (which would have been 250 feet above sea level during the ice age). That entire subcontinent flooded and became a shallow sea.
Bottom line: the stories about flooding are real, and occurred roughly 11,000 years ago at the start of our current interglacial. Sea levels rose 400 feet globally during this period due to the melting of the continental ice sheets.
indeed. It is amazing how panicked they are over this.
I also notice how the word theory is being pushed, whereas Hancock himself speaks of hypothesis.
Also, his interview on Brand Russel Channel is interesting.
I have been familiar with Hancock's views for quite some time and noticed how mainstream archeology is vehemently against postulating ancient knowledge of the heavens, the sole hypothesis of the alignment of the pyramids of Giza with the Orion belt, despite its obviousness, is fought tooth and nail. Not because he is wrong, but because it totally destroys mainstream narratives and views of historical developments.
You cannot watch the episodes from the zdf sure without a registration and it looks like they only want media people in the registry, not direct viewers
Some years ago I found and read a book called Forbidden Archaeology. I will find the book and let you know the authors. It details some serious anomalies in archaeological finds that conflict with the accepted archaeological storyline. The most damning fact of the book isn't the anachronistic finds, it is the measures taken to debunk, disenfranchise and suppress the discoveries that show the dogma of modern scientists. The cancel culture didn't start in the media, it started many decades ago in the scientific community. I watched the series on Netflix of Ancient Apocalypse and find the information provided to be plausible and compelling. In the mind of a true scientist, that means it requires more investigation, not suppression.
“The most damning fact of the book isn't the anachronistic finds, it is the measures taken to debunk, disenfranchise and suppress the discoveries that show the dogma of modern scientists.”
Because they’re lazy and intrenched, exactly like the “scientists” who find it easier to attack Stefan Lanka than actually make an effort to understand his virus research:
It was a well-produced docuseries that shot holes in a lot of mainstream archeological narratives. Like Covid-19, the fact one can't argue opposite of what we are told by the "professionals" without being smeared says everything we need to know. I have always wondered why archeologists ignore the obvious connections our ancestors made with the universe, but now it is clear that they have to ignore it because by admitting it they would also have to admit that there was a far advanced ancient culture likely smarter than we are today. Skewing results by selective omission in order to achieve a desired outcome is all this Cabal knows.
Okay... I've known Graham for a long time. Not my cup of tea, but he is is on the right track. In fact he ain't stupid... which lends us to the current timeline. Either you are in or you are out.
I doubt they are actually worried about what Graham Hancock is going to say. After all his deal is: "there used to be an ancient civilization that had advanced knowledge of astrology and building etc, which was destroyed by a cataclysm at the end of the last ice age/ younger dryas." He suggests that the reason for the cataclysm was a series of comet strikes, a hypothesis that is gaining strength in paleo-archaeological circles. Archaeology also accepts that Gobekli Tepe was buried some 11,500 years ago so why is Graham's ideas which are nearly acceptable common sense seen as such a threat?
These attacks suggest he is over the target, but which target? I doubt it is the "Younger Dryas was caused/ended in a world wide cataclysm". I doubt it is the "there used to be civilizations that were more advanced than we thought in prehistory." either. We have too much evidence of reasonably advanced prehistoric civilizations as it is.
So what target is he over?
I think they are worried that this will lead people to the idea that our sun is a recurring micro-nova and that the disasters that affect this planet are cyclical, occurring every 12 thousand years. That the climate change we are seeing is down to these changes which happen on a galactic level and that we are due the next one in the next 30 years.
I haven't watched it yet but I can tell you 1 thing with absolute certainty; there were more advanced cultures that came before us - we are the least advanced & most depraved of them all.
It's very good and worth a watch- I'm 6 of 8 episodes through- not as full in explanation as some of his other stuff (but I think he's played it a bit safe for the mainstream and stuck mostly to questions)- he did a good podcast with Joe Rogan and Randall Carlson (Mathmetitcian, Geologist and yes, mason)
Hidden history, another cabal control mechanism, is starting to unravel. From what I've read, they've been in control for tens of thousands of years and have orchestrated the rise and fall of many civilizations. Apparently interesting stuff will be coming out of Antarctica which is currently an off-limits continent reserved to the cabal alone.
In my opinion all history is his story. World War II and before is pure fakeness. Look at old buildings with a consistent architecture around the world buried in the ground and it looks like a worldwide flood to me. Fake news didn’t just start in 2012 with sandy hook or 94 with okc. They’ve been faking it all forever
Anyone interested in a discussion of these ideas from a Christian perspective would enjoy the Blurry Creatures podcast in general, and probably the stuff with Timothy Alberino in particular. Look up his Empires of the Gods stuff.
