451
posted ago by Factfiler ago by Factfiler +451 / -0

From Patel Patriot: I got so excited I forgot to even reference what I'm talking about. Trump's official spokeswoman, Liz Harrington, released a 12 page letter from Trump.

It's one big ass devolution-proof.

https://tinyurl.com/vtk38yba

Comments (152)
sorted by:
52
AZTrumpette1776 52 points ago +61 / -9

What about that letter is proof of devolution?

15
UglyTruths 15 points ago +40 / -25

It does not prove or disprove.

I've read the devolution series, but honestly I think after the eighth segment, you can begin to see confirmation bias in Patel Patriots' series. He desperately wants his theory to be true, so he looks for things that confirm his theory while ignoring other things that might disprove him.

Here is a little thought exercise:

  1. If you were Dave of X22, would you rather have the country fixed up overnight or would you rather the current situation gets prolonged? Selling hopium is good business I heard.
  2. If you were Patel Patriot, you see donations keep coming in for the series, would you rather be proven right immediately or just point out enough ambiguous clues to keep the readers engaged and donations coming?
  3. If you were General Flynn, would you rather have Trump reinstated as president or have the current situation keep going and charge hefty speaking fees? (And the prospect of a presidential run in 2024.)

I could go on and on, and when you go through them with an honest and unbiased assessment, you realize that it is possible that only a few individuals are actually serious about fixing this. I have a lot of respect for Mike Lindell, he is risking everything he has in order to fix this.

Perhaps the end goal is for the majority to wake up to the fact that no one else has your and your loved ones' interest at heart, for only then will you be motivated to do something about the predicament we're collectively in.

Edit: Judging by the responses, it is clear that many got the impression that I had concluded that Dave, Patel Patriot and General Flynn have sinister motivations. That's not true, I merely posed hard questions, to which I have no definitive answers, that's why I said it is possible that only a few individuals are actually serious about fixing things.

Attacking someone for asking uncomfortable questions that challenge your own interpretations of things by immediately calling them doomers or shills is no different than the left's name calling.

Humans are complex creatures, on any given issue, we fall into a spectrum of opinions in a Bell curve distribution pattern. You can't expect everyone to see things the way you do, and if the right-leaning platforms start banning people for saying things that don't exactly match their stance, then they are also no better than Twitter or Facebook. We don't want this to become an echo chamber. Just my opinion here.

29
GoingCamaro 29 points ago +31 / -2

You bring up some interesting points, but your educated guessing is no different from all the folks you listed. And I'm sorry, we can snuff out Paytriots rather easily, in fact we made a sport of it for a time. I can see and agree with confirmation bias, but only from a point of good faith. They se guys want it to be true because it's good for everyone if it is. Same can be said of us in this group. Yeah we get a little carried away, but the intentions are mostly good (not so much from those who want a theocracy).

when you go through them with an honest and unbiased assessment, you realize that it is possible that only a few individuals are actually serious about fixing this

It's also possible your interpretation is dead ass wrong. I think a lot of people want to fix it, they just have different ideas about doing it. I myself think it was pure stupidity to go in unarmed January 6th. Not because they should have been using their guns in a threatening manner, but because it sends a statement loud and clear that we won't be manipulated. But everyone decided to follow local infringement protocol and now some of them are rotting in jail. Go figure.

My point is, your interpretation isn't the correct one. And while you ask hard questions, your answers aren't the right ones. It's still anyone's guess, though mathematically speaking there is plenty of reason to accept there is a plan or rather plans.

12
FractalizingIron 12 points ago +12 / -0

Noice rebuttal.

8
FrankieBiglips 8 points ago +8 / -0

Second.

11
Metalheads4Trump 11 points ago +11 / -0

The “UglyTruth” is that his account is just over one month old, lol

6
FatReggie 6 points ago +8 / -2

And zero posts. A total non-contributing zero.

4
damessinger 4 points ago +4 / -0

I thought something was fishy as I was reading his post. It is possible to write a bunch of bullshit and make it sound plausible.

1
FractalizingIron 1 point ago +1 / -0

As opposed to institutions like the New York Times, where writes a bunch of bullshit but is still unable to make it sound plausible.

7
WhiteHouseDog 7 points ago +8 / -1

I think this board has been rather lousy at sniffing out Paytriots. My original account was BANNED for calling out "George News" as bull shit.

I am sure many who were here a year ago remember all the drama surrounding the topic.

Meanwhile we have Lin and Powell and Flynn and Lindell and many others feuding with each other... for no other reason than SOMEONE being a swindler... but no one can really identify who... or maybe none of them are, but there is so much paranoia that they all suspect each other.

Either way, I don't trust anyone at the moment.

