Trump files RICO against HILLARY R. CLINTON, HFACC, INC., DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL COMMITTEE, DNC SERVICES CORPORATION, PERKINS COIE, LLC, MICHAEL SUSSMANN, MARC ELIAS, DEBBIE WASSERMAN SCHULTZ, CHARLES HALLIDAY DOLAN, JR., JAKE SULLIVAN, JOHN PODESTA, ROBERT E. MOOK, PHILLIPE REINES, FUSION GPS, GLENN SIMPSON, PETER FRITSCH,
NELLIE OHR, BRUCE OHR, ORBIS
BUSINESS INTELLIGENCE, LTD., CHRISTOPHER STEELE, IGOR DANCHENKO, NEUSTAR, INC., RODNEY JOFFE, JAMES COMEY, PETER STRZOK, LISA PAGE, KEVIN CLINESMITH, ANDREW MCCABE, JOHN DOES 1 THROUGH 10 (said names
being fictious and unknown persons), and
ABC CORPORATIONS 1 THROUGH 10
The Defendants, ABC Corporations 1 through 10, are corporate entities presently unidentifiable to the Plaintiff, including, but not limited to, media companies, publication companies, editorial companies, municipalities, state or federal agencies, law enforcement authorities, investigative agencies, political organizations, political affiliates, private firms and/or other duly authorized corporate or governmental entities who caused or contributed to the incident or incidents for which the Plaintiff seeks damages, and/or are vicariously and/or otherwise liable for the acts, commissions, or other culpable conduct of those who did cause or contribute to the incidents alleged.
Which MSM will cover the other MSM going into court? They all colluded together and are named as Defendants if they did collude with Hillary or the DNC. Judging by the MSM's stories, writ large, they breathlessly reported total and complete BS for over 2 years.
This is a MOAB court filing if the judge accepts the case.
So much spin, they can now identify as an apache helicopter.
The suit also contains some factual inaccuracies and some of the same grandiose or exaggerated false claims that Trump has made dozens of times.
The civil suit alleges that Clinton and top Democrats hired lawyers and researchers to fabricate information tying Trump to Russia, and then peddled those lies to the media and to the US government, in hopes of hobbling his chances of winning in 2016. Trump claims they were assisted by "Clinton loyalists" at the FBI, who abused their powers to investigate him out of political animus.
CNN has reached out to many of the defendants for comment. Some attorneys for defendants named in the lawsuit were still digesting it on Thursday.
"We haven't had a chance to read the complaint, but knowing the former President, there's probably very little in there that's true," said Aitan Goelman, who represents former FBI official Peter Strzok.
The Clinton campaign did pay researchers to dig up dirt about Trump and Russia, and well-connected Democrats took some of their findings to law enforcement, believing possible ties between Trump and Russia were worth investigating But many of the key elements of Trump's far-reaching accusations in the lawsuit have previously been debunked by the Justice Department inspector general and by a bipartisan report from the Senate Intelligence Committee.
I don't see how Trump expects to win in the same court system that would lend huge credence to the justice department inspector general and Senate intelligence committee reports. Both of those sources say the things Trump is accusing are not true. So how is Trump expecting to win?
It really doesn't matter what the Judges Opinion is, it is a Civil Lawsuit, and Trumps Team can introduce anything and everything under the sun.....
Plus it'll be a Jury Court, which means that the odds of getting a Conviction are really, really, Good....
And then AFTER Conviction, comes the Criminal Trial from all the Crimes introduced in the Civil Court, and That Judge will be Barred from the Picking and Choosing of ""Allowable Evidence""......
Once the crimes are introduced in one Court, it has to be accepted in another court.....
I... suspect they shopped venues a tiny bit, to find a place where it would be accepted. The filing is pretty brutal- the statement of facts looks very solid.
Who the hell watches Fake News nowadays anyway? They are viewed by a fraction of a percent of the population. CNN viewership: 400,000. U.S. population: 330 million. Do the math.
Most people don't watch cable news anymore, as shown by your figures. But most people read their news in online articles from the various MSM sources. It's not very insightful to look at cable news watcher numbers when that's just not what's popular anymore. But more than enough people read CNN online articles, and I'd bet that number is much much higher than the TV viewers. MSM is still very, very relevant and read by most normies. Don't fool yourself.
"The meaning of RICO law, or the "Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act," is that it is a law that allows authorities to punish offenders engaging in criminal activities, particularly racketeering.
"For example, RICO law punishes crime bosses who order their subordinates to carry out criminal activities for them."
This timing is not an accident. It was highly planned. This seems to have just popped out above the sea of absolute catastrophe that is flooding us, and I am betting it is because it actually has something to do with current situations, more than an election six years ago that he won.