Hancock has done some great work but he misses the fact that the Bible actually describes a time when a group of angels/Watchers/(call them aliens if you wish, they were alien to earth) chose to come to earth and intermarry with human women, thus creating giants and all manner of other weird things. Thus we get all the legends of gods and demigods etc.
Man had been given the right to rule Earth, but this crew wanted that for themselves and the only way to obtain it legally was to have offspring that were human enough to carry that right. So the giant offspring of the Watchers became the kings of empires, pointing all their people to worship their fathers the watchers. During that antediluvian time the "gods" walked among men, built incredible empires, etc etc.
For anyone interested, look into the works of Christian scholar Michael Heiser such as his Supernatural Seminar and his FringePop321 video channel. Fringepop explores archaeology and history including topics like these and ancient aliens. He unpacks what the Bible and other texts have to say about nephilim, watchers, and giants.
I have several Graham Hitchcock books. They are all very well researched and articulated. Hitchcock is one of the most foremost researcher and historian in the world.
I especially laughed at the woke criticism stating-- "The discussion of race in Ancient Apocolypse' is conspuous by its absence. Hancock does not need to identify the individuals in the myths he describes as white because most of his audience already knows it. This is what permits him to conceal what archaeologists recognize as implicit racism in the theory."
On the Hierarchy of Argument scale, this is the lowest level of refutation and is called 'Name calling'. If "implicit racism in the theory" has actually been adopted in the field of archaeology, it is the weaponization of this field of science. No real intelligence or critical thinking is required from making reckless statements like this. It certainly is at the opposite end of the Hierarchy of Argument from "Refuting the Central Point'.
Now I want to watch this. I've been watching a lot of the work of Robert Sepehr lately which is pretty awesome and seems to come to the same conclusions.
I just finished all 8 episodes of Ancient Apocalypse, and I also happen to be listening to old broadcasts by Bill Cooper and Alan Watt about the ancient esoteric religions that still rule over us today. The intersection of these topics is the concealment of the true origins of civilization. The esoteric religions and the cabal have always hidden history and technology from us. Graham's proof about advanced civilizations existing as far back as 12,000 years ago exposes the fraudulent version of history projected by academia.
Graham never set out to expose anyone, but academia has attacked him using irrational arguments. If we want to understand specifically what academia wants kept secret, we can start with Graham's observation that a single enlightened civilization around 10,000 BC passed along its secrets to other civilizations around the world.
I’ve read a bunch of his books, and listened to multiple podcasts, Rogan included. I have come to a similar conclusion.
Randall Carlson and Hancocks appearances together on Rogan we’re incredible.
The things they talk about were really mind-opening. Maybe they're right. Maybe they've only got part of the picture but it's pretty compelling.
No "ancient Aliens", just other humans who would probably seem "alien" to us now.
Yep! Ive actually said this before. It would make a lot of sense that this is the cabal and what they are hiding. They obviously love covering up history, why?
An ancient civilization so advanced, they were like gods and rulled the world, until some defected and tought the commoners their ways and exposed their scam.
Then it all collapses, they go into hiding, with their secrets. Now theyre trying to recreate this senario by throwing us back into the dark ages by restricting cars and electricity.
My old post from 2 years ago XD
Nephelims
Here are three threads from an "Insider" that cover these ancient cults and how their power is expressed today.
Make of it what you will.
https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/405598009
https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/405606938
https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/405677108
Edit: Tip for newbies. Ctrl-F the ID of the Original Poster in each thread, makes reading it easier that way. So for the first thread ctrl-F gwCOMDGE
This stuff always gives me cancer. This guy is faaaar downstream IMO
We know for a fact the cabal is a Satanic Cult
Let's assume their ultimate goal is to "destroy God", because well...they worship his enemy
How exactly would they do that?
yikes, on thread 2. So I don't know the timing, did this OP really call out Ye's intention to run with Trump prior to Ye's half joking comment about his meetup with Trump? That would be enough to establish not a LARP at least as far as being in Ye's trusted circle
All "insider drops" will by design have things you disagree with or have to take on faith. Personally I think it's impossible to "prove" either way how much is true and false. It's about reading it, and your unconscious telling you which parts are more real and which parts are more fake.
Op is
flVaSTv6 I’m second thread
Ctrl-F does nothing on my Mac. Did you mean [cmd]-F ?
lol is this a serious comment? Most people have PCs dude, you should know that when people say "Ctrl-F" it means the find function. We get it, you have a Mac.
So what's the key combination for Linux and for Android?
