If you consider yourself 'Awakened', you should be familiar with this pending SCOTUS case.
(americanmediaperiscope.com)
Comments (137)
sorted by:
I will be holding my breath. Wish me luck.
u/#kek
Don't hold too long, not at precipice yet. People have to see things get bad.
I don't know.
The Precipice thing has been severely latched on to because, I think, folks have needed to somehow quantify or justify the Plan not unfolding as they expected. There is a real desire to have some sort of timeline, to have some sense of if, when, and for that reason, "The Precipice" has become a hook to lay the reasoning on.
"We're not at the precipice yet."
Q referred to the precipice in 4 drops:
2254
4407
4641
4685
But we should note:
Already, in post 2254 Q stated "We are at the precipice". So what does this mean?
Also, opinion: I think we are most certainly already at the precipice. I don't think the precipice is an incident, or event, but is a state of being. And in many ways, we're already there.
Q referred to the precipice with a nod to the film The Day the Earth Stood Still. In some ways, humanity has been at the precipice for decades now.
It's just an opinion, but I wouldn't place a lot of emphasis on being either at or not at "the precipice", because how are we to really know? There are a lot of people at the precipice as we speak. What defines "the precipice"? Q does not offer a definition. All Q is pointing out is that the people need some stimulus to discover their inner strength, will, to change.
I think that's an ongoing process. We're at the precipice, but there might be a LOT of tottering to happen while everyone wakes up.
Anyway, random thoughts.
I agree, I think you can only know the precipice after it's reached.... looking back at historical events. And even then everyone after us will claim 'this' or 'that' was IT. And they'll all be somewhat correct as the precipice for everyone living it will be different events.
Well stated anon. Each individual will have their own precipice, no doubt.
Strictly speaking of societies and populations, it wouldn't take much to spur America. Shit, a repeat of the 70s gas crisis would do it. Or, it doesnt even have to be gas.... Cant buy cigarettes, booze, gas, groceries, etc? That'll cause the normie working class silent majority to go postal!
After all, the only reason they haven't went all torches and pitchforks is they've had the underlying support of routine/survival to fall back on...
"Wait... So gas is $10 a gallon, it's rationed, there's no vices for me to purchase to relieve stress... And even if I could at least work and provide an income for my family I can't because I spent all day attempting to buy gas, smokes, etc so I could keep on keeping on in the labor/tax slave system? Well... Time for torches!"
Turn off the part of the machine that keeps the working class repeating their routine and then you'll see the public at the precipice faster than Creep Joe's leg hair turning blonde at a Summer pool party.
We keep talking about economic and authoritarian precipes but what about the physical precipes that our bodies can endure with all the weapons being used against us.... poisoning our food and water, chemtrails, fluoride, 5G, vaxes.......
What happens when all the vaxxed find out the truth about what was put in them. That may be bigger than economic collapse
I agree, the precipice has been reached by many, some are saying we need complete economic destruction like Venezuela. I don't believe that at all. The chess pieces had to be moved into place. Twitter was a main piece allowing the left narrative to be countered, now there will be a steady drip drip drip of red pills. A major drop will trigger a shutdown of all media, but the steady drip makes it extremely difficult for them to counter.
I think there has already been the drip, drip, drip.
I suspect that what we are on the precipice of is a fire hydrant of volume. It will build and build, but I think the drip phase is probably over.
Take a listen to the first 40 minutes (especially between the 20min/45min mark) of Defected #4 (Just Human and Burning Bright) - they discuss this topic, about twitter specifically. I like the way they think.
https://rumble.com/v1xhqnu-defected-ep-4-sun-900-pm-et-.html
I don't think there will be economic destruction like Venezuela either. But I know the economy and market will crash big time, there is irrefutable evidence that we are headed for a major crash.
Based on the EO stating that the DS assets are to be confiscated, how do you think that plays out? Q talks about a restructuring, I'm thinking of it sort of like a monopoly game, where near the end someone has all the assets, but someone steps in and says hey you cheated, you need to give the money back.
Redistribution of wealth to the tax payers and victims of their crimes against humanity (this includes financial crimes as stated in the EO)
It is different for everyone. I am at the precipice financially especially with my business. Personally, health and spiritually I continuing to grow and trust God's plan no mater what happens on the financial end, especially since it is just a form of slavery anyway. I would prefer whatever happens to happen sooner rather than later.
very thoughtful comment, Frac
謝謝你
:) what does that mean?
Its "thank you" in Chinese. I'm giving respect to the Chinese people protesting against the tyranny.
:)
Plan unfolding as expected. People have taken opinions Nd guesses and tried to enshrine rhem in the plan. The plan is the plan and Q was clear, we don't know it.