1
VetforTrump 1 point ago +1 / -0

This stuff is so controlled and contrived you have to willingly not see it.

11
Badgertime33 11 points ago +11 / -0

so he looks for things that confirm his theory while ignoring other things that might disprove him.

Here is a little thought exercise:

present us with things he has ignored than disprove him rather than simply arguing everyone is in it for money.

these are talented people. there's much more lucrative things they could be doing than selling out their country for a few extra dollars.

4
Cpleb 4 points ago +4 / -0

What you’re saying is possible but it’s going on the assumption that greed drives these people. That may or may not be the case.

A more interesting point is the downfall/potential downfall of capitalism. Man’s love for money will always be the root of all evil. But will all men chose money over morals? Dunno but I do know even the “honest” businessman who chooses to put their clients needs above exorbitant profits will eventually get bought out by said greedy corps. So possibly moot point.

4
Ausernamegoeshere 4 points ago +4 / -0

It's not man's love for money that is the root of all evil, it is man's love for anything but himself and his neighbor, with trust in God.

Money is a tool, as much as a spear, screwdriver, or rifle are.

But a man that obsesses over his power unto others - or his rifle, his trophy wife, his pile of silver or gold - will do all manner of evil things to maintain a dominion on what has caught his eye.

Man is most evil when he is the furthest from another man. Inhuman, if you allow my literary flourish.

2
VetforTrump 2 points ago +2 / -0

I'd be willing to bet most don't think it will be fixed at all. I disagree.

Wanting it fixed and believing it will be are two different thing.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
7
populist_nationalist 7 points ago +42 / -35

I read it. Not one word made me think devolution. Patel Patriot is really grasping at straws to keep this shit up now.

55
I-AM-ANON 55 points ago +69 / -14

Really? A twelve page letter detailing how the election was outright stolen & that there is institutional capture within our local & state court systems didn’t give you the idea that there is a hardened contingent within our Republic that is engaged in civil war with another one?

Honestly if you are in these comments posting takes like this after having read an open letter that directly accuses the democrats of treason, is headed by ‘President Donald J Trump’ - contains the clear cut quote “we won on November 3rd,” - and ends with NCSWIC paraphrased, I petition for you to be banned. At this point it’s clear that dooming is a sort of addiction among the pessimistic here and you’re either better off getting booted and being a lurker to prompt you to focus on pulling your own life together, or youre a deliberate shill.

23
deleted 23 points ago +28 / -5
11
The_Knight_of_sunset 11 points ago +11 / -0

Trump really did his homework with this letter. Bibliography, citations, laying out the facts in a clear and precise manner that is not hard on the eyes, the whole nine yards!

Should be recommended reading for everyone on the side of Trump and America!

5
Greekish 5 points ago +5 / -0

"Rumors circulated that the Justices devolved to shouting"

This word made me think of devolution.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
6
JessWithTheMess 6 points ago +14 / -8

You want him banned... for not agreeing with you? God, help this forum. Not to mention Devolution isn’t even a Q prediction! You guys are acting like Q went away and left y’all in charge... He’s not a shill and people like you are what is pushing anons away from places like this. This is exactly what I’m talking about. Treating skeptics or even berating doomers like shills, and then when their predictions come true, you are quieter than a church mouse, explaining why this loss is actually a win in disguise.

7
TheNewsCommenter 7 points ago +7 / -0

“You can’t tell them, you have to show them” is Q’s repeated nod to devolution. Patel (Jon) mentions Q only in that he says none of his work is based on it and finds it interesting that it just happens to line up.

4
GreenLivesMatter 4 points ago +4 / -0

Not that I agree with the banning part, but COG/Devolution would be run by the military, no? And GITMO is where we put foreign terrorists/prisoners of war. Both talked about by Q.

2
JessWithTheMess 2 points ago +2 / -0

Not necessarily, many thought it was Trump declaring martial law. After he left office, it was believed it was the EO he signed right before leaving office. Devolution is literally just another proposal/theory of what Q meant by military control. It could be, it could be not, but devolution was from our own idea, not mentioned by Q.

2
I-AM-ANON 2 points ago +3 / -1

No, I want doomers who INSIST on pessimism to be banned, because they are not productive to discussion. When Trump literally signs off with NCSWIC and people get up in the thread with “myh expectations of drastic overnight change” and start detracting from the CLEAR Q proofs present in comms, it’s time to hit the ban. After all the HUNDREDS OF PROOFS you’ve seen if you are on the forum bitching it up about timetables, yes, it’s time to free up the comment feed for persons who are capable of ON TOPIC DISCUSSION.