He meant get a real keyboard.
Yes, Mac has their own version which is cmd F. It's just about finding the text to help you sift through it.
I spent 9 months in Egypt because of them
I have to say I'm envious.
As for Nan Madol, Bob Greenyer who is a research chemist i follow who is researching Cold Fusion and Ball Lightning has produced a video about how it was built, the basalt that built it was taken from the top of a mountain, he tells us how it was done amongst other things such as coherent anti gravity and exotic vacuum objects.
Its complicated stuff though, but well worth a few views.
Sorry for the yoo toob link. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cUdzYvaX3pI&t=2563s
Reminds me of this: https://youtu.be/iBF0hP2_nGw
Ancient sea fairing people that had tools well before the bronze age and were actually a different humanoid species other than homosapien and neanderthal.
Wonder if part of all the fear mongering regarding melting ice caps is because they're terrified of what people are going to discover.
If one explores what Randall Carlson is saying, the younger Dryad was caused by a couple of meteor or comet impacts, which has been verified by a crater that was recently found near Greenland. Most of the Northern Hemisphere has a carbonized layer at that time-period in the geological record. Because the impact was into ice, it also caused extensive flooding as well, which as Carlson shows, there is dramatic record in the Midwest: giant ripples in the landscape, so tall, that the water, which suddenly inundated that land, was very deep and rushing - like a giant tsunami. Geologists were saying that these 'ripples' were a glacial thing, i.e. a retreating ice cap - not a flood thing. However, I agree with Carlson that it looks like wave-like water action, not a gradual melt.
The flood stories are prevalent in creation myths all over the world. This impact had an extraordinary effect on humans. We all have flood at the BEGINNING of our Biblical, or other records - Hancock speaks of amnesia - no real spoken records of anything happening before those floods, except for Adam and Eve, and their offspring, and then we have Noah and the flood as the very next chapter.
However, read for interest, the first few pages of the Bhagavad-Gita, that speaks of a terrible light and fire that wipes out a plain where a mighty battle was taking place - no water - they were at the other end of the earth. In the eighties I wondered if that was an ancient nuclear weapon, but now I think it was that comet the impact of which would have had a destructive sonic and thermal boom that was experienced in India. Some creation myths talk of a feathered serpent who attacked from the sky - a description of a long tailed comet perhaps.
Lol EXACTLY - it's like we were twins separated at birth - except you write far better than I do. It's quite daunting to come face to face with the realisation that just about everything is built on lies. The one bit that I haven't figured out, is why hide all the ancient history (buy up and hide OOPARTS, why the Vatican library is locked down with all of it's amazing treasures of knowledge etc). How does that serve the cabal. What is wrong with knowing that there have been waves of civilisation that ebb and flow? What is wrong with knowing that there were peoples from the South Pacific in S America tens of thousands of years before the Clovis peoples?
Well thank you for the kind words.
I think it serves them to keep stuff hidden because they have a narrative to uphold, and lies beget lies. Have you looked into the archeological sites that are locked to the public in NZ? e.g. http://www.celticnz.co.nz There a paleolithic/astrological observance sites, and even a pyramid, built along Egyptian lines and orientation, that go against the 'there were no people in NZ until the Maori got there' narrative ... There are 'Pakeha' (others?) in the northern Taranaki and King country that claim they have been there forever. Even the Maori speak of a red-haired people that were already living in NZ.
But NVM, there is a claim of we-wuz-indigenous peoples, that they want to implement via the UN. It is one powerful group of elites that have discovered how to influence politicians to get more power. Note that most Maoris don't even agree to all this. Quite disgusting, given all the different people: tiny shy fairy-like people living in caves near Rotorua, 'giant skeletons' found North of Raglan, etc. etc. that are quietly covered up and ignored. The official story is that there are no paleolithic remains, even as the carvings have celtic roots.
How dare you!!
I find the level of denial around the Kaimanawa Wall to be most bemusing. I do not see how signs of ancient ruins from great antiquity causes any kind of challenge to Maori views about being the tangata whenua - no reasonable person disputes that when Capt Cook sailed into view Maori were all over the place, so why does an obvious man-made wall from great antiquity constitute such a threat. I do not believe the rest of the world understands how incredibly shut-down and closed-minded NZ has become over the past 20 years. We are a real-world example of Plato's cave.
Agreed.
Nephelim
Religion often uses information as a control. A new documentary on this topic did an excellent job of showing the why, who and how. enter texthttps://youtu.be/crasHY5HCdI
Well .... now I am going to watch it.
Streisand effect. Me too.
Your screen name indicates you would know.
Me too...
Definitely worth it.