Just not as WE (general) expected.
In other words, agreed.
This is a way for ther deepstate to lull people into inaction. "You think it's bad? Not yet, wait for the precipice. We said there would be a precipice."
Next thing you know you've got top bunk at camp FEMA.
I think I've heard that a million times. The problem is, if the plan is to lull us into inaction, why did Q cause so many people to wake up to the corruption? A public awake is their greatest fear.
It's a good question. I woke up without Q and maybe it was just happening anyways. Maybe Q was some autistic genius who knew a lot but ultimately no arrests ever happened. I think trump found out later on about Q and he likes being popular so he started participating and syncing his posts with Q dates. I sure hope I'm wrong but so far the result of Q seems to keep people relatively calm and not taking action whereas maybe without his posts people would have Hobbs head on a pike by now. Wake people up because it was happening anyways in exchange for inaction. Maybe that's what the geniuses at the think tank came up with. I mean no one has been arrested and no election has been overturned and a lot of the military got gutted during Obama's time.
I suspect it was a CIA crafted psy ops. They have tons of experience with all kinds of psy ops which have been implemented here and overseas.
Keep people calm and placated by creating this idea and movement where there are super secret and powerful white hats within all of the government and they are secretly working on taking down the bad guys.....but you don't see it or hear about it.....and everything bad that happens is actually good because "you're watching a movie" and "trust the plan, it had to be this way."
You can keep people believing for decades using this formula. Especially with all of the nuances such "oh, you don't see anything yet because all the normies have to be woken up first."
And here we are with 3 stolen elections, a sick and dying economy where thousands are losing their livelihoods each day, we are getting poorer, the globalists are growing more powerful and richer, people are dying, political prisoners have been rotting away for years in jail, zero arrests of any notable corrupt leadership have been made, etc.
Very well stated.
Violet! You're turning violet, Violet!
I've heard that can cause moderate to severe hiccups.
Thanks for the article. I've been scouring around, trying to follow this. This was the best part of the article:
Vote in Favor
If the Justices vote in favor of the petition:
Will the U.S. Marshals and Secret Service remove the 388 members? If removed, will they be replaced by qualified U.S. military officers to carry on the business of the United States of America in continuity-of-government maneuver? Will the removed members be indicted and tried for treason or a lesser offense? Will both the 2020 and 2022 elections be disqualified and replaced with a secure election at some point in 2023?
This could explain SO MUCH!
<passes hopium>
PS do you have any idea when this is going to be heard? I can't find it on Scotus calendar.
US Marshals are in the DOJ under the AG. Not gonna do anything regardless of how the court rules. Secret Service is in Homeland Security under Mayorkas. Again, nothing. The military is the only way. I doubt an obscure case will be the trigger, but let's see.
Retired military officer here. I will gladly come out of retirement to restore true justice to our country.
Thank you for your service. You may be needed one day to serve again.
Our family as well.
Good points. Let's see what happens. Roe v Wade gave me so much hope, I'm sure that anything can happen now!
I agree that an obscure case from seemingly out of nowhere could be the trigger... but then again, Hunter's laptop came from an Apple repair shop owner. Perhaps prescribing obscurity to massive "wins" is a move on the chessboard.
Judging by the current state of our military, not so sure this is the answer everyone has been hoping for. Basically the command structure are complete political woke hacks and the based rank and file have been mostly purged. Those that remain have demonstrated that they will follow illegal orders to keep their jobs and the command has done nothing to protect these soldiers. This was deliberate and done as a means to remove the military option off the table.
Or it's an unintended consequence of putting so much energy into the Invasion of Iraq and now for 20 years multiple generations of young people have seen thousands of fellow youths die for oil companies and Dick Cheney's PMC friends, all while never finding the promised and obviously false reason for the invasion in the first place... And yet the ongoing loss continues.
Yes, those things have contributed to the downturn in recruitment. But, those things you mention speak more to forces outside of the actual military itself - the complex of government and private industry that use our military to achieve political and commercial benefit. What I am talking about is the condition within our military itself. It has been a slow and deliberate destruction of the rank and file soldier which leaves us extremely vulnerable. The constant repetition of the mantra that the military is our only answer does not seriously consider the consequences of that reality. Military takeovers are never good for the people - especially when that military is compromised to the state that ours is.
True
Garland, and Mayorkas were appointments by an illegal regime, they would not have any legal authority over the DOJ and DHS. They would lose their power. This is a massive house of cards that will be coming down.
They haven't granted the petition yet - https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/docket/docketfiles/html/public/22-380.html , not sure what the timeline looks like for that.