1
JessWithTheMess 1 point ago +2 / -1

It’s skepticism about YOUR devolution theory, not a Q proof. This isn’t the first time Trump used NCSWIC, not to mention on publishing’s he made about Durham trial, audits, etc. that did not come into fruition, and the alleged “doomers” were more informative and PROVED accurate and productive, than you and others were about the situation.. So by your logic should the mods ban you? Of course not, because differing opinions matter, even those making blind, unrealistic, hopium-filled predictions/analysis that end up being a nothingburger and distraction. It’s aggravating because you criticize and critique these people, who end up being more correct and realistic about the circumstances were in and the elements at hand, and you wouldn’t bother to even mention or acknowledge when wrong in any instance, or even acknowledge (as we’ve all seen recently) when those “doomers” predictions ended up being right.

1
I-AM-ANON 1 point ago +2 / -1

Youre making a lot of inferences here that don’t apply: namely what is meant by “devolution” and B) the fact that “doomers were right, and have muh level headed down to earth predictions that aren’t false and hopium filled.”

Youre the one dismissing evidence and insisting your predictions were right. Literally doing an exact 180 of what youre saying.

Doomers IGNORE plentiful and continuing proofs. 5/25 jack resigned. Q525 says goodbye jack. Trump just put out a letter which the third paragraph starts “Seventeen” and ends NCSWIC.

The entire Q phenomenon is based on anons being able to string together crumbs and bake bread.

When you get in here and start shitting in the bread because you want a nice baget fucking hand delivered and won’t put in the cognitive effort to piece it together, youre fucking up the whole board and being a demoralizing bitch.

Doomers aren’t making “down to earth, PROVEN accurate predictions,” — what the fuck are you even talking about? Are you bitching about the Sussman trial? We’ve all established it was a sleight of hand play to get critical evidence introduced, which is consistent with Q. In this situations doomers were also PROVEN wrong.

You see, YOU are the one being willfully ignorant to the comms. Doomers repeatedly shit in breads all over the boards and employ a MO where

They IGNORE PROOFS They IGNORE COMMS they take MSM narratives and announcements at face value

They over all and consistently push PESSIMISM AND DEMORALIZATION.

The shit is fucking annoying and forum slides. It’s honesty bullshit to read a bunch of bitching, but it’s gotten to the point we have to bitch about the bitching.

Either way, this type of behavior isn’t “healthy skepticism” — it’s DEMORALIZATION

it should be a clear rule added to the side bar that continued offenses in this regard is grounds for removal from discussion

1
bgny 1 point ago +2 / -1

Doomers don't understand morale. High morale translates into participation in the work to spread awareness, the fight to take back the country, and the perseverance necessary to win. While they may think they are the "reasonable" and "down to earth" ones whose self-important mission is lecturing us on the dangers of "hopium", they are actually useful idiots working for satanic pedophiles. I'd much rather them sit on the sidelines and stfu because they are doing worse than nothing by weakening the movement. They are like a replicating demoralization virus and I've been advocating for them to be unceremoniously banned since the beginning of this board.

1
10122046 1 point ago +1 / -0

Targeted Misinfo in an Info war is an assault.

4
Murphy71 4 points ago +4 / -0

Awesome rant. Well said.

3
Make_It_So 3 points ago +4 / -1

Everything you said is spot on. Except for the ban petition. That was silly, but I get your frustration with the smooth brains.

1
I-AM-ANON 1 point ago +2 / -1

I’m just saying, a certain amount of “willful dooming” should be grounds to remove people from forum sliding. Or at least temporary ban.

1
bgny 1 point ago +1 / -0

Dooming is a bannable offense per the rules.

2
Make_It_So 2 points ago +2 / -0

You one of those unwavering rule followers? Wearing masks was the rule too. Getting the clot shot was the rule too. I don't care for the doomer BS but sometimes people get frustrated, and I can't blame them. Just block em if they get you worked up.

1
NazisWereSocialist 1 point ago +1 / -0

You still call Bill Clinton President, it does seem to me to make Q references but that’s not necessarily the devolution theory that Biden is an actor right?

20
AllowMeToExplain 20 points ago +20 / -0

He did use the term "treason"

7
jasqid 7 points ago +8 / -1

That word has been thrown around a lot the last 6 years but the last time I saw anyone pay the price was Benedict Arnold.

Actually.. Kawakita.

7
WhiteHouseDog 7 points ago +7 / -0

The Rosenburgs. Death sentence in the 1950s.

3
Cozette 3 points ago +3 / -0

"I saw". How old ARE you or are you implying you have a time machine and used it? :)

0
BoatingAccident 0 points ago +2 / -2

Doomer!!!!!!

4
polish_snausage 4 points ago +4 / -0

Yes, Three times he said treasonous

16
Badgertime33 16 points ago +16 / -0

he's not going to literally say "devolution is in effect"...

if anything, he might let the deep state assets ADMIT AND DISCLOSE that devolution is in effect!!

wouldn't it be funny if the 1/6 committee uncovers the PEADs and discloses that they are not only real but in effect??