I watched EP01 and it is* an interesting show. The outrage collected here simply means that there is something to it. No reason why they'd all pounce like this if there wasn't something juicy in it.
I tend to agree with this statement though, I myself have realized a long while ago now that, most all the science that is accepted as fact because, they push it as fact, is nothing but a theory "someone came up with" in the first place and others just used their findings based off the first guys thoughts, when it comes to science/human/animal and earth history. We are a species with amnesia of our past for the most and it gets darker every generation that passes.
I have been tracking Hancock's progress for a while and he keeps making links that make sense - I know he gets criticised for building off other people's work - but I find he's pretty good at giving his sources and giving credit to those sources - so I think that is just more establishment 'credentialism' to avoid the fact that he keeps on asking really, really good questions. How come the Great Pyramid - is a scale model of Earth? How come the Sphinx has water erosion marks if it is only 4500 years old and Egypt wasn't wet 4500 years ago and to get those marks it would have to be over twice that old. How come the Sphinx points to where Leo would have been on midsummer's day 13000 years ago. If civilisation is only 4500 years old - WTF Goblecki Tepe in Turkey which is also 13000 years old. And on and on and on with the good questions - and archeaology just dismisses everything he says. We know on this forum here that when credential establishment figures dismiss something - they're basically covering something up.
Wierd criticism since that's supposedly literally what academia is
That too. They're desperate.
Of course they do the same thing to climatologists against the narrative, non-big-bang cosmologists, etc so this is 100% not a surprise, sadly.
The problem is that academia stays within its artificial sectored boundaries. which is not how knowledge was approached, even a few hundred years ago. Archeologists do not really talk to Geologists, for example. Which is weird if you think about it - they are both digging into soil and dating stuff. What Hancock is doing is joining their dots, which is outrageous to the establishment. The same thing happens between Psychologists and Strategic Management types. Again - weird - why would management strategy not include a measure of how mass psychology works?
The premise of Science is to take a theory and disprove it. These days, people are trying to make science concrete and irrefutable, (famously illustrated by Pelosi's "Science, Science, science" comment) but that is not what is supposed to happen. Those people who disprove hypotheses, like Hancock and Carlson, are now seen as heretics. REEEeeeEEE.
You're just supposed to shut up and believe the Great Pyramid was built at the beginning of the Egyptian civilization and their building skills rapidly declined thereafter.
Only because evil rulers hide truth
Yep, one of the first statments in the show was a guy interviewing Hancock and questioning why he couldn't just say this is weird and stop there?
Why did he have to make a theory around the weird?
I got so mad because making a theory around discovery is litterally what all of archeology does. Its all theoretical. It is all it will ever be. It is just the "accepted" theory. Doesn't make it fact.
What a joke these "intelectuals" are.
Same as it has ever been. Why do you think they were and still are pushing "Big Bang Theory" as if 100% proven Fact or "Fossil Fuel" as fact when it comes to Petroleum? Whomever controls the science decides on what to record it as being. All theories and people furthering their knowledge off those theories. Seems a good way for people to no longer be able to actually figure shit out in the long run unless, they scrap what they have been told and do as Graham has done, get out there and do your own research. heh.
Look him up on Rogan too. Aw well as Randall Carlson
By their own Standards shows like the History channel's Ancient Aliens should be cancelled and boycotted... but its not. So what gives about this Ancient Theory show that has their panties in a bunch
Biblical truths I’m sure
The point of the show is that our whole history was fabricated by the ruling class. That obviously includes the bible and all the religions they gave to the slave classes
Is that your stance, or the show’s??
Agreed.
It's not wild theories about aliens building stuff w/ a crazy dude w/ crazy hair. This guy is using carbon dating on subterranean structures that date back to pre-civilization time periods by tens of thousands of years... and finding underground lairs/buildings/etc. that go back even further.
I've never given too much credit to the wild Antarctica theories as they are mostly based on assumptions and outlandish ideas with nothing to back them up, but if this series goes into that, maybe this is the nerve he struck? Not sure yet, only got to EP01.
They block this but not the show 'Ancient Aliens'. Look here not there. One show may have some truth and one they can point and say 'look at the crazy conspiracy theorists'.
Notice Ancient Aliens never bring up Hancock, only Zach Sitchen (sp?) and and of course Von Daniken
Its a good starting point but don't expect the truth on netflix. Its obvious that all our known history is a fabrication, there's plenty out there to research.
What stands out to me is an archeologist telling people not to watch the show. Guess what I'm gonna do today?
