Stickying this to get eyes on the situation and Anons digging into these events.

There is another video going around 𝕏 in the last few hours that shows what appears to be a nuclear weapon detonation in Lebanon.

According to the title of the YouTube clip, these bombings in Yemen happened in 2015, i do believe those were nuke explosions indeed

This was an extremely powerful conventional bomb. Conventional bombs can mushroom. Israel would be insane to detonate a nuke that close to their borders. The fallout would kill more than Israelis than all hamas terrorist attacks combined.

Hey Time traveler. I don't think that you're a shill, but it's too early for me to say that those are nukes. Time will surly tell. I've seen some massive explosions like that that were a result of a weapons cache being blown up. Since I believe that the white hats are destroying the cabals toys, I kind of expect to see things like this. Anyway, always love ya fren, no homo. I think that your information has extended my life so I am always curious to read what you're putting down.

Then we would need to know the source of the video to be able to determine nuke or not because these speckles could be faked, couldnt they? How do we know that the video showing the speckles isnt part of the psyop?

I gave YouBot four queries, and the results were quite interesting.

1. tactical nuclear weapons

2. have tactical nukes been used in conflicts?

3. if they had been used, would the public necessarily know?

4. could a neutron-based bunker-buster be considered a tactical nuclear weapon?

its answers supported OP's theory. It did say tactical weapons hadn't been used in conflict, but it also admitted the public may not know if they had.

the response to the last query may have been the most interesting, so i'll copy it here:

Neutron-Based Bunker-Buster as a Tactical Nuclear Weapon

A neutron-based bunker-buster could indeed be considered a type of tactical nuclear weapon. Here’s why:

1. Definition and Purpose:

   • Tactical nuclear weapons, also known as non-strategic nuclear weapons, are designed for use on the battlefield and typically have shorter ranges and lower yields compared to strategic nuclear weapons. A neutron-based bunker-buster fits this definition as it is intended to penetrate hardened targets, such as underground bunkers, while delivering a nuclear payload.

2. Characteristics of Neutron Bombs:

   • Neutron bombs, or enhanced radiation weapons, are designed to maximize the release of neutron radiation while minimizing the blast effect. This makes them particularly effective against personnel and equipment in confined spaces, aligning with the tactical use case.

3. Bunker-Buster Functionality:

   • Nuclear bunker busters, including those that may utilize neutron technology, are specifically engineered to penetrate deep into the earth before detonating, targeting fortified structures. This capability is crucial in modern warfare scenarios where adversaries may hide critical assets underground.

4. Yield Considerations:

   • While tactical nuclear weapons are generally characterized by lower yields (often below 5 kilotons), neutron-based bunker-busters can also fall within this category, making them suitable for tactical applications.

In conclusion, a neutron-based bunker-buster can be classified as a tactical nuclear weapon due to its design for battlefield use, its capability to target specific military objectives, and its potential for lower yield compared to strategic nuclear weapons.

Major, high-effort and worthwhile post, /u/JohnTitor17. I've repeatedly seen assertions over the years, some with sauce, that small nukes have been used occasionally without MSM comment, including in the 9/11 bombings of the Twin Towers.

I appreciate all the reference material you've provided.

Not a shill but curious... Why are the electronics working to record this? Doesnt the electronic pulse knock out electronic devices, even outside of the blast radius?

why did you tag your post as "research wanted" if you're just going to berate anyone who raises valid doubts

also please learn to format your posts properly. all this green shit and emojis and randomly capitalized words makes you look retarded

You can tell on the second clip those flashes are picking up dust and dirt its some sort of secondary explosion also the first and second you can see them leaving smoke in the air.

Rather doubtful these are nuclear.

Not to mention the target is what a hill outside a mud city?

With the Yemen video, where is the heavy light output that is typical for nuclear reactions? You have lasting incandescense of the debris cloud typical of large explosions, but no ultra-bright flash associated with really any nuclear reaction useful for bomb making.

Why isn't this all over X?

Edit; oh, your title is misleading. You are talking about 2015.

Thank you for putting this together. Much appreciated. I will be sharing this with others.

Does anyone have an explanation as to why the speckling effect seems centered around the blast itself rather than across the whole frame?

Bear in mind that the ccd sensor in the phone is tiny and a radiation wave is pretty even, especially compared to something like a laser, which has an area of intensity, a scattering effect around the edges which reduces the futher out you go.

If a nuclear weapon was used it could be detected from the VLF waves it produces, they used to make kits back in 60s so you could detect the pulses from the nuclear tests. I am sure there are better ways to detect it now, but it would be fairly obvious to the Ham Radio community. Nuke Detector Circuit

PDF Of Magazine with Circuit diagram

Had to be slightly underground detonations because there was no Mach Y stem effect. Always skeptical about nukes, but there is nothing else that I know of that produces a column of fire. There is a maybe of a new thermobaric. The nukes would have to be small, but we have been going small for quite some time.

How are we supposed to get in the mega ton club with pop gun nukes.

This is off-topic, but I'll never have another chance to ask this, so mods, please forgive me:

OP, have you ever seen the anime Steins;Gate? The old John Titor posts are a major plot point, and I know from your older topics that they fascinate you, to the point you took it for your username, so I thought it might be of interest to you. I really do highly recommend that anime to everyone here--so much in it is relevant to the Q mission.