Q said evidence in court is how you get evidence out to the world. This seems like the perfect way to do it. And if that is the purpose, perhaps 'winning' takes the form of classified evidence distribution to the masses and not a jury ruling. Or both maybe.
I think he'll be lumped in with the Bidens. Either that or he ratted them all out to save his scrawny ass so that he can go back to Africa and attempt to become King of Kenya or something.
Finally, we are getting somewhere! Let's see what discovery is produced! So Trump is suing in civil court and Durham goes after her criminally! Does this mean Durham is soon to bring down the hammer on good old Hillary?
I shit you not that quote has stuck out with me ever since I read it. Now rereading this post and looking at current events, HOLY FUCK, does this post make a lot of sense.
This is why they're all suddenly "testing positive" for "COVID"
It's comms that they've been arrested, subpoenaed, something!
Bingo
and I'll bet "vaccinated" means they think they're protected, or they're in a safe location for the time being
buckle up!
That's a good decode, I'll have to remember that one....
maybe we should all look back a few months and see who else announced "testing positive" for COVID...
Good idea, it might clue us in on how many of them have had some type of Legal Proceedings brought against them....
Because we already know they ALL used IVM against Coveve....
It makes sense to start with civilian Court battles leading into military tribunals
I got this from telegram
Trump files RICO against HILLARY R. CLINTON, HFACC, INC., DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL COMMITTEE, DNC SERVICES CORPORATION, PERKINS COIE, LLC, MICHAEL SUSSMANN, MARC ELIAS, DEBBIE WASSERMAN SCHULTZ, CHARLES HALLIDAY DOLAN, JR., JAKE SULLIVAN, JOHN PODESTA, ROBERT E. MOOK, PHILLIPE REINES, FUSION GPS, GLENN SIMPSON, PETER FRITSCH, NELLIE OHR, BRUCE OHR, ORBIS BUSINESS INTELLIGENCE, LTD., CHRISTOPHER STEELE, IGOR DANCHENKO, NEUSTAR, INC., RODNEY JOFFE, JAMES COMEY, PETER STRZOK, LISA PAGE, KEVIN CLINESMITH, ANDREW MCCABE, JOHN DOES 1 THROUGH 10 (said names being fictious and unknown persons), and ABC CORPORATIONS 1 THROUGH 10
in a 108 page filing that I’m reading now.
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.flsd.610157/gov.uscourts.flsd.610157.1.0_2.pdf
@TracyBeanzOfficial
Tracy found the court filing here
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/63184300/trump-v-clinton/
He's publicly/legally going after the media, too -- sweet!!
Best news I've heard in a long time (and there's been lots of good news during this March Madness).
Where do you see the part about going after the media too?
"" and ABC CORPORATIONS 1 THROUGH 10""
Check out #41 (page 12). This is the court filing.
Cc: u/HOSEQ
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.flsd.610157/gov.uscourts.flsd.610157.1.0_2.pdf
He is suing for treble damages (or 3x the amount) $24 million x3 = $72 million.
See the Damages section, pages 70-71. #314 lists the $24M as a kind of "below the actual damages" which are "still accruing".
Edit: that $24M is just his expenses
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.flsd.610157/gov.uscourts.flsd.610157.1.0_2.pdf
Trump files RICO against:
HILLARY R. CLINTON,
HFACC, INC.,
DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL COMMITTEE,
DNC SERVICES CORPORATION,
PERKINS COIE, LLC,
MICHAEL SUSSMANN,
MARC ELIAS,
DEBBIE WASSERMAN SCHULTZ,
CHARLES HALLIDAY DOLAN, JR.,
JAKE SULLIVAN,
JOHN PODESTA,
ROBERT E. MOOK,
PHILLIPE REINES,
FUSION GPS,
GLENN SIMPSON,
PETER FRITSCH,
NELLIE OHR,
BRUCE OHR,
ORBIS BUSINESS INTELLIGENCE, LTD.,
CHRISTOPHER STEELE,
IGOR DANCHENKO,
NEUSTAR, INC.,
RODNEY JOFFE,
JAMES COMEY,
PETER STRZOK,
LISA PAGE,
KEVIN CLINESMITH,
ANDREW MCCABE,
JOHN DOES 1 THROUGH 10 (said names being fictious and unknown persons),
and ABC CORPORATIONS 1 THROUGH 10
(such an awesome list deserves paragraphs)
I'm sorry, where's John Brennan?
Maybe he flipped? Or maybe he is visiting no name?
Probably included in the Federal Agencies
That's my guess. He was CIA director then.
Or shifty pencil neck?
What a great name you gave him. Thanks for the good laugh.
That moniker is from Trump (so it is naturally great).
One leeds to another.................
John Doe #2 ??
Well, this about covers them ALL!