That always stands out to me. I always notice when people ("experts") tell me not to see or not to hear because we are the educated folks who know better, and you should only listen to us. It doesn't necessarily mean the forbidden thing is all truth in its purest form, but it does mean there is truth to be found in it. This means there is a narrative that is fragile to opposing ideas. It means they are telling a lie.
The thing we must understand is that this is in everything. It's not just politics and medicine. Every single venue of human endeavor and exploration has been compromised to present a unified matrix that denies God and promotes isolation and hopelessness. Look to where they deny God, look into the things they ridicule and attack the most, look into what they are hiding, and you will find it all pointing to the truth they desperately want to conceal.
"All experts agree" is another one that makes me perk up. It is a statement that cannot be true, just like 99% of people voting for a dictator cannot be true. It means they have agreed upon what they will present as the truth, not that what they say is true. Their peers who disagree do so at their own peril, putting their careers, their reputations, and even their very lives in jeopardy. Those are the people worth listening to. That kind of conviction doesn't exist in the darkness.
One of the issues archeologists come up against is the subjective - mythological records. They like to view themselves as 'scientists' that pursue objective proofs - look a tooth, or a needle, and here is the carbon dating - or whatever. There is a very strong impulse to not stray into human word-of-mouth 'contamination'. This has kept them away from astronomy as well, which is very odd, because the star positions themselves are not really changing, but the whole sky shifts as the earth wobbles on its axis- which gave this odd re-orientation of the temple structures on Malta, that could not be explained via the structures themselves - except by saying that the people building the structures were not competent, or something.
I came across this anti-subjectivity idea in recent academic work, where the beaks were pressuring us to write a thesis according to positivist lines - i.e., form a hypothesis and then try to 'prove' it using objectivity. A battle with the beaks ensued: me pointing out that hypotheses can never be proven a la Popper, they can only be disproven. Them saying, but this is how it must be done. Me: no this is categorically NOT how it must be done. Get thesis study guide, and it is all about setting up interviews or surveys (as if this is objective)- rigidly sticking to what went before. i.e. start by forming a hypothesis from the literature. Jeez. What about current real-world problems? There are plenty of academic examples where subjectivity is allowed in because one is studying human morality or belief systems - take law for example. So, one can find humanities subjects that use subjectivity, and connect dots across disciplines, but the idea of multidisciplinary theses are still very rare.
So yes, academics are set in their ways, but there are notable divergencies, and one can certainly demonstrate a history of it. It's just that subjectivity must be defended more rigorously, because the positivists are so rigid in their thinking, and will jump on any conjecture - even as hypotheses are formed from that very conjecture.
This is cyclical in human history. A consensus view ossifies, and then all new data must conform to that. It doesn't change until the price of remaining with conformity is looking like a fool in the face of new ideas that have abundant proof in observation.
Astronomy and astrophysics are now reaching that point. For decades, new observations had to conform to the official story (or else), so they sprinkled fairy dust into the heavens and populated it with unicorns to save the theory, but that doesn't work anymore. The Big Bang is dead. Nothing they see confirms it, from the way stars operate to ubiquitous filamentary structures, gigantic orderly magnetic fields, and energetic beams that retain a linear structure despite being light years long. That is just mentioning a few things on a very long list.
A problem that contributes to this is specialization in education. There is little cross-disciplinary training from other sciences, so astronomers come up with ridiculous things like magnetic reconnection, which is literally impossible in this universe. Just a week of being educated in the well-known laws of electrodynamics would have preempted this particular form of nonsense coming from otherwise brilliant men and women.
https://www.leedskalnin.com/
Speaking of, here's Ed Leeskalnin's research on magnetic currents - how he constructed the coral castle - for anyone interested.
You seem to have broken the code, when are you going to build it?
Is there a particular person you recommend listening to? I got into the hollow earth theory about 15 years ago and need to know more about this.
Can you dm me that document?
Could you tell me more about your “holy location” or the holy locations of the world? Who are the Irish and Welsh and Scandinavians to you? I’ve always felt there was a reason they tried to kill the Irish language and a reason why the welsh protect theirs.
Thank you I'm gunna check this out
Fascinating
Assuming most of you aren't downloading it by alternate means, I'm a bit surprised how many of you are propping up Netflix by subscribing.
This. Came in to ask how to get to it without supporting pedos.
123moviestv.me
ETA: I use this site daily eith no issues
real hero
Ayy, been looking for a good mirror for this in my own time, even. Cheers!
Thanks, giving it a go, and Ancient Apoc came right up! And a download option? (Vince McMahon overwhelmed meme here)
(Wow what a selection!) Interestingly the bottom of the page has a blocked window in the comments, to prevent FB tracking. Still kind of blown away; you've seriously positively impacted our entertainment lives here, lol! Merry Christmas, my good man!