7
ILoveIvermectin 7 points ago +7 / -0

Lit must be shown that the civil government is fully captured and corrupt.

“Military is the only way”.

3
Yeetthedems 3 points ago +3 / -0

4.2.5 Preserve the Continuity of Operations. • Maintain comprehensive and effective continuity of operations, including appropriate devolution, to ensure the preservation of the United States Government’s structure under the U.S. Constitution and the continuing performance of National Essential Functions under all conditions. https://trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/National-Biodefense-Strategy.pdf

5
GizzardPuke 5 points ago +5 / -0

Doomy fuck.

1
GAWker 1 point ago +2 / -1

Not even the word devolution?

2
Greekish 2 points ago +2 / -0

Rumors circulated that the Justices devolved to shouting...

6
Cook_My_Robin 6 points ago +6 / -0

"And how about if they widened the search even more? The numbers become astronomical, and the results would be a landslide victory for Trump. It is all on live tape produced by the government"

"We have it all" vibes.

3
50StateLandslide 3 points ago +4 / -1

There isn't really a hint of proof, but I suppose anons are clinging to the fact that Trump declared himself the victor in 2020 and called himself the president of the US.

To me, no proof was there whatsoever, because you can't say "Trump confirms devolution in letter" where he dedicates a paragraph's worth of sentences to claiming victory, and another 11 pages to saying that Biden is running America into the ground and is the President despite fraud.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
33
ProudOfAmerica 33 points ago +33 / -0

The fact that Trump is releasing this comprehensive letter on the night before his birthday might be an indicator that he thinks that something is going down tomorrow.

It would be just like 'them' to arrest him (or something similar) on his birthday.

5
TrumpIsGreat2020 5 points ago +5 / -0

There was a datefag a year ago about Trump getting arrested on his birthday.

3
FrankieBiglips 3 points ago +4 / -1

Love to see it, but it would take forever to find…probably.

6
3
WhiteHouseDog 3 points ago +3 / -0

That isn't a Q datefag, it's some nobody.

3
Yungsheets 3 points ago +3 / -0

He didn't say it had anything to do with Q he just said it was a datefag.

30
I-AM-ANON 30 points ago +31 / -1

This letter begins prominently with ‘Seventeen’ and ends bluntly: ‘but we can’t be stopped.’

7
TDanonDJTJR2024 7 points ago +7 / -0

Oh I noticed

15
ImaSueDeNym 15 points ago +15 / -0

When speaking of the Democrats, he says "Make no mistake, they control the government. They own this disaster. "

So does this mean he and/or the military isn't secretly in control of the government?

16
I-AM-ANON 16 points ago +20 / -4

It means the democrats own the legal entity that is formally the “US gov” — it does not mean that said gov has not fractured into factions vying for power within a vacuum.

Politics is the first principle. Within our governance, we handle political forces (factions) as registered parties.

What happens when legally registered parties fail due to institutional capture? Does the first principle of political struggle cease because the formal delegations of this struggle have failed in representative duties?

No, and war is proof of this. Political struggle is the prima facie - not a derivative. When formal political processes fail, war ensues.

So what does it mean that Trump is clearly and publicly announcing that formal political parties have failed to address political concerns?

It means, by logical definition, that this political conflict is a war.

And he clearly, presciently, BLATANTLY, announces charges of treason, within a document clearly detailing the break down of codified political discourse: ie, a formalized declaration of war.

Trump is very clearly announcing he is mobilized within a larger, hardened faction which is articulating in no uncertain terms that they consider the nation at war with a treasonous enemy.

This document is exactly as the title & OP describes.

5
ImaSueDeNym 5 points ago +5 / -0

I'm going to be honest- a lot of what you just said is way over my head.

I am not nearly as politically savvy as the average person here, so sometimes I need people to explain things like they're talking to a fairly intelligent chimpanzee.

On a practical level, all of the things that are listed as being wrong with the country, such as inflation, the Afghanistan muck up, stocks plunging, etc... who bears responsibility for that? If the Democrats are the ones running things into the ground, then doesn't that mean, on a basic level, they are in charge?

If not, what exactly is President Trump in control of? What is he responsible for?

And if this is a declaration of war, who controls the military?

11
I-AM-ANON 11 points ago +13 / -2

Was Samuel Adams the Admiral of the Navy when the Boston Tea Party was organized?

What I’m saying to you is that government is just a tool. It’s a reflection of the real power which are PEOPLE.