Something something placeholders something... ?
True anons should be digging into the drops and finding parallels in the mysterious numbers Q always referenced when talking about classified things
I think Q used [class 1-99] and not 1-10. But good point anyway...
Who is Bathhouse Barry?
Big Mike's cock pocket!
LOL
Micheal Lavauhgn Robinson do love him some Obama butthole
Oh please, maybe we can't have everything, at least not right away.
And maybe Bathhouse Barry flipped.
Q 3852 “How do you introduce evidence legally? Hunters become the hunted...caught them all.
http://qalerts.app/?n=3852
http://qalerts.app/media/3caf8a2f68f06ccf0398085b17a605c3a631b6c6950568bfd9669f56712b36e4.png
u/#trumpsalt
This is perfect
u/#jail
u/#arrest
Thats beautiful.
Oh, what beautiful video.
This too, is perfect.
cunt only going through these ape motions to pander to her smoothies. fuck I hate her
Great video. Thanks.
Is this gonna get wide MSM coverage or they gonna pretend it’s not HABBENING with their heads in the sand?
Which MSM will cover the other MSM going into court? They all colluded together and are named as Defendants if they did collude with Hillary or the DNC. Judging by the MSM's stories, writ large, they breathlessly reported total and complete BS for over 2 years.
This is a MOAB court filing if the judge accepts the case.
Front page news on cnn.com https://www.cnn.com/2022/03/24/politics/trump-sues-hillary-clinton/index.html
Funny how they would do this, being an unnamed defendent and all. 😎
Kind of a rock and a hard place at this point.
And/Or
"UNDER NEW OWNERSHIP" sign out front. 😎🙏
So much spin, they can now identify as an apache helicopter.
The suit also contains some factual inaccuracies and some of the same grandiose or exaggerated false claims that Trump has made dozens of times.
The civil suit alleges that Clinton and top Democrats hired lawyers and researchers to fabricate information tying Trump to Russia, and then peddled those lies to the media and to the US government, in hopes of hobbling his chances of winning in 2016. Trump claims they were assisted by "Clinton loyalists" at the FBI, who abused their powers to investigate him out of political animus.
CNN has reached out to many of the defendants for comment. Some attorneys for defendants named in the lawsuit were still digesting it on Thursday.
"We haven't had a chance to read the complaint, but knowing the former President, there's probably very little in there that's true," said Aitan Goelman, who represents former FBI official Peter Strzok.
The Clinton campaign did pay researchers to dig up dirt about Trump and Russia, and well-connected Democrats took some of their findings to law enforcement, believing possible ties between Trump and Russia were worth investigating But many of the key elements of Trump's far-reaching accusations in the lawsuit have previously been debunked by the Justice Department inspector general and by a bipartisan report from the Senate Intelligence Committee.
I don't see how Trump expects to win in the same court system that would lend huge credence to the justice department inspector general and Senate intelligence committee reports. Both of those sources say the things Trump is accusing are not true. So how is Trump expecting to win?
Durham
There's a reason he waited to file as he could have done so immediately after the election or sooner.
It really doesn't matter what the Judges Opinion is, it is a Civil Lawsuit, and Trumps Team can introduce anything and everything under the sun.....
Plus it'll be a Jury Court, which means that the odds of getting a Conviction are really, really, Good....
And then AFTER Conviction, comes the Criminal Trial from all the Crimes introduced in the Civil Court, and That Judge will be Barred from the Picking and Choosing of ""Allowable Evidence""......
Once the crimes are introduced in one Court, it has to be accepted in another court.....
Or at least that is how I understand it......
Isn't the jury going to be residents of Florida, DeSantis country?
Yup, and I'll bet my Vets Comp that the trump Team has already vetted every Judge that this could end up in front of.....
I believe you are right. This is carefully planned.
All I can think when reading this stuff is the whole ""Military Precision"" and ""Surgical Strike"" thing, and this is where I end up.....
All the Judges Vetted BEFORE the filings....
I... suspect they shopped venues a tiny bit, to find a place where it would be accepted. The filing is pretty brutal- the statement of facts looks very solid.
Who the hell watches Fake News nowadays anyway? They are viewed by a fraction of a percent of the population. CNN viewership: 400,000. U.S. population: 330 million. Do the math.
Most people don't watch cable news anymore, as shown by your figures. But most people read their news in online articles from the various MSM sources. It's not very insightful to look at cable news watcher numbers when that's just not what's popular anymore. But more than enough people read CNN online articles, and I'd bet that number is much much higher than the TV viewers. MSM is still very, very relevant and read by most normies. Don't fool yourself.
Sadly, the normies do. Especially the elderly. They only know legacy media
About time.