No problem! I still need to watch it myself
Yes. Following as well.
Downloading it now. Ooo arrrr, Jim lad!
https://1337x.to You can also try Usenet but it will help if you have a Usenet subscription
Edit again
The whole season was available by torrent four days ago
I use Newshosting. They have great retention and it doesn't cost much. I have downloaded tens of thousands of books and hundreds of thousands of MP3 files, including music and old time radio shows.
Usenet is more than just girlie photos.
Some places like T-Mobile include Netflix as a perk so you can still choose to not watch but you're paying indirectly until your "free" phones are paid off.
Oh man, if you're into this stuff check out the podcast with him and Randall Carleson. About an hour in, if I remember right, Randall discusses technology being released in the next few months that has been in the works and kept secret for a decade. One of which is a generator that runs on geometry. Exciting stuff!
Tesla?
I believe some of it is aligned with his theories yes. Supposedly they are releasing it all open source. Dangerous stuff, I pray that these folks are kept safe until it is released.
Oh I love him! I hadn’t heard of this series but would love to see it. I read his book, UnderWorld. He did an excellent job presenting theory and facts supporting the idea that humans have been way more advanced in history than we’ve been told. Proposing the shift of plates on the earth’s crust caused some areas to flood and others to rise. Since we mainly settle and therefore develop on coastal land, when that is flooded, civilization takes a step back. He had a geographer use the computer to map the land mass back in time & allowed the land to tell the story. For instance, sunken cities like off the coast of India and Cuba. Or huge boulders that go through the West, that had to be put there by rushing waters. On and on, he’s done so much research. If we only look at the pyramids around the world and the fact that we still can’t explain how to build them, or that granite is cut to perfect right angles or what I’ve seen myself which is perfect drill holes in granite in Peru.
I've been seeing more and more proof of the big flood come out around the world. The Grand Canyon shows fast erosion, not slow, for example. And if the flood was real, if Giants are real, if Sodom and Gomorrah were real...
There is good geologic evidence to support the flooding. Paleoclimate is the study of the Earth's climate over geologic time (my degree was in geophysics).
Temperature data over hundreds of millions of years comes from isotope ratios in fossilized shells, and on a shorter timeframe of hundreds of thousands of years from isotope ratios in ice from glaciers (Greenland and Antarctica).
The Earth is currently in an icehouse climate overall, but in a short period of warm temperatures called an interglacial.
Interglacials are geologically brief periods of warm temperatures, about halfway between the extremes of hothouse and icehouse. They last anywhere from 10,000 to 15,000 years on average. We are currently in the latter part of an interglacial that began approx. 11,000 years ago. The name of our current interglacial is the Holocene.
During the ice age, ocean levels were about 400 feet lower than they are currently due to all the water locked up in continental ice sheets. The ice of the continental ice sheets melt during the warm interglacials, and ocean levels rise as a result. This is the source of the flooding people are talking about.
As one example, during the ice age, the area that is now the south china sea was one of the best places on Earth to live, but is now under 150 feet of water (which would have been 250 feet above sea level during the ice age). That entire subcontinent flooded and became a shallow sea.
Bottom line: the stories about flooding are real, and occurred roughly 11,000 years ago at the start of our current interglacial. Sea levels rose 400 feet globally during this period due to the melting of the continental ice sheets.
One of my first redpills was learning how politicized archeology was.
Anthropology and sociology both quite the red pills
Oooh, how so?
indeed. It is amazing how panicked they are over this.
I also notice how the word theory is being pushed, whereas Hancock himself speaks of hypothesis.
Also, his interview on Brand Russel Channel is interesting.
I have been familiar with Hancock's views for quite some time and noticed how mainstream archeology is vehemently against postulating ancient knowledge of the heavens, the sole hypothesis of the alignment of the pyramids of Giza with the Orion belt, despite its obviousness, is fought tooth and nail. Not because he is wrong, but because it totally destroys mainstream narratives and views of historical developments.
added: https://www.zdf-studios.com/en/program-catalog/international/unscripted/history-biographies/ancient-apocalypse
Interestingly, ZDF, Zweites Deutsches Fernsehen, always had docus of high quality on their programming, and archived on their site.
Scroll down, and you' ll see the episodes.