I want you to think about Game of Thrones. Does the whole story just stop in the first episode because the king is murdered and the crown usurped? Does the other side of the struggle just disappear because the other claimed the “formal” control? Or does the story continue to unwind for another 8 seasons as these two factions act out a war, even though, formally , the Lannister’s seize the crown in the very beginning ?

Come on. Politics and struggle doesn’t just vanish because one side says “we are the winners.”

Trump is very clearly demonstrating right now he is leading a faction - a SIGNIFICANT faction, which most likely does constitute itself of real, “hard power” - ie nuclear access - that is clearly writing out: the other side has committed treason against the lawfully elected government and captured our political institutions.

It isn’t academic to understand what this means.

3
Cozette 3 points ago +3 / -0

Remember, you described your knowledge level as that of a " fairly intelligent chimpanzee" when asking for help understanding what's going on.

This response to the first attempt to give you the help you asked for suggests you forgot.

-4
ImaSueDeNym -4 points ago +3 / -7

Basically it seems like what you're saying is "might = right".

On one hand you dismiss the laws and rules of government as a tool and formality, but then say that Trump was "lawfully elected" and that the election should have been honored.

So which is it? To the victor go the spoils, or play by the rules?

7
Mr_A 7 points ago +7 / -0

It's more "enforce the actual rules without cheating," AND "the real victor then gets the spoils."

3
ImaSueDeNym 3 points ago +4 / -1

How do you picture President Trump enforcing the rules here?

I'm not trying to doom or be argumentative just for the sake of arguing.

I've had a hard time understanding how President Trump is secretly still the President ever since Biden was sworn in. Much of what people are arguing to prove Trump is still President looks a lot like what I-AM-ANON has been saying, and quite frankly that's above my pay grade.

I'm more interested in the practicals of it. Such as, who exactly is President Trump declaring war on here? Just the Democrats? Because there are a good number of Republicans involved as well. Yes, I'm aware that they're really RINOs, but still...

And if he's really still in charge, and has the backing of the military, then what is stopping him from having those he's labeled as traitors arrested? Surely we're not still waiting for everyone to wake up to what is going on. Not if he's declared war.

I think people are getting really worked up and overly emotional over something that we don't even know is authentic or not. I understand the need for hopium, but we still need to use our heads.

6
redtoe-skipper 6 points ago +6 / -0

You are posing a question as to whom the prima facie declaration of war is directed to.

The answer is in the first few paragraphs were the enemies are listed.

Simple 8 grade text analysis.

3
Mr_A 3 points ago +3 / -0

Devolution speaks for itself. Patel Patriot did an excellent job in the first 4-5 installments. This letter doesn't add anything to it, doesn't prove nor disprove it.

He instructs officials to do their jobs, i.e. enforce the existing laws. That's all.

5
I-AM-ANON 5 points ago +8 / -3

It seems like youre grasping for straws in order to have an asinine conversation.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
9
HelloDolly 9 points ago +9 / -0

Can you link to the source that connects this to Trump? It's not from the desk of or anything, it's just a 12 page pdf.

8
hot_covfefe 8 points ago +8 / -0

Liz Harrington linked it from her verified TS account.

7
Factfiler [S] 7 points ago +7 / -0

It's from Liz Harrington and Patel Patriot was referencing it. That's all I had to work with initially, but the letter seemed very important, and when I didn't see it on the board, I wanted to get it posted. My bad for being a little sloppy on details at the gate.

3
rottn 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yeah, I kind of wondered that too, but it is encouraging, so I forwarded it to a bunch of frens.

-4
Camarokirk -4 points ago +2 / -6

Yeah....i don't download pdfs.

5
ForgetMePls 5 points ago +5 / -0

oops I did download it. It seems very legit. Please please tell me if it's not.

8
ILearnedToCode 8 points ago +8 / -0

Its legit

7
LRAD 7 points ago +7 / -0

When pondering what Greg Phillips and True the Vote has been doing, rewatch Joe M's classic The Plan to Save the World video. Skip to about 6:45.

https://rumble.com/vbd957-q-the-plan-to-save-the-world-1080p60.html

"We caught 'em. We caught em all. Let's see what happens."

I too am tired and it's an easy vulnerable time to let doubt and impatience get the best of me just like it has to the majority of us. If this undertaking is truly of such a grand scale that we've learned about, there is no way we would ever be able to project or phantom how this will all unfold or how long it actually will take. I repeatedly have to cleanse my mind of the negative and recalibrate to have the patience of a chopping block.

Don't give up folks. We've all come a long way and may have a long way to go, but it's worth hanging on while badguys continue to press every wrong button into their inevitable self destruction. When they do implode, and it sure seems like they will, we will still be here to pick up the pieces and be part of one of the most amazing restorations mankind has witnessed and endured.

4
CokeOrPepe 4 points ago +4 / -0

I’m still in.