By the way, thank you for the heart topic about Vitamin C and L-lysine. I've put my stepdad on the protocol, though I don't know how strictly he's holding to the "two hours before, one hour after" rule, even though I wrote everything down. The man still trusts doctors.

I started the protocol myself a couple of weeks ago, just to prove that it works, even though I'm pretty sure I don't need it.

I have seen many videos of explosions have have never seen the speckles like on that 2015 video, i even looked at some other versions of that video to see if someone had added them in but no they are there on all versions i have seen.

When Q talked about the "scare event" necessary it made me think what would scare people enough to wake up, the constant mass shootings and violence, wars are just normal now and made me think something big like a nuke going off would wake people up out of their slumber.

In the comments of the first vid someone claims to know what this was and what it was for. Epw weapon neutron nukes. Delayed detonation 100ft underground targeting tunnels housing missiles aimed at isreal and also iranian centrifuges. Wouldn't say how it was delivered or by who. I paraphrased the comment.

It was interesting that the short clip at the end of the first vid didn't show much speckling, but it was only short ans then I realised they didn't have line of sight to the point of impact, meaning the radiation was being blocked by the buildings.

This supports the radiation premise, but I'm not sure why in the other videos the speckling is concentrated around the point of impact. Wouldn't that imply an area of effect more akin to a laser than a wide area field such as a radiation blast?

Gamma rays and neutrons bombarding the videos of the explosions are all I need for verification.

Was reading about this the other day, and figured it may be germane to the discussion;

https://muse.jhu.edu/article/794729/figure/fig01

Short version is, this was the cleanest, highest performing nuclear weapon of the era.

With Modern tech, this could likely be minitaturized.

Thanks for this vital information, u/JohnTitor17 - Especially the sauce from Deiter Klein - myth busting proof. It seems there's always something that leaves a fingerprint behind so we can peek through the wool... That's undeniable.

Other myths like EMPs busted as well in this case...Yes, that can happen but not always AND the myth of residual radiation and hundreds of years half life etc - on both - "it depends"

In light if this thread I'm reminded of the circa 2022(?) nuclear preparedness posters they put up on NJ transit trains and around NYC - it was very subtle... but people still freaked out: New York City residents rattled by preparations for nuclear attack PSA video

The Mayor of New York City has denied claims that a 'public service announcement' warning residents on how to prepare for a nuclear attack, was alarmist. The city's Office of Emergency Management this week released the video providing three steps on how to survive a nuclear attack, leaving many residents baffled and rattled. Mayor Eric Adams later praised the forward-looking nature of the PSA, explaining that the war in Ukraine had made being proactive, and focusing on preparedness, 'a great idea'.

MUSHROOM = Nuke we'll know in a few days for sure ,cant hide Radiation sickness

This is complete nonsense. Those were exclusively chemical explosions originating at ground level. (Nuclear weapons are detonated at an optimum altitude.) No nuclear flash. No nuclear fireball. No blast wave. Impressive mushroom clouds are an old story for chemical explosions; watch the tail end of Walt Disney's "20,000 Leagues Under the Sea" (1954) for the special effects explosion of Nemo's island, Vulcania. The "speckles" are not ionizing radiation effects (and neutrons are not ionizing radiation). You see the same thing in impressive fireworks: little incendiary components of the explosion. What you may not appreciate is that a big detonation of explosive at an ammo dump does not immediately involve all the munitions available. A lot of the small munitions are carried up in the cloud and fall out, detonating on their own, to provide flashes. I've seen this sort of thing with big explosions in Ukraine.

The Beirut detonation of an ammonium nitrate stockpile came much closer to simulating a nuclear explosion (suddenness, blast wave), but it was still non-nuclear.

Neutron bombs are still nuclear weapons and have all the same requirements and effects, only an augmentation of neutrons, which no camera technology can detect.

To bone up on the subject read "The Effects of Nuclear Weapons" by Glasstone and Dolan, and watch a lot of actual nuclear detonation films.

Cell phone cameras are getting strange. Recently, around here, there were tons of people photgraphing the northern lights which are only rarely ever visible. However Iphone cameras were showing wild and vivid pinks, oranges, and yellows despite nothing being visible to the naked eye. Normally, phone cameras only show black screen in the dark except when they pick up light sources.

November 2015 Paris attacks Germanwings Flight 9525 crash

Earthquake in Nepal that killed 8,964 people

World leaders pose for a picture during the 2015 Paris Agreement

Airstrike in Sana'a during the Saudi Arabian–led intervention in Yemen

Refugees of the Syrian civil war come ashore in Greece

FIFA president Sepp Blatter is forced to resign in disgrace in the wake of the 2015 FIFA corruption case

New Horizons makes a flyby and takes the first images of Pluto.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/2015

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saudi-led_intervention_in_the_Yemeni_civil_war

Yemen stuff in common with Haiti:

• Ousted leaders
• Civil War
• UN Intervention
• HRC
• ...

Hmmm. "I don't know what caused the earthquake."

it's amazing how many people still blindly accept that the last wartime nukes were dropped in 1945... this hasn't been true for a long time. There was evidence of a small but precise nuclear explosion at the WTC in 2001 and there was another in Syria 10 or 15 years ago. I'm sure they've been used in various other war theaters as well.

But typically they are using smaller ones, often on underground or undersea targets, so the public doesn't see what Hollywood has taught them to expect they'd see in a nuclear war.

Thank you for this. I am now smarter than most people about this. That's what I love about this Board.