Oh yes, that makes sense, thank you for that. Let me rephrase - how do you think we can find out when they will do the process of granting the petition?
I'm both embarrassed and amazed that I don't understand this process.
Spoiler alert - they are not granting the petition.
Yeah I'm not too sure, looking at their case distribution schedule page, I think they may decide in early December perhaps? https://www.supremecourt.gov/casedistribution/casedistributionschedule.aspx
Thank you, fren, now isn't all of this VERY INTERESTING!
That you Dave? kek
It’s not going to be heard. SCOTUS (unlike most appellate courts) has almost complete discretion as to what cases it hears and it doesn’t - it will deny cert on this case. Not dooming, just a lawfag.
I agree lawfag here too. Anyone can file. The government lawyers waived responding because they know it will be denied.
Probably depends on what dirt the cabal has on the justices and how much real integrity they have. These are not dumb people. They know out politicians have been taken over by foreign actors. I’m still trying to decide if the early “roe vs wade” vote was integrity or just ammo for the Democrats to use for midterms.
Could you give a lowly normfag the ELI5 on what this case is even about?
And what makes it obvious that SCOTUS will decline?
Thanks for helping us put this in context, fren.
Juan o savin talked about this today with Micheal Jaco. It's a pretty good watch.
https://rumble.com/v1xce96-juan-o-savin-lays-out-the-plan-for-return-of-cic-trump-and-scotus-treason-c.html
This is the part I needed clarification on and the article helped somewhat:
I'm trying to get this story to folks like Patel Patriot, Brian Cates, and Clandestine. More Patriots and Anons need to be bringing awareness to this court case. I've only heard Nino and his guests talking about this.
ReTruth the Brunson v Adams story. We need to get this trending!
Patel Patriot and Patrick Gunnel discussed it on their recent Devolution Power Hour 101, I think.
https://rumble.com/v1xcke0-devolution-power-hour-101-featuring-patrick-gunnels.html
Or it was Just Human and Burning Bright.
https://rumble.com/v1vtrma-defected-ep-3-sun-900-pm-et-.html
Or both (sometimes these podcasts create a blur in my mind - I only listen to the audio, and don't watch the videos.)
I'm pretty sure it is on their radar. Whoever it was I was listening to yesterday, they pointed out that its merely on the docket, that pretty much any qualifying petition etc, can go on the docket, and that it does NOT mean the case has been accepted.
RT'ed it last night, got some traction - and then donated to both of the Brunson's bigly.
Addendum:
https://t.me/realjust_human/10700
Just Human #155: Brunson v. Adams, Trump's Dinner w/ Ye, Jones Appt'd Monitor, Huawei & ZTE Banned
REPLAYS:
DLive- https://dlive.tv/p/dlive-zgorsvigpe+g6c-imKVg
Foxhole- https://share-link.pilled.net/topic-detail/511975
Rumble- https://rumble.com/v1xkaem-just-human-155.html
https://rumble.com/v1xi6vh-juan-o-savin-112722-video-b.html
Not a Juan O fan but this vid has a good explanation of what and where this is at with SCOTUS
Haven't listened to the podcast yet, (I plan to), but if Juan O is promoting or espousing this as a big thing, I'm very disinclined to have much expectation.
This is an EXCELLENT intro to this case.
I watched it in full yesterday, which got me on the train to find out more.
The video does a really good job explaining how the case came to be and the steps that have been taken so far.
But it was extremely sad when Mr. Brunson said that doing all of the work to get it to the Supreme Court was possible because none of the three brothers involved had wives or kids or jobs that would distract them.
Yeah. Thought that was really kinda ... well, I think a lot of us are in this especially because of our wives/husbands, kids, rels, etc.
His idea makes perfect sense. If the traitors try to mess with the scotus in their last month then scotus just eliminates them all.
Is Juan the guy in the top right?
Do I hope something comes of this? Absolutely. Do I think something will come of this? Nope.
https://www.cruz.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/sen-cruz-we-have-an-obligation-to-the-constitution-to-ensure-that-this-election-was-lawful
https://www.cruz.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/joint-statement-from-senators-cruz-johnson-lankford-daines-kennedy-blackburn-braun-senators-elect-lummis-marshall-hagerty-tuberville
Above links refer to the 10-day audit that was proposed before certification of 2020 elections
This is a nothing burger until SCOTUS accepts the case. They have thrown out do many vital cases like this that there's little point getting your hopes up.
If it sounds too good to be true, it probably is. This isn't even hitting any blogs because it's likely garbage. There are plenty of lawfags who could step up here to trumpet what this is, and, better, the chances of it being anything at all. No one is stepping up. Why? Likely because it's crap. Again.