4
FiercePatriot 4 points ago +4 / -0

Me too

6
8
Tewdryg 8 points ago +8 / -0

Thanks, Anything in the URL after the '?' mark is spam and for tracking. Delete all of that so you don't help spread it.

3
ThePowerOfPrayer 3 points ago +3 / -0

Here's the cleaned up link - https://cdn.nucleusfiles.com/e7/e746fae9-7a5f-462d-a0dd-dd9a11895451/statement-by-president-donald-j.-trump.pdf

Anything in the URL after the '?' mark is spam and for tracking. Delete all of that so you don't help spread it.

Indeed.

 ?utm_medium=email&utm_source=ncl_amplify&utm_campaign=20220613-statement_by_donald_j_trump_45th_president_of_the_united_states_of_america&utm_content=ncl-WeyXbMHzvA&_nlid=WeyXbMHzvA&_nhids=9B2YtE8qZ2

If we examine the above code, we can further split it up to determine what its purpose is.

You'll see utm variables repeatedly.

What is UTM?

UTM originally stood for the Urchin Traffic Monitor, which was part of a software called “Urchin WebAnalytics Software” released in 1998. Google eventually purchased its technology in 2005 and sold the software for almost seven years until it was discontinued in March 28, 2012.

Although it’s no longer selling, Google continues to use its URL conventions in its own analytics software to create campaigns, hence the “utm” in “utm_source” and many other variables. Simply put, the “utm” variables are tracking mechanisms that help companies gauge on how successful their campaigns are.

https://www.maketecheasier.com/what-is-utm-source/

Other commercially available and proprietary marketing software also utilizes UTM standards to this day.

tl;dr This is tracking the success of this particular email campaign.

 ?utm_medium=email

What original medium was used to send the link (i.e. referral, email, instant message, etc.)? In this case, it was email.

 &utm_source=ncl_amplify

What site/source did the link originally come from? In this case, I believe "ncl_amplify" identifies marketing campaign management software used by both WinRed and Trump's team, which appears to be Campaign Nucleus, created by former Trump campaign manager Brad Parscale in 2016.

 &utm_campaign=20220613-statement_by_donald_j_trump_45th_president_of_the_united_states_of_america

This identifies which email campaign contained the link. In this case it was an email sent out on June 13, 2022.

 &utm_content=ncl-WeyXbMHzvA

This is used to identify the exact element on the ad or promotion that was clicked. This is often used for optimization purposes.

I'd have to see the email this link is from, but it's possible there could be more than one link to the PDF in question.

If that's the case, this would let the marketing team know if a particular graphic induces more people to click through to the statement.

If not, it's meaningless for the most part.

 &_nlid=WeyXbMHzvA

Not sure what this variable stands for. I did a search on https://www.acronymfinder.com and the only results were "National Livestock Identification for Dairy" and "Non-Linear Inverse Dynamics."

I would assume it's proprietary to the marketing software used by Trump's team, and that it's an ID of some kind, maybe the ID of the person who the email was sent to.

&_nhids=9B2YtE8qZ2

Same thing with this variable. Assuming it's also proprietary to the marketing software. Not sure what it means.

In any case, this tracking information at most would identify which high energy patriots are spreading the word about this PDF.

1
Tewdryg 1 point ago +1 / -0

Thank you. You certainly did a mighty fine job with your research. This rule is generally an all-round good one. By all means, I'm only sharing what was presented to me a number of years ago. I do appreciate the content of your post. The 'after-the-'?'-mark coding may vary greatly from the one above and by eliminating it for posting purposes assures others of safety.

1
ThePowerOfPrayer 1 point ago +1 / -0

I've been reposting links with the tracking remove and also have been telling people to delete the ? and everything after before posting for a while.

It mostly protects the person sharing the link.

5
CONDOR 5 points ago +5 / -0

13 June 2022 / House January 6 Commission / Testimony Chris Stirewalt

Its not everyday you get to see a burnt hushpuppy sock puppet talking...

https://youtu.be/jblC2Ooog2U?t=4981

"... Because we had partnered with the Associated Press and The National Opinion Research Center at the University of Chicago thanks to my friend and colleague. Arnon Mishkin had built a wonderful device for forecasting the outcomes of elections. So we had a different set of data than our competitors did. We had more research and we had a better system and we had a great team...."

"... partnered with the Associated Press..."

https://youtu.be/Fkk9DI-8el4?t=23

"... and the National Research Center..."

https://youtu.be/Fkk9DI-8el4?t=32

"... at the University of Chicago..."

https://youtu.be/Fkk9DI-8el4?t=35

"... Arnon Mishkin..."

https://youtu.be/Fkk9DI-8el4?t=37

"...built a wonderful device for forecasting the outcomes of elections..."

https://youtu.be/Fkk9DI-8el4?t=49

5
CONDOR 5 points ago +5 / -0

30 December 2014

Arnon Mishkin Interview by Lucy Aharish on the program One-on-One / i24news, an international 24-hour news and current affairs television channel based in Jaffa Port, Israel.