Another way to watching is to download it via torrent. VPN required for safety. [rarbg dot to]/torrents.php?search=ancient.apocalypse
You have to go through a tiny captcha process.
added: https://yewtu.be/channel/UCT6Y5JJPKe_JDMivpKgVXew
This is a channel with 16 episodes, regarding the collapse of civilization in different locations of time and place. https://yewtu.be/channel/UCT6Y5JJPKe_JDMivpKgVXew
Just wanted to say THANK YOU for the torrent link you obfuscated. You've opened up a whole new world for me and gave purpose to my VPN account.
Yo HO Yo Ho A Pirates live for me .....
Although, in this case: I think the wording of the song needs updating to modern vernacular. ;-)
If your VPN supports port forwarding, turn that on and configure the port in your Bittorrent client.
You cannot watch the episodes from the zdf sure without a registration and it looks like they only want media people in the registry, not direct viewers
Some years ago I found and read a book called Forbidden Archaeology. I will find the book and let you know the authors. It details some serious anomalies in archaeological finds that conflict with the accepted archaeological storyline. The most damning fact of the book isn't the anachronistic finds, it is the measures taken to debunk, disenfranchise and suppress the discoveries that show the dogma of modern scientists. The cancel culture didn't start in the media, it started many decades ago in the scientific community. I watched the series on Netflix of Ancient Apocalypse and find the information provided to be plausible and compelling. In the mind of a true scientist, that means it requires more investigation, not suppression.
True, and logical- they had to control academia and 'education' in order to create the puppet armies in media, teaching, psychiatry etc.
https://humansbefree.com/2015/03/3-forbidden-archaeology-discoveries-that-will-rock-your-boat.html
“The most damning fact of the book isn't the anachronistic finds, it is the measures taken to debunk, disenfranchise and suppress the discoveries that show the dogma of modern scientists.”
Because they’re lazy and intrenched, exactly like the “scientists” who find it easier to attack Stefan Lanka than actually make an effort to understand his virus research:
Talk first.
Think later.
Read NEVER!
Read lots of old books.
You might be interested in this documentary, "What on Earth Happened."
https://rumble.com/vqhvzt-ewaranons-what-on-earth-happened-all-13-parts-full-15.11.2021.html
https://www.bitchute.com/video/U9qC2pHloqI9/
https://youtu.be/S972tpMDHMI
It was a well-produced docuseries that shot holes in a lot of mainstream archeological narratives. Like Covid-19, the fact one can't argue opposite of what we are told by the "professionals" without being smeared says everything we need to know. I have always wondered why archeologists ignore the obvious connections our ancestors made with the universe, but now it is clear that they have to ignore it because by admitting it they would also have to admit that there was a far advanced ancient culture likely smarter than we are today. Skewing results by selective omission in order to achieve a desired outcome is all this Cabal knows.
“Selective omission”
Man eating Giants.
Caleb was one of the baddest hombres to walk this earth.
Okay... I've known Graham for a long time. Not my cup of tea, but he is is on the right track. In fact he ain't stupid... which lends us to the current timeline. Either you are in or you are out.
Thanks, just started watching it. I love this kind of thing.
The Antediluvian period interests me the most, because of the question, How advanced did we get before the flood?
Very. Men lived for close to 1000 years.
I doubt they are actually worried about what Graham Hancock is going to say. After all his deal is: "there used to be an ancient civilization that had advanced knowledge of astrology and building etc, which was destroyed by a cataclysm at the end of the last ice age/ younger dryas." He suggests that the reason for the cataclysm was a series of comet strikes, a hypothesis that is gaining strength in paleo-archaeological circles. Archaeology also accepts that Gobekli Tepe was buried some 11,500 years ago so why is Graham's ideas which are nearly acceptable common sense seen as such a threat? These attacks suggest he is over the target, but which target? I doubt it is the "Younger Dryas was caused/ended in a world wide cataclysm". I doubt it is the "there used to be civilizations that were more advanced than we thought in prehistory." either. We have too much evidence of reasonably advanced prehistoric civilizations as it is. So what target is he over? I think they are worried that this will lead people to the idea that our sun is a recurring micro-nova and that the disasters that affect this planet are cyclical, occurring every 12 thousand years. That the climate change we are seeing is down to these changes which happen on a galactic level and that we are due the next one in the next 30 years.
I'm not seeing any "climate change" that can't easily be explained by sunshine and chemtrails.
I haven't watched it yet but I can tell you 1 thing with absolute certainty; there were more advanced cultures that came before us - we are the least advanced & most depraved of them all.
I don't think GEOTUS is depraved or less advanced.
I'll have to dispute your last statement; how depraved does an 'advanced' culture have to be, to believe they are above 'morality'?