I suspect youre right, but lets face it; We have NO IDEA what the plan is.
NO FUCKING IDEA
Weve been guessing and datefagging and decoding for 5 years now.
And we have ___ ___________ ______
Trying to fill in the blanks... I'm guessing it's December 12th, 2022!
/s
I'd like to solve the puzzle.
Yep. I mean, we have ideas, actually, but they are basically ideas.
What we DO have is a clear knowledge of what WE need to do, and HOW to do it. We've been honing our skills for 5 years.
When the time hits, we'll be ready steady.
I'd be able to trust a plan much better if I knew a bit more about it and saw some actual evidence that the plan was being implemented. At some point Q said that only 20% would be made public, but then Q changed that to 40% being made public. (Correct me if I'm wrong here.) So, question this is: Where's the 40%? Because, by my estimate, we've seen around 2% being made public. Go to Reddit, one of the most popular forums in the world, and post on /politics what you really think and believe about Trump, then report back here to us what your experience is.
Great Awakening? Sure, for a good minority. But we're far far far from done.
There are very few lawfags here that I know of... Simonsays and WinsAnon being the only two I can recall. 😔
I feel like I haven’t seen WinsAnon on here in forever. Then again, I haven’t been on very much lately so maybe that’s why. 🤷🏼♀️😬
Lawfag here - the SCOTUS will not grant cert on this case, do not hit the hopium.
and you know this how. SCOTUS grants small % for sure but you can't know
I'm an attorney. I looked at some of the procedural history and, while I have not made an exhaustive search, I have read a few of the rulings in this case.
On January 6, 2022 this case was dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The court ruled that he did not have standing, and that the government has not waived sovereign immunity.
Brunson appealed this ruling, and the answer stayed the same. The most recent ruling was this month actually.
Looks like a nothingburger.
I will happily look more into it if anyone can point to something to the contrary. But this is why I don't trust these blogs. The last point especially in the blog, that "If the justices don't vote in favor, they may be charged with treason" is especially ridiculous. Absolute fantasyland.
Last, there is nothing to suggest that SCOTUS will accept cert in this case. Extremely unlikely.
Thanks, lawfagAnon. I rest my case. More smoke being blown up our collective asses.
u/simon_says hopefully will have something to say about it!
Military being the only way means we will suffer incalculable loss and failure, especially at the highest levels like the SCOTUS. Aside from some small achievements, comparatively, the memory hole contains infinite nothing burgers and empty promises.
Saw this on a substack…might have some teeth here…definitely keeping an eye on it.
I think people need to be realistic in their expectations of this. People tend to get excited when they hear the Supreme Court is involved, but many people don't know that out of the 7,000+ cases people petition to the Supreme Court in a year, only about 100 will actually go before the Justices.
Just because a case has been presented to them doesn't mean that the SC has to hear it.
Having hope is a good thing, but if that hope is based on not understanding how the SC works....that usually turns into a lot of people being upset.
Excellent post. Thank you.
Wow!
Their website for any contributions and doc downloads.
https://7discoveries.com/
Their website for doc downloads and contributions
https://7discoveries.com/
👀
Great, fren, thank you!
This case is a joke. We should stop discussing it. This will be slam dunked out of SCOTUS 9-0. They wont take the petition.
The case was filed by pro se plaintiff. His case was dismissed by the district court for lack of jurisdiction. It specifically doesn’t opine on the merits of his case. Meanwhile the petition doesn’t really address the jurisdiction issue directly, makes a poor argument for standing, and tells the court the FTCA is unconstitutional so throw it out. On the last part, I don’t think he raised this argument before. Otherwise the trial court would have addressed it, even briefly, in their order dismissing the case. And they did not.
Finally, he asks the court for relief which they could not grant. He wants SCOTUS to tell the district court to grant his claims. Uh…what? There has been no trial. That isn’t how this works. You can’t ask the court to just grant your claims. The best they could do would be to find standing as well as subject matter jurisdiction. Then remand to district court.
Basically, this case is dead as a door nail. Not going to be granted. And it shouldn’t be. The causes of action are legally specious and amplified by a lot of hyperbole instead of supported by facts. I know this because I took 30 minutes of my life I won’t be getting back to read thru the case filings. Do yourselves a favor and tune this case out…it is pretty foolish to think this is going anywhere.
I have a hard time arguing with that. And I have no doubt that I cant compete with your legal arguments. That's why I said "should be familiar with it". I picked those words pretty carefully.
There's just something about it that doesn't immediately dismiss itself to me.
This case should absolutely dismiss itself to you
Why should people be familiar with it if it's essentially trash?
Why doesn't it dismiss itself to you?