Lucy Aharish: "Welcome back to The News Today, this is One-on-One. In every election campaign behind the ads, the campaigns and the database... or debates, there are a group of people looking at the data evaluating the results and calling the winners and losers. With me tonight is a someone highly familiar with that and everything that goes into it. Mr. Arnon Mishkin heads the decision desk at Fox News. Good Evening. Thank you very much for joining us."

Arnon Mishkin: "Thank you very much."

Lucy Aharish: "So, Mr. Mishkin, a lot of people are trying to predict and be, maybe, some kind of prophets before each and every campaign. Can you..."

Arnon Mishkin: "There's money in it!"

Lucy Aharish: "... be a prophet?

While there is still 9 minutes and 15 seconds to go... the interview is basically over.

https://youtu.be/CnWgzeXUzOM

5
GoingCamaro 5 points ago +5 / -0

Interesting read... like all the other interesting reads. I am open to explanations as to how this is a proof, but so far there have only been downvotes to those asking in lieu of a response.

1
Yeetthedems 1 point ago +1 / -0

4.2.5 Preserve the Continuity of Operations. • Maintain comprehensive and effective continuity of operations, including appropriate devolution, to ensure the preservation of the United States Government’s structure under the U.S. Constitution and the continuing performance of National Essential Functions under all conditions. https://trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/National-Biodefense-Strategy.pdf

4
mmtwo 4 points ago +4 / -0

fk it..i cant help myself . im in

3
SovereignSon 3 points ago +3 / -0

I'm in, lets go!

3
changeagent 3 points ago +4 / -1

FINALLY!

3
Needmorecovfefe 3 points ago +3 / -0

I see that last paragraph as a way to tell patriots we are doing the hard work required to take our country back, even though the courts and the justice system has failed our country, we have remained steady in resolving these atrocities.

3
bidiadicc123 3 points ago +3 / -0

The shills and handshakes are on the prowl in here tonight

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
3
Hope70 3 points ago +4 / -1

There is no letterhead, no signature verifying this was put out by President Trump. In the 12 pages I read nothing pertaining to devolution. To me this is questionable, same news we have been hearing, just another day, no proof of authenticity.

2
Yeetthedems 2 points ago +2 / -0

4.2.5 Preserve the Continuity of Operations. • Maintain comprehensive and effective continuity of operations, including appropriate devolution, to ensure the preservation of the United States Government’s structure under the U.S. Constitution and the continuing performance of National Essential Functions under all conditions. https://trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/National-Biodefense-Strategy.pdf

3
GA_Logic 3 points ago +3 / -0

The slow trickle of information over a long period of time confirms to me this is part of the operation to unwind the societal brainwashing from MSM.

On page 2 Separation of Powers paragraph is very important to highlight.

3
rherrell 3 points ago +4 / -1

I read the whole thing and not once did I think devolution, sounds like PP has some 'splainin to do.

2
Yeetthedems 2 points ago +2 / -0

I’ve already posted this many times, but I hope it brings some explanation.

4.2.5 Preserve the Continuity of Operations. • Maintain comprehensive and effective continuity of operations, including appropriate devolution, to ensure the preservation of the United States Government’s structure under the U.S. Constitution and the continuing performance of National Essential Functions under all conditions. https://trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/National-Biodefense-Strategy.pdf

3
polish_snausage 3 points ago +3 / -0

Every time he mentions the 85 billion I re-read q post 85...

Who funds MS13? Why did BO instruct HS & BP to release MS13 captures at the border? What agency has direct ties to (2) major drug cartels? Why is AG Sessions / POTUS prioritizing the removal of MS13? Why is AG Sessions / POTUS prioritizing building the wall? Immigration? Drugs? Who do you hire for a hit? Who can be eliminated after the job is complete? Seth Rich. Who was found dead (2) shortly after his murder? What affiliation did they have? Classified. Q

2
dec3169 2 points ago +3 / -1

This last line from his statement ...

The Democrats know that I would correct all of this, and they are doing everything in their power to stop me – but we can’t be stopped. We have to Save America.

... makes me wonder if another line will be added later today, that he is announcing he will be running in 2024.