It's very good and worth a watch- I'm 6 of 8 episodes through- not as full in explanation as some of his other stuff (but I think he's played it a bit safe for the mainstream and stuck mostly to questions)- he did a good podcast with Joe Rogan and Randall Carlson (Mathmetitcian, Geologist and yes, mason)
Joe Rogan Experience:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0H5LCLljJho
Another Randall Carlson vid with extremely interesting numerical wizardry:
HIDDEN MATHEMATICS - Randall Carlson - Ancient Knowledge of Space, Time & Cosmic Cycles
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R7oyZGW99os
Hidden history, another cabal control mechanism, is starting to unravel. From what I've read, they've been in control for tens of thousands of years and have orchestrated the rise and fall of many civilizations. Apparently interesting stuff will be coming out of Antarctica which is currently an off-limits continent reserved to the cabal alone.
...[ Khazarian Mafia ] not one mention yet in all this discussion, interesting, no
In my opinion all history is his story. World War II and before is pure fakeness. Look at old buildings with a consistent architecture around the world buried in the ground and it looks like a worldwide flood to me. Fake news didn’t just start in 2012 with sandy hook or 94 with okc. They’ve been faking it all forever
I watched it all.
Was pretty legit.
Anyone interested in a discussion of these ideas from a Christian perspective would enjoy the Blurry Creatures podcast in general, and probably the stuff with Timothy Alberino in particular. Look up his Empires of the Gods stuff.
Hancock has done some great work but he misses the fact that the Bible actually describes a time when a group of angels/Watchers/(call them aliens if you wish, they were alien to earth) chose to come to earth and intermarry with human women, thus creating giants and all manner of other weird things. Thus we get all the legends of gods and demigods etc.
Man had been given the right to rule Earth, but this crew wanted that for themselves and the only way to obtain it legally was to have offspring that were human enough to carry that right. So the giant offspring of the Watchers became the kings of empires, pointing all their people to worship their fathers the watchers. During that antediluvian time the "gods" walked among men, built incredible empires, etc etc.
Pretty crazy stuff.
For anyone interested, look into the works of Christian scholar Michael Heiser such as his Supernatural Seminar and his FringePop321 video channel. Fringepop explores archaeology and history including topics like these and ancient aliens. He unpacks what the Bible and other texts have to say about nephilim, watchers, and giants.
As long as he does not start with, "The Earth is only 6,000 years old." I will watch it.
I believe in young Earth but not held to a specific date. Much younger than billions. More than 10,000, less than 100,000. Where? Who knows.
Yeah, good stuff. They've had Michael Heiser on Blurry Creatures too.
Haven't seen the show yet. I wonder why his findings are known as promoting "racist conspiracy theories."
I have several Graham Hitchcock books. They are all very well researched and articulated. Hitchcock is one of the most foremost researcher and historian in the world.
I especially laughed at the woke criticism stating-- "The discussion of race in Ancient Apocolypse' is conspuous by its absence. Hancock does not need to identify the individuals in the myths he describes as white because most of his audience already knows it. This is what permits him to conceal what archaeologists recognize as implicit racism in the theory."
On the Hierarchy of Argument scale, this is the lowest level of refutation and is called 'Name calling'. If "implicit racism in the theory" has actually been adopted in the field of archaeology, it is the weaponization of this field of science. No real intelligence or critical thinking is required from making reckless statements like this. It certainly is at the opposite end of the Hierarchy of Argument from "Refuting the Central Point'.
Now I want to see it. Sound like it covers the flood and other Biblical events
IF anyone is interested they can be found here:
https://duckduckgo.com/?t=ffcm&q=Ancient+Apocalypse&atb=v353-3&iax=videos&ia=videos
Now I want to watch this. I've been watching a lot of the work of Robert Sepehr lately which is pretty awesome and seems to come to the same conclusions.
Me too. Discovered Sepehr through Ashlanddog. He's fascinating. I can't get enough.
Same
I've been reading the book: The Adam and Eve Story The History of Cataclysms. It touches on some similar stuff. Here is the cia link to some of it. https://acrobat.adobe.com/link/review?uri=urn:aaid:scds:US:38fc9138-7671-320d-97c9-69157fa261fe
Great series!
Very spicy!
F netflix, he has hours of video on youtube. He has been around for years and doesn't go near "Ancient Aliens".
This is good to hear.
Ancient Aliens. What a joke!
I watched all 8 episodes and found them highly Intriguing. How and why were those huge sites built? Cavemen didn't do it lol.
I just watched a few hours of his stuff. Facinating for sure. Odd it's on here now.
No it's not. Normal People stuff.
Thank you libs for pointing out something i didnt know i should watch!!!
HIStory is a giant lie.
Dinasours, as we know them, arent real
What’s bad about it?