You're basing these things on feelings. All lawfags agree this is a waste of time, put down the hopium.
I 100% do not place my faith in lawyers.
Look where having a government full of lawyers has gotten us.
FUCK LAWYERS. (yes I mean you)
I place my faith in citizen-rebels, as our founding father did.
Where do you think the judges on the supreme court, in whom you're placing your faith, got their start?
I know how this game works.
Objection.
Defense is asking a question that requires conjecture. He doesn't know in whom I place my faith.
You are exactly right on all points, especially on the relief requested making no sense. If Juan O Savin has been pushing it as a plausible case, it tells everyone all you need to know about the veracity of following that particular line of mis-info. Btw, it took you 30 minutes.... slow reader lol :) Issues presented gave the game away.
Exactly, isn’t gonna happen... now, that being said, in the event something does - I’ll eat my hat and post me eating said hat online.
No way that this is the way. This isn’t the way you wake up the normies, they’ll just refuse to believe and only think that this was Trumps doing. Then you’ll see a civil war. I don’t believe that would ever happen either... it’s just, this is a gigantic nothing burger of false hope. Just being realistic.
Yes this Brunson fella was on Ninos Corner. Could be promising.
Article:
I believe it is on the docket. This does NOT mean that the Supreme Court has taken the case. It means that it will consider whether or not it will take the case.
https://www.counselpress.com/page_blog_single.cfm?bid=11
https://www.scotusblog.com/2009/12/glossary-of-legal-terms/
Awesome Clarification, Frac.
This is fascinating case. Just listened to Nino's podcast where he had this guy on. I'm hopeful but cautious
The fact that the case was brought "By the people" and not accusing the D's or the R's of election fraud but accuses Congress of not following the law as it stands and actively blocking it (it being the 10-day rule) which a lot of us were screaming about in 2020 not only gives this standing it's almost assured a slam dunk 9-0 vote. Merry Christmas!
FB is blocking the link. I tried to post it tonight. If FB is blocking it they must be scared of it. If they knew for sure it was going nowhere they would want us to post it, to make us look crazy and desperate.
This was a shoddy article. The author claims that no other news outlet, specifically on the right, has reported this, which is false. It is an interesting case, which I read when a different news outlet first reported it. But, let's see if anything happens with it.
I disagree. The author posited two scenarios, which are plausible. Begone, doomer!
The author CLEARLY stated that no other news outlet had reported on it. Here it is: "But with “national emergency” language added to the second submission of the petition it begs the question relating to the alternative news outlets, such as Zero Hedge, Unz.com, Breitbart, and The Gateway Pundit failing to cover this story—as of this writing Monday at 12 noon—that resides in the public domain"
That is a false statement, hence shoddy work.
Am I the only one who first read the url in the OP as “American Diaper Scope”? 🤣
If we win this case it changes everything across the country. Not just Federal elections but State elections, county elections, school boards, everything.
Talk about cutting off the head of the serpent.
.MILITARY IS THE ONLY WAY.
Nov 23 2022-**Waiver of United States of right to respond **submitted.
https://www.supremecourt.gov/docket/docket.aspx?Search=22
Thanks for that, fren!
yw i wish more would read this
Oh Please, Please, Please vote in favor.
So the claim is that procedure was not followed by Congress.
NOT that there was election fraud.
Will this actually gain some traction? Will this get somewhere? Some new hopium? Hmm....
As what would that do to the KJB SCOTUS appointment?
Inception level stuff here...
Imagine if KJB also rules in favor of the case!
The case is great, i remain hopeful.
2025-2033 is the window for our timeline to evolve.
This article is way overblowing things, especially the timescale. A brief answer to all the questions at the end of the article: No. No, none of those things will happen. Obviously SC justices are not going to randomly be arrested by SOMEONE by denying a petition.
And even if they do hear it, nothing happens automatically. The 388 or whatever people are not immediately arrested or anything. As is said in the brief being analyzed, the issue is a Justice branch issue, and they are asking the court to draw some distinct lines between two SC-supported legal frameworks. But since that line had not been drawn yet, you can't arrest people for crossing a line that didn't exist at the time.
Also, do y'all really want to set the precedent that Trump's 2025 confirmation can just be pushed back by any rando saying they have concerns?
Where in the world are they getting the idea that SCJs will be arrested for refusing to hear this case? There are 7,000+ cases petitioned to the SC each year, and they only hear around 100 of them.
The article writers probably know that and are just trying to whip up clicks from places like here by making outrageous claims to benefit off that second-hand hopium
Loy Brunson asks Donald Trump Questions at Freedomfest
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ek5ehj968nE
Coincidence?