3
ilovetrump4 3 points ago +3 / -0

Not about 2024, see:

PDJT retruth'd - https://t.me/realKarliBonne/97675

Verified - https://qagg.news/?read=TT356

2
ilovetrump4 2 points ago +2 / -0

Not about 2024, see:

PDJT retruth'd - https://t.me/realKarliBonne/97675

Verified - https://qagg.news/?read=TT356

2
Qonsciousness 2 points ago +2 / -0

I wonder how many hate Trump and love Biden at this point

2
WhiteHouseDog 2 points ago +3 / -1

I wish this wasn't so ham handed.

This letter claims that on election night he was well ahead in states that he was actually "losing" at the time, especially Arizona where he was way behind and only closed the gap later.

Seriously, that was a pivotal moment on election night, when he appeared to be so far behind in Arizona (WHERE I LIVE) but was slowly coming back. We all remember Trump trailing there on the 3rd.

2
Yungsheets 2 points ago +2 / -0

"On Election Night, America watched as my lead grew and grew over Joe Biden, as I was set to claim another victory. By the morning of November 4th, the day after the Election, I led by 700,000 votes in Pennsylvania,1 300,000 in Michigan,2 and hundreds of thousands in Georgia, Arizona, and Wisconsin."

Edit: added rest of sentence

2
GreenRoar 2 points ago +2 / -0

This information is an excellent outline of the crimes committed by Democrats & Rinos. I suggest you spread it far and wide. As far as devolution, there has to be certain things occur for devolution to begin. If not complete, this paper certainly is a very big step to trigger it.
However, we may not be aware that devolution is at work until the end. If it is at work in certain units of the military, they are not going to say so. So, don't expect weekly updates on it.

2
DontTreadOnIT 2 points ago +2 / -0

DJT released this letter 17 months after January 6.

2
huhWHAThuh 2 points ago +2 / -0

Attorneys General have no authority to change election law or protocols. It can only be changed by State Legislatures.

Attorneys General changed election laws and protocols.

That ^ is ^ ILLEGAL.

Anyone who says it was a clean or legal election is an open liar.

The proof is on the surface. Totally out in the open.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
SvbHvman 1 point ago +2 / -1

Where are the statements supporting the implementation of devolution? What page and paragraph. I don't see it?

2
Yeetthedems 2 points ago +2 / -0

It’s on a different document (:

4.2.5 Preserve the Continuity of Operations. • Maintain comprehensive and effective continuity of operations, including appropriate devolution, to ensure the preservation of the United States Government’s structure under the U.S. Constitution and the continuing performance of National Essential Functions under all conditions. https://trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/National-Biodefense-Strategy.pdf

1
usernametaken3 1 point ago +1 / -0

I do believe this is from Trump, however whenever he releases a statement, it's on his letterhead and he signs it at the bottom. This has neither. It just ends... does that mean he will be adding to it later? That it isn't the end of his statement, because he didn't sign it yet? Why didn't he use letterhead? All very interesting to me, and out of character.... makes me wonder what message he's trying to send with both of those things.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
PhDinNY 1 point ago +1 / -0

Thanks for that link; posted to twitter, including a Rasmussen Reports feed. If there is any, which there must be, video evidence of some of the mules doing the drops at multiple locations, when combined with the geo-tracking data linking them to the boxes and Dem organizations, then you would have to be the best liar in the world to say there was no voter fraud.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
Yungsheets 1 point ago +1 / -0

The Best Is Yet To Come!

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
0
deleted 0 points ago +3 / -3
-4
SOTUisFUBAR -4 points ago +4 / -8

Sauce on Patel saying this?

The PDF is dubious at best. No letterhead, no signature, and why on earth published on that platform. https://campaignnucleus.com/

Definitely needs some digging...

Edit: Eh, maybe not, seeing it pop up on a few other sources including TGP

5
ThePowerOfPrayer 5 points ago +5 / -0

why on earth published on that platform

As for the Campaign Nucleus platform, it was created by Trump campaign manager Brad Parscale back in March 2016, and the platform touts itself as “the only automated digital ecosystem made for efficiently managing political campaigns and organisations”.

“Stop wasting time using big tech platforms to reach audiences. Talk to people directly,” says Campaign Nucleus' website, which allows users to send emails, text messages and statements to the media and press, as well as send mail via the US Postal Service.

https://sputniknews.com/20210402/campaign-nucleus-trump-using-new-online-platform-protects-him-from-cancel-culture-report-says-1082522382.html

-7
Razo -7 points ago +10 / -17

Totally confirms devolution. I love the part where he said military is in control and all the traitors have been detained at gitmo

4
ImaSueDeNym 4 points ago +5 / -1

Sarcasm?

3
Redeemed2014 3 points ago +5 / -2

Where dude? Don’t be delusional.

1
Cozette 1 point ago +1 / -0

Encountering intellectual tweens makes me so grateful that wasn't my final phase. Sarcasm is so insecure and self destructive. Thank God I finally gained the courage to be honest.