Come on Legend, give us a smile. ☺️
I'm pretty sure Trump can't sue Hillary Clinton for anything. There is no American court that has jurisdiction in hell.
Kek
Maybe a DC, Vatican or London court.
Or Disney World, for that matter
Didn't see that coming.
💥BQQM!💥
u/#pepenuke
u/#catdance
From https://legaldictionary.net › rico-law:
"The meaning of RICO law, or the "Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act," is that it is a law that allows authorities to punish offenders engaging in criminal activities, particularly racketeering.
"For example, RICO law punishes crime bosses who order their subordinates to carry out criminal activities for them."
So is Trump filing criminal charges as I private citizen or is this a civil case based off the indictments Durham is filling
This is a private case for damages, based on criminal activity. Asking for trial by jury. Jury of peers: sounds like an interesting pool.
How can we volunteer for jury duty!!!
Moving to S Florida is not a bad start. Beats Racine, that's for sure.
Kek, the Root
The Root River flows into lake Michigan in Racine WI
I found TTT on telegram. It was the funniest thing.
Can you see the lawyers picking the jury?
"Sir, have you ever worn a red ball cap?"
"Ma'am, do you ever use the letter Q in a singular fashion?"
I've never heard of a civil RICO case. This is interesting
https://schlawpc.com/business-disputes/federal-civil-rico-lawsuits/
This is a GREAT way to bring attention to the normies!!!!
DISCOVERY will awaken the normies, and it will be pure gold.
This timing is not an accident. It was highly planned. This seems to have just popped out above the sea of absolute catastrophe that is flooding us, and I am betting it is because it actually has something to do with current situations, more than an election six years ago that he won.
Kool-Aid Man has entered the room
Oooooh Yeaeaah!!!!
I need some moar popcorn.
u/#mjpopcorn
I'm loving March Madness! Anyone else?
u/#catdance
One half of me is going "OH, SHIIIIIIIIT! TAKE THEM ALL DOWN, PRESIDENT TRUMP!"
The other half is going "Omg, is this going to get thrown out of court without the judge even refusing to hear evidence?"
Help me, fellow pedes. You're my only hope.
Q said evidence in court is how you get evidence out to the world. This seems like the perfect way to do it. And if that is the purpose, perhaps 'winning' takes the form of classified evidence distribution to the masses and not a jury ruling. Or both maybe.
Nice!
u/#lightning
u/#catdance
GOOD!
Ha... Gotta love it. Discovery is a beyotch. Rake them over the coals~ Then arrest them all for Treason.
DUDE, FUCK YES.
Amazing news, i could imagine Trump has been sitting on this for a while biding his time and now is the time to strike.
u/#trumpnato u/#catdance
one glaring ommission - barack hussein obummer aka barry sotero
I think he'll be lumped in with the Bidens. Either that or he ratted them all out to save his scrawny ass so that he can go back to Africa and attempt to become King of Kenya or something.
Or Queen of Kenya with Big Mike being King.
Nature of Suit: 👉470👈 Racketeer/Corrupt Organization
QPosts 1659/1660on 7/1/2018
Q1659- Ask yourself - who is filing the indictments? It would take a very large team to work this quickly. Who has that kind of manpower? 470 👈
You posted this 6 times
Oh Lord phone malfunction.. hang on
Lol glad to know that was the reason behind all the deletes. I thought someone was being a real asshole & the mods took him down🐸
Sorry 🤣. Carry on Patriot 👍
Commenting so my offspring knows I was here.
Finally, we are getting somewhere! Let's see what discovery is produced! So Trump is suing in civil court and Durham goes after her criminally! Does this mean Durham is soon to bring down the hammer on good old Hillary?
Ooooh, this is getting good!
And another question is will Trump's lawyers be able to subpoena evidence from Durham's investigations?
I suspect they can't get at this, unless Durham happens to release his stuff RIGHT NOW, BY COINCIDENCE.
Excellent!!
Yeah baby!!
The winning of the stormy Daniels case was an appetizer 😂
I guess Durham is taking too long. Saving this one to look at later.
Maybe Durham has dropped enough evidence that DJT can officially file this lawsuit.
All three films playing at once, finally.
It's all going to hinge upon the KEYSTONE: Ukraine.
I'm about to OD on Hopium. Someone get the adrenaline syringe.
I think this is a civil case based off the Rico charges from Durham Indictments
To quote one of my favorite wrestling personalities, Jim Cornette, "Fuck you, shit's on"
https://qposts.online/post/3850
"How do you introduce evidence legally?"
I shit you not that quote has stuck out with me ever since I read it. Now rereading this post and looking at current events, HOLY FUCK, does this post make a lot of sense.
😁❤🇺🇸🐸👌
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/03/president-trump-sues-hillary-clinton-russia-collusion-hoax/
Sweet